Sanders, Quordalis v. Wall, Edward et al

Filing 9

Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Appeal Information Sheet, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 6 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Info Sheet, # 2 Order, # 3 Judgment, # 4 Docket Sheet) (elc),(ps)

Download PDF
Case: 3:14-cv-00192-wmc Document #: 4 Filed: 04/30/14 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN QUORDALIS V. SANDERS, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER l 4-cv-192-wmc v. EDWARD F. WALL and LENNIE A WEBBER, Defendants. Plaintiff Quordalis V. Sanders, an inmate at the Racine County Jail, filed a proposed civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against Secretary Edward F. Wall of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Racine County District Attorney Lennie A. Webber. On April 4, 2014, the court found that Sanders was barred from proceeding in Jonna pauperis because he had previously filed at least three frivolous actions or appeals while incarcerated. See 28 U.S.C. § l 915(g). Therefore, the court advised Sanders that this case would be dismissed without further notice unless he paid the filing fee within twenty-one days. To date, Sanders has not paid the fee as directed or otherwise attempted to comply and his time to do so has expired. Accordingly, under the inherent power necessarily vested in a court to manage its own docket, the complaint will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962); Ohio River Co. v. Carrillo, 754 F.2d 236, 238 n.5 (7th Cir. 1984). Case: 3:14-cv-00192-wmc Document #: 4 Filed: 04/30/14 Page 2 of 2 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the complaint filed by plaintiff Quordalis V. Sanders is DISMISSED pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4l(b). Entered this 30th day of April, 2014. BY THE COURT: Isl WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?