Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 240

Exhibit to 236 Declaration,,,, filed by Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 15 - Excerpt from April 25, 2011 ITC Hearing, Inv. No. 337-TA-710, # 2 Exhibit 17 - Patent No. 5,519,867, # 3 Exhibit 18 - Patent No. 6,275,983, # 4 Exhibit 20 - Prosecution History for Patent No. 5,519,867, # 5 Exhibit 21 - Patent No. 5,566,337, # 6 Exhibit 23 - Apple's Infringment Contentions regarding Patent No. 5,566,337, # 7 Exhibit 25 - Email, dated June 3, 2011, # 8 Exhibit 26 - Motorola's Preliminary Proposed Claim Constructions, # 9 Exhibit 27 - Email, dated June 6, 2011, # 10 Exhibit 28 - Disregard; wrong document filed, see entry 255 for replaced version # 11 Exhibit 30 - Anatomy and Physiology of an Android) (Burrows, James) Modified on 11/8/2011 (llj). Modified Exhibit #28 with replaced version entry on 11/9/2011 (mmo).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC. and NeXT SOFTWARE, INC. (f/k/a NeXT COMPUTER, INC.), Plaintiffs, v. MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-CV-662-bbc JURY TRIAL DEMANDED DECLARATION OF DAVID M. ELIHU IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS AND CROSSCOMPLAINANTS MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. AND MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.'S STATEMENT OF PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EXHIBITS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?