Emrit, Ronald v. Wisconsin Supreme Court et al
Filing
6
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docket Sheet and Judgment to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re 4 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Order, # 2 Docket sheet) (jef),(ps)
12/18/2015
ECF Western District of Wisconsin
U.S. District Court
Western District of Wisconsin (Madison)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:15cv00492wmc
Emrit, Ronald v. Wisconsin Supreme Court et al
Assigned to: District Judge William M. Conley
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Date Filed: 08/10/2015
Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
Ronald Satish Emrit
represented by Ronald Satish Emrit
4529 Townwall Street
Las Vegas, NV 89115
(301) 5378471
PRO SE
V.
Defendant
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Defendant
American Bar Association (ABA)
Defendant
National Conference of Bar Examiners
(NCBE)
Date Filed
#
08/10/2015
08/10/2015
Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. (Case
nonrandomly assigned to District Judge William M. Conley.) (Attachments:
# 1 Envelope) (jef) (Entered: 08/10/2015)
2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Ronald Satish
Emrit. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 08/10/2015)
08/14/2015
3 ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening.
Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 8/14/2015. (jef),(ps)
(Entered: 08/14/2015)
12/18/2015
4 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Plaintiff Ronald Satish Emrit. In forma pauperis
pending. No Docketing Statement filed. (Attachments:
# 1 Envelope) (jef),(ps) (Entered: 12/18/2015)
https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgibin/DktRpt.pl?396794911966332L_1_01
1/2
12/18/2015
12/18/2015
ECF Western District of Wisconsin
5 Appeal Information Packet. (jef),(ps) (Entered: 12/18/2015)
https://ecf.wiwd.circ7.dcn/cgibin/DktRpt.pl?396794911966332L_1_01
2/2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?