King, James v. Werlinger, R.

Filing 13

Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docketing Statement, Appeal Information Sheet, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 9 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Info Sheet, # 2 Docketing Statement, # 3 Notice of Transcript Information, # 4 Order entered 12/19/2013, # 5 Judgment, # 6 Order entered 1/13/2014, # 7 Docket Sheet) (elc),(ps)

Download PDF
ECF Western District of Wisconsin 1 of 2 https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?385237011025602-L_1_0-1 U.S. District Court Western District of Wisconsin (Madison) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:13-cv-00537-wmc King, James v. Werlinger, R. Assigned to: District Judge William M. Conley Referred to: Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker Cause: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa Date Filed: 07/30/2013 Date Terminated: 12/19/2013 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 530 Habeas Corpus (General) Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant Petitioner James T. King represented by James T. King 30123-424 Oxford - FCI P.O. Box 1000 Oxford, WI 53952 PRO SE V. Respondent R. Werlinger Warden Date Filed represented by Leslie K. Herje U.S. Attorney's Office P.O. Box 1585 Madison, WI 53701-1585 608-264-5158 Fax: 608-264-5724 Email: leslie.herje@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED # Docket Text 07/30/2013 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Federal, filed by James T. King. (Case randomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (jef) (Entered: 07/30/2013) 07/30/2013 2 Supplement to 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by James T. King. (Attachments: # 1 NDIL Case 11-cv-50056 decision, 6/14/11) (jef),(ps) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/9/2013) (jef). (Entered: 07/30/2013) 08/05/2013 Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 34690017890. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 08/05/2013) 01/23/2014 3:00 PM ECF Western District of Wisconsin 2 of 2 https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?385237011025602-L_1_0-1 10/31/2013 3 Letter Requesting Status Update by Petitioner James T. King. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (jaf),(ps) (Entered: 10/31/2013) 11/18/2013 4 Clerk's Office letter response to 3 Letter Requesting Status Update by Petitioner James T. King. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 11/18/2013) 12/19/2013 5 ORDER dismissing James T. King's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for lack of jurisdiction because his claims do not fit within the savings clause found in 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 12/19/2013. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 12/19/2013) 12/19/2013 6 JUDGMENT entered dismissing James T. King's 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for lack of jurisdiction because his claims do not fit within the savings clause found in 28 § U.S.C. 2255(e). (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps) (Entered: 12/19/2013) 01/09/2014 7 Motion for Reconsideration re 5 Order on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Petitioner James T. King. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service, # 2 Envelope) (jaf),(ps) (Entered: 01/09/2014) 01/13/2014 8 ORDER denying 7 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 1/13/2014. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 01/13/2014) 01/23/2014 9 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Petitioner James T. King as to 8 Order on Motion for Rehearing, 5 Order on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. In forma pauperis requested. Docketing Statement filed. (Attachments: # 1 Docketing Statement, # 2 Notice of Transcript Information, # 3 Certificate of Service, # 4 Envelope) (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014) 01/23/2014 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis on Appeal by Petitioner James T. King. (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014) 01/23/2014 11 Affidavit of petitioner James T. King re: 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014) 01/23/2014 12 Appeal Information Packet. (elc),(ps) (Entered: 01/23/2014) 01/23/2014 3:00 PM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?