King, James v. Werlinger, R.
Filing
13
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docketing Statement, Appeal Information Sheet, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 9 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Info Sheet, # 2 Docketing Statement, # 3 Notice of Transcript Information, # 4 Order entered 12/19/2013, # 5 Judgment, # 6 Order entered 1/13/2014, # 7 Docket Sheet) (elc),(ps)
ECF Western District of Wisconsin
1 of 2
https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?385237011025602-L_1_0-1
U.S. District Court
Western District of Wisconsin (Madison)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:13-cv-00537-wmc
King, James v. Werlinger, R.
Assigned to: District Judge William M. Conley
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker
Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Date Filed: 07/30/2013
Date Terminated: 12/19/2013
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus
(General)
Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant
Petitioner
James T. King
represented by James T. King
30123-424
Oxford - FCI
P.O. Box 1000
Oxford, WI 53952
PRO SE
V.
Respondent
R. Werlinger
Warden
Date Filed
represented by Leslie K. Herje
U.S. Attorney's Office
P.O. Box 1585
Madison, WI 53701-1585
608-264-5158
Fax: 608-264-5724
Email: leslie.herje@usdoj.gov
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
#
Docket Text
07/30/2013
1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal, filed by James T. King. (Case
randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments:
# 1 Envelope) (jef) (Entered: 07/30/2013)
07/30/2013
2 Supplement to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James T. King.
(Attachments:
# 1 NDIL Case 11-cv-50056 decision, 6/14/11) (jef),(ps) (Attachment 1 replaced
on 9/9/2013) (jef). (Entered: 07/30/2013)
08/05/2013
Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 34690017890. (jef),(ps) (Entered:
08/05/2013)
01/23/2014 3:00 PM
ECF Western District of Wisconsin
2 of 2
https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?385237011025602-L_1_0-1
10/31/2013
3 Letter Requesting Status Update by Petitioner James T. King. (Attachments:
# 1 Envelope) (jaf),(ps) (Entered: 10/31/2013)
11/18/2013
4 Clerk's Office letter response to 3 Letter Requesting Status Update by Petitioner
James T. King. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 11/18/2013)
12/19/2013
5 ORDER dismissing James T. King's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28
U.S.C. § 2241 for lack of jurisdiction because his claims do not fit within the
savings clause found in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). Signed by District Judge William M.
Conley on 12/19/2013. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 12/19/2013)
12/19/2013
6 JUDGMENT entered dismissing James T. King's 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas
Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for lack of jurisdiction because his claims do not
fit within the savings clause found in 28 § U.S.C. 2255(e). (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)
(Entered: 12/19/2013)
01/09/2014
7 Motion for Reconsideration re 5 Order on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by
Petitioner James T. King. (Attachments:
# 1 Certificate of Service,
# 2 Envelope) (jaf),(ps) (Entered: 01/09/2014)
01/13/2014
8 ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge William
M. Conley on 1/13/2014. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 01/13/2014)
01/23/2014
9 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Petitioner James T. King as to 8 Order on Motion for
Rehearing, 5 Order on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. In forma pauperis
requested. Docketing Statement filed. (Attachments:
# 1 Docketing Statement,
# 2 Notice of Transcript Information,
# 3 Certificate of Service,
# 4 Envelope) (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014)
01/23/2014
10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal by Petitioner James T.
King. (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014)
01/23/2014
11 Affidavit of petitioner James T. King re: 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis on Appeal (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014)
01/23/2014
12 Appeal Information Packet. (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014)
01/23/2014 3:00 PM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?