Raspardo v. City of New Britan

Filing

OPINION, the district court judgment is affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded, by RKW, GEL, CFD, FILED.[1336666] [12-1686, 12-1870]

Download PDF
Case: 12-1686 Document: 175-4 Page: 1 10/06/2014 1336666 1 United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 ROBERT A. KATZMANN CATHERINE O'HAGAN WOLFE CHIEF JUDGE CLERK OF COURT Date: October 06, 2014 Docket #: 12-1686cv Short Title: Raspardo v. City of New Britan DC Docket #: 09-cv-1321 DC Court: CT (NEW HAVEN) DC Docket #: 09-cv-1321 DC Court: CT (NEW HAVEN) DC Judge: Thompson DC Judge: Martinez NOTICE OF DECISION The court has issued a decision in the above-entitled case. It is available on the Court's website http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov. Judgment was entered on October 6, 2014; and a mandate will later issue in accordance with FRAP 41. If pursuant to FRAP Rule 39 (c) you are required to file an itemized and verified bill of costs you must do so, with proof of service, within 14 days after entry of judgment. The form, with instructions, is also available on Court's website. Inquiries regarding this case may be directed to 212-857-8523.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?