Raspardo v. City of New Britan
Filing
OPINION, the district court judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded, by RKW, GEL, CFD, FILED.[1336666] [12-1686, 12-1870]
Case: 12-1686
Document: 175-4
Page: 1
10/06/2014
1336666
1
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
ROBERT A. KATZMANN
CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE
CHIEF JUDGE
CLERK OF COURT
Date: October 06, 2014
Docket #: 12-1686cv
Short Title: Raspardo v. City of New Britan
DC Docket #: 09-cv-1321
DC Court: CT (NEW HAVEN)
DC Docket #: 09-cv-1321
DC Court: CT (NEW HAVEN)
DC Judge: Thompson
DC Judge: Martinez
NOTICE OF DECISION
The court has issued a decision in the above-entitled case. It is available on the Court's website
http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov.
Judgment was entered on October 6, 2014; and a mandate will later issue in accordance with
FRAP 41.
If pursuant to FRAP Rule 39 (c) you are required to file an itemized and verified bill of costs you
must do so, with proof of service, within 14 days after entry of judgment. The form, with
instructions, is also available on Court's website.
Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8523.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?