Schmidt, Travanti v. Reynolds
Filing
35
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docketing Statement, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 31 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Docketing Statement, # 2 Order, # 3 Judgment, # 4 Order, # 5 Docket sheet) (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
TRAVANTI SCHMIDT,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
13-cv-810-wmc
SERGEANT REYNOLDS,
Defendant.
State inmate Travanti Schmidt filed a civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against
a correctional officer employed by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections.
He
requested leave to proceed without pre-payment of the filing fee and made an initial,
partial payment as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b)(1), which allows indigent prisoners to pay the filing fee by installment until
the full amount is satisfied.
In an order entered on December 22, 2014, the court
dismissed Schmidt’s case with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Schmidt now requests that all funds paid
toward the filing fee in this case be returned to him, including funds paid by a third
party. Schmidt’s motion will be denied.
Schmidt contends that he is entitled to a refund of the filing fee because he was
allowed to withdraw this case and refile it at a late date. First, Schmidt is mistaken about
the disposition of his case, which was dismissed with prejudice. Second, even if he had
withdrawn the action he would not be entitled to a refund of any filing fee. As the name
suggests, the $350 filing fee is the fee for filing a case. The fee covers the administrative
costs incurred at the time of filing. Congress has set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915 the
manner in which prisoners must pay the fees for filing federal lawsuits: “if a prisoner
brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner is required to pay the
full amount of the filing fee.” Neither the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure nor any
statute enacted by Congress authorizes a district court to refund a filing fee in instances
in which the filed case is closed following a ruling by the judge. Accordingly, plaintiff’s
motion is denied.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that Travanti Schmidt’s request for a reimbursement of the fee
for filing this case, dkt. #29, is DENIED.
Entered this 20th day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?