Raspardo v. City of New Britan

Filing

OPINION, the district court judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded, by RKW, GEL, CFD, FILED.[1336666] [12-1686, 12-1870]

Case: 12-1686

Document: 175-3

Page: 1

10/06/2014

1336666

2

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
ROBERT A. KATZMANN

CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE

CHIEF JUDGE

CLERK OF COURT

Date: October 06, 2014
Docket #: 12-1686cv
Short Title: Raspardo v. City of New Britan

DC Docket #: 09-cv-1321
DC Court: CT (NEW HAVEN)
DC Docket #: 09-cv-1321
DC Court: CT (NEW HAVEN)
DC Judge: Thompson
DC Judge: Martinez

VERIFIED ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS
Counsel for
_________________________________________________________________________
respectfully submits, pursuant to FRAP 39 (c) the within bill of costs and requests the Clerk to
prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed against the
________________________________________________________________
and in favor of
_________________________________________________________________________
for insertion in the mandate.
Docketing Fee

_____________________

Costs of printing appendix (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________
Costs of printing brief (necessary copies ______________ ____) _____________________
Costs of printing reply brief (necessary copies ______________ ) _____________________

(VERIFICATION HERE)
________________________

Case: 12-1686

Document: 175-3

Page: 2

10/06/2014

1336666

Signature

2