The Authors Guild v. Google, Inc.

Filing 44

JOINT APPENDIX, volume 4 of 6, (pp. 901-1200), on behalf of Appellant Jim Bouton, Joseph Goulden, Betty Miles and The Authors Guild, FILED. Service date 04/07/2014 by CM/ECF.[1196263] [13-4829]

Download PDF
13-4829-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit THE AUTHORS GUILD, BETTY MILES, JIM BOUTON, JOSEPH GOULDEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, HERBERT MITGANG, DANIEL HOFFMAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, PAUL DICKSON, THE MCGRAW-HILL COMPANIES, INC., PEARSON EDUCATION, INC., SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC., ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN PUBLISHERS, INC., CANADIAN STANDARD ASSOCIATION, JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant-Appellee. –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOINT APPENDIX (UN-SEALED REDACTED VERSION) Volume 4 of 6 (Pages A-901 to A-1200) DURIE TANGRI 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 362-6666 – and – WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20006 (202) 663-6600 Attorneys for Defendant-Appellee FRANKFURT KURNIT KLEIN & SELZ, P.C. 488 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor New York, New York 10022 (212) 980-0120 – and – JENNER & BLOCK 1099 New York Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20001 (202) 639-6000 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Appellants i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page District Court Docket Entries .................................... A-1 Excerpts from the Objection of Amazon.com, Inc. to Proposed Settlement, dated September 1, 2009 A-53 Excerpts from the Objections of Microsoft Corporation to Proposed Settlement and Certification of Proposed Settlement Class and Sub-Classes, dated September 8, 2009 .................. A-65 Excerpts from the Memorandum of Amicus Curiae Open Book Alliance in Opposition to the Proposed Settlement, filed September 8, 2009 ...... A-78 Excerpts from the Objection of Yahoo!Inc. to Final Approval of the Proposed Class Action Settlement, filed September 8, 2009 ...................... A-80 Declaration of Michael J. Boni in Support of Motion to Approve the Amended Settlement Agreement, dated November 13, 2009 (Omitted herein) Exhibit 2 to Boni Declaration – Amended Settlement Agreement, dated November 13, 2009 ............................................... A-83 Opinion of the Honorable Denny Chin, dated March 22, 2011 ...................................................... A-127 Fourth Amended Class Action Complaint, dated October 14, 2011.................................................... A-175 Defendant Google Inc.’s Answer to Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amended Complaint, dated June 14, 2012 A-191 ii Page Declaration of Judith A. Chevalier in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 18, 2012 .............................. A-201 Exhibit A to Chevalier Declaration – Expert Report of Judith A. Chevalier, dated May 4, 2012 ........................................................... A-203 Declaration of Dan Clancy in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 26, 2012 ................................................ A-222 Exhibit A to Clancy Declaration – Cooperative Agreement between Google Inc. and Regents of the University of Michigan/University Library, dated June 15, 2005.................................. A-228 Exhibit B to Clancy Declaration – Search Results Page for the Query “Steve Hovley” .................................................................. A-241 Exhibit C to Clancy Declaration – Portion of an About the Book Page that is Displayed when one clicks on Ball Four in the Search Results Pictured in Exhibit B ..................... A-243 Exhibit D to Clancy Declaration – Portion of the About the Book Page Depicted in Exhibit C Showing the Snippets Displayed ........... A-245 Exhibit E to Clancy Declaration – Excerpt from a Search Page for Black’s Law Dictionary .............................................................. A-247 Exhibit F to Clancy Declaration – Page Showing Foul Ball in Partner Program Preview .................................................................. A-249 iii Page Exhibit G to Clancy Declaration – Webpage at http://books.google.com/ googlebooks/testimonials.html Reflecting User Comments on Google Books ................................. A-251 Exhibit H to Clancy Declaration – Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books by Jean-Baptiste Michel ......... A-259 Declaration of Joseph C. Gratz in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 27, 2012 .............................. A-267 Exhibit 1 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of Deposition Transcript of Paul N. Courant, dated April 23, 2012................................ A-270 Exhibit 2 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of Deposition Transcript of Paul Aiken, dated April 19, 2012 .............................................. A-283 Exhibit 3 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of Plaintiffs’ Responses and Objections to Defendant Google Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories, dated April 27, 2012 ..................... A-298 Exhibit 4 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of Deposition Transcript of Judith A. Chevalier, dated June 8, 2012 ................................ A-307 Exhibit 5 to Gratz Declaration – Letter from Pamela Samuelson to the Honorable Denny Chin, dated February 13, 2012 ................... A-310 Exhibit 6 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of Deposition Transcript of Eric Zohn, dated April 13, 2012 .............................................. A-316 iv Page Exhibit 7 to Gratz Declaration – Exhibit 2 to the Deposition Transcript of Eric Zohn ....................................................................... A-322 Declaration of Albert N. Greco in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 23, 2012 .............................. A-325 Exhibit A to Greco Declaration – Expert Report of Albert N. Greco, dated May 3, 2012 ........................................................... A-327 Declaration of Kurt Groetsch in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 25, 2012 .............................. A-335 Declaration of Bruce S. Harris in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 23, 2012 .............................. A-340 Exhibit A to Harris Declaration – Expert Report of Bruce S. Harris, dated May 3, 2012, with Exhibits D-H ........................... A-342 Declaration of Brad Hasegawain in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 25, 2012 .............................. A-392 Declaration of Stephane Jaskiewicz in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 25, 2012 .............................. A-395 Declaration of Gloriana St. Clair in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 18, 2012 .............................. A-398 Exhibit A to St. Clair Declaration – Expert Report of Gloriana St. Clair, dated May 3, 2012 ........................................................... A-400 v Page Local Rule 56.1 Statement in Support of Defendant Google Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated July 27, 2012 ................................................ A-417 Declaration of Joanne Zack in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, dated July 26, 2012 .......................................................... A-429 Exhibit 1 to Zack Declaration – U.S. Copyright Office Certificate of Registration No. A173097 .......................................................... A-435 Exhibit 2 to Zack Declaration – U.S. Copyright Office Certificate of Registration No. TX0000338841 ............................................... A-438 Exhibit 3 to Zack Declaration – U.S. Copyright Office Certificate of Registration No. A346254 .......................................................... A-441 Exhibit 4 to Zack Declaration – Printouts from Google’s Website displaying Search Results in Jim Bouton, Ball Four .............. A-444 Exhibit 5 to Zack Declaration – Printouts from Google’s Website displaying Search Results for the Term “pitch” in Jim Bouton, Ball Four .................................................. A-510 Exhibit 6 to Zack Declaration – Printouts from Google’s Website displaying Search Results for the Term “pitches” in Jim Bouton, Ball Four .................................................. A-516 Exhibit 7 to Zack Declaration – Printouts from Google’s Website displaying Search Results in Betty Miles, The Trouble with Thirteen .................................................................. A-522 vi Page Exhibit 8 to Zack Declaration – Printouts from Google’s Website displaying Search Results in Joseph Goulden, The Superlawyers: the Small and Powerful World of the Great Washington Law Firms .......................... A-532 Exhibit 9 to Zack Declaration – Excerpts from a Spreadsheet produced by Google identifying approximately 2.7 million scanned Books Google has distributed to Libraries ............ A-542 Exhibit 10 to Zack Declaration – Printout from http://www.authorsguild.org/about/ history. html ........................................................... A-546 Exhibit 11 to Zack Declaration – Printout from http://investor.google.com/ corporate/faq.html .................................................. A-549 Exhibit 12 to Zack Declaration – “Google Checks Out Library Books,” dated December 14, 2004 ................................................ A-555 Exhibit 13 to Zack Declaration – Pages 1, 2, 15, and 56 of Google Inc.’s 2011 Form 10-K ............................................................. A-559 Exhibit 14 to Zack Declaration – Pages 1, 3, and 50 of Google Inc.’s 2010 Form 10-K ....................................................................... A-564 Exhibit 15 to Zack Declaration – Google Print Partner Development: Global Sales Conference (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-1-CA-16) ......... A-568 vii Page Exhibit 16 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Daniel Clancy (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-17-CA-83) ....... A-569 Exhibit 17 to Zack Declaration – Google Book Partner Program Standard Terms and Conditions ....................................................... A-570 Exhibit 18 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Thomas Turvey (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-84-CA-115)...... A-579 Exhibit 19 to Zack Declaration – Printout from http://support.google.com/ books/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=43729I ....... A-580 Exhibit 20 to Zack Declaration – Announcement from Google, “Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) Joins Google’s Library Project,” dated June 6, 2007 ..................... A-582 Exhibit 21 to Zack Declaration – Declaration of Daniel Clancy in Support of Google Inc.’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, filed February 8, 2012 ............ A-586 Exhibit 22 to Zack Declaration – Printout from http://support.google.com/ books/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=43751. ........ A-591 Exhibit 23 to Zack Declaration – Compilation of Documents produced by Google (Portions of Exhibit 23 Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-116-CA-308) ......................................... A-593 viii Page Exhibit 24 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Kurt Groetsch (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-309-CA-340) ... A-685 Exhibit 25 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Stephane Jaskiewicz (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-341-CA-372) ... A-686 Exhibit 26 to Zack Declaration – Defendant Google Inc.’s Supplemental Narrative Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Second Request for Production of Documents and Things (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-373-CA-388) ... A-687 Exhibit 27 to Zack Declaration – Excerpts from the Defendant Google Inc.’s Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for Admission ..................................... A-688 Exhibit 28 to Zack Declaration – Printout from http://www.google.com/ googlebooks/library.html ....................................... A-705 Exhibit 29 to Zack Declaration – QA Training Manual (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-389-CA-407) ... A-707 Exhibit 30 to Zack Declaration – Excerpts from a Spreadsheet produced by Google A-708 ix Page Exhibit 31 to Zack Declaration – E-mail from Joseph Gratz to Joanne Zack, dated December 9, 2011 (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-408-CA-409) ... A-712 Exhibit 32 to Zack Declaration – Library of Congress Trip Report (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-410-CA-422) ... A-713 Exhibit 33 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Paul Courant (Redacted Version. Unredacted Version Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-423-CA-437) ................................................... A-714 Exhibit 34 to Zack Declaration – “Google Print Full Text Book Mini-GPS,” dated December 10, 2003 (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-438-CA-454) ... A-748 Exhibit 35 to Zack Declaration – “Google Print: A Book Discovery Program,” dated October 15, 2004 (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-455-CA-478) ... A-749 Exhibit 36 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Gloriana St. Clair ........... A-750 Exhibit 37 to Zack Declaration – Expert Report of Daniel Gervais ........................... A-782 x Page Exhibit 38 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of James Crawford (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-479-CA-497) ... A-797 Exhibit 39 to Zack Declaration – Expert Report of Benjamin Edelman ..................... A-798 Exhibit 40 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Bruce Harris ................... A-808 Exhibit 41 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Albert Greco .................. A-825 Exhibit 42 to Zack Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Judith Chevalier (Redacted Version. Confidential Pages Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-498-CA-501) ............................................. A-852 Exhibit 43 to Zack Declaration – Defendant Google Inc.’s Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories ........................................................ A-909 Plaintiffs’ Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, dated July 26, 2012 (Public Redacted Version. Confidential Pages Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-502-CA-508) ............................................. A-927 Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendant Google Inc.’s Local Rule 56.1 Statement, dated August 26, 2013 (Public Redacted Version. Confidential Pages Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-509-CA-516) ............................................. A-949 xi Page Declaration of Michael J. Boni in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated August 26, 2013 ..................................................... A-979 Exhibit 1 to Boni Declaration – Compilation of Google Snippet Displays from Jim Bouton’s Baseball Memoir Ball Four ............. A-982 Exhibit 2 to Boni Declaration – Google Snippet Displays from Joseph Goulden’s History Superlawyers............................................. A-1074 Exhibit 3 to Boni Declaration – Google Snippet Displays from Betty Miles’s Novel The Trouble with Thirteen ........................... A-1172 Exhibit 4 to Boni Declaration – Internal Memos produced by Google to The American Society of Media Photographers, Inc. (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-517-CA-521) ... A-1204 Exhibit 5 to Boni Declaration – Cover, Table of Contents, and Complete Chapter Two with Answer Key for The Seinfeld Aptitude Test by Beth Golub (Carol Publishing Group, 1994) ...................................................................... A-1205 Exhibit 6 to Boni Declaration – Cover, Table of Contents, and First Three Pages of each Chapter from Welcome to Twin Peaks (1990 Publications International Ltd.) ................... A-1244 xii Page Exhibit 7 to Boni Declaration – Excerpts from the Deposition of Bradley Hasegawa (Filed Under Seal. Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-522-CA-538) ... A-1271 Exhibit 8 to Boni Declaration – Printout from a Webpage on Amazon.com, obtained by clicking on the “Amazon” Link on the Google Books Page for Joseph Goulden’s book Superlawyers................................................. A-1272 Exhibit 9 to Boni Declaration – Printout from a Webpage on Amazon.com, obtained by running a Search on Amazon.com for “Steve Hovley” ...................................................... A-1277 Exhibit 10 to Boni Declaration – Printout from a Webpage on Amazon.com, obtained by running a Search on Amazon.com for “Minoru Yasui” ...................................................... A-1287 Declaration of Paul Aiken in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment, dated August 26, 2013 ......... A-1290 Attachment A to Aiken Declaration – Amazon Press Release: “Amazon.com Launches “Search Inside the Book” Enabling Customers to Discover Books by Searching and Previewing the Text Inside” ............................................................ A-1302 Attachment B to Aiken Declaration – “The Great Library of Amazonia,” Wired Magazine, November 12, 2003 .............................. A-1305 xiii Page Attachment C to Aiken Declaration – “News: A9, Amazon’s Search Portal, Goes Live: Reverberations Felt in Valley,” John Battelle’s Search Blog, April 14, 2004................................... A-1314 Attachment D to Aiken Declaration – “Can Amazon Unplug Google?” Business 2.0, April 15, 2004 ........................................................ A-1319 Attachment E to Aiken Declaration – “Amazon to Take Searches on Web to a New Depth,” The New York Times, September 15, 2004 ............................................... A-1325 Attachment F to Aiken Declaration – “Amazon’s A9 Launches Visual Yellow Pages,” Search Engine Watch, January 26, 2005 ................ A-1329 Attachment G to Aiken Declaration – “Google Hires Amazon Search Chief,” Seattle Post-Intelligencer, February 7, 2006 ..................... A-1333 Attachment H to Aiken Declaration – “Google Announces New Mapping Innovations at Where 2.0 Conference,” News from Google, May 29, 2007 ......................................................... A-1337 Declaration of Joseph C. Gratz in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, dated August 26, 2013 ........................................... A-1340 Exhibit 1 to Gratz Declaration – Portion of the Web Page resulting from a Search on the Library of Congress Catalog at http://catalog.loc.gov for the Query “500 Pearl Street” .................................................................... A-1344 xiv Page Exhibit 2 to Gratz Declaration – Portion of the Web Page resulting from a Search on https://books.google.com for the Query “500 Pearl Street” ........................................................... A-1346 Exhibit 3 to Gratz Declaration – Portion of the Web Page that results from clicking on the Result Alas! What Brought Thee Hither?: The Chinese in New York, 1800-1950 in Exhibit 2................................................................. A-1348 Exhibit 4 to Gratz Declaration – Portion of the Web Page resulting from a Search on https://books.google.com for the Query “Hong Kee Kang” ............................................................. A-1350 Exhibit 5 to Gratz Declaration – Portion of the Web Page that results from clicking on the Result Chinese America, History and Perspectives in Exhibit 4 ................................ A-1352 Exhibit 6 to Gratz Declaration – Printout from http://www.amazon.com/gp/offerlisting/B002H9DITW ............................................ A-1354 Exhibit 7 to Gratz Declaration – Marc Egnal, Evolution of the Novel in the United States: The Statistical Evidence, 37:2 Soc. Sci. Hist. 231 (2013) ..................................................... A-1356 Exhibit 8 to Gratz Declaration – Written Testimony submitted by Paul Aiken to the Committee on the Judiciary of the United States House of Representatives in connection with a September 10, 2009 Hearing titled “Competition and Commerce in Digital Books” ... A-1381 xv Page Exhibit 9 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of the Deposition Transcript of Paul Aiken...................................................................... A-1412 Exhibit 10 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of the Deposition Transcript of Betty Miles ...................................................................... A-1419 Exhibit 11 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of Plaintiffs’ Reponses and Objections to Defendant Google Inc.’s First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiffs The Authors Guild, Inc., Jim Bouton, Joseph Goulden and Betty Miles herein, served on April 27, 2012.................. A-1425 Exhibit 12 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of the Deposition Transcript of Jim Bouton.................................................................... A-1432 Exhibit 13 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of the Deposition Transcript of Joseph Goulden.................................................................. A-1435 Exhibit 14 to Gratz Declaration – Exhibit 6 to the Deposition of Paul Aiken ............. A-1445 Exhibit 15 to Gratz Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Daniel Gervais ............... A-1448 Exhibit 16 to Gratz Declaration – Deposition Transcript of Benjamin G. Edelman .... A-1509 Exhibit 17 to Gratz Declaration – Exhibit 5 to the Deposition of Jim Bouton ............ A-1588 Exhibit 18 to Gratz Declaration – Exhibit 2 to the Deposition of Betty Miles ............ A-1590 xvi Page Exhibit 19 to Gratz Declaration – Exhibit 16 to the Deposition of Benjamin G. Edelman ................................................................. A-1592 Exhibit 20 to Gratz Declaration – Excerpts of the Deposition Transcript of Judith A. Chevalier ................................................................ A-1595 Declaration of Scott Dougall in Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, dated August 22, 2013 ........................................... A-1602 Google Inc.’s Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs’ Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, dated August 26, 2013 (Public Redacted Version. Confidential Pages Reproduced in the Confidential Appendix at pp. CA-539-CA-555) ............................................. A-1605 Notice of Appeal, dated December 23, 2013 ............. A-1639 A-901 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 24 of 52 Page 186 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 188 J.A. Chevalier - CON F IDE N T I A L A. So as I describe in the report, as I've discussed, locating rights holders is a very, you know, as Dr. St. Clair reports, locating rights holders is a very difficult and costly process. If you're referring to an organization where book rights holders, you know, provide, you know, register or provide their books, I think there are already, I think there are already mechanisms in the marketplace for book rights holders who want to, you know, who want to -- I don't, I think the problem is the rights holders who cannot be found, largely speaking, or the rights holders who, the orphan works problem. And the thing you're describing to me does not solve the orphan works problem. Sorry, I don't, I cannot, since I can't tell you whose need would be met, it's hard for me to tell you why it doesn't fill an unmet need. The product you describe, I can't, I cannot figure out whose need would be met by that product. 1 J.A. Chevalier - CON F IDE N T I A L 2 how an entity that relies on the active 3 depository of rights with it, would solve unmet 4 needs of libraries in the short run. 5 Q. I'm not just talking about libraries. 6 What about unmet needs of Google, if 7 that was the only way it could get the books? 8 MR. McGOWAN: Objection, incomplete 9 hypothetical, foundation. l O You may answer. 11 A. So I guess I -- in this case, as 12 opposed to the case I cite in the footnote, I 13 don't quite see the service -- that the source 14 of the efficiencies are not apparent to me. 15 Q. Well, AMCAP and BMI -- ASCAP, excuse 16 me, and BMI, were created because the rights 17 holders had a legal copyright interest; correct? 18 MR. McGOWAN: Objection, foundation. 19 You may answer. 20 A. So my understanding is that ASCAP and 21 BMI arose -- yes, so the rights holders, yeah, 22 the composers, mostly, yes, or the rights 23 holders, yes, as I say in my report. 24 Q. Right, so it's not just that there 25 were problems of widely disbursed rights holders Page 187 1 J.A. Chevalier - CON F IDE N T I A L 2 Q. Well, what about the need of 3 copyright owners to obtain compensation for the 4 digitization of their books? 5 MR. McGOWAN: Objection, foundation. 6 You may answer. 7 A. So as I've said in the report, I 8 don't think, I don't think there are a body of, 9 for example, libraries or other entities, with lOan interest in digitizing books, who are willing 11 to pay for licenses for less than the full text 12 of books. 13 And if this product helped those 14 libraries, let's say, find the copyright 15 holders, it might be valuable. 16 But if it, ifit doesn't solve that 17 problem, I don't think it would be --it wouldn't 18 meet an unmet need of a buyer. 19 Q. What if it, what ifthe collective 20 licensing organization created efficiencies for 21 entities like libraries and others who are 22 trying to get rights to use books? 23 A. So it may be the case that some 24 entities could create some efficiencies, but I 25 don't -- I think what I'm saying is I don't see Page 189 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 J.A. Chevalier - CON F IDE N T I A L and widely disbursed music users, there was also the issue that the rights holders had a right to withhold the music users from listening to their works; right? MR. McGOWAN: Objection, incomplete hypothetical, lacks foundation significantly. You may answer. A. Sorry, so my understanding is that the purpose of ASCAP and BMI was that rights holders, you know, deposit their rights with AS CAP and BMI, and AS CAP and BMI provide an efficiency by tracking down and monitoring the disbursed rights users on the other side. Q. Do you understand that ASCAP and BMI arose after music users attempted to use music without paying royalties? MR. McGOWAN: Objection, foundation. You may answer. A. I don't know exactly. I don't know the history of AS CAP and BMI that completely. My understanding is that, you know, that these disbursed rights holders were required to pay for the music that they were 48 (Pages 186 - 189) 212-279-9424 VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY www.veritext.com 212-490-3430 A-902 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 25 of 52 Page 190 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 . 22 23 24 25 J.A. Chevalier - CON F IDE N T I A L performing, and that ASCAP and BMI served the intermediary function of negotiating and transacting with those disbursed rights holders. Q. SO you don't know the genesis of it beyond what you said here? A. I know that ASCAP and BMI are a solution -- are a solution to the economic problem of disbursed rights holders. I don't know that much more about the history than that. Sorry, disbursed rights holders and disbursed users. Q. Right, but there would be no problem to solve from the perspective of the music users, if they didn't have to pay for the use of the music; right? MR. McGOWAN: Objection, foundation, calls for legal conclusion. A. So my understanding is that, yes, the users -- that the purpose of ASCAP and BMI, is to track down the users and get them to pay. Q. Because what they're using is copyrighted music? MR. McGOWAN: Same objections. A. So my understanding is that the user Page 192 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 J.A. Chevalier - CON F IDE N T I A L A. So I think as I've described in my report, what I said in my report is absent the existence of Google Books, I do not believe a market for snippet display would arise. That's the opinion I express in my report. Q. But you're not expressing the opposite? A. So I'm surely not expressing the opposite of the opinion in my report, but what's the -- what is your question? Q. You're not expressing the opinion that if Google, we have -- Google Books now exists? A. Yes. Q. And if a court detennined that Google could not legally display snippets, are you expressing an opinion about whether or not Google, as a matter economics, would enter into a license to display snippets? MR. McGOWAN: Objection, incomplete hypothetical. You may answer. A. So I'm not expressingan opinion about whether Google would enter into licenses Page 191 1 Page 193 lA. Chevalier -C 0 N F IDE N T I A L I 2 -- my understanding is that the users have to 3 pay because the performance rights are a right 4 that has, it has been determined by some, by a 5 court that users of music, in these 6 circumstances, have to pay. 7 But the full scope of when users of 8 music have to pay, etcetera, you know, is 9 factually fairly complicated. 10 Q. But you would agree that music users 11 wouldn't be paying unless they had to; right? 12 A. I am sure some music users would be 13 paying, you know, if they didn't have to. 14 But the point of ASCAP and BMI is to 15 make sure they all pay, to collect from them. 16 Q. SO ifit was determined that Google 17 could not display snippets without permission 18 under the copyright laws, are you expressing an 19 opinion about whether a market would or would 20 not develop for Google to pay for the use of the 21 materials necessary for them to produce the 22 snippets? 23 MR. McGOWAN: Objection, incomplete 24 hypothetical. 25 You may answer. 2 , 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 J.A. Chevalier - CON F IDE N TI A L with rights holders. They may well abandon the project. I don't know the answer to that. MS. ZACK: I don't have anymore questions. (Time noted: 2:59 p.m.) JUDITH A. CHEVALlER 11 Subscribed and sworn to before me 12 this _ _ day of ,2012. 13 14 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ 15 Notary Public 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 49 (Pages 190 - 193) 212-279-9424 VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY www.veritext.com 212-490-3430 A-903 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 26 of 52 Page 194 2 CERTIFICATE 3 4 STATE OF NEW YORK. ) 5 : ss. 6 COUNTY OF NEW YORK. ) 7 8 I, NANCY SORENSEN, Notary Public 9 within and for the State of New York, do 10 hereby certify: 11 That JUDITH A. CHEVALIER, the witness 12 whose deposition is hereinbefore set forth, 13 was duly sworn by me and that such 14 deposition is a true record of the 15 testimony given by the witness. 16 I further certify that I am not 17 related to any of the parties to this 18 action by blood or marriage, and that I am 19 in no way interested in the outcome of this 20 matter. 21 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto 22 set my hand this 8TH day of JUNE, 2012. 23 24 25 Page 196 1 2 EX H I BIT S (Cont'd) 1 NANCY SORENSEN 3 4 Defendant's Exhibit 97, a series of pages 181 5 from the Internet concerning the acquisition 6 by Google of Rightsflow 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pagel97: Page 195 1 2 ------------------ I N D E X -----------------3 WITNESS EXAMINATION BY 4 nmITH A. CHEVALlER MS. ZACK 5 6 1 PAGE 4 7 ----------- INFORMATION REQUESTS -------------- 8 DIRECTIONS: 2 3 4 5 6 _~I ------------------ EXHIDITS ------------------PLAINTIFF'S FORlD. _~I _~I 14 _1 __1 15 4 Plaintiffs Exhibit 96, a number of 4 pages collected from Google's website concerning the Partner Program 1 1 1 18 19 20 21 1 _ _ __ _ 1 _ _ __ _ 1 _ _ __ _ 1 _ _ __ _ 1 _ _ __ _ 1 _ _ _ __ 1 _ _ __ _ 1 _ _ __ _ 1 16_~1 17 24 25 _1 __1 11 13 23 _1 __1 _1 __1 12 13 12 MOTIONS: Plaintiffs Exhibit 95, Expert Report of Judith A. Chevalier 800-362-2520 CASE: AUTHORS GUILD, ET AL. VS. GO OGLE, INC. DEPOSITION DATE: JUNE 8, 2012 DEPONENT: JUDITH A. CHEVALIER PAGELINE(S) CHANGE REASON 7 8 9 10 9 RULINGS: 10 TO BE FURNISHED: II REQUESTS: 20 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ERRATA SHEET VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY 1250 BROADWAY NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10001 _1 __1 1 _ _ _ _ __ 1 1----- 1 1 1 _ _ _ __ 1 1 1 _ _ _ __ _ JUDITH A. CHEVALIER 22 23 24 25 SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS _ _ DAY OF ,20_. (NOTARY PUBLIC) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 50 (Pages 194 - 197) 212-279-9424 VERITEXT REPORTING COMPANY www.veritext.com 212-490-3430 A-904 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 27 of 52 Cmljidt'lIliai I<:rrata Sheet Name of Case: 1'1 IE AUTHORS GUILD, ct aL v, GOOGLE, INC. Dak of Deposition: June 8, 2012 Name of Deponent: Prol'c.:ssor Judith A. Chevalier Change To 5 analysis group Analysis Group II So that in that case PllgC Line [ did similar variety of platform 23 Misquote Punctuation error I did similarly listing of members or publishers that were 18 t So in that case listing of members - of publishers that were members ~"""''','' Misquote variety ofplatf()fl1ls ""''''''''''-'''''',,'''''''''' Misquotc """''''''''''''''''''''t" on his reports 24 on his repOJi 'fypographicaJ error 26 II tbis is "Amazon announces the first publicly available SOLlTCC. Amazon announces sales impact from new Search T nside the Book features." this is "Amazon the lirst announces. , , publicly available source "Amazon announces sales impact from new Search Inside the Book ft:utmes," Pllnctuation error 36 19-20 all of tbe books in the partner Program all of their books in the Partner Program' Misquote some cost some costs Typographical t!rror wby "" my understanding 'rypographical error '" ""'-""'-""'" ''''+--'''''''' 38 '''r'-''''''''''''''''-''''''--'-'''''''''''''''''''''' "'''''-'''''-'''''''''''' ",,'" 38 why my understanding " " " " " f"""'''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' 44 16-1 g and so to the extent that, you know, copyrights and perhaps they playa pal1icuJar role in the economics of technology "'~-,-""""+ and so to the extent tbat. you copyrights and patents a particular role in the of technology Misquote ,,~,,+"'''''' compliment opinions about their \-1isquole Expert reports tl)r acadt!mic o :Vlisquote i'.-iisquote the deposilion Stephane the deposition of S!cphanc Missing word ""'" ''''-'''---+---'''''''''' the add revenucs the ad revenues Pagt! 1 of 1 Misquote A-905 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 28 of 52 ( 'ot?!ideutwl 60 your choice. These links an: not paid for by the site features, Clicking on a link to purchase "These links are not paid j()f by the site lcatures. Clicking on a link to pun:hase your book at an on-line retailer, won'! generate any revenue direc1ly. your book at an on-line retailer. won'l generate any revenue directly." combined with what do 1 earn hom the program, . 20-21 "On the preview page f()f your book, "ve display a set of links to buy the books at the major retailers. as well as to a site of your choice, 61 On the preview page for your, book, we display a set of links; to buy the books at the major i retailers, as well as to a site of carn from the program,'" and what do I cam from this program program" Missing punctuation combined with "what do I and "what do I cam from this 6i 23-24 inttTesl in demand 71 4 is a compliment 80 18 So is my undcrstanding So it is my understanding 93 6-7 the message you have sl'Ul'ched this book too many limes the message "you have searched this book too many 108 5 WelL I may lOR 19-21 the important test It)l' whether tests for whether a good is a new good J 11 4 times" 112 Misquote Missing punctumion is a complement a compliment the important tcst f(Jr whether -- tests for whether a good is a iv1isquok .....................+ . _.. . . . . I explained in the thing as I explained in the beginning Misquole In That's if Misquote 113 is the scanned Typographical error 114 Google has provided the Misquote of two libraries functionality to libraries -- for libraries 115 at tbe output ~._ 116 16 ........ o_._ . ".... _o. . "employs" of the word employs Page 2 of2 + J\:lisquote Missing punctuation A-906 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 29 of 52 ( 'olltldemiai 122 17-18 I'm not an expert in the ex:actity of exactly how I'm not an expert in exactly how Misquote 124 ~ ,) Google Go Books Googlc Books ['ypographical error 127 19 more relevant in the markctpiace morc preva].,:nt in the marketplace Misquote 129 Ig IT 130 () Misquote 138 (, Misquote 1:19 6 As though 140 5 I'm exactly sure 143 18 Ir the publisher wasn't more 151 16-19 My analysis is neither assuming. nor expressing an opinion about \\'ha1 Googk does. It's about what vvhether Google does is a fair llse .- .. ~------ r --- ---.~---'" _. '/'ypographical error !'ypographical error 110t exactly sure Missing word •.•• ~ •••. j ,..~ 'rypographical error complement Misquote Extra word they were __ ._•...• Misquotc is the _........_ ... _. Misquote primary ,,_.. ,.. analysis is neither assuming. nor expressing opinion about whether Google does. It isn't whether what Googk fair use Misquote "'····~··"-··i ..........., .. , 180 8 disbursed dispersed Misquote ]80 16 disbursed dispersed Misquote 180 18 disbursed dispersed Misquote 183 5 by which about which Misquote ]89 15 dishursed dispersed Misquote 189 24 disbursed dispersed Misquote 190 4 disbursed dispersed rVlisquote 190 9 disbursed dispersed - -_ ..... _-_ ...... _ - - - - - - - - Misquote ~~-.---~-- 190 II disbursed dispersed Misquote 190 12 disbursed dispersed ivlisquote Page 3 of3 •..... A-907 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Page 4 0(,4 Filed 08/03/12 Page 30 of 52 A-908 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 31 of 52 Page 193 1 J.A. Chevalier 2 with rights holders. 3 project. I They may well abandon the don't know the answer to that. MS. 4 CON F IDE N T I A L ZACK: I don't have anymore questions. 5 (Time noted: 6 7 2:59 p.m.) 8 ~,~d_~_'_ _ __ 9 JU~tJH A. CHEVALIER 10 11 Subscribed and sworn to before me 12 this day of 2012. 13 14 15 Notary Public 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 212-279-9424 VERlTEXT REPORTING COMPANY \vIVW. vcrit\:xt.~oln 2! 2-490-3430 A-909 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 32 of 52 EXHIBIT 43 A-910 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 33 of 52 DURIE TANGRI LLP DARALYN J. DURIE (Pro Hac Vice) ddurie@durietangri.com JOSEPH C. GRATZ (Pro Hac Vice) jgratz@durietangri.com 217 Leidesdorff Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-362-6666 Facsimile: 415-236-6300 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE AUTHORS GUILD, INC., Associational Plaintiff, BETTY MILES, JOSEPH GOULDEN, and JIM BOUTON, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 05 CV 8136 (DC) ECF Case v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant. DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES A-911 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 34 of 52 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 and 33, Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”), by its attorneys, hereby responds and objects to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories (the “Interrogatories”) dated March 14, 2012. These responses are based on the information currently available to Google. Google reserves the right to amend, supplement or modify its responses and objections at any time in the event that it obtains additional or different information. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Google objects to the preface, instructions, and definitions to the Requests to the extent that they purport to impose obligations that exceed those imposed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, relevant local rules, and applicable case law. In responding to these requests, Google has followed the applicable law and has ignored the improper preface, instructions, and definitions. 2. Google objects to the Requests in their entirety and to each request to the extent that the documents and information sought are protected from discovery by the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, or any other applicable privilege. 3. Google objects to each and every request to the extent that it seeks information that is confidential and/or proprietary information. To the extent not otherwise subject to objection, Google will provide such confidential information in accordance with the terms of the protective order entered in this case. 4. Google objects to Plaintiffs’ definition of “Google” as vague, ambiguous, unintelligible, and overly broad. For purposes of responding to these discovery requests, Google will interpret “Google” to mean Google, Inc. and/or its agents. 1 A-912 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 35 of 52 RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Identify all factual and legal bases supporting Google’s defense that its digital copying in libraries of Books in their entirety is a fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107, including without limitation all facts Google intends to rely on with respect to the four factors set forth in Section 107. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged information, attorney work product, or information protected by any other privilege or immunity. Google objects to this interrogatory’s use of the term “digital copying in libraries of Books” is vague and ambiguous, and understands it to refer to Google’s digitization of Books from library collections. Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks more than “the claims and contentions” of Google, as permitted by Local Civil Rule 33.3(c). Subject to and without waiving these objections, Google responds as follows: Google’s digitization of Books from library collections is a fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107. Specifically: x The “purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes,” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o The purpose and character of Google’s use is transformative, because it adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, and does not merely supersede the objects of the original. ƒ The purpose of Google’s use is to assist users in identifying Books which may be of interest by creating a search engine by which the text of Books may be searched. 2 A-913 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 ƒ Filed 08/03/12 Page 36 of 52 Google’s digitized copies do not serve as a substitute for Books, but rather are necessary to create Google’s book search engine, which is a new tool for finding books. o The nature of Google’s use is at least partially noncommercial, because the use facilitates access to the collections of libraries, enables research and scholarship, and does not directly generate revenue for Google. x The “nature of the copyrighted work” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o All of the Books at issue have been published. o Some of the Books at issue are factual in nature, and as to those Books, this factor tilts more strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are less factual in nature, and as to those Books, this factor tilts less strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are out of print, and as to those Books, this factor tilts more strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are in print, and as to those Books, this factor tilts less strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. x The “amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o Because the use is transformative, and the use of the whole is necessary to the transformative purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified, the digitization of the entire work does not militate against a finding of fair use. 3 A-914 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 x Filed 08/03/12 Page 37 of 52 The “effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o A search engine is not a market substitute for a book. o The effect of the use on the traditional market for the sale of Books is positive, because it enables the creation of a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified. o There is no market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified. o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified is not a traditional market. o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified is not a reasonable market. o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified is not a market which is likely to be developed. o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified is a transformative market, and is thus not cognizable. x Balanced in light of the purposes of copyright, the four factors favor fair use. o Each factor either favors fair use or is neutral. 4 A-915 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 38 of 52 o A finding of fair use promotes the purpose of copyright, which is to promote the dissemination of knowledge by granting limited exclusive rights to authors. Google’s use promotes the dissemination of knowledge, by assisting users in identifying books which may be of interest, while not serving as a substitute for the Books themselves. In addition, Google’s use is fair because it is necessary to the fair use purpose set forth in Google’s response to Interrogatory No. 3. Google reserves the right to make different or additional contentions for the purpose of rebutting Plaintiffs’ contentions. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Google is willing to meet and confer in good faith in the event Plaintiffs require additional details regarding the contentions identified herein. INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Identify all factual and legal bases supporting Google’s defense that its distribution to libraries of entire digital copies of Books is a fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107, including without limitation all facts Google intends to rely on with respect to the four factors set forth in Section 107. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged information, attorney work product, or information protected by any other privilege or immunity. Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks more than “the claims and contentions” of Google, as permitted by Local Civil Rule 33.3(c). Subject to and without waiving these objections, Google responds as follows: Google does not distribute entire digital copies of Books to libraries. Rather, Google makes available to libraries an automated system, called GRIN, by which a library may choose to create and download digital copies of Books which have been scanned from its collection. A 5 A-916 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 39 of 52 library performs the volitional acts which result in the creation of the digital copies which are created by the GRIN system and which result in the transmission of the content of those digital copies to that library. Accordingly, Google can be at most liable under doctrines of secondary liability, and cannot be directly liable for the library copies. Google is not secondarily liable with respect to the library copies. First, Google is not secondarily liable with respect to the library copies under any theory of secondary liability because there is no underlying act of direct infringement by the libraries, since the libraries’ volitional acts in creating and downloading the library copies are fair use, not infringement. Second, Google is not vicariously liable because vicarious liability requires a financial benefit directly attributable to the particular infringing activity, and Google does not derive any financial benefit directly attributable to the library copies. Third, Google is not liable under a theory of contributory liability because (1) the GRIN system has at least substantial noninfringing uses; (2) the libraries were and are contractually bound to use the GRIN system only in a noninfringing manner; and (3) Google lacks knowledge of any use of the GRIN system which is infringing, as opposed to fair use. The libraries’ volitional acts in creating and downloading the library copies are fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107. Specifically: x The libraries’ use is in part for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research. x The “purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes,” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. 6 A-917 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 40 of 52 o The purpose and character of the libraries’ use is transformative, because it adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, and does not merely supersede the objects of the original. ƒ One purpose of the libraries’ use is to assist users in identifying books which may be of interest by creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched. ƒ The libraries’ digitized copies do not serve as a substitute for Books, but rather are necessary to create the libraries’ book search engine, which is a new tool for finding books. o The nature of the libraries’ use is entirely for nonprofit educational purposes. x The “nature of the copyrighted work” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o All of the Books at issue have been published. o Some of the Books at issue are factual in nature, and as to those Books, this factor tilts more strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are less factual in nature, and as to those Books, this factor tilts less strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are out of print, and as to those Books, this factor tilts more strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are in print, and as to those Books, this factor tilts less strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. x The “amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. 7 A-918 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 41 of 52 o Because the use is transformative, and the use of the whole is necessary to the transformative purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified, the digitization of the entire work does not militate against a finding of fair use. x The “effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o A search engine is not a market substitute for a Book. o The effect of the use on the traditional market for the sale of Books is positive, because it enables the creation of a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified. o There is no market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified or for the creation of a “dark archive.” o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified or for the creation of a “dark archive” is not a traditional market. o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified or for the creation of a “dark archive” is not a reasonable market. o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified or for the creation of a “dark archive” is not a market which is likely to be developed. 8 A-919 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 42 of 52 o The market for a license to scan Books for the purpose of creating a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified or for the creation of a “dark archive” is a transformative market, and is thus not cognizable. x Balanced in light of the purposes of copyright, the four factors favor fair use. o Each factor either favors fair use or is neutral. o A finding of fair use promotes the purpose of copyright, which is to promote the dissemination of knowledge by granting limited exclusive rights to authors. The libraries’ use promotes the dissemination of knowledge, by assisting users in identifying books which may be of interest, while not serving as a substitute for the Books themselves. Google provides this response as a courtesy to Plaintiffs, and the burden of proving infringement (be it direct or secondary) remains with Plaintiffs. To the extent Google performed any volitional act with respect to library copies, which Google denies, Google’s conduct was fair use because it was necessary to the foregoing fair use purposes and was conducted at the behest of the libraries expressly for the purpose of achieving the foregoing fair use purposes. Google reserves the right to make different or additional contentions for the purpose of rebutting Plaintiffs’ contentions. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Google is willing to meet and confer in good faith in the event Plaintiffs require additional details regarding the contentions identified herein. INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Identify all factual and legal bases supporting Google’s defense that its display of verbatim expression from Books in response to search requests is a fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 9 A-920 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 43 of 52 107, including without limitation all facts Google intends to rely on with respect to the four factors set forth in Section 107. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 3: Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged information, attorney work product, or information protected by any other privilege or immunity. Google objects to this interrogatory’s use of the term “display of verbatim expression from Books in response to search requests” is vague and ambiguous, and understands it to refer to Google’s display of snippets of Books from library collections in response to search requests. Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks more than “the claims and contentions” of Google, as permitted by Local Civil Rule 33.3(c). Subject to and without waiving these objections, Google responds as follows: Google’s display of snippets of Books from library collections in response to search results is a fair use under 17 U.S.C. § 107. Specifically: x The “purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes,” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o The purpose and character of Google’s use is transformative, because it adds something new, with a further purpose or different character, and does not merely supersede the objects of the original. ƒ The display of snippets is important to helping users find books which may be of interest. ƒ The snippets displayed do not serve as a substitute for Books, but instead serve as a tool to identify books which are of interest. 10 A-921 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 ƒ Filed 08/03/12 Page 44 of 52 Snippets are not displayed with respect to those Books for which there is a possibility that a snippet could serve as a substitute for a Book, such as dictionaries and books of quotations. o The nature of Google’s use is at least partially noncommercial, because the use facilitates access to the collections of libraries, enables research and scholarship, and does not directly generate revenue for Google. x The “nature of the copyrighted work” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o All of the Books at issue have been published. o Some of the Books at issue are factual in nature, and as to those Books, this factor tilts more strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are less factual in nature, and as to those Books, this factor tilts less strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are out of print, and as to those Books, this factor tilts more strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the Books at issue are in print, and as to those Books, this factor tilts less strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the snippets at issue are factual in nature, and as to those snippets, this factor tilts more strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. o Some of the snippets at issue are less factual in nature, and as to those snippets, this factor tilts less strongly in favor of a finding of fair use. x The “amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o Snippets are displayed only in response to user search queries. 11 A-922 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 45 of 52 o Each snippet is only approximately one-eighth of a page. o At maximum, three snippets are displayed in response to a particular search query. o Only snippets containing the user’s search query are displayed. o The location of a snippet on a page is fixed. o Some snippets are blacklisted. o Some pages are blacklisted. o Measures are in place to prevent any one user, or users in the aggregate, from abusing the system by repeated queries. o Some of the snippets at issue are taken from long books, and as to those snippets this factor tilts more strongly in favor of fair use. o Some of the snippets at issue are taken from short books, and as to those snippets this factor tilts less strongly in favor of fair use. x The “effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work” weighs in favor of a finding of fair use. o A snippet is not a market substitute for a Book. o The effect of the use on the traditional market for the sale of Books is positive, because it enables the creation of a search engine by which the text of books may be searched so that books of interest may be identified. o There is no market for a license to display short snippets as part of a search engine so that books of interest may be identified. o The market for a license to display short snippets as part of a search engine so that books of interest may be identified is not a traditional market. 12 A-923 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 46 of 52 o The market for a license to display short snippets as part of a search engine so that books of interest may be identified is not a reasonable market. o The market for a license to display short snippets as part of a search engine so that books of interest may be identified is not a market which is likely to be developed. o The market for a license to display short snippets as part of a search engine so that books of interest may be identified is a transformative market, and is thus not cognizable. x Balanced in light of the purposes of copyright, the four factors favor fair use. o Each factor either favors fair use or is neutral. o A finding of fair use promotes the purpose of copyright, which is to promote the dissemination of knowledge by granting limited exclusive rights to authors. Google’s use promotes the dissemination of knowledge, by assisting users in identifying books which may be of interest, while not serving as a substitute for the Books themselves. Google reserves the right to make different or additional contentions for the purpose of rebutting Plaintiffs’ contentions. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Google is willing to meet and confer in good faith in the event Plaintiffs require additional details regarding the contentions identified herein. INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Identify by title, author, publisher and ISBN (if applicable) all Books as to which Google claims a license to digitally copy in full, and for each Book identify all factual and legal bases supporting the defense of license. 13 A-924 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 47 of 52 RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 4: Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged information, attorney work product, or information protected by any other privilege or immunity. Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks more than “the claims and contentions” of Google, as permitted by Local Civil Rule 33.3(c). Subject to and without waiving these objections, Google responds as follows: Google claims the defense of license with respect to those Books listed in the document bearing Bates number GOOG05004752. Google is permitted by law, at least under the doctrine of fair use, to digitally copy in full all of the remaining Books at issue, as set forth in Google’s response to Interrogatory No. 1. Google reserves the right to make different or additional contentions for the purpose of rebutting Plaintiffs’ contentions. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Google is willing to meet and confer in good faith in the event Plaintiffs require additional details regarding the contentions identified herein. INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Identify by title, author, publisher and ISBN (if applicable) all Books as to which Google claims a license to distribute digital copies to libraries, and for each Book identify all factual and legal bases supporting the defense of license. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 5: Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged information, attorney work product, or information protected by any other privilege or immunity. Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks more than “the claims and contentions” of Google, as permitted by Local Civil Rule 33.3(c). Subject to and without waiving these objections, Google responds as follows: 14 A-925 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 48 of 52 Google claims the defense of license with respect to those Books listed in the document bearing Bates number GOOG05004752. Google is permitted by law, at least under the doctrine of fair use, to digitally copy in full all of the remaining Books at issue, as set forth in Google’s response to Interrogatory No. 1. Google reserves the right to make different or additional contentions for the purpose of rebutting Plaintiffs’ contentions. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Google is willing to meet and confer in good faith in the event Plaintiffs require additional details regarding the contentions identified herein. INTERROGATORY NO. 6: Identify by title, author, publisher and ISBN (if applicable), all Books as to which Google claims a license to display verbatim expression in response to search requests, and for each book identify all factual and legal bases supporting the defense of license. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 6: Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged information, attorney work product, or information protected by any other privilege or immunity. Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks more than “the claims and contentions” of Google, as permitted by Local Civil Rule 33.3(c). Subject to and without waiving these objections, Google responds as follows: Google claims the defense of license with respect to those Books listed in the document bearing Bates number GOOG05004752. Google is permitted by law, at least under the doctrine of fair use, to digitally copy in full all of the remaining Books at issue, as set forth in Google’s response to Interrogatory No. 1. Google reserves the right to make different or additional contentions for the purpose of rebutting Plaintiffs’ contentions. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Google is willing to meet and confer in good faith in the event Plaintiffs require additional details regarding the contentions identified herein. 15 A-926 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1053-9 Filed 08/03/12 Page 49 of 52 INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Identify any and all affirmative defenses other than fair use and license which Google claims in this case and, for each such defense, identify all factual and legal bases supporting such defense. RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 7: Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it calls for attorney-client privileged information, attorney work product, or information protected by any other privilege or immunity. Google objects to this interrogatory to the extent it seeks more than “the claims and contentions” of Google, as permitted by Local Civil Rule 33.3(c). Subject to and without waiving these objections, Google responds as follows: Google does not claim any affirmative defenses other than fair use and license affirmative defenses with respect to Plaintiffs’ claims of direct copyright infringement as to Books scanned from the collections of libraries, but does not intend to waive any such defenses to the extent they overlap with Google’s fair use and license defenses. Google reserves the right to present different or additional affirmative defenses in the event Plaintiffs make other or further claims, or for the purpose of rebutting Plaintiffs’ contentions. Google reserves the right to present defenses which rebut or negate elements upon which Plaintiffs bear the burden, which defenses are not encompassed within this interrogatory because they are not affirmative defenses. Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, Google is willing to meet and confer in good faith in the event Plaintiffs require additional details regarding the contentions identified herein. 16 A-927 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 22 Michael J. Boni (pro hac vice) Joanne Zack BONI & ZACK LLC 15 St. Asaphs Road Bala Cynwyd, PA 19004 (610) 822-0200 (phone) (610) 822-0206 (fax) MBoni@bonizack.com JZack@bonizack.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- x The Authors Guild, Inc., Associational Plaintiff, Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, : : : : : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Google Inc., : : Defendant. : : ------------------------------------- x Case No. 05 CV 8136-DC FILED UNDER SEAL ECF CASE PLAINTIFFS’ STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED FACTS IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT (PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION) Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 56.1(a) of the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York, Representative Plaintiffs Betty Miles, Joseph C. Goulden, and Jim Bouton, and Associational Plaintiff The Authors Guild, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, submit the following statement of undisputed facts. A-928 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 2 of 22 UNDISPUTED FACTS 1. Representative plaintiff Jim Bouton holds the United States copyright in BALL FOUR (registration number A173097). See Copy of U.S. Copyright Registration No. A173097 for JIM BOUTON, BALL FOUR (Declaration of Joanne Zack in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (hereinafter "Zack SJ Decl.") Ex. 1). 2. Representative plaintiff Betty Miles holds the United States copyright in THE TROUBLE WITH THIRTEEN (registration number TX0000338841). See Copy of U.S. Copyright Registration No. TX0000338841 for BETTY MILES, THE TROUBLE WITH THIRTEEN (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 2). 3. Representative plaintiff Joseph Goulden holds the United States copyright in THE SUPERLAWYERS: THE SMALL AND POWERFUL WORLD OF THE GREAT WASHINGTON LAW FIRMS (registration number A346254). See Copy of U.S. Copyright Registration No. A346254 for JOSEPH GOULDEN, THE SUPERLAWYERS: THE SMALL AND POWERFUL WORLD OF THE GREAT WASHINGTON LAW FIRMS (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 3). 4. Each of the books identified in Nos. 1-3 above has been copied and displayed by Google in its Library Project without plaintiffs' permission. See Print-outs from Google's website displaying search results in JIM BOUTON, BALL FOUR (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 4); Print-outs from Google's website displaying search results for the term "pitch" in JIM BOUTON, BALL FOUR (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 5); Print-outs from Google's website displaying search results for the term "pitches" in JIM BOUTON, BALL FOUR (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 6); Print-outs from Google's website displaying search results in BETTY MILES, THE TROUBLE WITH THIRTEEN (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 7); Print-outs from Google's website displaying search results in JOSEPH GOULDEN, THE SUPERLAWYERS: THE SMALL AND POWERFUL WORLD OF THE GREAT WASHINGTON LAW FIRMS 2 A-929 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 3 of 22 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 8); Defendant Google Inc. 's Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs First Set of Requests for Admission (hereinafter "Google Admissions") at 11 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 27). 5. Google had distributed approximately 2.7 million scanned books to the partnering libraries, as of March 26,2012. See Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 9 (excerpts from spreadsheet produced by Google to plaintiffs on March 26, 2012). 6. Digital copies of BALL FOUR and SUPERLAWYERS have been distributed to the University of California library: BALL FOUR on July 20,2010, and SUPERLAWYERS twice, on July 29,2009, and November 16, 2010. See id. 7. The Authors Guild, Inc. is the nation's largest organization of published authors. Print-out from http://www.authorsguild.orglaboutlhistory.htrnl (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 10). 8. The Authors Guild advocates for and supports the copyright and contractual interests of published writers. !d. 9. Defendant Google Inc. ("Google") owns and operates the largest Internet search engine in the world. See Print-out from http://investor.google.com/corporate/faq.html ("Google is now widely recognized as the world's largest search engine.") (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 11, p.l). 10. Each day, millions of people use Google's search engine free of charge, while commercial and other entities pay to display ads to visitors to Google's web sites and other web sites that contain Google ads. See Google Dec. 14,2004 press release, "Google Checks Out Library Books," p.2 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 12). 11. For the year ended December 31, 2011, Google reported over $36.5 billion in "advertising revenues." 2011 Google Form] O-K, p.56 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 13). 12. For the year ended December 31,2010, Google reported over $29 billion in revenue generated "primarily by delivering relevant, cost-effective online advertising." 3 A-930 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 4 of 22 See 2010 Google Form 10-K, p.3 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 14). 13. In October 2004, Google first announced its digital books program, calling it Google Print. See GOOGOOO 10 1103 (noting that Google Print was launched on October 6, 2004) (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 15); see also Transcript of deposition of Daniel Clancy taken February 10, 2012 (hereinafter "Clancy Dep.") at 93-94 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 14. Google Print later became Google Books. Clancy Dep. at 94 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 15. Google's Partner Program together with Google's Library Project comprise the 16). Google Books program. Id. 16. Works in the Partner Program are displayed with permission of the rightsholder. Clancy Dep. at 215 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16); Google Books Partner Program Standard Terms and Conditions (hereinafter "Terms and Conditions") 17. ,r,r 2-3 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 17). Since 2004, the Partner Program has allowed publishers and other rightsholders to permit Google to display their works in exchange for a split of ad revenue. GOOGOOOI0I103 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 15); Clancy Dep. at 93 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 18. The Partner Program is aimed at "he1p[ing] publishers sell books" and "help[ing] books become discovered," while "adding authoritative content" to Google's website. Transcript of the deposition of Thomas Turvey taken February 17, 2012 (hereinafter "Turvey Dep.") at 1819 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 18). 19. To participate in the program, rightsholders enter into a contract with Google and send a printed copy of their books to Google for scanning (or provide Google with an existing digital copy). Clancy Dep. at 215 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16); Terms and Conditions ,-r,-r 2-3 (Zack SJ Dec!. Ex. 17). 4 A-931 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 20. Filed 08/03/12 Page 5 of 22 Partners decide "how much of the book is brows able" on Google, "anywhere from a few sample pages to the whole book." See Print-out from http://support.google.comlbookslbinlanswer.py?hl=en&answer=43729/ (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 19). 21. Google agrees to share with its partners a portion of the revenue it earns from ads shown next to pages of books searched in the Partner Program. Turvey Dep. at 31 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 18); Terms and Conditions ~ 8 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 17). 22. During 2004, Google entered into dozens of contracts with publishers covering tens of thousands of books. GOOGOOO101103 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 15). 23. By 2004 year end, Google had received nearly 200,000 books for the Partner Program, even though Google's extensive outreach efforts focused almost exclusively on publishers, with little or no attempt to sign up authors. Id.; Turvey Dep. at 76-80 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 18); Clancy Dep. at 93 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 24. As of early 2012, the Partner Program included approximately 2.5 million books, by permission of approximately 45,000 rightsholders, with the number of partners continuing to grow. Turvey Dep. at 32 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 18). 25. Google publicly announced a new program in December 2004, stating that it had entered into agreements with four university libraries (Harvard, Stanford, the University of Michigan, and Oxford) and the New York Public Library to "digitally scan books from their collections so that users worldwide can search them in Google." Dec. 14,2004 Google press release, "Google Checks Out Library Books" (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 12, p.1). 26. Google refers to the endeavor identified above in No. 25 as its Library Project. Clancy Dep. at 33-34 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16); June 6, 2007 Google press release, "Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) Joins Google's Library Project" (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 20). 5 A-932 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 27. Filed 08/03/12 Page 6 of 22 Since its December 2004 announcement, Google has entered into agreements with additional libraries (such as the Library of Congress, University of Texas at Austin, University of Virginia, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Columbia University, Cornell University, Princeton University, University of California, and the Committee on Institutional Cooperation (a consortium of twelve research universities». June 6,2007 Google press release, "Committee on Institutional Cooperation (CIC) Joins Google's Library Project" (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 20); Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 23 (compilation of agreements between Google and the various libraries, hereinafter "Library Agreements"). 28. Google has also developed and patented scanning technology that allows library books to be copied. Clancy Dep. at 14, 211 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 29. Google has used this technology to copy the entirety of over twenty million books. See id. at 30; Declaration of Daniel Clancy in Support of Google Inc.'s Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (hereinafter "Clancy Decl.") ~ 4 (Zack S1 Decl. Ex. 21). 30. In exchange for access to a library's print books, Google distributes digital copies of the scanned books to the contributing library. See Print-out from http://support.google.comlbookslhinlanswer.py?hl=en&answer=43751 ("Each library will receive a digital copy of every book we scan ... from their respective collections.") (Zack S1 Decl. Ex. 22); Clancy Dep. at 44-45 (Zack S1 Decl. Ex. 16). 31. To carry out its scanning en masse, Google set up scanning facilities in Mountain View, California, where Google is headquartered, as well as in Ann Arbor and near Boston. Clancy Dep. at 180-81 (Zack S1 Dec!. Ex. 16). 32. For some libraries, Google undertook "selective scanning," which entailed a library identifying a collection or set of books, and Google determining which books it had 6 A-933 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 7 of 22 already scanned or planned to scan from another library partner, to avoid duplicative scanning and to "increase efficiency." !d. at 185-86. 33. The "selection" process identified in No. 32 above was unrelated to the content of the book. Id. at 187. 34. Google engaged in "bulk scanning," with libraries providing "carts of books" for Google to scan. Id. at 15,103. 35. Google's scanning operations involved approximately three hundred scanning machines, and reached an annual budget of $30 to $40 million for the scanning alone. Id. at 8485, 179. 36. Some libraries (e.g., the New York Public Library, Harvard, Columbia, and Princeton) allowed Google to scan only public domain works, while others (e.g., the Universities of California, Michigan, Wisconsin, Cornell, University of Virginia, CIC, Stanford, and Texas) allowed Google to scan in-copyright works as well. See generally Library Agreements (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 23); Clancy Dep. at 19 ("Harvard, New York Public Library, Columbia, and I believe Princeton is only providing us public domain."). 37. A "large number" of independent contractors - "on the order of hundreds" - served as Google's scanning operators who performed the physical scanning, often working five to six days per week, two shifts per day. Clancy Dep. at 14, 181 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 38. In scanning up to four million books per year, Google's contractors did not make any judgments concerning a book's content. Id. at 182-83. 39. Google copies every book its library partners provide, regardless of content, unless (a) Google determines that it already has or will copy the book from another library; (b) the book is physically not fit to be copied; or (c) Google has received a specific request from a 7 A-934 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 8 of 22 copyright owner not to scan the book. See Transcript ofthe deposition of Kurt Groetsch (hereinafter "Groetsch Dep.") at 27-31 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 24); Transcript ofthe deposition of Stephane Jaskiewicz (hereinafter "Jaskiewicz Dep.") at 16-17 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 25); Clancy Dep. at 182-87 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 40. Each book copied by Google as part of its Library Project was copied by Google in its entirety multiple times. Jaskiewicz Dep. at 22-29 (Zack SJ Dec!. Ex. 25); Defendant Google Inc. 's Supplemental Narrative Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs' Second Request for Production of Documents and Things (hereinafter "Supplemental Narrative") at 5-6 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26); Google Admissions at 8 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 27). 41. Google maintains digital copies of each book it copied as part of its Library Project on its servers and on back-up tapes. Jaskiewicz Dep. at 22-29,69 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 25). 42. In response to search inquiries by users of its search engine, Google searches the complete text of books copied in its Library Project. Id. at 45-46; Supplemental Narrative at 8 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26); Google Admissions at 11 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 27). 43. Since 2005, pursuant to uniform rules of its own devising, Google has displayed verbatim expression from these books on the Internet in response to search requests by users of its search engine. See Google Admissions at 10 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 27); Supplemental Narrative at 11-12 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26). 44. Google generally divides each page into eighths, each of which Google calls a snippet. Supplemental Narrative at 11-12 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26); Print-out from http://www.google.com/googlebooks/library.html (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 28); see also Print-out from http://support.google.comlbookslbinlanswer.py?hl=en&answer=43729/ (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 19). 8 A-935 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 45. Filed 08/03/12 Page 9 of 22 By perfonning multiple searches using different search tenns (including multiple search tenns suggested by Google), a single user can view far more than three snippets from a Library Project book. See Print-outs from Google's website displaying search results in JIM BOUTON, BALL FOUR (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 4); Clancy Dep. at 43-45 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 46. Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 4 demonstrates that Google displayed to one user - making a series of consecutive searches within BALL FOUR - about 37 different snippets, consisting of over 1900 words of verbatim expression. 47. Even minor variations in search tenns will result in different displays of text. Compare snippet results for search tenn "pitch" in BALL FOUR (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 5) with snippet results for search tenn "pitches" in BALL FOUR (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 6); see also Clancy Dep. at 44 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16) (,,[FJor a given query, we might display up to three snippets, but then if you entered a different query, you might see different snippets."). 48. Google shows its users snippets from all portions of the books displayed in its Library Project, except for the small proportion of each book that it "blacklists." Supplemental Narrative at 11 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26); Clancy Decl. 49. ~ 10 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 21). For those books in snippet view, Google blacklists 10% of the pages of books and one snippet per page. See Supplemental Narrative at 11 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26); Clancy Decl. ~ 10 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 21). 50. For those books in snippet view, Google makes the vast majority of the text available for verbatim display to its users collectively. See Supplemental Narrative at 6-7 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26); see also Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 4. 9 A-936 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 51. Filed 08/03/12 Page 10 of 22 Some of the books copied in the Library Project are placed by Google into metadata only view, where no text is displayed. See Supplemental Narrative at 6-7 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26). 52. In general, reference works (i.e., encyclopedias, almanacs, dictionaries, thesauri, trivia books, books of quotations, bibliographies, indexes, poetry books, sheet music, pricing guides, travel guides, joke books, recipe books and catalogs), books published within the preceding two years which would have been placed in snippet view, and works for which the rightsholder has instructed Google not to display the work are placed in metadata only view. Id; "QA Training Manual," at GOOG05002440 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 29). 53. To date, in its Library Project, Google has digitally copied over four million in- copyright English language books (Clancy Decl' ~ 4) (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 21); see also Zack SJ Decl. Exs. 30-31 (spreadsheet and accompanying email from Google identifying a list of over eight million English language books copied and that Google has detennined not to be in the public domain); distributed complete digital copies of over 2.7 million of in-copyright books to libraries (see Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 9) (spreadsheet from Google identifying the scanned books which have been distributed to the partnering libraries, including certain books distributed more than once); and displayed verbatim expression as snippets from millions of in-copyright books over the Internet in response to search requests from its users. Google Admissions at 10 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 27). 54. Google did not seek or obtain pennission from copyright owners before it made the uses described in No. 53 above. Google Admissions at 12-14 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 27). 55. Google has not compensated copyright owners for its copying, distribution to libraries, or display of verbatim expression from these books. Id. at 13. 10 A-937 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 56. Filed 08/03/12 Page 11 of 22 Googlc has admitted in its rcsponsC3 to Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions that it digitally copies books in their entirety - including in-print and out-of-pri nt books. fi ction and nonfiction books, reference books, anthologies, a:l.ucational hooks, tex tbooks, dissertations, monographs, journals, government publications, and other types of works; provides entire d igital copies of books to librari es, and displays snippets from books in response to user requests, all without copyright owner pennission. ld. at 5-1 2; see also Supplemental Narrative at 5-9 (Zack SJ Decl. TIle. 26). 57. Pur.!iuant tu their wupcra li ve agreenn:;ut:s will I Google. ead l library provides books to Google, Google scans the books, makes a d igita l fi le of the books fo r Google's use, and discributes digital co p ie~ of scanned books to the providing library. Clancy Dep. at 44-45 (Zack $J Dec!. Ex. 16); Ubrary Agreements (Zack SJ Dec!. Ex. 23) . 58. One ofGoogic's earliest library agreements, its digitizlltio!1 agreement with Stanford University. summarizes their agreement as follo" " 1 See Uigitizatio n Agreement ·...·ith Leland Stanford Junior University, p.l (Znck SJ Decl. Ex. 23 at 000005002264). 59. Google's library agreements refer to dissemination of infonnation or making in fonnal"ion ])uhlic1 y availahle, nften stating that " Googlt: and tltt:: Uni"'t::~i t y ~hart:: a mutual interest in making info rmation available to the public." Seq, e.g., Cooperative Agreement with the University of Califomia, p. 1 (Zack SJ Ded Ex. 23 at GOO005000306). II A-938 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 60. Filed 08/03/12 Page 12 of 22 Google's agreements with each of the librflri es have many of the same or s imilar tenus. See Library Agreements (Zack SJ Oed. Ex. 23). 61. 62 . Google executed the digitization by scanning the covers and every page of in- copyright boob, pcrfonning optical character rooognition on tbe sCllnncd imagcs to obtain machine-readable text, and then, through an "automated process compil[ing] a digital copy of the book." Supplemental Narrative at 5-6 (Zack SJ Ded . Ex. 26); .Yee alsu Jaskiewicz Dep. 25 -30 (7J1d SJ neel Ex 63 . 7.~). To facilitate the mutual interest in making information available to the public (see No. 59 above), Google wi ll " digitize" mass quantities of hooks. wid, "digitlze" defined as " to convert content from a tangible, analog fonn into a digital representation ofth a! content." Cooperative Agreement with the University of Michigan, p. 1 (Zack SJ Ded . Ex. 23 at 00000500355). 64 . .0.. fier digiliZJl.T iOT1, The agreements req1li re T Google provid e The libraries with har digital copies of the books provided to Google from each library. See, e.g., _ 12 A-939 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 65. Filed 08/03/12 Page 13 of 22 Google itself explained that after the library requests a copy ofa particular hook: that Ooogle has scanned, Google provides its digital copy by placing the fi le of the book on a server that the requesting library can access to down load the file over the Internet. See Supplemental NEltTEitive at 8 (ZElek SJ Decl. Ex. 26); sec also lusldcwicz Dep. at 65 (ZElek 81 Decl. Ex.. 25); Clancy Dep. at 217- 19 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex.. 16). 66. Tht: c.1 isuibulioll uf lht: <.l igiLall..:upit:s to tltt: librarit::S ..... ~s WI important compollt:nt of the Library Project. See Clancy Dep. at 44 (Zack SJ Dec!. Ex. 16) ; Zack SJ Ded Ex . 23 . 67. Dan Clancy stated at hi s deposition, "it is part of the Library Proj ect ihat- as ] stoted - that we provide a copy. the ability to get 0 copy, for our library partners of the books we scan, in addition to any other uses." Clancy Dcp. at 45 (lack SJ Dec!. Ex. 16). 68. Google al so transfers ownCI1ihip of the distnbuted oopie5 to the libraries. as the agnxmt:nts darify that the libraries solely own the rights to use the digital copies provided by Ooogle. See, e.g., Cooperative Agreement with the United States Library of Congress, pA (Zack SJ Dec!. Ex. 23 at G()OIJ O!;OO<0237); 69. The Univcrsity of Virginiu's agreement stutes thot, regarding the library' s copy, "As between Google and Uni ....ersity ... University shall own all rights, title, and interest to the Uni versity Digi tal r opy." Cooperative Agret:men t with the University of V irgin ia. p.S (Zack SJ Dec!. Ex. 23 at 0 00005000385). 70. Each of the agreements in Exhibit 23 contains a similar transfer of ownership clause. See. c.g. , Cooperative Agreement with the University ofM iehigiln, p.5 (Zack SJ Decl . 13 A-940 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 14 of 22 Ex. 23 at GOOG05000359) ("As bctwecn Googlc and U ofM .. . V ofM shall own all rights, title, and inter~t to the U afM Digital Copy."); GoogJe's cooperative agreements with the libraries presume the libraries' further 7 1. usc afthc di gitized works. See, .. _ ; Cooperative Agreement with the University of Wisconsin-Madison, p.5 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 23 at GOOGOS000432) ("University shall have the right to use the University Digital Copy ... as part of services offered openly on University's website and internally for research, scholarly and academic purposes."). 72. For example, Google's agreement with the University of Michigan spe<:ifi cally allows for the use of Michigan 's copies for "ind usion in Michigan's search services." Cooperative Agreement with the University of Michigan, p.1 (Zack 5J Dec.!. Ex. 23 at GOOG0500355); see also Clancy Dep. at 35 (Zack SJ Oed. Ex. 16) ("In addition, libraries receive a copy, and with that copy, they may use it lor similar search and indexing or other nondispJay uses, various different research initiatives and, also, archiving it for posterity. ") 73 . 74. Michigan's Vean of Libraries, Dr. Paul Courant, testified that "Google did scan works from the University of Michigan libraries, and 14 Goo~!:le - and we did indeed receive copies A-941 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 15 of 22 ofthose scans"; _ C o u r a n t Dep. at 15,20-21,43-45 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 33). 75. Google undertook the Library Project for commercial reasons. GOOG05004756 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 34); GOOG000645741 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 35); Supplemental Narrative at 9 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 26); Clancy Dep. at 84-85, 117, 120, ] 4], 198-203 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16) 76. A Google internal presentation in 2003 states that "[w]e want web searchers interested in book content to come to Google not Amazon;" "[e]verything else is secondary ... but make money." GOOG05004756 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 34). 77. An October 15, 2004 Google PowerPoint presentation states that Google's purpose is to "[g]ain a competitive advantage." GOOG000645741 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 35). 78. Dan Clancy testified that, "to the extent other search engines were not similarly investing in such a project, then the belief [within Google] would be that this would enhance our experience for users and, therefore, improve the product we might offer, which would tend to give us an advantage." Clancy Dep. at 141 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16). 79. Google monetizes its search product by running advertisements in response to search queries. Id. at 117. 80. As such, when Microsoft initiated a project "similar to [Google's] Partner Program" it was the subject of internal discussions at Google. Id. at 142. 81. Clancy testified that during the six years he was chief engineer for Google Books, Google invested at least $180 million in its books scanning operations alone, and that this 15 A-942 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 16 of 22 amount does not include the salary and other expenses associated with the Google Book team of over twenty people. Id. at 84-85, 120. 82. To protect this commercial investment, Google even restricts the way its Library Partners can disseminate access to out-of-copyright (public domain) works that Google distributes to the library.ld. at 198-203. 83. As Clancy testified, "[w]e were investing a fair amount in digitizing these documents, and so this was an investment where we did not want third parties that might be building an equivalent service to be able to obtain the documents directly from us." Id. at 200. 84. Clancy testified that Google did not want its competitors to obtain a "complete corpus of all the public domain documents" that Google had scanned. Id. at 200-01. 8S. Google has stated: "Google admits that it has entered into agreements with certain libraries, pursuant to which those libraries have requested that Google scan books, including incopyright works, provided to Google by the library, and Google has provided digital copies of millions of those books to the libraries .... " Google Admissions at 7 (Zack S1 Decl. Ex. 27). 86. Google also makes a number of non-display uses of Books it copies in its Library Project. Supplemental Narrative at 9 (Zack S1 Decl. Ex. 26). 87. The non-display uses identified in No. 86 above have commercial benefits to Google.ld. 88. Google makes available over four million books on the Internet in snippet display. See Zack 81 Decl. Exs. 30-31. 89. An "index" of books' metadata already exists. Transcript of the deposition of Gloriana 8t. Clair taken May 31,2012 (hereinafter "St. Clair Dep.") at 46-48 (Zack 8J Decl. Ex. 36). 16 A-943 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 17 of 22 90. Libraries use what is known as MARC records to catalog books. Id. at 48. 91. "MARC records are essentially the electronic version of a card catalog record," and contain the book's metadata, such as author, title, publishing information. Id. at 46,48. 92. To create MARC records, the book does not need to be scanned or copied. Clancy Dep. at 25-26 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 16); Groetsch Dep. at 21-25 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 24). 93. The cataloging of metadata through MARC records is done by hand with the cataloger reviewing the physical book and identifying enumerated fields of information. See Groetsch Dep. at 21-25 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 24). 94. The Copyright Clearance Center presently licenses "essentially printed content, much of the same nature as the material scanned by Google." See Report of Daniel Gervais ~ 11 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 37). 95. IfGoogle's uses are found to be fair, this will legitimize widespread digital copying without permission, thereby impeding the development of collective licenses for digital uses of books and excerpts from books by search engines, libraries, and others. Id. 96. ~ 17, 42. Collective management of copyright provides important advantages in licensing uses of copyrighted works, as it reduces transaction costs, benefitting authors and users. Id. 97. ~~ 12, 15. For example, in the United States, ASCAP, BMI and SESAC are well-known organizations that license the use of music. See id. 99. 19. Collective management of copyright has existed for more than two centuries and is indispensable for many types of copyright uses. Id. 98. ~ ~ 18. The Copyright Clearance Center ("CCC") is another well-known collective management organization ("CMO"). Id. ~ 28. 17 A-944 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 100. Filed 08/03/12 Page 18 of 22 If they wish to participate, authors or publishers register their works with the CCC, which offers per-use and annual repertory licenses. !d. 101. A business or academic institution can enter into an agreement with the CCC that permits it to, for instance, photocopy a periodical article or create an electronic coursepack. Jd. 102. CMOs typically pay authors and other rightsholders based on actual usage of their works, id. ~ 15, which can result in substantial revenue to rightsholders. 103. In its 2011 fiscal year, CCC reported revenues in excess of $238 million, with payments to rightsholders exceeding $171 million. !d. ~ 28. The difference between the two numbers includes but is not all a service charge. Due to the time period required to process usage data, the 2011 distributions were mostly of 2010 collections which were significantly lower than 2011 collections. Jd. at 9 n.15. 104. Collective licensing markets have often developed in response to new technologies: "Often, after a new form of use has emerged, collective management systems are established to license uses that have been found to be desirable but unauthorized." Id. 105. 41. A collective management system "would develop here if some or all of Google's uses are found not to be fair." Id. 106. ~ ~ 17. If Google' s conduct is permitted as fair use and becomes widespread, such an outcome can be expected to thwart the development of collective management systems for the digital uses of books (and book excerpts) that would otherwise likely develop. Id. ~ 42; see also Id.~17. 107. Google admits in its Form 10-K that its "security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our data or our users' or customers' data. Additionally, 18 A-945 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Filed 08/03/12 Page 19 of 22 outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce employees, users, or customers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our data or our users' or customers' data. Any such breach or unauthorized access could result in significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence in the security of our products and services that could potentially have an adverse effect on our business. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and often are not recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures." Google 2011 Form lO-K, at 15 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 13). lOS. Google is not contractually obligated to, and does not in practice, monitor or control the security of the digital copies of books provided by it to libraries in its Library Project, and the security measures of libraries who receive digital copies of books from Google are subject to similar breaches. Clancy Dep. at 195-202 (Zack SJ Dec!. Ex. 16); • • • • • • • • Transcript of the deposition of James Crawford taken April 10, 2012 (hereinafter "Crawford Dep.") at 56 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 3S); see generally Expert Report of Benjamin Edelman (hereinafter, "Edelman Report") (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 39). 109. Subsequent copying by the libraries of the digital files received by them from Google, see Courant Dep. at 22-27 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 33), risks further security breaches. Edelman Report ~~ 20-26 (Zack SJ Decl. Ex. 39). 110. As the number of unlawful copies of an in copyright book increases, so does the risk of further infringement and/or piracy of the work. Id. 19 ~~ 14-19. A-946 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 111. Filed 08/03/12 Page 20 of 22 The copyright holder's control over the distribution and publication of his or her work becomes increasingly threatened when multiple unauthorized digital copies are created, and even more so when they are placed on and/or distributed over the Internet. Id. ~~ 34, 36. If Google' s bulk and indiscriminate copying is found to be "fair," other website 112. operators, no matter how small, will also be given sanction to create online databases of books and other works.). Id. 113. ~~ 9, 13, 18. These website operators may have insufficient security to prevent widespread piracy of such works. Id. 114. ~~ 18-19. In particular, less sophisticated operators have a reduced capability to design, install, and maintain systems to secure books, as well as a lesser ability to screen their internal staff to prevent data theft by rogue employees or to adapt their systems to prevent hacking by outsiders. !d. 115. ~ 18. These concerns will only be amplified if "numerous companies and organizations scan books," because "attackers can focus their efforts on whichever installs the weakest security. Similarly, attackers can take advantage of even a brief period when a single book provider is insecure .... " Id. 116. ~ 19. These are not merely hypothetical risks, but reveal a real danger to authors, as book piracy is already occurring. Id. ~~ 11-12; see also id. ~~ 13-17 (discussing multiple ways in which books may be redistributed through piracy). 117. also id. ~ A security breach could have a "devastating impact" on the Class. !d. ~ 38; see 36 (describing how information may remain widely available, even after measures are taken to correct the breach, as information cannot be "unpublished" once it becomes publicly available on the Internet). 20 A-947 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 118. Filed 08/03/12 Page 21 of 22 If Google's unauthorized reproduction, distribution and display is found not to be fair, licenses will be required for such uses, and copyright owners can require in such licenses that financial responsibility for the risks of unauthorized uses of the copies be fairly allocated between the parties to the license.ld. 1[1[9, 39. 21 A-948 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1054 Dated: JulYJ6, 2012 Filed 08/03/12 Page 22 of 22 JO~~ Michael J. Boni (pro hac vice) Joshua D. Snyder Joanne Noble BONI & ZACK LLC 15 St. Asaphs Rd. Bala Cynwyd, P A 19004 Tel: (610) 822-0200 Fax: (610) 822-0206 jzack@bonizack.com mboni@bonizack.com j snyder@bonizack.com jnoble@bonizack.com Robert J. LaRocca KOHN SWIFT & GRAF, P.C. One South Broad Street, Suite 2100 Philadelphia, P A 19107 Tel: (215) 238-1700 Fax: (215) 238-1968 rlarocca@kohnswift.com Sanford P. Dumain MILBERGLLP One Pennsylvania Plaza New York, NY 10119 Tel: (212) 594-5300 Fax: (212) 868-1229 sdumain@milberg.com Counsel for Plaintiffs 22 A-949 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------The Authors Guild, Inc., Associational Plaintiff, Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, x : : : : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Google Inc., : : Defendant. : : ------------------------------------- x Case No. 05 CV 8136-DC FILED UNDER SEAL PUBLIC VERSION PLAINTIFFS’ RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.’S LOCAL RULE 56.1 STATEMENT Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 56.1(a) of the Local Rules of the Southern District of New York, Representative Plaintiffs Betty Miles, Joseph C. Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and Associational Plaintiff The Authors Guild, Inc., submit the following response to Defendant Google Inc.’s Local Rule 56.1 statement (ECF No. 1033). 1. Research libraries house millions of books. Decl. Dan Clancy Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Clancy Decl.”) ¶ 3. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 2. Most books included in the Google Books Library Project are academic works. Clancy Decl. ¶ 3. RESPONSE: Controverted. The term “academic” is undefined and vague in the context of this statement, there is no factual basis for Clancy’s statement, which refers to works in unspecified research libraries in general rather than books included in the Google Books Library Project, and the statement otherwise lacks foundation and any factual basis. A-950 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 2 of 30 3. Most books included in the Google Books Library Project are non-fiction. Brian Lavoie and Lorcan Dempsey, Beyond 1923: Characteristics of Potentially In-copyright Print Books in Library Collections, 15 D-Lib 11/12 (2009), available at http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/november09/lavoie/11lavoie.html. RESPONSE: Controverted. The cited reference does not support the paragraph as the article “characterizes the aggregate collection of US-published print books in WorldCat,” an online collective library catalog, and does not purport to undertake any analysis of books actually included in the Google Books Library Project. 4. Most books included in the Google Books Library Project are out of print. Clancy Decl. ¶ 3; Decl. Stephane Jaskiewicz Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Jaskiewicz Decl.”) ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Controverted. There is no factual basis for Clancy’s statement, which refers to works in unspecified research libraries in general rather than books included in the Library Project, and Jaskiewicz’s statement refers to “Google Books” in general, which encompasses both a “Partner Program” (under which Google displays portions of books with rightsholder permission), see Plaintiffs’ Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 1054 (“Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt.”) ¶¶ 15-24, and a “Library Project” (where Google copies, distributes, and displays books without permission), id. ¶¶25-85. 5. All of works in the Google Books corpus were published. Decl. Joseph C. Gratz Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Gratz Decl.”) Ex. 3, Plas.’ Resp. Obj. Def. Google Inc.’s 1st Set Interrogs. No. 1 at B(1). RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “All of the works in the Library Project corpus were published in print form.” Additionally, the statement is irrelevant as stated. The only relevant corpus is the Library Project, as Google Books includes both a Partner Program and a Library Project (as differentiated in response to Paragraph 4, above). 2 A-951 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 3 of 30 6. The Google Books corpus contains novels, biographies, children’s books, reference works, textbooks, instruction manuals, treatises, dictionaries, cookbooks, books of poetry, and memoirs, among other works. Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant as stated. The only relevant corpus is the Library Project, as Google Books includes both a Partner Program and a Library Project (as differentiated in response to Paragraph 4, above). 7. Beginning in the late nineteenth century, libraries indexed books using index cards, which recorded some bibliographical information and classified the book under a handful of subject headings chosen by librarians. Decl. Gloriana St. Clair Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“St. Clair Decl.”) Ex. A ¶ 40. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “From the late 19th century through the first half of the 20th century, libraries used small index cards stored in file drawers. These cards recorded some information about a book-its title, author, publication date and publisher, and three or four general subject headings.” See St. Clair Decl. Ex. A. ¶ 40. 8. In the second half of the twentieth century, the gradual digitization of card catalogues allowed library users to perform electronic searches for the names of authors and to search within a book’s title as well as a few subject fields per book. St. Clair Decl. Ex. A ¶ 41. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. By way of further response, libraries use MARC records as electronic versions of card catalogs, which generally contain “Author, title, publishing information, typically two or three subject headings and some kinds of notes about additions and so forth.” Declaration of Joanne Zack in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 1053 (“Zack Decl.”) Ex. 36, St. Clair Dep. at 48:4-9. 9. Electronic card catalogue searches do not allow a user to search for information not tied to the author, title, or one of the specific subject fields. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 96:16-97:2. RESPONSE: Controverted. The deposition testimony cited does not refer to “author,” “title,” or “subject” fields, and the deponent refers to only the possibility that full text searching 3 A-952 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 4 of 30 will lead to results (referring to “subject matter that might not be apparent”) that differ from those using the card catalog. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. at 96 (emphasis added). 10. Google Books allows a user to search the full text of the Google Books corpus using a query of the user’s own design. Clancy Decl. ¶ 7. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 11. A search for “Archimedes” using Google Books locates many thousands of books in less than one second. Clancy Decl. ¶ 7. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “A search for ‘Archimedes’ using Google Books locates many thousands of books in less than one second, according to information provided by Google in connection with its display of search results.” However, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 12. A search for Archimedes using Google Books returns the most relevant books in the Google Books corpus that contain any reference to Archimedes. Clancy Decl. ¶ 7. RESPONSE: Controverted. The phrase “most relevant books” is undefined, subjective, and vague in the context of this statement, and searches using Google Books return results that may not be pertinent to the user. For example, a user who searches for books about the mathematician “Archimedes” will locate the book, ARCHIMEDES AND THE SEAGLE: A NOVEL, by David Ireland. 4 A-953 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Aa:;himedn ~lId Filed 08/26/13 Page 5 of 30 UI!J Wi:lulo: i:l nvwl bool<3.9:><>g1e.cc rnIbook, ?i~ t n - O 1 4()J00902 ...."...., - n •• id 1 ,.1>00 _ 1911~ _.';n [If>01 V",'N _ Mir" "tiln n. 1o~ , Df. " h .. oFiri""," on life, Fe,pIe , 5 ~ ' !r-'1b , ono h . "'1 d the l>.-chi-ne:l.5, • -- Additionally, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 13. The ability to search electronically the full text of books can be achieved only by digitizing the full texts of those books. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 96:16-97:2; Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 104:7-105:2. RESPONSE: Controverted in part as stated and as overbroad. The term “digitizing” is undefined and vague. To the extent the term implies that the ability to search electronically the full text of books can only be achieved by all of the conduct Google has undertaken with respect to the books in the Library Project, including the copying, retention, display, and distribution of .jpeg or other image files of the pages of books, the statement is denied. For example, the ability to search electronically does not require the retention or display of full or partial images of pages of a book as opposed to optical character recognition (OCR) text files. See generally Declaration of Michael J. Boni in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Boni Decl.”) Ex. 7, - . 14. In 2004 Google began scanning books in the collections of several significant research libraries, including the University of Michigan and the University of California. Clancy Decl. ¶ 5. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 5 A-954 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 6 of 30 15. A book is scanned at one of a small number of scan centers. Clancy Decl. ¶ 6. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 16. Physical access to the scan centers is limited to Google employees and contractors. Clancy Decl. ¶ 6. RESPONSE: Controverted in part as incomplete. It is uncontroverted that Google’s policy is to limit access to its scan centers to its employees and independent contractors. However, the statement is incomplete inasmuch as it obscures the fact that the overwhelming majority of the individuals—“[o]n the order of hundreds”—who have access to the scan centers are independent contractors, not Google employees. Zack Decl. Ex. 16, Clancy Dep. at 14. 17. Decl. ¶ 3. Images of the book pages are stored in a secure manner for processing. Jaskiewicz RESPONSE: Controverted in part. The phrase “secure manner” is vague and ambiguous as neither the statement nor the declaration cited in support of the statement describes the steps to secure the stored images of book pages. It is uncontroverted that Google intends to store these images in a secure manner. However, Google is not immune from design flaws and security breaches. See Zack Decl. Ex. 39, Edelman Report ¶¶ 27-35. Additionally, Google recognizes the risk of a security breach. See Zack Decl. Ex. 13, Google 2011 Form 10-K, at 15; see also • . 18. Optical character recognition (OCR) is performed on the images to generate machine-readable text, which is also stored on Google servers. Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 3. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 6 A-955 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 7 of 30 19. The Google servers on which books are stored are not publicly accessible. Decl. Brad Hasegawa Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Hasegawa Decl.”) ¶ 3. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. The phrases “Google servers on which books are stored” and “publicly accessible” as used in this statement are undefined, vague, and potentially misleading. It is undisputed that, subject to rules of its own devising, Google has displayed verbatim expression from books on the Internet in response to search requests by users of its search engine. See Zack Decl. Ex. 27, Google Resp. to Pls.’ RFAs at 10; Zack Decl. Ex. 26, Supplemental Narrative at 11-12. - . See Boni Decl. . 20. The Google servers on which books are stored are protected by the same security Google employs to protect its own confidential information. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 3. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, Google is not immune from design flaws and security breaches. See Zack Decl. Ex. 39, Edelman Report ¶¶ 27-35; Zack Decl. Ex. 13, Google 2011 Form 10-K, at 15. 21. Google is aware of no security breaches resulting in unauthorized access to books. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 7. RESPONSE: Controverted. 7 A-956 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 8 of 30 22. Google analyzes each scan and creates an overall index of all the books that have been scanned. Clancy Decl. ¶ 6. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. The statement lacks foundation and the terms and phrases “analyzes each scan” and “overall index” are vague in the context of this statement and oversimplify the actual processes involved. See Zack Decl. Ex. 26, Supplemental Narrative at 58. 23. The Google Books index links each word or phrase appearing in each book with all of the locations in all of the books in which that word or phrase is found. Clancy Decl. ¶ 6. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 24. The Google Books index allows a search for a particular word or phrase to return a result that includes the most relevant books in which that word or phrase is found. Clancy Decl. ¶ 6. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 25. When a user performs a search, Google Books uses the index to generate search results for a user’s query. Clancy Decl. ¶ 8. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 26. The search results return a list of books in which that user’s search term appears. Clancy Decl. ¶ 8. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 8 A-957 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 9 of 30 27. A user can click on a particular result to be directed to an “About the Book” page. Clancy Decl. ¶ 9. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated and potentially misleading. It is uncontroverted that users can click a particular search result and see another webpage. However, the title “About the Book” does not appear on that page, see Clancy Decl. Ex. C, but rather is how Google refers to that page. Moreover, the statement is misleading to the extent it implies that this page is uniform for different books scanned as part of the Library Project. See Zack Decl. Ex. 16, Clancy Dep. at 126:7-17. 28. The “About the Book” page allows the user to obtain more information about the book in question. Clancy Decl. ¶ 9. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated, potentially misleading, and incomplete. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 27. Additionally, the statement is incomplete and misleading to the extent that the statement the “page allows the user to obtain more information” implies that such information would be unavailable in the absence of the Library Project. For many books, this page would only provide metadata on the book, see Zack Decl. Ex. 16, Clancy Dep. at 126-127, which is available from other existing electronic card catalogs, see, e.g., Paragraph 8, above; see also Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 89. 29. The About the Book page includes links to sellers of the book. Clancy Decl. ¶ 9. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated and as incomplete. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 27. Additionally, the page may include links to sellers of the book with respect to books that are in print or link to sellers of used books for out-of-print books where the author gets no royalties for such sales. For example, by clicking the link to Amazon.com on the Google Books page for Joseph Goulden’s The Super-Lawyers, a user is taken to a page on the Amazon website listing used copies of that book for sale, along with links to numerous other unrelated 9 A-958 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 10 of 30 books for sale. See Boni Decl. Ex. 8. By way of further response, ; see also Declaration of Paul Aiken in Support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Aiken Decl.”) ¶¶ 4-5, 32-33, and generally. 30. The About the Book page includes links to libraries listing the book as part of their collections. Clancy Decl. ¶ 9. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated and as incomplete. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 27. Additionally, rather than “links to libraries,” the page includes a link titled “Find in a Library,” see Clancy Decl. Ex. C, which when clicked runs a search for libraries the book may be found on a separate website using the WorldCat online catalog, at http://www.worldcat.org. 31. No advertisements have ever appeared on any About the Book page for any book that is part of the Library Project. Clancy Decl. ¶ 9. RESPONSE: Controverted. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 27. Additionally, the term “advertisements” as used in this statement is vague and ambiguous. The page attached as Exhibit C to the Clancy Declaration includes links for the sale of books at various online booksellers, as well as Google’s own advertisement to “Shop for Books on Google Play,” which it states is “the world’s largest eBookstore.” See, e.g., Clancy Decl. Ex. C. Moreover, there are links on the page to Google’s search engine and other services, see id., and the statement is misleading and incomplete inasmuch as it omits the fact that the primary aim of the Library Project is for Google to gain a competitive advantage and drive traffic to its search engine where it does generate advertising revenue. See Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶¶ 75-79. 10 A-959 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 11 of 30 32. In some uses of Google Books, users can also see a small amount of text from the book (a “snippet”). Clancy Decl. ¶ 10. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “For all of the millions of books in ‘snippet display,’ users can also see text from the book (a ‘snippet’).” However, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 33. Google employs security measures to ensure that users cannot recover the entire text of a snippet view book. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. Uncontroverted if restated as follows: “Google employs security measures that attempt to prevent users from recovering the entire text of a snippet view book.” Google’s security measures cannot “ensure” anything as there is always the risk that its “security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our data or our users’ or customers’ data.” Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 107; see also Zack Decl. Ex. 39, Edelman Report ¶¶ 27-35. 34. Google employs security measures to ensure that users cannot recover one complete page of a snippet view book. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. Uncontroverted if restated as follows: “Google employs security measures that attempt to prevent users from recovering one complete page of a snippet view book.” Google’s security measures cannot “ensure” anything as there is always the risk that its “security measures may be breached due to the actions of outside parties, employee error, malfeasance, or otherwise, and, as a result, an unauthorized party may obtain access to our data or our users’ or customers’ data.” Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 107; see also Zack Decl. Ex. 39, Edelman Report ¶¶ 27-35. 11 A-960 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 12 of 30 35. A user cannot cause the system to return different sets of snippets for the same search query. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, even minor variations in search terms will result in different displays of text. See Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 47. 36. Decl. ¶ 4. Google Books does not allow the searcher to copy the text of snippets. Hasegawa RESPONSE: Controverted. Users can take a screen shot of the text of snippet images. See Boni Decl. Exs. 1, 2, and 3; see also Zack Decl. Ex. 16, Clancy Dep. at 149:15-24; Boni. Decl. Ex. 7, Hasegawa Dep. at 61, 79-80. 37. The position of each snippet is fixed within the page, and does not represent a “sliding window” around the search term. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 38. Only the first responsive snippet available on any given page will be returned in response to a query. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 39. One of the snippets on each page is blacklisted (meaning that it will not be shown). Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 4. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. ¶ 4. 40. At least one out of ten entire pages in each book is blacklisted. Hasegawa Decl. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 12 A-961 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 13 of 30 41. Even if an “attacker” had a physical copy of the book in question in front of him, and used that physical copy to identify words appearing in successive passages to use as the basis for the attack, the most complete patchwork of snippets he could end up with would still be missing at least one snippet from every page and 10% of all pages. Hasegawa Decl. ¶ 5. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, as alternatively stated, by removing just 10% of the pages and only 1 out of 8 snippets on the remaining pages, approximately 78% of the work is available to such an “attacker.” 42. Not all books are placed in “snippet view.” Clancy Decl. ¶ 11. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 43. Works whose text is organized in short “chunks” such as dictionaries, cookbooks, and books of haiku are excluded from snippet view. Clancy Decl. ¶ 11. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 44. The determination whether to place a work in snippet view is made by human operators who examine each book to ascertain whether it is organized in short chunks. Clancy Decl. ¶ 11. RESPONSE: Controverted. 45. Decl.¶ 11. No book is designated for “snippet view” without a manual review. Clancy RESPONSE: Controverted. 13 A-962 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 14 of 30 46. Google has a policy of excluding works a rightsholder has asked Google not to display. Clancy Decl. ¶ 11. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement is misleading and confusing inasmuch as it does not state from what it is that Google has “a policy of excluding” works under such circumstances. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “Google has a policy of excluding from snippet display works a rightsholder has asked Google not to display.” 47. Any rightsholder can ask to exclude a book by filling out an online form which has been available since 2005. Clancy Decl. ¶ 11. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. The statement is misleading and confusing inasmuch as it does not state from what it is a rightsholder can ask to exclude a book under such circumstances. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “Any rightsholder can ask to exclude a book from snippet display by filling out an online form which has been available since 2005.” Moreover, the statement omits the fact that in order to seek such exclusion, the rightsholder would first need to be made aware of the fact that Google has made the work available in snippet display and Google does not first seek permission from the rightsholder to do so nor does it notify the rightsholder that it has done so. See Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 54. 48. For excluded works, users may view bibliographic information about the book but not text from the book itself. Clancy Decl. ¶ 12. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “For works excluded from snippet display, users may view bibliographic information about the book but not text from the book itself.” 14 A-963 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 15 of 30 49. Rightsholders may request that Google display text through the Partner Program. Clancy Decl. ¶ 13. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant in that it refers to the Partner Program, which is not at issue in this litigation, rather than the Library Project, which is at issue. See Response to Paragraph 4, above. 50. The rightsholder can choose what percentage of the text of the book to display as part of the Partner Program. Clancy Decl. ¶ 13. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant in that it refers to the Partner Program, which is not at issue in this litigation, rather than the Library Project, which is at issue. See Response to Paragraph 4, above. 51. Most rightsholders in the Partner Program choose to display at least 20% of the text of their books. Clancy Decl. ¶ 13. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. The term “most” as used in the statement is vague and the statement otherwise lacks a factual basis as the supporting declaration only states that “usually” the rights holder chooses to display “at least 20%.” Additionally, the statement is irrelevant in that it refers to the Partner Program, which is not at issue in this litigation, rather than the Library Project, which is at issue. See Response to Paragraph 4, above. 52. Over 45,000 publishers have included works within the Partner Program, including HarperCollins, Penguin, Simon & Schuster, and Macmillan. Clancy Decl. ¶ 14. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is irrelevant in that it refers to the Partner Program, which is not at issue in this litigation, rather than the Library Project, which is at issue. See Response to Paragraph 4, above. 15 A-964 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 16 of 30 53. Google Books advances scholarly research. Gratz Decl. Ex. 5, Samuelson letter to Judge Chin at 1; St. Clair Decl. Ex. A ¶ 43. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it and the cited materials refer to Google Books generally, including books for which permission of the rightsholder has been obtained in the Partner Program, and are not specific to the Library Project, which is the only program at issue here. For example, the St. Clair declaration speaks primarily of the advantage of a student who “sits comfortably in his office reading the relevant texts on his or her computer,” St. Clair Decl. Ex. A ¶ 43, which would only be applicable to books either made available through the Partner Program or available in the public domain. 54. A search on Google Books for “Steve Hovley” returns dozens of books that discuss that major leaguer, including Ball Four and a book about the 1969 Seattle Pilots (for whom Hovley played). Decl. Kurt Groetsch Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Groetsch Decl.”) ¶ 12. RESPONSE: Controverted in part as misleading and incomplete. The statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally, including books for which permission of the rightsholder has been obtained in the Partner Program, which is not at issue in this litigation, and is not specific to the Library Project, which is at issue. See Response to Paragraph 4, above. The statement is also misleading inasmuch as it purports to imply that Google Books is the only way to search for “Steve Hovley” to find books that discuss the major leaguer. For example, a search for “Steve Hovley” on Amazon.com, where works are searched by permission of the rightsholder, returns dozens of books on the subject, including Ball Four: See Boni Decl. Ex. 9, Printout from Amazon.com; see also Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. at 105:3-24 (discussing other searchable databases); see generally Aiken Decl. 16 A-965 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 17 of 30 55. A search in of the catalogue of the Library of Congress produces no results for Steve Hovley. Groetsch Decl. ¶ 11. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. However, the statement is potentially misleading and incomplete for the reasons set forth in response to paragraph 54. 56. A researcher searching the catalog of the Library of Congress for information about attorney Minoru Yasui will find only one book containing information about Mr. Yasui. Groetsch Decl. ¶ 13. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 57. A search of Google Books for attorney Minoru Yasui will identify dozens of books available in bookstores and libraries with information about Mr. Yasui, from a reproduction of the Supreme Court filings in Yasui v. United States to an oral history of Japanese settlers in Oregon containing a whole chapter in which Mr. Yasui recounts his story. Groetsch Decl. ¶ 14. RESPONSE: Controverted in part as misleading and incomplete. The statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally, including books for which permission of the rightsholder has been obtained in the Partner Program, which is not at issue in this litigation, and is not specific to the Library Project, which is at issue. See Response to Paragraph 4, above. The statement is also misleading inasmuch as it purports to imply that Google Books is the only way to search for “Minoru Yasui” to find books that discuss Mr. Yasui. For example, a search for “Minoru Yasui” on Amazon.com, where works are searched by permission of the rightsholder, returns dozens of books on the subject: See Boni Decl. Ex. 10, Printout from Amazon.com; see also Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. at 105:3-24 (discussing other searchable databases); see generally Aiken Decl. 17 A-966 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 18 of 30 58. Text from the books in the Google Books corpus was used as an input to the “ngrams” research project. Clancy Decl. ¶ 15. RESPONSE: The statement in paragraph 58 is neither controverted nor relevant to the issues in this lawsuit. Additionally, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 59. The n-grams project provides a tool for users to determine how frequently different terms or phrases appear in books published at different times. Clancy Decl. ¶ 15. RESPONSE: The statement in paragraph 59 is neither controverted nor relevant to the issues in this lawsuit. Additionally, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally and not the Library Project (see response to Paragraph 4, above). 60. The n-grams project has resulted in the publication of a paper in the journal Science. Jean-Baptiste Michel et al., Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books, 331 SCIENCE 176 (2011), available at http://www.sciencemag.org/content/ early/2010/12/15/science.1199644. RESPONSE: The statement in paragraph 58 is neither controverted nor relevant to the issues in this lawsuit. 61. Google entered into agreements with participating libraries pursuant to which the libraries’ books would be scanned, after which the physical copies of the books would be returned to the libraries. Clancy Decl. ¶ 5. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 62. The libraries promise contractually to abide by the copyright laws with respect to their copies. Clancy Decl. ¶ 5. RESPONSE: Controverted. Google’s agreements with libraries, collectively attached at Zack Decl. Ex. 23, are the best evidence of the contractual terms referred to in this statement. 18 A-967 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 19 of 30 The obligations with respect to copyright law are not uniform among those agreements, and the statement does not accurately and completely capture the provisions relating to copyright law set forth in those agreements. For example, . (Notwithstanding that provision, there have been instances where the University of Michigan inadvertently displayed in copyright books from the digital files it received from Google as part of the Library Project that was not authorized by the rightsholder. Zack Decl. Ex. 33, Courant Dep. at 37-39.) . - 63. Pursuant to its agreement with Google, a library that has submitted a book to be scanned may make and download a copy of the scan of its book using a system called the Google Return Interface (GRIN). Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 6. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated and as incomplete. The statement is incomplete and potentially misleading inasmuch as it purports to imply that Google does not actually make and provide the digital copies of the books to the libraries. Google has admitted that it “provided digital copies of millions of those books to the libraries.” Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶ 85; see also Zack Decl. Ex. 27, Google Resp. to Pls.’ 1st Set of RFAs Nos. 6 and 8; Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶¶ 30, 57, 6470. 19 A-968 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 20 of 30 64. No library may use GRIN to make a digital copy created from another library’s book. Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 8. RESPONSE: Controverted in part as incomplete. The statement is also potentially misleading inasmuch as it purports to imply that no library may obtain a digital copy of another library’s book scanned by Google. Libraries that received copies of books digitized by Google have deposited copies of those digital books in the HathiTrust database, which is a collective depository of numerous research libraries. See, e.g., Zack Decl. Ex. 33, Courant Dep. at 20-25. 65. To make a copy, a library first submits a request to the GRIN system. Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 8. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 63. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “To obtain its copy, a library first submits a request to the GRIN system.” 66. The library’s request to the GRIN system triggers the creation of an encrypted copy of the book that is placed on a secure Google server. Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 8. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 63. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “The library’s request to the GRIN system triggers the creation by Google of an encrypted copy of the book that is placed on a secure Google server.” 67. Decl. ¶ 8. Each book is encrypted, and each library has a unique encryption key. Jaskiewicz RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 68. Decl. ¶ 8. The library may download the encrypted copy of the book it made. Jaskiewicz RESPONSE: Controverted. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 63. Uncontroverted if restated as follows: “The library may download the encrypted copy of the book made by Google.” 20 A-969 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 21 of 30 69. Some but not all of the books in the class have been copied by the libraries using GRIN. Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 9. RESPONSE: Controverted. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 63. Additionally, the phrase “books in the class” is vague. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “Some but not all of the books meeting the definition of ‘Books’ in the class definition have been distributed by Google to libraries using GRIN.” 70. Where a library takes no action with respect to a particular book, the GRIN system does not do anything with respect to that book. Jaskiewicz Decl. ¶ 9. RESPONSE: Controverted as vague and potentially misleading. See Pls.’ Response to Paragraph 63. Uncontroverted if re-stated as follows: “Because the library’s request to the GRIN system triggers the creation by Google of an encrypted copy of the book that is placed on a secure Google server, Google will not create such a copy for the library where the library has taken no action to request that particular book.” 71. No library has loaned out any digital copy it made using GRIN. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 46:3-20. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement lacks foundation and is not supported by the cited material as the deponent speaks only for the University of Michigan and does not purport to testify as to what any other library has done. 72. Libraries have used the downloaded copies to make their own full-text indices of the works in their collections. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 105:2-12. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 73. Libraries have used the downloaded copies to make the digital copies available to the blind. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 43:2-15. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 21 A-970 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 22 of 30 74. Libraries have used the downloaded copies to archive digital copies for the purpose of preservation. HathiTrust Mot. Summ. J. at 3; see also Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 85:12-86:11. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 75. The participating libraries have taken security precautions to protect their copies of works included in the Google Books corpus. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 106:23107:8. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement lacks foundation and is not supported by the cited material as the deponent speaks only for the University of Michigan and does not purport to testify as to what any other library has done. The statement is further controverted to the extent that it implies that a university’s security “protections” eliminate the risk that its security measures may be breached. See Pls.’ 56.1 Stmt. ¶¶ 107-109; see also Zack Decl. Ex. 39, Edelman Report ¶¶ 27-35. 76. There is no evidence that any security breach has occurred with respect to any of the library copies of works included in the Google Books corpus. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 107:5-8. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement lacks foundation and is not supported by the cited material as the deponent speaks only for the University of Michigan and does not purport to testify as to what any other library has done. 77. No library has reduced its purchasing of books as a result of downloading of scans using GRIN. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 108:15-19. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement lacks foundation and is not supported by the cited material as the deponent speaks only for the University of Michigan and does not purport to testify as to what any other library has done. 22 A-971 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 23 of 30 78. Libraries historically have not paid authors or publishers for the right to scan books in order to index them. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 112:6-9; St. Clair Decl. Ex. A ¶¶ 5(c), 9. RESPONSE: Controverted as misleading and incomplete. The statement as to whether libraries historically paid authors or publishers for the right to scan books in order to index them is meaningless in the absence of evidence that libraries did, in fact, scan books in order to index them, which not supported by the cited materials and contrary to Google’s own statements concerning the relatively new development of such practice. See, e.g., Google 56.1 Stmt. ¶¶ 7-9, above. With the development of new forms of use found to be desirable, collective management systems are often developed to license such uses. See Zack Decl. Ex. 37, Gervais Report ¶ 41. 79. Libraries historically have not paid authors or publishers for the right to scan books in order to search them. Gratz Decl. Ex. 1, Courant Dep. Tr. 112:6-9; St. Clair Decl. Ex. A ¶¶ 5(c), 9. RESPONSE: Controverted as misleading and incomplete. The statement as to whether libraries historically paid authors or publishers for the right to scan books in order to search them is meaningless in the absence of evidence that libraries did, in fact, scan books in order to search them, which is not supported by the cited materials and contrary to Google’s own statements concerning the relatively new development of such practice. See, e.g., Google 56.1 Stmt. ¶¶ 7-9, above. With the development of new forms of use found to be desirable, collective management systems are often developed to license such uses. See Zack Decl. Ex. 37, Gervais Report ¶ 41. 80. One traditional way to promote book sales is to provide readers with the ability to browse books. Decl. Bruce S. Harris Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Harris Decl.”) Ex. A ¶¶ 10-14. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 23 A-972 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 24 of 30 81. Books in bookstores are typically displayed on shelves or tables where they can be browsed. Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 146:10-147:19; Harris Decl. Ex. A ¶ 15. RESPONSE: Uncontroverted. 82. Browsing can occur through websites such as Amazon.com, where publishers and authors can agree to allow users to “Search Inside the Book.” Harris Decl. Ex. A ¶ 17; Decl. Albert N. Greco Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Greco Decl.”) Ex. A ¶ 15; Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 147:20-23. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. The term “[b]rowsing” is vague as used in the context of this statement and is misleading to the extent that it implies that the vast majority of a book is subject to “browsing” on Amazon’s site without the rightsholder’s permission. 83. Some but not all of the books at issue in this case can be browsed on Amazon’s site using “Search Inside the Book.” Decl. Judith A. Chevalier Supp. Def. Google Inc.’s Mot. Summ. J. (“Chevalier Decl.”) Ex. A ¶¶ 40-42; Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 183:20-184:20. RESPONSE: Controverted as unsupported by the cited materials. None of the material cited, which discuss Amazon’s “Search Inside the Book” feature generally, address whether any of the “books at issue in this case” are available using that feature. To the contrary, materials cited that reflect that are available on the Amazon’s “Search Inside the Book” feature are books that are subject to the control of the publisher whereas the majority of the “books at issue in this case” are likely to be out of print. In addition, the statement is misleading to the extent that it implies that the vast majority of a book is subject to “browsing” on Amazon’s site without the rightsholder’s permission. See generally Aiken Decl. 84. Search Inside the Book displays excerpts that are larger than the Google Books snippets. Chevalier Decl. Ex. A ¶ 47; Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 183:20-184:20. RESPONSE: Controverted. The cited materials do not support the statement. The Chevalier Declaration only generally speaks of “excerpts often voluntarily provided by publishers,” not the Amazon.com Search Inside the Book feature, and the deposition testimony 24 A-973 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 25 of 30 cited makes no mention of the size of the display of excerpts on the Search Inside the Book feature. Moreover, the statement and any comparison between the Search Inside the Book feature, which only displays excerpts with the permission of the rightsholders, see Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Dep. 183:20-184:20, and the Library Project’s snippet display of a book, which occurs without such permission, is irrelevant. See generally Aiken Decl. 85. Rightsholders give permission for online browsing using “Search Inside the Book” without compensation to authors. Chevalier Decl. Ex. A ¶ 41; Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 183:20-184:20. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated as “without compensation” is undefined and vague in this context. In addition, the statement is controverted as misleading, as rightsholders may receive compensation for certain books that are sold from Amazon.com, unlike the out-of-print books in the Library Project, which provide no compensation to the author. 86. The Authors Guild believes that online browsing has a net positive effect on book sales. Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 186:14-17. RESPONSE: Controverted in part. The statement cited is limited to the Amazon.com Search Inside the Book feature. Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. at 186:14-17. Further, the users of Amazon.com can only view those portions of a book that are permitted to be viewed by the permission of the rightsholder. Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Dep. 183:20-184:20; see also Aiken Decl. 87. The Authors Guild has recommended to its members that they make the entire first chapter of a book freely available on the Internet. Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 176:1-8, 13-24. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement mischaracterizes the testimony cited, which is limited to recommendations made “in conjunction with the Back in Print Program.” Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. at 176:18-19. 25 A-974 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 26 of 30 88. The “Back in Print” program allows authors to digitize their out-of-print books and make them available for sale through a company called iUniverse. Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. Tr. 172:25-175:25. RESPONSE: Controverted in part as incomplete. The Back in Print program, which operates with the permission of the rightsholder, allows authors to provide copies of their out-ofprint books to iUniverse, which creates digitized image (not text) files of those books. Gratz Decl. Ex. 2, Aiken Dep. at 172-176. Those image files are then used to create print-on-demand copies of those books. Id.; see also Aiken Decl. ¶ 29. 89. William Morris is the largest literary agency in the world. Gratz Decl. Ex. 6, Zohn Dep. Tr. 12:24-13:9. RESPONSE: Controverted. The statement lacks any foundation or factual basis as the witness qualified his characterization of William Morris’s size with terms, such as “probably” and “I believe.” Gratz Decl. Ex. 6, Zohn Dep. at 12:24-13:9. 90. William Morris believes that inclusion in Google Books “is a fair use and not detrimental to the copyright owner in any way.” Gratz Decl. Ex. 7, Zohn Dep. Ex. 2 at 1. RESPONSE: Controverted as stated. The statement is vague and ambiguous with respect to the phrase “inclusion in Google Books.” The document quoted refers to “simple inclusion in the database.” Gratz Decl. Ex. 7, Zohn Dep. Ex. 2 at 1. Additionally, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally, including books for which permission of the rightsholder has been obtained in the Partner Program, and is not specific to the Library Project, which is at issue. Moreover, the statement is an improper legal conclusion lacking any factual basis. 26 A-975 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 91. Ex. A ¶ 47. Filed 08/26/13 Page 27 of 30 Google Books has not displaced the sale of even a single book. Chevalier Decl. RESPONSE: Controverted. The source cited does not support the statement and any opinions offered by Prof. Chevalier concerning the whether Google Books has displaced the sale of any books does not satisfy the requirements of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), and the Federal Rules of Evidence. However, such an opinion is meaningless speculation because at her deposition, Prof. Chevalier testified “I have not done any empirical analysis of the sales of books that were on Google Books.” Zack Decl. Ex. 42, Chevalier Dep. at 158:25-159:3. Moreover, Prof. Chevalier further testified that, with regard to analyzing the sales of books that had been displayed in snippet view on Google Books, “I think it would be a difficult, if not impossible project.” Zack Decl. Ex. 42, Chevalier Dep. at 161:24162:2. Additionally, the statement is irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as it refers to Google Books generally, including books for which permission of the rightsholder has been obtained in the Partner Program, and is not specific to the Library Project, which is the only program at issue here. See also Aiken Decl. ¶¶ 4-5, 32-33 and generally. 92. A survey of authors has shown that the majority of authors approve of their inclusion in Google Books. Decl. Hal Poret Supp. Google Inc.’s Opp’n Plas.’ Mot. Class Certification Ex. 1 at 14, ECF No. 1001-1. RESPONSE: Controverted. The survey cited in this statement is irrelevant, misleading and does not support the statement. The phrase “inclusion in Google Books” is vague and ambiguous. The survey asked respondents about “the extent to which” they “approve of or object to Google scanning your copyrighted books so that they can be searched online and short excerpts displayed in search results.” See ECF No. 1001-3, at Question 245. However, the survey did not specifically inquire as to whether authors approved of or objected to Google doing so without permission from or notice to authors and without any compensation. The majority of 27 A-976 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 28 of 30 the authors surveyed (508 out of 880—57.7%) were not at all familiar with or had never heard of Google Books. See Poret Decl. at 26, ECF No. 1001-1. Moreover, most of the authors surveyed (759 out of 880—86.25%) were unaware of whether their books were available on Google Books or thought that they were not available. See Poret Decl. at 22, ECF No. 1001-1. The survey was conducted in 2012 for the purpose of opposing class certification. This was after two detailed published class notices from the Court stating they would receive substantial monetary benefits from Google Books (67% of revenue from each book sold, and a substantial up-front amount for each book scanned) See ECF No. 56, Ex. 1 thereto, at pp. 8 and 21-41. Thus, to the extent any of those surveyed were settlement class members, certain responses favorable to Google’s Library Project could have mistakenly reflected the belief that the settlement benefits were in force. In fact, Google actually played on this misassumption. Google misleadingly asked those surveyed if they “felt” they benefitted financially from Google Books, and 17.6% answered “yes” (no doubt because they either received class notices or read the widespread publicity about the proposed class settlement). This is reflected in at least the following verbatim answers: “You can download my book if you want, you still have to pay for it.” ECF No. 1001-7, Response No. 100357. “A lot of them are ebooks. One of my publishers went through Google to get the book electronically. I get royalties through that from the publisher.” Id, Response No. 100057. “I have a vague memory of informing [sic] I might be able to get royalties from Google books.” Id., Response No. 100756. “I do get a check for permission to download a chapter or whatever is download[ed].” Id., Response No. 100357. Others believed that Google scanned and displayed only books in the public domain. Google’s survey did not disabuse them of this misapprehension. Google did not explain it was scanning and displaying books that were in copyright without the rightsholders’ permission. 28 A-977 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 29 of 30 (E.g., “They’re often old books. They are orphans meaning the author of the book cannot be found or they’re out of copyright.” (ECF No. 1001-7, No. 100040); “Plan to do public domain books in Harvard library.” (Id., No. 100116); “Know that they are out of copyright books that are online and some in copyright books are available with arrangements with the publishers.” (Id. No. 100528); “That it’s a project to make electronically available all published books that are not under copyright I assume . . . .” (Id. No. 100188). Additionally, the statement and the underlying survey are irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as they refer to Google Books generally, including books for which permission of the rightsholder has been obtained in the Partner Program, and is not specific to the Library Project, which is at issue. Google’s reliance on this survey is further controverted for the reasons set forth in their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment and in their Reply in Support of the their Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 1008). 93. A survey of authors has shown that the majority of authors do not perceive any harm from their inclusion in Google Books. Decl. Hal Poret Supp. Google Inc.’s Opp’n Plas.’ Mot. Class Certification Ex. 1 at 14, ECF No. 1001-1. RESPONSE: Controverted. There was no question in the survey asking respondents whether they perceived “any harm,” only questions specifically concerning financial harm and the impact on the demand for books. Additionally, the survey is unreliable and misleading because the majority of respondents were not at all familiar with or had never heard of Google Books and the open-ended responses demonstrate fundamental misunderstandings of how Google Books operates. See Pls.’ Resp. to ¶ 92, above. Additionally, the statement and the underlying survey are irrelevant and/or overbroad inasmuch as they refer to Google Books generally, including books for which permission of the rightsholder has been obtained in the Partner Program, and is not specific to the Library Project, which is at issue. Google’s reliance 29 A-978 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1071 Filed 08/26/13 Page 30 of 30 on this survey is further controverted for the reasons set forth in their Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Google's Motion for Swnmary Judgment Md in their Rep ly in Support of the their Motion for Class Certification (ECF No. 1008). Dated: August 26, 2013 ~~ MIchael J. (pro hac vice) Joshua D. Snyder John E. Sindoni BON[ & ZACK LLC [ 5 St. Asaphs Rd . Bala Cynwyd, PA 19([04 Te[: (6 [0) 822-0200 Fux : (6[ 0) 822-0206 mboni~bonizack.co m jsnyder@bonizack.com jsindoni@bonizack.com Robert 1. LaRocca KUHN ~WI FT & GRAF, P.e. One South Broad Street, Sui1 2100 e Philadelphill, PA 19107 Tel: (215) 238 · 1700 Fax: (2[5)23 8-1 %8 rlarocca@.kohnswift.com Sanford P. Dumain M [LBERG LLP One Pennsylvania Plaza New York, N Y ] 0119 Tel: (2 [2) 594-5300 Fox: (212) 868-1229 sdumain@milberg.com Counsel Jor PlainiiJJs )0 A-979 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- x The Authors Guild, Inc., Associational Plaintiff, Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, : : : : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Google Inc., : : Defendant. : : : ------------------------------------- x Case No. 05 CV 8136-DC FILED UNDER SEAL PUBLIC VERSION DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. BONI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I, Michael J. Boni, declare pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 as follows: 1. I am a partner in Boni & Zack, LLC, counsel for plaintiffs in this litigation and admitted pro hac vice in this Court. I submit this declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant Google’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a compilation of Google snippet displays from Jim Bouton’s baseball memoir Ball Four, which was compiled by a paralegal based on searches run between July 12 and August 22 on the Google Books page for Ball Four, located at http://books.google.com/books/about/Ball_four.html?id=FSs9AAAAIAAJ. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a compilation of Google snippet displays from Joseph Goulden’s history Superlawyers, which was compiled by a paralegal based on searches run between July 12 and August 22 on the Google Books page A-980 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073 Filed 08/26/13 Page 2 of 3 for Superlawers, located at http://books.google.com/books/about/ The_super_lawyers.html?id=AtO7AAAAIAAJ 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of Google snippet displays from Betty Miles’s novel The Trouble with Thirteen, which was compiled by a paralegal based on searches run between July 12 and August 22 on the Google Books page for The Trouble with Thirteen, located at http://books.google.com/books/about/ The_Trouble_with_Thirteen.html?id=FCfsNpPWOc0C 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of internal memos produced by Google to The American Society of Media Photographers, Inc., which has been designated as Confidential by Google and is being filed UNDER SEAL. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the cover, table of contents, and complete Chapter Two with Answer Key for The Seinfeld Aptitude Test by Beth Golub (Carol Publish Group, 1994). 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of the cover, table of contents, and first three pages of each chapter from Welcome to Twin Peaks (1990 Publications International Ltd.). 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Deposition of Bradley Hasegawa, February 13, 2012, pp. 19-23, 41-42, 52-61, 73-75, 79-80, which has been designated as Confidential by Google and is being filed UNDER SEAL. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of a print out from a webpage on Amazon.com, which was obtained by clicking on the “Amazon” link on the Google Books page for Joseph Goulden’s book Superlawyers. 2 A-981 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073 10. Filed 08/26/13 Page 3 of 3 Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of print out from a webpage page on Amazon.com, which was obtained by running a search on Amazon.com for "Steve Hovley." 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of print out from a webpage page on Amazon.com, which was obtained by running a search on Amazon.com for "Minoru Yasui ." I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct, and that this declaration was executed on August~, 2013 in Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania. 3 A-982 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- x The Authors Guild, Inc., Associational Plaintiff, Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, : : : : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Google Inc., : : Defendant. : : : ------------------------------------- x Case No. 05 CV 8136-DC EXHIBIT 1 [PART 1 OF 3] TO THE DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. BONI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT A-983 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Ball four: Filed 08/26/13 Page 2 of 30 my life and hard times throwing the knuckleball in the Big Leagues Jim Bouton **** 265 Re'/iews World Pub. Co .. 1970 - Sports & Recreation - 400 pages BALL .... FOUR g.. The diary of a major-league basebal player during one season reveals the game·s venal and foo~ s h aspects Common terms and phrases asked Astros bai t ltl ballgame ba Ipar< oolplaver BJev J3Se b3seball ~Iil).€f balinJ j)""aclic3 Liq lecqueo COed Beidl·, lJo:..>yo Talbot Gary Bell funry Io',dher ","g". J::nnny Don Mincher Dierke' kids bullpen BrduelIUJ\ he. hitter d.i]Dut Gem, hJrrJe rm Eddie O'Brien fastball gettilg Iioue knuckleball NI-.:i cdll~d Cd.ell cdlcllel club gJdd"," hurt oo]hed going ',field ocker Jim c<.1feld =>3] i arOli Sal Maglie PJttin ~OOlJnt pitch pitcher ,co'Ed s€asJn Seattle Filots siting Steve Havley plJY guys I"wened Ildll)· Bouton Joe Schultz Marty Pattin novo' li!ilt ODoroguJ IXOltf Ranel'" ;pnng n ring Yankees Fred gees3 ;tatej sure talk tell there·~ thing ttnught tlrel'! told tonight J"1i1g ur ~ r" Vi'J"C Juvel· walked Ndll" f3el H look ITIClldger Mar.:in Milkes Mc~lortoo·{ ~iclq Mike Marshall clubhouse Y'edll Oky Ray Oyler Steve Barber Tommy Davis A-984 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 3 of 30 From inside the book unp"8 [ Search I 10 palOS m'tc ht» lImpile ir this b)Ok ~ " . ,lie, ..,.. ""O Com< r I'" into . n _''''''''01';11> on IEpi ........ J"'< jlwirll bact .. d ","t. 'rho 1.1 !hill "!LIJ CollIe,. Y<rJ1I ..., ..... , y ,.,.. ..iJ Ih.L" '* ..... Ii""- P'go 146 .""..s .... ",,)"j.~ <I'.... .. >II, I "y '0 bo "pe<I>l'y r, .... 10 .... h :"'~ ,.e<t<l}'body else barwes btll 0111 !II t im. H,', not "..ctly 11'<: be<1 ""'rl,e, D .' ~e <o.!l!, .... """'n Is ror rron btlllg "',lil>O:. lie doc.", ",lis ,',,' m.oy 4 ...... fT...... \10, .. ".. b<otb oKl<" lJI,. aoy !<"'d ~< ""'rino." fl., <>I ... ""I""'" 101: ""~;r>d . , __ _ ... _ A" . _. , . ~. ~_w ' - 'J .. - - - - . - - - a r..., ___ " ' _ - " _ __ ~,~ , -ro·· - - " ¥_.•• -..---- - "CPO .....)' I,...,. OW" bulli"n and It<: ""?f'td by. u w p."lIx lim< k!>OQ: ••",mp. tt"" hit huk . . ....... ,irnH ,1'<:1'11 1<1 .~ ._ ,_. umpires wLl. "Why" ;1 ,~, "'">' 1>00 m ,.... ~ r call • fc.-o l boJl ~y ",.<1 . .~ud the ltartin, pjuho. wbut he f!'lJ !l t~n oot of the baH· ,lUll<?""...,.. 1110 ..... <11;.,. A-985 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 4 of 30 From inside the book [ S, Qd * pogcc ""tcring ') o '~m y ~,,·i . H J in th;o bo ok Pogc 88 r.i,~~ '~p ~ .....! "'."Y OtId . lot d r)" 10<11; I>IIly NoV""' Ev«)body ..... d gr •• ~ .....-w ~ im >D<I To",,,,y 0...-;. i> ... M.., _ , . ., . . ., . . . . ..... ~ .,.. .-....~........ w ........... u, • .....-... "' ~"O"". bat it y<>U ule ....'Oy bar 0<1( '0 lho ba~pe. )'OIJ S" oil kiIwIs c-f . .. tic. "The br<I ;. th i< _ I in B. l li"'..... mit.. me th ;., ~ otw .. bod tlKJJ&Ilu.. 1 thiot rn fO nsh ..., mI' bnln ..lib WOp. PagE 2ffi r-- · - --, ._-, -_.- - - --_. - -,--, -- .. - dI....... j::>II l'te U lltT" "1\Jl JUl11 p:t i< • oan.o.b! jut> In 'Mo'I> oumcpl-." 1"\I.,,,,y H... So I IUrt<d drug a l:=""'u....... agc. ~it. tMllt """,I Tn""'f Dao.ll bIs 1nmuc1K>n,.•• ~""". TOIl. \011 b.ve 10 .. 31<. , ... '0 r.illl tbo ,.,gjd. A-986 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 5 of 30 From inside the book [ ~ BOrC1 p,,,,, 1] I ",""hod La. in FlDri<Ia .rod be ",ill L... trio "'p',I...... 10 "',.,..~ ' dll\ ho: " 101 ~ il would """"I la.;nll h"" "h~ didn1. tIIar hi: ,.. •• iu>' • ruo ~i< ]ClUllJ'8 '" "",10 ,1M: bl~ k>o,l£ ..d ~ 'h·' ....., '"lbul~ '" 2'" onS'} at iii.,. B., .100 til .. t.• ·d ....... ~, it 0 ... ' "",",ully ,,"d d<rickd 1M: sMoJd the athrr plal<n ud til. <lrik<. So he ,"'as '"won '~D n. He ",mod pale on;! mopod 0 ... ' 10 Joo, .low:)', .. j( ollKl>.d '0. I..,. rubkr !wid. Bul o.l J ... ",ant<d . . . I<> ",:1 u. re ...... .., .... 0>\'" lapl ~,.., '"'<10 in . . I)ullpcft anti _ ., .~ I . ' 0 "'" ... ho:~ e'<e..,body ctoo: d.id . • ....... . ... . . ...... v " " 10 ... ~-, ou.- ... _ "" ~"" F'" _ Imm..... h, ........ ou ~ ... , , ......... ' ~ n;,.~ ,_,. R . .... ~~ _ aJ>CI ICCOCId. Pete Rooe"p- Rul dllld, lIiI.. tOla. I rhmw """ ~ nutkk· boDs r", 1Nlh. Ed ... Kb ~ r~ • • b .,b.all .. I liL.Ok. h .. , vii. R..., io ...t j ..r r>i"s 10 rip m! f..1boJ1. I know io. So 1 lhr"", • b .......b. 1I r. . . • l<h. anath.. krIDC~l<baJl 1001 b.all •• ,Mrrl <lrik~ Ihr10l and " .., r#f ,.,. ...... "'" r"" • ror A-987 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 6 of 30 From inside the book 'red sox" [ Se a ch S pal's match n 9 ',.4 sox" I n this boo, By ''''' ' """'p" w.'" ".n<l:n!' ,n ",mpo '" h " 0 ; ,<n • • d "'.""'tr fly 1>:01. b~rl"'" .,1;< ,,," , to """'" "", "'.~. II .... [)ict Slu,n .. lO<)' 1IiI) :00' )'. and 1II i. (01, <."'"i"8 ~,.., .Io~ony p,>itr "'.. fl)! him an4 ... .~"",. n. u~ , - ... ., . . . . . bOUl 'Il< ,i>< It.J So ••• d S, . .... ~.", plo)'inS 1.. < lor • 101 of !h;nt'- F.,.,. """'" !ki> ~'fio~ ".><wI . .. ~h .. ~~ ., . • . III< ,Ime. WI><. lIIln!:, are goIn~ ~ y ••" •• "",U .. UI p..n oul Wheo Ihiop ot<nl PS _II ho"ll giw • 1Wf..... db". 1Iu, be'. 8'" '" IIUct! aboi!), lila' U'Ie o.ly thin, you CII~ de ill pll "" willi 1IlDl. I .. led . rn, ol'~ Red So. 1/ thc:y k dac:r>«i tho fi'< HId I 1kluV- 'boy "",old &f,nd hi,.. Bill tt..y s3Id. "He &SO""" it ,0 '_go' ocarcd. Ariel ...llIo:,~, all th<J _Id do .... DIck WUlI.",. Iw bote. ftre~ ylY<' ........ ' 0( ,I>< Red $>l . I tllllk lho, "lie•• 'eo .. wins. penn".' ,b. "n:l<nO)' is 'e ~'" 'OD moc:, or ... i, to tI'I< ......ec'" •• d """•• ,,,. .. ""'" ,., ,,,d,"cy i< ... Itim 'cc hi."" A-988 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 7 of 30 From inside the book LS.", ch J 82 p'les rro:chin! Y.llke.,. j, the boo. tIoc: ..<>« ,ob'a ud ba:."", b<,,,,,,,,~ I n~, .. h<~ b.c b<:~.n to pI. y fM!ht 'i.au ••.• 0<1 1\161.. wh<n he!.lt .. a ~~adI. lie h.d 1"11«1 """'" KIfIIC 2J WO~d Seri..."."" In l<ldilion I~ ,,'" considefJbl< .... '1 . ch'<kin~ .... nd "" _ U. oO",i<ed t,;'" >f<ndinS ""'Y m""h of • . In odd :I"; • .. utin ....."" 61... hr .~i bl. thn>uo!t F"";iohndL....,... ~ ~ .,]~ ", . ...........- I"'I"'" ~ vpo - ............ , ......... ,.. '- - " ' " 1""1'" I"'fdy "" ...... myel lho:y ..... te ~e l piltg tho 'iank ... 10 will. Chum. I"~,"by, tnI.II:~'<:t-I>Ol.~t>, co."''''" c..ly ... II>.IoJ. Ope d,JA', have .'Co ,I><: pro""", 0/ oI>jo<ti.~y. Hoo "' ....... only""'" '" , .. f ""'ro, who wo.ld toke 1100 .,,,.,al"-Uninc $tr<lch In Ib.c Y."k<e holl. 0,.." .t • w;.", """" "'. r,"' ......... d", Y"",l=o \0<00 .... "'''"... , "'"' UJ:rn IJI"'<'''~ ""' ~ r< women.. [ """""', 10,... .. if, ..rtlI rho pi"""'" 1l!e blJ oorIrootolim b eonln, ~iQIcr. Th<: Y.nk<Q ";1 b; u 1",. be<n in';!ed '0 tho ..,.._ .,.;". . ~ .... , ............ <1.... ~in ... , ..... M ........· ~ 0:1<_ ;. , .. 10..... in . """pI, of ob)" and 'rro" " .&""'....... A-989 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 8 of 30 From inside the book 'mick, y IM" le" 17 p,g ... m,tding "Illi<koy .",n,I." n thi, bo,~: Mio~.y M",,\Je ...... un<ed ""' .. ~ .. moOl "'" <>11K, doy ....d I "" 1<1 Ihint;n •• IxIu, t'l< ml ..d red.." l'vo a:waJ'l' t.ad IIxUI him. On ,he <IQC h.nd I ,0.011, likal hi> "'IlK 01 ~"" LO! .nd ... 00,.. isbllCloS. lh< ....)' """d ,,,,,nd 1111 lb. ,im< in lh< olubm_ m a'in ~ up u..... """'"""u ,n.. '''''........".'5 ~ . .. '""" " .. "'" ."u"."5 ..... tnne in IlIecy< GI a b"rd,' And [ Con'1 Ii~. lho M..,tlc ,h.1 "I.st<! _""n. ""It.. ''''trd u \0 .~. i, tn .igo. b", Uul. <I"l~""""" \><f<o < ~"' 5"""'" 1;;"'.11 ) d", ..... ,ip"''''''_ h.~ Mu.I.·, Sn ,lie ..... "'nu«"", of bI".ball. 000.00 ,ho coua,ry I'm h... betn 'Igt.d ... by Ml<k'~ .... n,' . ......... ...... ,,-n., r'le 31 _. _ wilh ____• "'''''''r _ •• • • • __ _ • • __ _ - ". _ ___ ~h"'I, .M W~i'.) For<!. 'Thor n SO' •• > .. .. _ ~~' _ ___ _ , 11 , ••",.. 4 ur. hop"". inlO I eab aod !Old ,III; ~ri.-.. to lak. Il10,,, 10 TIle nome. A I1<f .t>oul • b.H_I,,,,,, Iho: oob pulkd "I' i. r"""o/ • pac.: ,h .......... the heon nl ,100 Ilum <e-liOl'l •• IY>le in I;' wall with. hmi ... pl,lO·tb.. In Iron! a.oj • tblle b",l«o-OO1om 01", over \hO d,.,,-- Th o ·'Ad.,...· " A-990 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 9 of 30 From inside the book LS ec<ch kncc,l , bQII ~~---~-- 0... 0/ tho p.oI:l< .... it 'hi tho ~;""" hu. to hi. 'sU'"' "'Y buell.balI ill blUi • • tIrlIdioo. Tho. dDo', lil ~ .;tc..'orn III work on • eom 0..,i. 2, ""111""'''_ I <lnrdc ou' 1""- ~'" hille, 1 1>tt<I "" Iocr pi'chn • • 11 tr.u, U• .,..., (Don·, Ilk IT.' woo )e WI.>, hilk" ~ .. ju" ""'., , ~ .... . ""Mn )"'" throw a k.... ,kkboJ' ycru don\ Iu"" ,~ '"any . km ""'ells ...d .... ak....... l"m •.01 ' U tbt:y .,. ...... )'t.~ja,. a.yR w.y.) J _0:.:.1 ~... ~ .. t J ~U<lW ' 1.:11'" l,,,,,,lJd,.11 in a !~l< ,~ ... .......... it ...... J ..... ' ou .... u... Aw<. Un !.<a& b.olI .. dcfi_ "" .... Iy higcr tl:L' U.e Pxik C""" L..8"'" boJl--1b .. I cou\c!n'l SOl .... d:.mrt t/lit l . ~ b:-oot 1.111. E"''Y I;IIp buekJc:b&Ill ltmt wu ml l1t, GVl:r, Of opiooi." . kk ....) .. ...., 1 n"nod 'Q pu>ic. 1 <ould f«illo< ,..-ca' . ----.......... _ . M I ..... --- --. ne! ........_._--_.- -_ .. _-- . -H."' ..... --_. --- . - ._-,-~ ,... ~ ~ ---.~ - ~ 1)1 .. ,,,,,- • • .."., ~""'- A-991 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 10 of 30 From inside the book j paqos mtc h ", hOlllers In th S oook .oniy V"- b<!;, I""", like r .. dill.." , f""" .. y ju t not ~6 " . "" ",mdy ",, <. ],', qU;lO '1"'' ' ",' n ,he Y".hu ;. 19&7. I "'.. ... ,lIy lmprwl<e. rlgln trom ,he be".~g. ] led !lie tllb In 1n. 1II1:' P!,t~ wi,h thUt)', ...0 I 6"'"" up ~ Ie",,", h~ .. fif,~". , nod "" home .. .,4 ",,11 ""n '" ,~= .Iu.« h;". My fRio. """ " .tnd> """' •• I"", iN'. ,,,.. ,,10'" 00< o f 'k boo .. o> oI! 0... M,o" ... ~"' , '" ,.., """" • . 1 I""nd n'l< I. "", no""ll RtolWIm ,h. Sa! U d III"""" • ~t .. he_ lh< 1"10.... "'" ... hit. He h"" I too!/lpCCX h h;',..,..:11 at tlle ~n>< md 1>< ,1",,. ~ loud on ,he v-nd (oo h.nI • Ine rn., )'tOt . . !,OW . . l1l<I...n on III< <p<JI) . .. _.. "lrt M .. "", ..... ~ '0 J P.[e240 Fred ToJl>ot " Y' tho, of".c:r 1,,","06'~ Sol h tl!ac """,;,p "".. dulde:! "bal tind e>l pilCber ho .."" ~_ ...,~. " /\ _ : T,lbcI JoJ..! ••,/\ rnl moth"." 1>1_ Mof;1l< olsc ...;d .. 1bc ........! tIoat OM .... Y <0 ~.ndlo Jxba> ..... not t~ tt ..... hin U1Y , n... So Jacbon hi line homo" A-992 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 11 of 30 From in5ide the book [ S o~rrn 'hom o rL.<1 ' ::6 pagES m<i crit>;l ·iom. ".," in this boe>< I p ink> ,IN: iilkk:.nd l k Cab:t<1 WOII I ~ i0oi< dow. L """'10 a od "'~. ho "TIll: buf .. 1;n,b<;11 n l1V""' ~ The: Ooy'_ f."ban b ,;,ioll- Tv.. ;IK' ",!:> .... , . . .IDol . it ... ,I«I, '~e 'C'Y .. "" pil<~ . ""me ron ;n'o 1M Id,· ~. ~d "'JI! . Tbo C"","", I I""k. up.1I<I clown ,he he r.." a nd .. yo "'Y "; "l~. -G<l' up. You..., wt... , h.w<"" """'n l"U go\ Iho ....Il "I"" H ,he"'" .. . ...... _..,. dlbhowc. 11 .... . qlOl< from m. I r'" , Md Siotte:nyse ~.ad hil on lukJ,:·tbo-pa< k Ira"" ...... .. lrO:Ir .. "'y i>ud for. pi:<to<r '" d ,. 0 .., '" ,~ ....... n cam. II> . . . . it .d "W~"' .... '" l"'" Ilrbrtinl whon Sl<lltIt",)'te w.. JOin, orolrld lile toasar 11 ..., • 1lIC¢. bUy "", .. .ion, .. I t" 'o hk• • ...." , d )' ....... wcr. I saKI I ..... I>opio! Ih" 'to, ,.01, """VII> ""'''J ~.""" Uri> Y'"'. - >he: .. AI. " I 11'" lI;oy." Why d>ou.ld)o> 8" _ 7 , "",,,'L Ii.... p' ....... . whllo." H don', 1m"",. tIM , 110. Ar.d ."''Y lime 1hey h~ • _ J rim ell y..... I j ... 11'" , .., mJ ..."• ..,~ , I yvu Jed, lW. ><J mu,y beco. ... , ......:, YO" ,g "'''J 'w" ..,.. II> bo ,, " _. __ __ '" b..oppy." __ "'u, _~ ,, _ ~. _ _____ , ~ ~ _ A-993 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 12 of 30 From inside the book '.rlrl. n'hi'n " A P"'Jos mlc h ", obtio" ·· 1n Ihrs bJok ··. ~di. Pay, 75 pk:llc. I lold.ptI~ JIlin in or "",,",l,," bec.a .... wh<n I .... Y"" !Oft! '0 ... "';11 i,r I think cooch Ed4i. O·lIrio • • ,""" 10 provo the .... If< II...... tli.ok bo·, I'IlIllt ... <""d ;"'0 hi> b>Ub>~ he ~ Cr ",,'~ ··wn., p' ! ' U3 ~"" 01ld". b.. "-II) t>eeo ~omed . }ok SnllB S.uH. " ', 'llenlim '0 <Iotail. S'J"I Mr. 5",111 5lU!( : . ,"' yo.r ha, lie ~ ,h . '0 me '0401. AIM '0 .\.t;).~ II <~. We -..ere IKJtb hpa.' tbt ,i..... Aa<Der "'''I Eddie O·Brion dCd Is <Iud <><1' 10 yo\! ,,1Ie~ beelUK or 0<1." ~Iti ,m."'! T . . .. . __ , • • ,. , _ _ _ __ ____. , ._ •• ~ " ,• • • . ","'-'s:. ~ . _ ~ ~ H E"",i.uJJ ~ .... It,t Ih" .... ~J ""'Y r".'f ~.""pt.l;olol.i. 0·11,., ... '·G_ ..h. "" .aid , ~ mc.M Tolro. ...... "H . ..M! .....p. 10 r.-otm lhis pone '0 1110 Comrniaiontr been,. _ COIJId ....... "'" b"llpU wil ~ Ii.r. i ...." ....." ,oo-kr1"' "!lo ",""., I ..Nt. A-994 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 13 of 30 From inside the book Jails 20 raJos mmh nJ b. lIs in Ih s book -.- - - ---. -- --~ - -- - - .-~ -- - - - - -- ----r--· -·· !U'.......,4. Nlio5 "'" why I.... "'>t ,..~ "'1 ....ft.p.• s.,........., i,.iII!!" 01 !he P "'" ! 11'" up ill ,toe bu~p<n .. ~ "",,!t.d wlU llIe iron t.1 Mile M.nU :! k.cpI o.111ocr •• T. _ .... con,"" I "'... only do""-5 ~ ",, ! ....,..Jd ,;.' en 'deYioian, oDd m. yl>c: 1 "-" . partly. Af.. , !he thluI w..e op T oJl>o! uid, "J""" OIri<1. Boutoo . .. hy do,~ I-'ag e lt1lJ • "fPOOh. <Iir<ctioo Gf • .,.. "'" tHd[: ...... 0 oluuo<. by • rl; htlum_ pUtlle' it b"",h ill ... a ,i&JnhaHed hit..,. Mil.. wan .. '0 , ......... _ a lII a..o Sol waot> MIl 10 thO"<l ",m: ball!. 00 Ih:fn: . 1 each otbcr d the Iim<. '"WI>y lUll t/uow """, ... t>alb and t<ll:\al U>eJ .... '" co"", ~oJ .. r 1' . I'Il"<ed. ""n·.),," P' g . ~ , - . "' ...... ~ , .. ..... r"' ............ ..... ' , .......... ' """ , ....... "" m .. ODd lOcoed. 1'<10 Rooc: .p. RaJ duteh ..... tioo. I throw kn .d<\o.. ~ .' I . lor !>aU. _ EdIw.!do <. lk f~ r . fastball U<l I ,hoI:< 0/(. R"", " j',U1 to rip .,y f;al>a.ll. I know iI. So J 1lItC'<! • k.UCC'deban for . o<rlh, ~, knu,l kbool foo- • ""'I t.oIl • • thir:! fQr otri.~ \h, .. aiKl '1"0 cot., ..,," .-.If • .., ..... ,,... .m. A-995 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 14 of 30 From inside thE book [ Se a ch E~ p'go, matching ball ir h, ,, ~ , .!- 1""&$. "1 toll! It'" He " ';WI'! t abll& ~..,.. ,,1>0 no ;"1<> him ... ~ . piled him. Dick ~"" .. TIIoo~" ~)k8 .od "" ru"er I'" ","0 bo .... No .. WIIson'1 p a spik«l ~fl foot and • mu 011 _~ ud he'. m><I. Tho It..., _ _ pjldI ... srO<lltd b.lI•~R L" __ d...-baoe _ _ , on:! , lin. _ __ _ _ __ •• _ _ • • _ _ 1Q"~1JnjJ\, al lb. [()~ 01 ~ .. iUly <:h.u:a •. At ,ho: I... 0000fId ........ """,inS ~ _~ ~~ ...... ._ _ _ . -.- .. - ~~" ~ _. ~ -_. ..._._ ._.,.- ... .., ... --_ _._.. ._.,. - ~ <c.'" ",.. n ' . an I WllI pblg W m._< ,~ "om. AllI>. 11>0 Is mm.J;lr.g ""y ...,11 ..;,""', !nO. 111<'", pI ' Y'"! ""I<h.... p ""II. n.. !"Y' "" ,ho: b:r.<:h.", oj.....4 wflcn ",.. OI~cr ~'" mUes ''''''nil.) error WI) l3)e ri&i>' ""_y. W.·.. tl>e HU "'" "'ti... lbe Im.b. ",hictt i! ""n of it ••:haot'F of i, ... ~< .... hiu ;,,~ of tit< boll . ,nd 1k1idts, ca~· \00. A-996 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 15 of 30 From inside the book ori ole> [ S.",ch ] 8 "geo m'lching <r io l"" in ho bo ~ , P'g' 193 N>oJ II". c..l y ... ' , ...... l~ """'" """'" . p ~wc Io<"~ jwl i,!nored "" .\rile and G.ry 801 <aid, "D>Joo~"''J'''U- ""'. CuI Va",... ",_ !ki II for hir.Ix. ~/s1 IJI~ _.<I Ind tile b:U ... ~ CVfrybGdy clIc." C<c, Gary, Corl Y~-u.kl? Yes. s...i<'.,... doria! !he .triU V .. , .......1<i ~<d ..-..I .upcr_ Poge :D1 . __ ._ "--,-- Tllt "~ al:>Ou! J"" :5dIuI ...... l1Iad M. nlIall 01 ..,.".Ihin!l I'll h. rP<"'" tho oth<, "i&l>'. ,\I' )'o-JEh ,.,. h-od i"" bJo"", _ .."'" tho 0,.;,,1<_. wll<n smal'" <Om< b Id: boo ,II< d,b ..... .., b: ... , ... ilb& Mike 1OOup' lh .. " .... kind uI "'ill", ""til II< b:anl S<:h:J!tl lOy, 10 'e o --AI 0 titN. I1l "Ik '" Eddie 000-.. ~ •• Jo< .. huh ..iJ. 1<.1 ..,il. DJ""J _ i"8 ~ r"," Or'nh 'ne>~.d i.'" ....t ""I'!""II- word II .h.. h .... f 61ie W", and f'e"".c kkbcn-ud &pool,od tine A-997 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 16 of 30 From inside the book [ ~ ear:h p ter S' p.,e , rratcl1 nJ pil,:h " this ooeJ< Ihc same :hill,. lbe)"~ aU"'1 ~.~ It:) obey £OOd -- -, lco:p "'" 1>;0:1 d o",. (lD"" hil:co.." hiw>-lRII honero). ---- - ptch~1 _"I priacifl.., m.kc (he d>< b.ll ,_"" ""ide rhe ... ik • ..,.., , Dd d • • !'" .pe«!. (k."P' ,br hi"" ~ff baJ ...... ). llld tr:I .h<ad of UIC ~ i ncr (wh<" 'ImI hv. I...., "rit es on • pileI> Ie,,, p>d (dan" I'och ~ ovcr 11.< he,,, of the: p~ ~), ...,"" "' ............. ""',... ""'-'J ... ,., "W OJ' , ...... t)'!' w ".., ."''', .. ,," the b . ~ 1 • 'p«"iIk 0 ' pal. r.Ol '~"I lhey ,"", •• l o,.",.r.tlaJin1- So .. W<)uI<j CM\pate p;lc:~in ! ~.~ pt"b!... t~ .. ,hey ...~ .. I<)i'$ 100 .... d .., Ihr_ Lo. ~L/cr dllprin~ I~. peen .]d lIy .hlll! y<lu !lied I... Lhe CU?)'OIL miq,t rniso IIw> v",n. The 11>"'1; IG do - . j.' hi' th, s;e<"" Filch tc • .."'....t . .... P.y; 123 The p«>bIa:Il rur • ....,~Idi<t ma.~ II (jw.j ... """"'.. wu. 10 tire bl.uelf ..... bel¢« • &_ ;" ",.icll hc -1 pitd> cip io.oiog. Dut if A-998 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 17 of 30 From inside the book 3E pages mete ri ng p it<he < n this book p'! ' 167 ~ ilII b<""""'- .~og. I ,,,.,, I>i:n abol;' "'Y _~,...tioo wiI.~ S<J>"':U """ hlIlhaup' ,III. ] couIm" be . " ... " 1>0<10_ 1 hod ooJ1 ~ I"od . 1 101 lim 111M ,,'t.m Mid an his tall P"" I ~;r! he'4 ItlfOym 9:1' 4 ... ktluUie,,,.." '" 1 1)4 p,"""" "We!!. y.K elll do !bol if it" brt.ilia&-H Sal said. ~ . . p ' ! ' 183 u.s.... Mon'lo ~I«I ~ 0.' 10'" ,t.. Linl. h:p"""'" ""d oooiloro pl oY'" ... IIe> ""' ... ....t.h"'l- •• 1 , omcllow I doI:b! it. So I'll do M11<... I< in Ib: fiat ,..ha, J"" S!",,,,, ,.,olled T<a,my Ilorpcr, I<~"'I 011. "" f,,", ... t,.~, flop" ..... tho _ , ~ ...... . 80Ji ""'. On ball two. way 0 .. ' """,,"5 head. H. "", I";', 10 ....1 ....,. d an:! ".b, ".,<cd pi"""" COOd ko""kJnaJ ..... lth I.. _m rllCh. '"'lid IIlI! lnd<y .bo'na 1oouiht. tl", ~ "" thol Jou /«1 ... ''''''f''I". aa.,I • .,ouud,. J b icd 10 ""ali tile h ot f.... ..... m·up I , nd I .""" ",too, ",tn .",,, "Why are L~ cy ~ ayirI ~ th: J"&lionaJ A_them 00 .. """yr' ] ",>lktd ohc fi .., hi'le' on f".., pitche .. "11>< pilch.. tlo> .,.l<. pi""" t """ " Ii", ,...., '0 A-999 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 18 of 30 From inside the book I Se arch 53 p'g" m.tching " "" in -ri s boof: "'~"I s,,'o a",t.:. " 0" \hI'« iJld"p and p""'l<d P,o"f "oil. ~Io)bc his lim dc.... n·' hun iii...~ ....:I--e.eoF' th. , I>: ....., in .1>< di'Ih<':n~ ml(h,n, a~'in !/"Os "",rnin~. r(mio.:s "'" o! • ILlY "·M ... ,,, wit' ~l: y .. leo, Iu, • "hil,. fl~ly Slam. H, '"'' • Ji,,'" knlwiCkr .. " ~ • s",·, o ~ - ,----.- 0' ~ re.liltd th.t ~;, pitching ... m is aD "'"I . n:! m~ sho.: ... lIt,n ~ ;, rip. or ... no .... frum ,hGwi.'1 ~.rv< b,I:•. U.. 01 <»1 .. .. dolorrMd .. Dod Dolol' um. 8 ••• 'Il"Io Md ,.,liG ••• -...y. p~<h.4 fOf til< Y""hn for . ..hil<. n.: polio I<ft ~ i", wi'" a~f""l: .. J.;. ri&ilt ..",. It t~.n .,. didn't _r bioI. .\Cn .......n Ill. playen ",,"Id mat. tu3 or II. .so"",. rog.5c Bartle, .... !I the dia<tcrm\' OIIw.inc aplr. lO\I'y and Ikn locke.;! pretty pod in bonin, fH""bc<. 1'", b!:rn rak .. , "'I'~in. My ..... oJld I did.~ "" .. ~11 pit<m,! BP .. D.. b.r. M. )bo ,h<",'••,,,,,,,, h"'S ho>,,, 10 tha1 dill.'>tnny ,.act,in<, Tho_",,'v ,~;" . 1 .~in~ ~r ,~"'" .1,,,, ........ 1 .. "'" ' 0 ,.;,,~;, MW A-1000 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 19 of 30 From inside the book [ ~.~rch 1,2 P"'JOS m<ich l1 Q p<,silion nth" bo,f: Fag' 19 -, ...."" '0 til< r----- -, - . -- --- -- ------ - 00 pn>t>I< ..... E,e,y once in a...tLik 1 1,1. ''''Iball fty and il conn OIJI of "'1 ~ ...... .".I my .. 01 _on lile I, ouuk ,., dJun. I .,on .In""" he,", , 'QKc in 'he b\t<\ of .. y m;"d wM'pc.i"S' " You an ~ bock '" ~. )'C>" 0'" finJ ;'. y"" taO fiod ,..,... ojd flSlbi:l1 llHl "",11 Ill: ~ . ~l1.' · Of course. 1'.. ---~ -~ - - 1"'""""' My""" '«:b good , ,.., poi", Fogo :037 .. d <h.-. ,10<:", book , H:', _ perf, .... ...,;"" }C' he <k><o!o', >«::n '0 "P"'" "mo, _ h,v, tho marine melltlil)'. One "irk. hr. hI< &l:llng mul~.l f.,..oli. bu, W1JrU"~ wi:!> m.r<k~ dt\ldltn. I:\Iclary '"' tho pj, ~ _ 01 plaJ: meuq - ~". _ jf JDU ...........hiftg 'Of" "')" you go ;'10 YO'" meld! p;>:!ilion, --''- ~ '---'b ----.-•• -_. - .. OM!. He o.aid I ...... I puo~iuo, wdl • .., <""l~ ~ p~dl ,lio-th .. £1. <kin" com 100. - - ' - - - b - - , .- " worKer. " plOd balik:r, I.., I fj,l&d my ... do:: r pre ...... ....... J,", ,II< C'l>bo II<Cdal. ,~"' J'm •• ld.M.... The..,.,." .<>1<1 ttl" r,O>, ,"" ,ho- "'ord ,., me It In'yet. ",,,,,,'-I"'~ l.I~e yoo.r A-1001 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 20 of 30 From inside the book [ Sc ~rch moo nd 17 P'9" m,jcr;r9 '"GllIlLi in h. book P"i!,IIO •• - - - - - - . _ - ----.,-- - . . . - p ~ • • ~ -.~ - - - - -- - . - - - - tho mouod_ In front of o!I,""'" rrorl<r", fdlll~c tb<: muund 'oo. aDd I ~""~ o\u <kw "'~ ."'u, ,t. "" rog. 2~3 ord .... trd "" !lie 111""'''1. lfId I 'hrew ""'" to Gene OliVtt willi tI>< b..... 1u.~<J tbI 't"", ItlJ h< UOCW II 0'" lh< =",·r",u ",all. 00 ,he "'" . _ .... <:I • b,toh ... """ _ ir It .... Il>o I....' ~O"'" .... 1 ..., V"'" .p. II ~~ ICCII1 rI~' IhlI ... ERA >hi>uld h ... IUIlpcd ba<t k> Pag.?21 - _ . - - - _ • •. - ~ -r - - - - •• , - - - -- - -- 001<1 !lie IEIcI du,io~ tilt: p. .... I <W»nl bflie.e hooo 'ar it wlnl_ <k .. 0':' '" 11>0 In/Idol , I, IandoJ h.lr... y 1><,,,"" <be rnound ud ~""'" pll"_ 1 _ ...,td "",," I .... j, "' •••<t. .lly soIDl'" ~"'1' ,,,"" Ille kid and I Iootcd ........ "' ... if al>l_' U(ll\O<ia:d me ,howl"J )0""" ""'-.!Ii . ..too ...... for tbe Gin ... ...n:cd <rII tho: ,hill. *. A-1002 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 21 of 30 From inside the book [ b ase 4E P"9" m.tching ~3S' ~3 ar:h n this 00'" Roy O)k, "41 ,,,,Ud ~p 0,....,..J 1>ao< bJ Oleno Ik< ~ cn 01 tho Cub<. :1<'1<1 .. heo he came IIKk '" _. ,1lI be .... ku,d ,~eoll Be"k<rt • _ 01 • t>ilcll. Ttlil iI fHlI 0:0 11_ ..... onlCT .. rnolh<rluc.... ~~I he <1;<10" h•• ~ . [01 of t,o", '" Ilw. ~ , )"" j .... "'" .....,.. 1h< ri<1d .n<! .IOk i>rIo '"""" b..., .... 1" ~ ""<I w11fl" poor\< ..:.0 ill< d....,be<! n .. ~ '''~ _1 fu, buc~oI1 •• _ ow. .... tcheJ ya. , .• • , 'T""", t~1o S.... on tck,.J.;"" ..... >Orne 01 tho fI.)'Od this sid. "' ••HI<Ict. I ""'f'" ~.~ .. ,~ u"' n ••• " , . .. ~ ""t"",;., w. Ko"~ . tId ,~, ~ •• 0 I", d ", ... pi0s 1I.rl ,~<:< , ~ , . ~ >"I\" I ~u.. 111< "'1 II bad in lh. old d')~, Eoc~ iodog I """'" bco<k '" ,i< dug"'" ond I "",,14 ..., • I;,d. mooc "'''P'Ci it ~ ..... of m,' "'m .... ''''- I .......:, wilh tho", ( mIT. ,t-" bo.i., . .... Tt-"", _ ' ... g~ willi rnrn 011 A-1003 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 22 of 30 From inside the book Uri 83 p',e, rro:ch"9 ,tItI in Ih, book P'gc 23 boidy liI1Ic: .)"tl <II .. i<I&o _ on 01:= or 10 011 t.im, rat;." caliltllon;a "jill 1111 "" \id> ""d n<'o'e' oriMjn~ , be.. ; ;"m;>i<" ' j""b, puo:.ul" . ;..1 ... rylk"~ A.Dlher thin, he Il00. " ~ "p e ""I')' mom"" .. ,;",/o"y, ~"" "d .. l ~~ lont p"' .....1IUI."0I1. Wlootn he ",n, ... ~~ tho Yao.- . on"" In a wllllo be'd run In!o ..,." 01 .. lUJIiJ:g bu:k 1IlJ£) a Dlp't o. P'y" 146 bock .. til< do"",t d"-" .,;...1 ,I n," ..k",. ... ~"" ..,iUt". I !Lot< lhal kind 01 5tut!. I rr."r., I pulh! w • • bol!pI;oy<. , S. , A>I,r... lI, ru, ~. "'~I II~ Anr;I, GI <»lIne, tIIo paycn pick i! "VII up, As"""" os lie rr.",'s a bod ,aU Il><v ...... ,,11;" •• "01>, III .. II<>< 00 .. .... 01 • bitch." S"", 11<'. ~aJtll""'" in " ·.~:..l ...... boI ..... oJ aJt I """ 00 is ."'" wilh 110>1<-1 th .. it'. beaI, .. 'K)' ,.hk I'm "";rJ >- ... ,/"',.. • _ .... pl<h. I """,, . • no ... ir.I>tc. Whll I 01:11'110<10 if, t.kc ","IIo<",lng lo1laao . nd lei the d"", br ...... ruo do .... Ihc f",o' Qf my ",.1""" and ... oIl up ond <iowa .he ~~If"J' ,,;,h • d i~ ', In"" 1 i"'l' ..... "I'" "" "'1 .m.t ..d say A-1004 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 23 of 30 From inside the book 4 p.qes mt:hinq s li~. i1 -h s book " 1Ia> OCOOnoc lk au' o," ID ..,.,... , ,,, >1111< "'''' 0<"","""',,, ..un • O>u_ haw do l"'" <III, '" ...hen """"'~ d"", . 1:<1< in hord <,.ry_ b<loJy FlO ""''''plaO<l ....... «n.l<"=. A r.... yom 'AU"""" 'I.''''';" II .. in", kbl» PJct.ardsoD ""ILh .. <tt<I<rnw 'plo..b an:! .1.. Yank_ ... " .'" vi$:bly lhoI:);<d. "~ .. IVwkl /" 1/" 1Io>I/~ [JW lJo~by' W. TI fit/ OOJO .,_,_ .• _ • ___"... ~ ~ ___ , "_0' ___ " _ .__" .. __, __ .~ _ v __ ___ ~ . - - --- --""" ""d bot ...... b. d guy, He 1iJ:.d '0 01 ... """ (I')'> lpik .. ~;'" <nd d,.'," blood. UurL'l ... ar. . . . . I,k,e to s.;o/C: U~llIJ 1«0 (he <luI0.1 to ' " if ho oc~ :d ",,"h >om<body in oh.< l>a<~ of (II< he .... H, eTC. " ,..,-I "'" ....... 1:1" fn, targ<. I"":I!C< . So I 1001: my .~nb'" him. w. a~ did, 0D0: I tI'.rt,,- • ball ... him ..,I."d bdu..d bi> IIcod tho, be <lid,,', ~ ;...' no oCf<lll \he 1lo:kl olld . lido wIth?"' bt ~ _ ~ an<! get it ov<r TIlt people w:.o ....1<Il0<l this g;un< Oft 1<bbJon ..... "'''''' or !tie do",""" _ 0.11 pial"" ~'ili ,;do 01 Ii ....dIal. I hop< t:.""'~ ,od .w, A-1005 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 24 of 30 From inside the book leroY\' [ Search 82 P"Y" ""lei i, Y tlrw .. irr II, > wuk ____ __ ___ -_, _. ·-- - r - -- -.--- r - ----. ______ _ ~lllcr ...... up ",i,b ,..., OX" <>f. b..., U<l .. D_ , look.d ;" lor ". 018" , ... Sc:h.kz 1>011«"". "1'10-.. re' o..d 01 ttl, £IIY:· And Sal bclle~. ""(io:1 1(IIIlC1ltn& on ~iI pilcil. H.·, . mll~.JJ r", iastonoc. • bi& hiucr.~ ..hd iu<' .. he <nDI<<<I ~p '" tt.-ow••,,,.l<bodj· (I """'.!ft', ..U Fa). 62 b~t<i . nd boN",ll"" ,_ bolb Q< (~~"'. Y"" .") U.. " tl~~" ~u." ~ pitu,~. K nd , .. hin« "ill b...... I<> .wi n ~ t~ proton h;""'If). ."ile•• bt,,,,..,,. ,.. Thi. is ,.. tsStlKC allhe baili. pile... and tho hi''',. ",d k tIocPt·, do .ny g<>o<I II) ~ I tills lJad or .:!'ilce "'. ploc."" II • on.;. oj, ....""'. I-k kn""" ~ .. ""II "' .. " - . hi ....... e. SUI pi"h~ ..,........"''''5 ..... ,.,.. . '!-'.-" ,~".., m """"" 'G .., "UIP" "-",,:e< Joo$(h .... Thio is ... hol 1 rkclIIod to My: "r .... ~ .. n • I... nl II,... "" 10 ,M•. r. foct 011 I..... ,,",,,yo' aboIIt ror ....... NumtJc. me. tile Irn..,tkbd. I'd ~"" yon to \110(1<1_ " ....... ~ ,.k,~ • r.-.. l 'n .h..-.w ~ _ ...." .' .... .. b """ I ,~;. L-' • • _ ... ,.~ i'" A-1006 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 25 of 30 From inside the book [ SCOfch heur 1R r ' o.' tn.'ltching h~", " Ie; , henk --- , ------. - -- - --- , 0--" -- -- "'ill! Mict<y 101.... 1< ."d W~I .. y F~rd. ~ y 1fI.- at rarl(i(d up, hop;x:d b."d lO'd Iho doi\>e. 10 10 k. ",,"M '0 r.... Fl."... AI.. , I h ll l· ha n II>: ol b pulkd ~p i, Imll <f. pfa:.: !hI! ..... ill th. hun ~ -- .b:>., "',e . .. 01 tIr. .rum wi""""~ 'Y" "",ti.,." i ~ f""" Md • bole in !he .. . il ... ith • ~ Ii..", ~"" \ M""'-" brcke~ ,j"" _. plate·&iO>I ,~ d<Jo,. T>l~ 201 ". ya.ca at 111m. ... """'" Tho", ..... . lot of ~ . _ , !be 11m , ... i, oI'er ,!It p ............, . ft~ """'. rIC<! • ruDUI ,. OIIJ. >q=p <>III """". ft'' '1 ""r.t<. W. """ •th,,,,· I""" •• ....t...."':1 ... 1ft ""t~ ~ Cblatll'l II we t.ld . ell ....., ftlY,1 "'" ..... 1<1 II . .. go<1OI ... 10 Se"~ • .. • Irorut _1 ... ~od '" I"....u.irty. Tho: bolld.b ........ lb., ~ " ,.J< .........--" lhlttr ~,", , ....." ....... "." ........1.. _ ",,' _'n•• A-1007 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 26 of 30 From inside the book [ Search ml ES : pag" m.Ching ",n,s in Ih S 00 0, ~'le 71 . _. 0.'.' fidd ..d ..... Goooocn ... ",'in& lin, baic. Ik.. h.nI .. .,;", wi,h h~ bled,-)' .. iI<I , nJ bi ... J , "",11 b .... _tinl witl>o ..... hI. I WIO .lRa'! miKb,!Ilm tniI !be ."ny lIIi"p he do.. Ind I lilOupl t.~ 1 a field tbat', only . b<>\I.t Ury y..tdI a"'J ..... yd It', <e&Ily h~nd",<b <>I y. th: dia<»<e bet ...... tile IH~ I.a~ue • • :1<1 V..,co"er. ""Ie. .... ~'[. 122 - . pit''''''_ . . • b. p' .:wI • eoOO A. Joh.ny ~ .. up.. "V"" dna', rom III. dllna t>all ~ th, I'la!c:. Jr ",tnI/]~ tid k, ll>cya loot lor ptch<n .. trKk "' ...... * 1,'. OK of ,be~, be ... oeb. pt>p.lor p;''''';'~ The", .... rI:d>o ...........II yOlo tbo• •"'Y.... pIoyod f." ""'. "'~o mo:l. !bell fUJI m~.. a day Il>d """e ..OO rudo \be", <lUI lw"tIly • on _,h. A-1008 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 27 of 30 From inside the book r'9,35 t" RII)' Oy~ ..... ~.,,", """"" bat< b~ C; .... . II«hn of Cubs, a:>d wilen I>: :.me back I[) earth be .... .. lid 10 cali Ike,on , ..,. of • W-~~. '!hit ;, ,..,. on tho ..... onl ..... IT.oth..f~l; .... b~ I ~ <1i<1o', h."" .101 of time: Illink. ,g )"" j .... "'••,..- \he: fieW . ... >lid< in>o >«<>OJ ~IQC .... ",. i: 0><, ",;,h)" it.. P""r:' who _"''''''' th" , ..... on ' d ...... loo ............ of the dllrrtltsl ..... blll 'v," pb)~ Il1Is ,ide 01 • sandiN. 1 b<:Ipc Kubel< a:'l<! P' q' 339 "",11 cut hinu ,...,," b.. lI . ebrin .• " I ."" eoing 10 t!HOW <DO fur.",",ely the ",nx, "In! co ><••1 "' ..."'~ • • <1 Edward> .~",w h:m cut. r.d ...,...... 8"''' c,,~ho,. H. c'l~t." ,ho buc\;I,"". "'IC' 010 ," Mtl'lcrt!I<JI. and k """,,', lu,~ tk toil [tIM". OIlY. 10 be E<1,,_ P",.w,nt. A-1009 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 28 of 30 From insidE the book fr st 61 p.ges mtc~i1g p'Y' 37 "st in Ih s boo, ,w_ w. ..... '" Iho: bt pitch to Comer a ItiaJ> _ u.ol be Como. dido'I.",o IooIc Ioock_ H. '''\L~J'' the """, pit::~ _ hi! lillie dI UIC Ina: [or _ triple. T he ulIIp _ec:: 0,",' .~ 01U b<a<b u:d .. 10:1, "S«, i, """' ... b;." a "<1« bi,,".~ ~ ,~ ~-' ''--"--_ "--- ~~ ~ ~ it _rile OlIo. Ilri", .. ._- --_ . n... •1,,\ g:>i>, '0 oorlo:< ..,;, ~ p'Y' 337 tho ,....lIu "" .. ~_ - - --- ---" - - - -- _ .- IhiIlg that I·............ 't; tlo: \>.1'';''1\ kllDCt tnn;,~ ....... """'~ '" ho n • • be •• 10 . ...... Aod -.--------.. --- ,-- -.----- - - -- -- --- -- -----. b... t a:JI ny ....r f<ncn, SUIl. It>o prnoo_, I 'hid, ;. 0"" 0/ It>o ......, • • ,;1;'$ ,,010::..,.. ,nil io', nne nI ,he r .... "" "';.,p .boo' 'un pay",. 1'0...,..•• ~ m""~ 1 bi:IO:-e m)' pmt ia !be L~6J Scrie:L J "':IS &iltq on L _ he '" o'tel> ...it:.>< [);;o. Do>d&k . remell~' .. ll ou~ """ . ~Iin~ .bou. frye r«:t a woy A-1010 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 29 of 30 From inside the book tri rd [ Se orch 51 P"9,o mtchrg 'hir d j, tri o took p'! ' 103 "'to in an inIIin,.lId-a-tb:r<l. M~ bUlClJcball just «><ly l"(. I ....:. ,"' ~ """ Ill< pto'" C<IIWsOC,tJy, ,.d ..1ocr! , II'" be'~ I .... to <"OlD< in witb"'1 r, ,,"ll .. ~i<~ """""" h.,.. Isa~ wo w .. So I P. r1pp::d ror 1(lII~ Ill'" IlI:lLldl" Ole DorI P .. I,,",,, ~ 0 .... ' It.. Id'-6eid....tJ. boI:Jl><d. nun doa.·, 00< . . 'c b< rO!' 103 Tl"Ie I1lIe io tllr:I, th. II.lItC1 cuI"! Fl cmllt':If d>e win unless lie plocK! a"" r·,n in ~;"p. s.~ e~,~ ..,. ..,....., . ~ .... ;n.loo ~"'. ...... In 1he ---.! .0<1 .n0",",' 10 d>e tblrtl. We..,. go< I ~ Ic>d lId U look. Ilk. 8,r1>r:, II hO""8 _I< ""t theR. He·. "';(~""! hio '""" .. d . ,.•<I<.i"l; i( <round ... Pa~, . .. . . . ...... 31T .,........- - - _._. - r- ._-, l1lo..lJ.· ~- ""t" _ . _ - . .. T""."y ' ' co:!o ""Iy ,_ ""'I~ oio:m b-. to brcal It.: ABcrlcm u . S"" f"ta>fd and on ~.io t-lis-,t only ~.ooo 1." ,1...-..1 up. W, not • i"O'I'i", "" i.bl 'ot.", 01 blS<~11rI :;ca1Ut:. W. d..... bllle 1Io:11E • ...bo. "",'re .....in •• _ ,~< 10.. 1Ia,,< Ihi! ,~;'d · dlC<· me.n. ""n A-1011 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-1 Filed 08/26/13 Page 30 of 30 From inside the book [ 3 , ~roh P"9" m.tcring rl.t" in h , bock • , __ _ __ ~ _! F.... bucr· ... Ibc lOp of hi> Iu,.,p, ~ L ~ _ I><hind _"'"' _pi .., .y<L6Il5 "Fir_ _ • .. r ____ _ _ _ _ " __ _ ~ ~ J ___ . .. • • AlMIIx ~y..tl . Umpire. <Io ~ ••"'0 ,"'1111 POOl"< • ..en good o"'piJa. I rem:mber "IN:. Gc:o~ SooI. lin • ...,." up 10 Boo ..... Hc m,,' .''C lrri"cod Ed """"'~ tho """«I ...... "".1""", Il .tot. Howud tim wt.c..~ RIIII ~ '.... lIeh : n~ t10 and Scot, .... It""" h]" "g 'hcouik> ""ukJo,', h.. c '~ """'_ '" .... ~ ;11'" !;.'.''''R .....U"'o,l .. '" "'I.,..! cl>< pI ... "'rugh' uoJ.Iio.l .. , "'I""'i;ol, good job <hi knod:lot..l l. A. co.pie of ,im.. I '~I'OW i, I:no.- ~l p. 3nd !he ball "",,mod 10 drop irI:c Ill. dirt. But ,I .. . , O>IJ, 011" I: hid cru<s«! ,I>:: pI_«. '" be ""'kd b,-,, ~ 01 Ihe", .lrih.. 5om< .mpirc. call oho t.e ",,"'I><r ",,"'!-.co iI. _ 'NI>". iI «_ Ibc ;>1>10. ea!I", pi''''' """... A-1012 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- x The Authors Guild, Inc., Associational Plaintiff, Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, : : : : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Google Inc., : : Defendant. : : : ------------------------------------- x Case No. 05 CV 8136-DC EXHIBIT 1 [PART 2 OF 3] TO THE DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. BONI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT A-1013 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 2 of 30 From inside the book [ ~e arcr catc,",' 15 palOS m'tc h t» catch., in -h s to,f: a _ ""'Y II< ... . C 11K """" ,e:o. " K<C' " were: pl_yi:l, ap.in>l _h 0Ihe< iD the CluJ,B c.ro:ina LAore- Rich ~ ... hit 1\<0'0 home nt.1 i" L"" &:., B'me of I dO. bktlo»:r IJId \1e < I.~ had SO"', okallhll lIIybcxly"l>:> hit tblt¢ .. me IUIJI In wvukl F So the ~lher ploycn OIl Rollin' l<1<li A<UIDO ..... \>&<:. '" .. Ioar, 0{< ,,00. 00' ....) 1t"~ .. • . Il0l-1001 II> sonobody <lie II tile lime KId lOll " lie IlIr'II:d 1<l ,.." ....,."... ... 0 &rio ...... b._ "" _ _ ~ ' •• look ~ f horfOJ CfOI .... llio f"", Ir_ he b<P" '" do In l..w. <lmoe. n. I>ot-I«>!er d 1»cn hot_fClOltd (fe< ,••m h!mstll. Joc ~ II . po.. "ad aw.~. she', IKiI in"mud II sloe.mU:o. oolJlelltbo, ""V" rome ...u.d _"5.tinS' .... it _ O/~. It·• or RDlKllie [O! , ht::kd "", 'he lame i~ Iwr Orll"",. n.. Orioles L""e 10 hot ri~' now I, C(l1UI ~ '~1I:I1b.J,JJ. Bu, poe< 0"'1" L<K>k ._. . '", ... .. A-1014 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 3 of 30 From inside the book [ Sca re, 6 ,'J'o m, tc ri ng b •• QIll , n in Ih 0 book P'lI" 281 01\ tIIn:. p;ltbcl.. 1Ij kn,dr;Ioblll$. 1 hOOl Btmit A'ltn JIIU. """"', wbclr. '>01. "", he rcO<hcd.,.., ODd laf>PCd one I~ llIe: I«O!ld buc- I:pt:i.1 ..... 010. F ... k H_ r:< • roi"gIe" ""'. lie'. ..,boIty...., 110:7 I"m p..l til< UI""lklull .. "' ",,01, r...p,y """'P" 1"~1e to do tho.. 10 ""., Y""l= .. r~,"" ... "'1"'" .. ......"..,£ . "" '" " " ' , _. cu , ... YO " " ~ ,~, .... • pinl In f.." "'" m 'e~ t .......... h<!r, ~......",d , ~~""'~ " !he kago<. YO" \t....... tile b.ll . "",1Id II", "", . _< I>:,' ~ buc",.., '" .~u,,_ 'IOp to _ J b• ..,""'n '~ , tj", bo .. mo.-oft ..... i","I~ ... ~ ond J'O" do ~ with ~ 10< d. II." We ",I boCkr a, ic 1Ij !he [mo. (,,,,, 5<>_ <>I ,he gU)' ">ore on No .. C~"' n. ,"" Son Dio<&<> fm' "".. . 111811. !ormr: tly of ClIc Al.ltU. Tiley kepi ,.,11-., lIl~t II< " .. Pi'Y alltl Mo. ··M.Il""- ..., uel"" "i«: ,hi"p, Illdary ... :oJ .., <"U' ~ m~ tin.. ,110 Iu, time ~'.y r>' ... h '" Co"',, h " a coup'" of ",n • ...,d boac UL Wei, .... i""'p:d oul 10 a 4-0 lead. bill lbc fitsI :me c.d Ho~ Ito"" A-1015 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 4 of 30 From inside the book I 3,o.c h 3 P'ge, rro:ch " 9 . ho,m, p in toi, "'" Pogo 163 '1"'<0, ,,"" >n:r, .. .,ponm<t>"", ..,orwO? . _ IliItl:II W _rn",:.,.,. .. pot type: ..,....". ur '"& "..,,- V'~&M "I(IIIf«, """ e.nltr- '" P,,",,296 we ""'l' nor .. •piri•. '""""'~. "" 01 """pac, 0""": I'" • '''' .. In r... _ fBi&"' ..... tH I>err, """"""d tho ~"",- i~ tiro '<a,"e. VO" dr""" II>< h.lI ,,1Kftd lire Mrn--catc.',.. 10 nISI baJcrn., 10 ,M"· ' 1"1''' _ b... l1IlIn '0 ,1IIn! b.... In....., ...... ""~ Y"" 00 ~ "';\10 • 100 of a.... w~ ~, l><\!cr . , ;, 011 Ill< ti"",. "_f",,.n Pogo 3L~ . Mflon' ~ "', - - . . rar '" ,Ire h1t. HOI.,.- - Waltlr 0·, 1 ro< l~ pkk..,n, Ha" y.- s.u., .",.gIl, 1h:"," • p"'cnd ball '0 rhe lnf.ci<l .,.J II ",), lx. ;"'0 the <l>Nuro:> ... ~ bf'elll<. " p doorble pI . y. • ;><.fo<cl <1;.1 •. ~SOfI of 3 bilC~. " ..... [);oli Rodef. ~. '·e;y time "" luo.e an Old~ t'" A-1016 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 5 of 30 From inside the book JU rrl~ C pogo, ",t,I-; '-g iOIll, n toi, " l O2J7 "of; --. - - _ . ... - ---_ . . _- -, ,.... --- . - --. !u1;«kk....... wo. 1d inlctf<oc...;th my j<>b. job ;. I a id Fn~~. " V"" ha ..n' ,.,. • i<>b. All )'011 dO .. go CYt. to u. baIi~, ~"(I ""'" o.-et}body • I>IIlI uod I~II l"'" .l, :boo<: ..d .... 1Clo tb: pme. WIo<n ok I"P"/'A i""'p ~p on<! ..11 ...... bod. .p. Th .. '. ,.,.,.. ... ~ "oo;Idmo lob. II. "'.tT' ....,,'t., W "''''pi'''''' '"..vm Ih•• ball p;.)..... play'" ."0) ~ il". i"p"'sitk 10 »''' .1lK>I.,.ally blgh Io, ,,,y ""! 01 ","",_ rODlbl U pI"ym, F' I II ~ ... ~.I>o '" III< Iocle, ""'... T"lIoy<l>.." or.<I ,,-, i ~mp up""! do,""" onoJ "~,, ril l. .. 4 kll ",do .. he. <In 'N: heh...:, ",I ."""1"""1""1. ,,,,1 , pi' . nd kid.: """ ' ''C'' >ncI th<y." ,cady'" go OUI • • d bUS! ",me hcJ<!s. If • l>aeball _,d .,._ ... - .~ .. -- .. '--~ ~. ~ - -... -~. ,- . ~.~ " l O34. .y"" s>' IU \.0",. 1 .f '-" " '"y. w ·M.ke . .... YOUI'<" J:OOOl jump, H u:y. ~ --~ --'- , .'"'-'" A-1017 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 6 of 30 From inside the book [ S ecord , e ru E pOl cO mctch n 9 0" . ' ir thio bo ok In u., ttl.., i,m, 1\' I ..·..: kod ''''''. mrrmittr<! an error ( hit II<n Gornp;rno:ri> in ,to; he..J "yin~ to ,hr.,.. ~ i n""' . ' ftr>t), wao ~ "" by • p....., ~I (a ",.1 p>d In", kl.r tUl brab in on • ri&bll"n:kd hI ... , ..... t <f1 M<Ntrtnoy- III""" orAl Net to the tmt .IOF) aM • . _ pie '" ...... if.<>: ~ i". Two ... ca""d """" So ,1-0: old ERA 1WtO eft .. _- ne kl<IlI rna.Jc '" or"", Ud .... l)'l;IOOy!>alal .. e lao 01. I. =m y...... ,loop. 1'.., '"m,d lui circle. I mil) ..y to mfElt". " iV>. T~m .. y. you .hould ha ... had 1l1.,.M bGt 1 go oul of my ~ t t> 11-_ trbsoIlidy ... n:"" ....... I ~un\ pld up lhr: n:oln ba~ aD<! >l... II <knoo., and I Iiaa'l. l:ick d ....... d I "",,"lOW. ""1":110 pIa)'O'" . • ~- ----- -- -~~ ~- -<." ~ .~ •• ~ ~---"-~ •• - ...... dm~ ... ..,k fa" my JIo""- But it·, I"" ""_ So> I w....,.. ~ ODd pi\clt IIIe ~intb. One K' Y P on wil/l I mp. an",,"," on u C:roI'. Nol:>ooly Itiu m. b.lt p>d 0fId 1'.. ""I <I. m. Io""'$- ,-,.;. dO< ..', ""0to' tile 1<""' ...hien rem.i", 10-). r, . . .. iog u~.lJ H'y .taW,;;:. "'" ,.". "",A ~ .. ..... ] ~,h~, I t liT.>< I A-1018 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 7 of 30 From inside the book [ Secrch 12 P'9'" 'notching .,. nthi, boo, P,ge 32 ..... r "'"""" bot;, l<>okolil« l".. "'" ",""II '0 l>c "'ody ...."'. 11'0 q.i", om ......' r....,. my I.., .",,"! .1Ie Y.n~"", ;" [9~1 I ..... ""'I ly l"PfC'I ..... Ii"~' !rom thl: bol:l.~g. I led \be d"b In ~ ;>tIdied "';lh ~.. itty, ."d I 11". "J' tbc f~,.." hils, ~k .... ....r _ Ioomt. . . ,,~ cn:y r...o 0I1btee 0111".- bit!. My ERA "'0$ .0112 . .. ~ic. ",:,./1, less "ill, I (Il00/ lJ<!rol "ffili 1t11<1 n,[p U<! ""> <o.na ~l 11< Ioo~." ,toe "'''''P''P'' toe'I:>:< • t.~ ERA. ..~""V> bil besI _ in 1961- 71(11",<0, '25 mlnp ""d .. ... ,~e:op. II ..... I' ...... ~ .011 EllA. k ..... I year oft .. Pnil Rep' of Ih' DodFB hod hO<l hi••~p<r 1<'",1..... [ ...... l .~: ERA"";' !c:i<t. Sh",1 tu.t dI"C<J I.o,oo; ~" $[ 6,000 .. ><I ht ..... lUllitg r., Ui.OOlt Shott nil 1>< ....... H I! . be and .bt ... ht t h~ bol, Rep" ~.a ju J.ipe~ • "",net for SH.OOO. M Repn h lf A-1019 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 8 of 30 From inside the book [ ,; , ar:h 67 pag" m't:hing pl.,' i1 th ' boo, P"9' ,s ...n1"' ~'5- ""11,1. do y.... th". you "U pla~T "I dm'\ trio .... I ,"",SS 1 Cal play. Yeah, hell, ... t .. Ihe be:1. 5..... I oon pl .y ,~ 'T><Nld. C;"' ... _ w~ )0. Out th< .... Unl,.. ".,... " ..... ,,, h,,," ,,-., , ........ , ~'." .... , '" )'0" .... hun_ nO."" ....,,'......... . Page 54 ~ ..." , '~I" ~ "'" ~ , ~ ~ ~J ~, ~_~ __ u • ~" • •- _. __ 01 li<:k". I.......y ~""" ..... admire«. n.. ion!!,'" ~ ill ,I>< Am.,.,.,.., Lelgue ..... pl.yed in UflrOil • )'em -10, I pi~(11«1 tile: lUi to:v<n ho,.,£, (Ill Ibo Y." ..", ill I 8~,'.~ f'U'OO , :IIiII8 wit<. t .....JI. tbi.~ ~p I dOl "'w 22·;'lIIIn, ,...., orA Lb<fC w:n: .... <11 boohbd It.. dugout, oil rei ...... of ~ hea'-"" 1 ""'" tho. I~ m)' -.-r ,b..". Some- Poge 05 If> Lep Iaa> " tlul Liw. """,', . we "bAL Berr • M .. ~. and ... "Wh,'d 1M ..y"1" Mi;:~.y w. ..a.:..., II< t.nal "Ho aid play it Ioudor." MiI'lic Clpl.i.1o«l. Liw: d ob', bdbe Ilw. Oon tbr: Ulhc.r lwlll be didn', .. op. I • • ~ ,ho hu&. h_tIU ... h .. viI • .-.I _ ... _ ..;..".. 'V.... ""'" ; .. .... hod< A-1020 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 9 of 30 From inside the book rJltrh )J rag's ma,chi1g <a1, h in this boe>< roge 1G7 __ _ •. . " _ , __ u. _ _ _ _ - - - 0 ••••• _ _ _ ' V' ,." _H •• I don' bl .... H .... y. Or 1'.g:I,roni, ... ho d_n't '""'" to ~."h "'" tllh<t. Aid r ",!<lId 11><111 \lUI. I'm IIUlie 10 Ilk. 111<;. iMnI ...·.y Ire", '" I-'age JJj _ R . ~i"""" ~;"h', k:n, • M • • • <OrridOl lOOOl <ho vioit.io, <I"~""""" ,. 1ft ",l>ou rhe .,. ... ".bod 1 _oelrood him the .ny_ H. ..oiUd ~ • • h.. .a Iurn1M<kU<ta:, Poge :og2 R",.g<, " HcJ' Ed, I' .. gco a Ih.e<-o'clo<k pi.". I. O>l<b ~CIt'.e. * ",bill you CD <k> .bo.\ eottlli "'" 0111 Q I!hi! blllV-.....- R""t" Ilid he ><outd. 00 u.. fir" ~it,h of thc iWalF ... 1, • Itri~~ and La,!, lunr;tlng 01\ tt.e 1"1' m p of thc dU!:""I, "Hoy, Ru.~ "~l< !be g''''' reus. A-1021 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 10 of 30 From inside the book [ S..arc, " or P"'J" m,t, r; "J Hy n thi, hml Pag, 52 Dy M .... Ihouth. ""..... lDIIilr. ,n d"mp of h e 0: :en a,d lace 'urn< bill> hoopp'" '" <unl< ~u, .... ). II " IS Oi,k S'""H'O<)' d. y ,,,,,.,..•od ,~;, ""8> , ~. lime John~r P.. t ~ .... """1!:i"I< 11>0 Rod So. anoJ Sl . "l "'... rl')·in~ r", hi, • ...J ,l""in! or Ilo:c f~, • I", ur "';"E'. I'", ,..",., ...."''' ,I. .. ~II<I'''K ~I ..."<r .. ___ • ~_ nf _loa!, on. ..... __ ___ " .• ___ .• ,_. ._._'L _,_ ..• •• ~ ~".' " <•••__ ••.•__ Pogo 153 -~ •. . . - - • &- •• - - _ • ••••• ".... - - . . .. - - • •_ , . to..,. the", '0 i0oi .-.-.d w'.'b tho Bdrl o~. ~. ,_Jld·robe.,. olec1ing 'k Imin, "r.y .• It Ibt eJld <1 .IC~ ...1Id 1lip. tiro: !uy ,,1>0 h..J oJ.; " "'_' kip ,g, by& r«'f"<. bcln5 • Th"'U _red. peoI. j .., ft,.i"!1 tlMom. Tho OWl oIocted .. cII.,good a dol .... Ak<>. if )"" ",1 CO""", .'1iIl)!.al ,he I.... a.'t<r al!:U>< ....., C "rlt~ thl! A-1022 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 11 of 30 From inside the book [ Seuch 751"'9 "' rr olc,in[ .o tt n thi, boo. P,[.121 , , "",-', tIo .... 1Ull in 1Y! I, ... ",It.isim apuo. flO ...joyce l>tq ..mir.o;ltd. I _III 0.' '0 ~ ia my I<>n! uO>dcr.cu wi,h • ",arm·up joe." 0 .. , "'" lop.,d I ,tout;bl In ny",lf, M[)orm, I ,,~ ..... ,body <n.1d so:: ~ "", 100:", b<io~ t/'.lo _foocx..-Wbl .. y I..oxtmuo ""ltoc, Cf • «<>.~ H If tbt~ lXIIy ........ bow hord I _ "iJ:ing ,~ ....,k t.nd _ • .bw, " Li>Ia:o, d... ', wu'IJ s.rt,- ,"" S<b\llt.< PI4. " r lee a lot '" <luI Sol "l'" 8" ;" 0 ... eO. .nd ou' .... 01. .,. 0.:..', ""''')' >bou, . ~. i)Q "-~.lC:V1/r ~U ~ .'c l~rJo to 8C! ItUly:' I <ouldv.: ki>.><d tum. I me ... </>on:" a ntaJI ....!roo ..."' ....,do • 1<11 MI;< ..'wi I ~"" $";>c<:I<d. Bu! oJt." lie sUI, "Tho problem wilb your oJt. "W. jIH. ! juri hod O1lOOgto," Mi.a.., ..io:I, "i\nd I 1>0<1 to houi of: 11'kI1""'.a. j'(IU ,M Comer ..... >lUI Iyin, .. tIo< ';'10 1«1in, his j_, -W.U, "'" rIoco.II', .. , k')I<Iu , bad p<,*",,- !I<.ai:!. Tutip.t C<Jmc:r "" hi> ' C>""§, Mix"« ........, ~I< [IUX&'''''' A-1023 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 12 of 30 From inside the book [ S e crch 3 p,g« m>lch " g 0." " tho to)~: P,ge 171 ",c•• CGlIIItdowIl Ml II>: ouU ..lito wt!re Head. ''Only d,ln OIU t~ ~ ""'} .... n. ~ ........ 10<', """';;" up and oJ<>- tho d>£OI'l and '" P,9" 294 yo. iXJUld Il" only 21 00"" ID • ,lne-tutbl bIIiI~", llId obi tho nlio boo_ .. ~to a n' ........ b.d. of 0." ......:I. oot c....p. 9~"ndoer lind PI£Iluooi lloougbL c!iII......Uy. The)" laid i! you rK"O(! • h~ .d ra1 tOtten,.... t.od • too ..- door>«> ' o strike oom-:k>J1 _,~ ;r :"'" fac:cd DOIly 27 or 21. And .. he tailed. Brahm&r t>' IK!t. tnt! H..• . r.ge 33'3 . ..· .. · .·._.. _· .. •. _ .u._ ~._~ ·A.· . . .. ._._.b ......_... Hu< i. ;,.. m)" J"' .... f m ri'<hinS I", • 1"" .... 01 OI>O\eI".d:, in A"!:",!. I •• lIly ... I",.y. Th~t·. "'~~ I thc>oJ!ll' "bout ",ho . I ....,mt QU' '" ,~. mound. This Ii< run, tills Is ti<:h. 5n. <001. II< oojon .. u"v .o !!n II!< r.-el <>I lloJl ,d A-1024 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 13 of 30 From inside the book [ Sear:h fait fO "9" In.tcl-; ng f . i, in Ihi, bod.: P>g,8 '·We wu.h:t •. ( Co ilia!. Ir. OU( or ..... IIC:IWI ." A _pi<> d d . )" 1>Ic, 1M .... lod "Dooo 128,000 lO"od fUr .ga". to )'OIl"?" 'Yo ;, dec" "'I)" f. ir. In fKl chef< .,.. • k>' 01. [ool< lis....... ' hiny •• hmy ....n I'd .. ~ Ihm),""" ..... """Lid T""'III.)'-<irh ~ t ..... ty~ .. , , , , Pag,3'::9 , • ,,, • •• ,m '_.11 • , • , • , • "" •,•, • • "" •• • • • • • • "" • ,m ._, ~ -.. . . . TO " ' ............. .. - P"\l' ,., • ~. - ~- ~CO • • • •• • n •. • ..• •• .. .... • •,,• ,• • • •,,• • • • ..•. ..• .. .. .. • ,. • • , • • •• .. " .. ." •• •• " .. •• .,,, . ..• , •• • • • •• " " " " " ,.. " • "" .. • "" • ,• ,• • •• • •• ". .. ,.. ".. .. • " • " " • • • , ~ "" • ~ <0. - A-1025 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 14 of 30 From insidE the book season [ Se~tC~ Bo.I"" .iooo he fnt CUI>< .p ... ilh ,he 'i~ , ...... ~ with hiI io:olIoet.&Ib; ... ,,~ .,d lui cnll1wiuIK, im'PlII;"" way <II '"""'""" the"" ao.l h """."".1 "' .... ~"'. db.y "' ................,•...., ill>< '1"'"' i,,.;th • .w.:,..I0,8"" ...." .. n. nod ",. ..""'" b.r~, pr .... oj IJl:l t &eocnl tole"". As wua/. h' wu lheat! Qt """ ¥l'wUly YCJO P'go A, • • • y ..... <eI. JDb .. ... " • eom, Nc<nl ,.,n • • 1Id "~ Mtk ,he", wr.o In, '" _ " ' "" hill'.. tie ,""""oJ '" ktl ~~ .....,h d.y .... "'" mOil 100p"n." day 0/ the ....... onJ i, ".""d riSh' ... i'" ,I>< op<~;", S'''. d .prine , ... ining. lrirn 11 ...,,-)" wi:l;n& ,~ .. ori".,. • ,n ""'.M" .,,,,,,,,,rl ..Ill • ~omo. And tlU a.....t • Itt 01 ""'~""'J:O probkm>. G.). pI.ycd " If 1"" don', )0> 110,. to ''''1 ill tk bo,ud,;o ...t tk1 pooJI<>: l the oj""",., .. id'igIo~" he . o.J,J , "If "/<'U """" PI. 1"" h. ... '0 p<m<I on till: door ..."1<1 I/W'. tk wly Iky caLd1 you:' m" ." A-1026 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 15 of 30 From inside the book 14 ral'S m,tc htl) aV"~1' ~(O{ " thIS Page " .... 111<"'-""'" ~rc .. t". clu><: I did betEl onoJ tc,u r, TIle WI five dlrp ortl-.., ........ I fi ...... d with. fturry, . nd .. y • .",.doNn ...... '" I; ....... 11, III< u.ucU.t. '1\11>$ 1.90. "'~k:h ......, (C'Od. no:: I..t d.y I1lbe 0<llWIl I .... in thr: d ub!xl"", """ MJle . .. Ill ~ wall". to Ie< mo fo<. "' .... te, I ... 0, up to hior offioo and k ,ili P' g. <:6 .. . ~- ~ .- ~"'1 ...-'- ~-. oompt. .. ,y I>one<t. ( I W<lrI<I<r ~ .. ~.~ . ". "bo, ,.~ ... • • •• ••• •••• • • ~ ,II< f_bo lt. ba,~.tbo • • • d l>c<:k.y poCp:c """,1<1 .oy 10 I~.I I'm MIl SUIC lui Iccl llul •• y. bOIl I ",'. :IJ ...,.,', (~inl < he", i> ."1 ,,",... bl i,,~. ' .. I im ido _\.00II. I '''''y I:c n. Tv •• bot I 'hiok Il><..... 'ny V",bl;"S- ot~! ;,,_limal p...io! .n 00,' .100. of i.-.formation. roge :081 ,.h. a,mgo. is up. Ted S.",1Co • rlj;ht.yo,,!" 01 .,O\UId .llO, " tho a .. ' hiller. H.,,) Wolh, rno!ic'" 10 10k" , )' Ed" .."" In.,. if "'" 1nI'II to _II< Tollll and f lldl to Sav>F. And I. tIl tltll*or "'II 10m. JM!k::r,lc "'.. • loftIIa_ b~lel hndcd t.itta .. I w ... ,~ ...... ",jlh • p><l bal~;"S ,~T~I •• 0.. ""~ . ...... _ o. ~ ... ,. ... ,~ A-1027 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 16 of 30 From inside the book 6 pages mat ch n 9 , llde, in -h s bJOk r'l e 167 "1' _,- I • ...,. -,-..... I <an _ . >11th< Iime. " "BUI lI>:)' 1Ilf1 1001'",10' the oaaJ> 1UIr." Sal ulfj.. - /\lid if iI 4oe",', bn:d )'<'" ~ 1>OllWo, cb:." ·'Wl".at about Wilh<II"r ' I ..id. '11Icy..,.;t!or!lh blldJetml ," ,,"'- .... ~ .~- ...._, ._ _- , ... -,"'- ....._..._-,._...... ... • 1".' ~ ....... • U k< !boo 1dIo" .. '" ''''''''' willo th< oh.i<L·Z""Ik •• Th. hu,lI« "ill 'read 011 0/ hi> tim. I""'><!U,S the .......... 're.di.s _~ .. b ..... "",lIoS ~ ke hoU . , <Sewn gIrtJ. His "",,,,mil< jtBl kHLnp ""'~ .... _, .....u. .. ~ ... IIl"", 10k;"! it e ..y. Aa:I ... .sa. pe>t ru.,ol., jut tati:lt lio rooru:we', _to, .. I pi'cml co..,h. He thin .. .. tbtr Iii" JlIM,.y Sail. "Y~ ... "", <:&01 1<11 ..,,,"' S'J I>< ".. lu l/1. u .. . . Iid.:, ,· "'Y'- "Thot', "'h' "'ey ~id 10 me. J h . ~ • 1><~.... """h...d cu ...... h... J :lntca ... I p I nd lbey lOkI .... I hIId 10 Ihmw • <lido,. So I _ ked on Ow,,,, ,he .lido, u '" ~ I 10<, "'Y _rlI ... d 0""'.' no .. ""'t hl ..., ""_ co ..ke A-1028 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 17 of 30 From inside the boak [ 3 e ~rch . octye )J p,g ... rr"chi'9 <"IVQ in Ih .. bock ............ ~1'Uh hbt. bo·. up.' ever the him hi'" ODd "twJ, hit lhal _ low.,.. ....y. ' idt .... 1<t WI.II. y"" I'" to pilCl "I'i!m hi", ..... Y.M """ tf"" "£hi !\till "" ~"" .~ .. , •••••• ~_ ,n." HII ,,1 .h • • , .. , , ~_ ~ ., R. h' no~ h'~' TIx: 1.1<>-1 .wv<IlI ... <7l "'i~c N .nl,oII t... him (.udi.. ~ w:, ~ s.J ",.<Ii< ,bout biJ .""'... tWi. A ~b ':n ;, .. "'""'"" biiJ Ih.. brnb in !he n ,.". ~,~ , N'- ,.m,s .... Joe Morp. a .... b;tc~ '" 10. ..rib ,1.-.. . "J~. ''''_.~ ~ ". '" ".- ".,," ' ''-'' 'j; 'h' dJ~JI after nU;tn~ Joe M ml'n .... y ( ~. v. I ...~rd ''Silt<, Norm. bow', ~ pg'" ''I'""..... In> Ii"" W, """, ... d 'n ~ 'c. I big cu"", boJI w~h)OO )"" ~,~ ..... , .hnd, iii" "iloh v,," A-1029 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 18 of 30 From inside thE book 73 p'ges malC~in[ JO. n t~i' boof: ~. "" 111 .. ,. APRIL • I ... £hI Joe S<hu .... ,,;IhooJ •• 1;'"",,,,,,, ......... h t<><lo.y. b.. kt<llll:n inl), ."..... """ llSI:.d hUn. Je3l!Y. Ibnl OIy <baao:s of • • • ~_ • • __ • --, "I 'm 'I d •• " . . " •• _ , .. U ". _ ••. • , . . . . . .. . _ • • • • • • ruckonS Wini..... " So:'. I" ~, M l-lieo M ..... I . .... OIIly 1hiJI: J"d dane lIJ ~ . , was ........ up. 1"<"l>y J .. ' [he , "' .. ' "." ""'II)'. J...... ..._...... . . . ......... .... , . ....... ~ _" " A-1030 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 19 of 30 From inside the book [ Se",ch I P.geG2 I r;u<U)QU Cl>ul~ sar I"m "" •. {j." Ding IlIMg 11<11 &<" h.. lin' "II'i." ....i..,.. St"~ U_ IO.T I_ b<l .. 'OJ'S 1Ie" ..... ,cody. I ' 01~ I>im n ,... ....... , to:< ..... 1 iI" a. ,bod • •,.ku <II<; ,,_ ~'. ~b. '0 be ~l<I otn. o.on .. "" o,,'OCr -.- - , _ - - - -- - - ------- - - - n -- - - --- , - , - - --- - hi".. _bod . He.."....d M. . dn. 1 ~ I ' • ., ~ ieh _ ,t... ",,11 - 'I.hi. t.J 01'1 J:IC. I bid • JtOOd """"""0' '" IIUlI" r.<>d .... Ible '" \lln>'O' f....., ktI ...... _ . ..hid> "' ..., pIe.sed Sol M'g;", Alto, 0., ~ Jam M"";" .. d [bm,Il B'll<l.>o go! it. So "", Ief<lwHll: •• BW H,0f')'. &Dd I IIocl m.de I" 1(1 I !:""'I tccllo,. bat It I ba,-. A-1031 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 20 of 30 From inside the book grou nd e' [ Sc~,d 'pog'< mtcr;ng (110,,,1<1., in th .. book ~,(e 6J Stattord <am< i. lef I"" "'''P and IOOteI1l.rnbl •. ~ I ..... ," [ncr<: in ,k, .. ",,",I •. T of 8'"" Tp .. ,I>< ~ .. , ,uy .:1 k""d),b~T • • "" SOl t;m ox. l "".11<1:<. T~ It.• ".:11 IfIlr I ,h« .. ~, ~ bc:l",lIul nuctJ.ba ll>. lie ~~ II", lim 'We 10, ,,';I ~'. Tho. 1>< 1000iod ,Iv ... 0/ ,,,"., 0/1' ..,d [ ,,,,,,,d ~,(e 14' P'gcH1 ~"e 2J3 .."". 01 !he., for SIriUs. I SU1ICI: Bulord Ir.[ "" I 11<. .1)' !hit """" ri£'o' ."..< .... p..... 11><" _ . OIlIoHle . Goo tho no" ...... ar • pop-up ODd 0011 gr<lUIIIo,. Alit' lhe to"'" ItO """ ..... "..,. aM uid r)' I'd b<cn ,hrow\.'l JOO OILI<IL Tho, ....... lot Dt droy lO<by. I'm dOl ........ I = "l~ m.. y like th ••. A-1032 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 21 of 30 From inside the book [ Search [u,"or I r ... . ,_<>, I!'" .., .~"", ' ''''' .." ...." ..... ~5 ""1t-"", S<> Darn]] wd. up ... d ... fly, A...! C_ .. ",,,,- "'-". Wtc. Damll CO,... iolG 1110 d.p<1 .. \be: . 1Id <III tho lm;n" M ' &ii< .... him lu.v: It, ' 1hrn1D]~" he .. ~ -'1'"" A"",.. )'AI"~ l!'" t " Fl"'~ from"'" .t.. "" in ...... . ituation." ..,m, P'go 176 ... " .. Xl b~tt' wtro bOIS. Onill, .m I <ver ~~ to l'now """ "",,,1 1"",,"".,,1, ..... ",on." ,rid '0 ' 1<& ""<GOd • • d E4"ar<ls Ih", '" him 1 Ed"'·. . ... ill . , ... '" [ ,",h... Ho c.t, "'" 'h< h "<,I<~a ' l h<"~ f ,M. : M~~'fIIE1 ...d h< doc:>n', m~ ,be biJ ~. ed"art!> ""&I" '0 be P,." id ... ,. ,», A-1033 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 22 of 30 From inside the book 5 pa~es rra,chi1~ SI ", in l1i3 ooeJ< •• '''"1'" •• UK 'I".'~ __ p' • ,~ •. ".~ "'" ~ 'K ~'HR' ~~ 1M: pcu'<!s lipln. I'olklwin , ~-ord ·. postlllalC I WU .i1.liJl ~ "" 'h, bcn<b .. the: ,u,. .. hire O.."y ..... pill:hio& Th~ I "" "" 00 0FP""" It I<;W ""I,y ,,, ti<I<n Lo"" ,hot pnrt. of §.ol Maglir ..6 l ¢e SOh ..''' ...... ~ ."".. al>o gcn;"~ ..,me ..... n.... ... ~, .. .. 01 • 'l"'<i1l kInO, '1)OOlulOly .... ~ .._ ., ""', . n ................... ,.h'~ u - ' ..... ;" ""'''" . ..." ..... <I ........ t, P'g' r, with ....... ond o<Id m<k lotmo:io ... 'hA' """, .. bock !he ft.rnes ,I,h. ocoi., . uo . Tho Sin w:oo a e:>ll<n pottO. half-hllokn. 'lid II "'" d,.".,.. oJon! it oppc".d I~ .. 10m< glaot Il"kkn clephont ,""";", 01""5 ,I" t.",;""" aM 1 lell so good I rom<mbotH ","",.th:ng JGhu, $";" u .-d 1) I>lk _ I . A-1034 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 23 of 30 From inside the book clr 9 pages match nJ dill in -h s boof: P.y; 74 "'V'" ..>II, -"'u. u" "'" ""'.. · Oh. ,.,.. •• bo on ~t. y." V l U,. .", ~ u"' ""'"1"""- J"" •• ;d..•J.... <pi' on ; ,..,~ rub """" din ~ ." Hop" "' .... ,j"·e '''''"' d.ooc vi. b" r,"gc-<> to< . 0 I.,..,. bon Joe .. . n. o..t ~ di;;b', !hi"".,.., ,aJ'" ol...... 1.0........, h, _ ~'" I" ,u uf 11M: t"'I'c. 1-10 I... . 1M lin' i,n;"11- and "'0 W<l" :>- 1. n.. """"00< t.!ineIoor c . ... in:O IfIt chbhouc. Co ....... ..1<) by Ihis t.... ,.as ""...... onl)' .;:.ok . 1I_;>. <.lin u:d nu "c\IJ . ... am... ,be """" wiIlo .. &b'" ,n IIi> 'Y". I.op«! on M"ot..,r'. _ and 1d...d him "" lb. ~c-m< f in ""'oc: =. P.y; 336 tho Abo 1.1 niu-, I _ Sl.Uidi"l Po "'" oJ:iII put 01 tho< Irlfltld tlclore p _ and Mille. <..-.: eN« on:! N id, · ' Il~y . )'01''1'< <lOt oIl." ... d .. '.lIo<.,.., _lei IUro "" ,he ;",",ld d;...· , ..., d ""'y. Ii",..,. W)"'" " a< tooiil1laround in tho< .nd he'• .,. ""IlI<I<le, lII<l lie P hit "" ,he 601!'" ..... ..,-,loj,., pIo,.", lI~rry mrio • ",Ie . t:'~1)" w... ""_1:1h;,,, 1 • __ _ _ __ _ _ L _ __ _ _ __ _ _ • . " A-1035 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 24 of 30 From inside the book [ Search "P' go ' 'I1,tchin, " • • 1 in h. book ;, <he _ , ri§:" .i<!c of tho cbu. is the b...II. Meal ud riab' ru.d to .he riFt """'hiD& tbc lelt Iq io Ii>< 1<, io ~;Hnd·T'I" . 'The principle 1><.. II 11111 h~1iJIC II~w 'r< '"'~ 1:10: lIell lIId ""nI"lli~ an: \lClOoO. 'Tho IUcoC ;, .... tbo I....IIj &a'N.& tho k,,,, .. and tbc "'<ii<ll<l< ",ill "" IO""""'S tbe righl ...... Th .. io, DO sip ;" -ud ""til oftu tile right pI., Mar.lle ~1ed il0UI Ie all ... unk 1..<",... h~""""'" ..cI collet<: 1,1. )'<, . .. bi> "",~ ".Io:h;" ~ toO "" ""_ 1 doub< il. So I'll do il b",o, It . tart«! '" ,he ~n' ionir:s ...100, Joe Sp ........1 1001 TOillmy HIf?,, " lead"" 04. ~ four-tlni"" pild>«. Hcpr! ..... IIw: ~ I barte, . 8a11 ore, On t.aIl ....." way uvor H<p.o\ h<.d. Horp<l trios'" ••",1 xtUIld • • d . ,,_. . - r - " - . __ . - 1""""1"1, . _., ... - - - ''''''u ..) - --, ""0 """",01 pilot. ri,b,..,.", ... lor a trip'~ . ... '" I .Iri ~ e nul ... line pilClors. In IIw: ~.!O.~ Harry IIY,. " Tol", .no., "Leek, J""'vc JI<lI. JtU! "itlin~ ~ '0. IPJ hil.tin~ .:lZO." " I ..... a!nid if "" ...!oed Tolu 1>0:'• • to.ol lCeor.d buc," E4 ...... do .ad. A-1036 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 25 of 30 From inside the book stcl e 4 pay's m'tc h", stole i1 tei, boo, AMhoull'> 1'"< ooj<o)<d tci>& io Arizuo>o. Ill<'" • .., Ib;,p' ,""". I't. ~ Lin .Id 1 "'m id h"c d;lfIC ' .. Lb Nu .... ~~ ... Taro ,!>, ..., .... ·d U<ll<:, Cul>;.. Ir<i ' i'e in flo,;' _ I'll WI:". E .... ry 'pli., bIood·w." iO"JP , . .. p"",,,,,~(} 'M _ 116<.cd wo'd 10,,,... bott!. 0(";'" , ... tolk 1 . Ilout OIl' old d» ~ III III< tnino, ;o'JU<S !aod tho Ii.., J .. rq.t<''''' 110., .boIl. - . --- - _ _ _r __ _ lIell, .Ite« Ole batdtoll wi"", ..... d,.~ k""" ,""', ,Ito "'""~1 .....' f~. be .., in orrPS "oi"i... 0< ch.. \I'e 11'" pJ.itI cV<.., '''c ".CD 4"' inl llie "'UOI. Job. J(.row;Iy. imoldCr, 11)"1 Ill.. ""'~ hi> ,.i/O f_ .,., .t«J1 Iho >j>R<, "'''''''y >be: "';<1, "0« "biz. .u lb., mo."y )'O'l P')" SO' _1. Hw. ""_ )'OlI'.. nov" ..;,~ • ....,.,., Iu-..,.,. ~. ",d> oQ'xtdy b po.r.icol.r. "l..oo ~ro;; l .1CIc ~ I> UL~ blue 1OII1~1 . n il·' ~5""'G f 2S.~ A,d Mi.e j.f,nhll ......,gh~ "My God. n-.. m",·. li.iIl8 in , dr..m ..-o)f1d. !-to 0<11 'hlIIk$ ....., wI.h ok Cordl11l •."' A-1037 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 26 of 30 From inside the book P,g,13S W;Ul~ '0 thru10 a r.. <bI11 "'. KUJd hi'trr ,.;u, ~ '·""d·l.".., uolt: .. 1'"" P • hi! load, ..d I tbi.ok [,', """"5 '0 """... r.. tb>!1 l .. I ,d ., . de.< ....... and [(, W«)ell tHl"'''' a ' ,,"all J .. d 0 .. hell. t.orno ..., or hi! .....:d bea' f t . In "wry"'" I'd r1lh<r w>lt the tu~ ",lib .,y l>=>< pit<h lb"" Ie, lWo boo, "'" ,.;u, OK .... Ir. ~ • Illy w=L f,_ • Ibe ""0 _ ,","[_pend oll 0/ ki> liD< ...."kIIo, "Ioc u.: _ . .... ...1Ib the ",at • TIlt holllkr the auuu, apcndi" _ y io bon, hoU . 1 "", . .., d"",. pll, Hio: ""'....... joan bon. . IltO\LIld I<hiD'l<leviolCft, takiD: it t:l$y. Al>d lie ".,.. pUt j." lO1i!'I\ iii> ru..mnne·, !cia.i.p. U~I poo;nd"~ eblo:~·~US1lcr . A-1038 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 27 of 30 From inside the book [ 3, arch p Iche, p'!' J4 ••..• ,- .• _••........ - •. _••• ·_-w ••• _. , - - -_. .• • __.•.• ",.. ". ,t"•• ""y, ,I'i"r. WUl<r ~." M;";Lcr I.. "" >i1l19<: ""-'Ill>. a nd .... I~ Wsl")">O , t."",~ 100.- I said lI1al w:u ~ "" .. i,h -'< ' "u if II< .. aOl,~ .ria ' 0 ,,,,,m w,,~ • )"'>OilS r iu:h<, l"d "M: a >i" ~ ' 00,.. "Thrn HolIk <.lIed Frn ;n , 0<1 ..,.jd, ··Bo\Jt.,." de>c".... . 'nol" i-'ay, bl Nw..J, ;.. ""'1'il<;I, 1""'''':' Ho o.l.InI : "lIu.t'"" ""'i" i",t w';,· "'810,),<",," 1ur ..... IHrII. y"" 8" " ~ .ru-.".,- _ ,billS 010< .I ~ tilt imrllCnal w(Wds DI O"'! Sto:!I&<l "NQ'N, WLiI. • mingl":' An: WI: tryin~ ,u ... in WI!"""" Wwn 11<1< ur an: "" ")"" '" 8'" (0., Iht _~ II.b., I .... '" I" .. is..",1nII 01 ,to. b\...,.b.lI. Aft~ ,0<lIl, olI oow.- n.. frirndl y ..do ...bt _Iy 1"" it '" Mors.'><.Il d>o other d. y. 1)01 If he didol USC b::lI<r jodf,"".' o:r 'ko .,1oc,1nn 01 M, pilda. dxi~ be <lIikd I""" the bend. by $. Mop . pitoh b.~ <OlI<h. M;k, " .... Iorio ... Aay p,,""r boo Ao Jofoony Sain h", H. !Old ~im wo.J. 1"';'''. A-1039 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 28 of 30 From inside the book [ S e~reh bullp en 65 pages rraie1i1, ~lIlIp." i1 ttl s book 'Tm 1""'1 I<",,,ullt j.w< i', ~ La"" .., r ., eobi" III< ....... '. 1 1 0ld tIm. - And th:rt on,;'n O<I!iced ..,... ~ f tbe: l")'1 YiCte <alir., i Ulnow., >«W ia do< "1l1~· " - H<J' .... '" 01 II..,." he ..iol. "l'Iu ""Iius i. ,I., ~ u1J1e"_ " I <a!kd .. y wile think I'd lit. """" :ale . _ cbU!, lbc: OC'<ell'" w.m, IODIsM ""'"""" I dldn't .pn. ODd jut .. tK ~ "u H kiftg "'" if .1It.'d eLi. 5hcloQ, """'" b""l '" len me !here no. a.I tor me to ...on. ~f' I ~ 100' .... he. L.o...,., &""" the oip;ool tho goY' ill the bull,.,. l'fl'ter.dod Ibc)' didn'llIDdcnlmd in order to Ii" SbddOIt time to eone --_._- - o "I\U rigIll, IlI lIlt 10 Eddie I ..., "oi" • ,bou' i1." Joe Sc ~" l tt sUI, Our"1 \ool~ "~ ~~ ... \ioc Uo< O<kob _ . ~,u i,~o "'" l'Ul11'...."""'" it. rut ~ ...... Edd.< W,lt and _ RXhert-and del""itod t~.,.., A-1040 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 29 of 30 From inside the book t " lg amE r.ge 10~ IeaJOII for .. I~ Ill: lite ll<er) otllor Team fJll aI. I'm KO"'A <>II, a/I<r!loo baJlso- ............. ..... too_ ' ;0!0 tho £II}" _}Ile .... ~ . ICV,," . ...·hicb m,tes II. bIitd. Thor.: is ""'I,,""tioo.bl, • dcoe lceling It KIOt .bool • day inlO Ih< bol!<:lub. _ ~ - -~ - - ~ """gen. J.. .., •• pamIon .. -_.- _ _- - - -_. -_. -.~ ~ ~- ~ .,--_.. ,....... ----- .,- _ .. VJ ..... "'1"~ " ' . . - ... '" mm. , ""''''' ......_ .... "" ,~ III. job 1>< ..... min ~ in \\'."' i"8''''' and ""- .... 'hOI I ..... m ,nt • ,"II)' pxI t>b my.c:t. I laid I wu ll>d hec'd n:Hla:d. WbaI. b<.au,ilul Uy. hll"s'n' ptoyia! lot T<ddyll ..p ..... Th. r • .. ho, II< .,.110 h'.....,II. 10 h is .ut"".~y 100. Wh., ;'. ' , F""nl:y RIIf.ge. "Hey, Ed. I"" JOI • thre,..,·clod pale to caccb bar.e. See ..h", you .... <b .b<!ut lI""i1lg me oct or <Ii> blLlp'"",.M R..,!< ..id be '<Outd. 0.. Ih< 6,., p~< h of Ih< go .... RWlIl" •• U. a "til:< ..,d Lory, IU"","',OI\ U>e I~ step cf ,lie dupt. )'tllJ.. "J-ley. lI.uc~ ..bat tile A-1041 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-2 Filed 08/26/13 Page 30 of 30 From inside the book [ 3 "''''LII '4 PlcO mete ri ng fH~ "thio boo. 11. ... "'y 1 ""5 fo.&1· """'o·IooI·I"o .prints ;' tho "."Iwld one! .'F' m)'""1 ~tl,,- imoginingl .... Ji .. R)'WI .... nlr.t in lhe Olympia: I'm Lv. 1110 W: lfIJ 1'",11 ouIl'", P& hJ,~ .., ftahhhJ8 0;. ud "-'wnw .ho.. If I'", jut Jim Dou .... ""'-""'~ 1"8 " po",,,, I,ttle I»I'P'''''' L<!', >eo. H....·.1lIc ,""olld w.. I ft\'iDl! toe: • •. roge 101 pil<he ..... tho wtfi::!d Il:>d ,., ttwm Iwd. fOOl! liD<: ." foul liu. SaiD Yla. "'m ... be:~ be: fUWMI <NIL s.. loo: .. CD' iotu urr"", UId ••U, "I. "'if. ... phc:hin& .td! tIaI led .. _boll;" "''''p\<t< to .... b" )",0. 7" .. y .... it..," N oyo'-- 1>1.,.•• - , meW><!. boot d"""" pid:«l it ~ p ood puI it io hia bock poc:let. I Il'" 0 1Iu", l ick OW <If ",. 1. I.... p... JolMY Ani_Iii pict inl 0, tho co,,", or "I)'OWc"'p, Ono ...... "'Y bn>ll>en &Dd I .nd _ ' ",Dd dodded .... tile '""f to cac.: ~ foul b;lIb in 1. 11 _ . t I/Ie t'<:IIo U!O.Jads 'Jo\U 10 u..... 11<1 aIld A-1042 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 1 of 32 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- x The Authors Guild, Inc., Associational Plaintiff, Betty Miles, Joseph Goulden, and Jim Bouton, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, : : : : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : Google Inc., : : Defendant. : : : ------------------------------------- x Case No. 05 CV 8136-DC EXHIBIT 1 [PART 3 OF 3] TO THE DECLARATION OF MICHAEL J. BONI IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT A-1043 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 2 of 32 From inside the book wo", pq>per Il":n-... "e, rnlUJ: . '.Y'~p's. JU.lLIII, !do, ...... , """1 .. U.UUI ""'IIW¥ '"""'K "ho' SIIddof> "'., .... .h. !<Idl,_ He ")~ ko~,,", .. _1II; ..."nc! poIioil2 u~ llx .... IlId no """ ..." M lm ., tim lor thX. He.:so....:o bock...:l fonlloo llx d.p.o. II C lie·, 011 .., ""porUOt .....:.- -on.. ~~"h:ft . M . . . .n ............. "' ~ .... _ .~~ .. "," ;,'" """"! ,a .bmw. :...,l>.oU "' . ~ I,;."" .. iLlo • ).,,0.1·1 _I, • .-teo.> I Iblnk 1,-, - 5 '0 IhtOlO • f..,baD l , 00 I p ..... , 00 11' ......... 8 I ~'hn"'. fu:... l .. d n ........ !vo_ N] or 101. """ld bel, ft. In t:V<r:! ClSO 1"0;1 ro""'. ",aI' .... l~Y "'IIh "'! be.: p«to 'han 1:< ...... kid " . . . :LIo _ '''P,~ \,,'. 2'" • b i, ..,.dno< I..d, .,.j .....) "".." h'. p,~I"! 'hOI tl>cy'd ..!be, po, f .... . ''''P< room ohm h .... "'" room 'rill Htwl,y. J"" like tlK Yl>:Qa, noy roU$l ohinI< .. ba"' .... r It .. I hove .... , they I dKla' du., Ilk io "'11 1'.. , _ "'II:~," ..... ...i.eIl. U, kim f.nd "'" ~lL A-1044 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 in~ i de From Filed 08/26/13 Page 3 of 32 the book [ S oarch '0 raj," m,lc rit>;l bottom in 11i3 bock . -- L. ud:«i.lk--o bit I". bcuu>< I'd opent .... ,"""tl.. In tlJ< "u'Y- D03 T OH'''& Jr .• 000 of u.. ...... e r... <he guy ...!lo .... ... f'f"'I"d 10 ' ;5",d 011 the Iowcr«h,lJ. pial"ft m~ mt. ~ rr.., • _trofI L,d oaid. "]wt .i,y> "'re. Oil the boa_ lirA: .. 1 "nrololocl '" <001...,.. ,n" it.- r $<I,oo)......il I "....., . ho .,"",_ .. MAY Poge 193 koucklebo:l. And al l T _ OJ<! "I' " ,ith ...., • "'... I Iud • F<II k.uctkboll when 1 .... nt il. bill I IDol I: In lhe d~t.t~ . I !", ~ ) ... r.... ","Lb. I" t~e t-I" .... ""' ~ .. . ..f . 1 1o"S tin. ~ ~' '''s <n 1 ..k "; Sol if 1 ..,.,.,1d.'Y Ih..,....." . Ii"., t.. 11'" th. 1«1 01 tile bocklebllli baot. ··NaII.* h. '"14. ''Ywn dol.~ all rI~. t. De- bott,,,, A-1045 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 4 of 32 From inside the book [ S oarcl- hoDcrod .. tIoe 101' of hi> YDiDo. "H.y. !olIe1d<:G, loe ....... '" ID ... y"" I. nit ~ ....._~ E""",II<d. ;ft It.. ",oIf .. ", ttl .!d .. Poge 17~ ,.....- And tl><: h.... ... olil l has .. 01. cwly • •'-'- -_h< 1<'" .. '-·r-- --' d Iriay ..ho:ft .. ... tor. --~ llIin -.-.~-- ~n S""" lon,. So h. <arM ."",nd oil kind. 0/ ",!uipmm( ;" • nee blue I'on ..... Ill,. Tltil1p iii•• IIot CO:n~, .-arIO\iS " '.... aid " lTC!, ~ .. f<>< tI>< hoirpio«, h. ir ...... ip.cn'..--.:I even a h.o~, lie ' AI',;,.. il .r....."", .. ..,.,... <XI the M ... te the ",rI<. "" ohI ....... ,'"" ~ Pag' :'65 I ..... dyi:l, to .... tell. I timed .mud &IX! ..t dO'IIn on 11>: i>:ocb. II oc.UlOtio< ""'" IOCmibk. I ....,·t .und lile t.... ..;"" 0/ ,..... pmos. Poo. ~ 0;. .... tad • oo-IILI1<1 ,oiol InIO U>c & blll bniD! Ind ~"'" In th, .. "'Iillho wp ~I Ihe 1h.O;t.oLb . .....e ~I.-uoh-I"" fQ' I,w. ••"'"..! ,.. " '~I" .,, ~ <ben Ol"I,JJ>~ . . . . [J)I)fe . - . ,. ,.. .. . A-1046 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 5 of 32 From inside the book I Se ~tch 53 p',. ' m,lc';' 9 ,it<:h., ~ ;r th .. bock P'go 33 "'''''! "'" """ '" r"", .... ''''' , ."'~ ......, ~ ' J ¥'" "......< n ~" " """ Vorb,,;c •• c . low! or fou, otk. piod"", 'v",,,), '''0 10..11> ' fOood wi'~ , ~< ",J...,,,,,, th.) .... ,.,. 1 ~ro o,e The Colono l 0"' of . Ms rr.ltH!. The f~llo ..in! ' !,,'ng Friu wo. "'1 ''''''."..". TI", ,hi"" .. r~t....-l >... ,,,,,,,,,'«.1 •• ,~:I; " . "nOT ..... '~ _~' ,h., _H~ .~" ... _ ,",", h. ~ .,,);<. _"'ub> "£"'"', W1Ul.,...,.ptch pilCIw-" _ Ryn< .""u, I""''"'''''-~ "'_", ..... "!"" (100 " Af"""otd ill "'" ""LO;'Id .... h.l~ed o.",u ...... one"flilch piteller. Hi, """ pi"b _ . ",lid _ ....up. Kync ....... ~ lI"t ""' ~«I Iik!be t.ot-.. 0/ Co& bonk>, ...... he'd .. sort '" II.,....:! "'" to tho """,,,",, ",d ... ·d ~ .. " tho ..."' .... O!ld 1<1 .. , - '- " - -- ..- ~~ _._. ._ -- -- ~ • .~ - ~~~- ..-- -- lhape and • r:ood ~lt:lIn. A, JoIIn.y SaID <1)-.. ''You obi', I\IB tt< d...,ft l>a!t ..., - , ... FI.... II ...... olfl ~ dW it, tl>cy'd b.\ lot pich.n .. tradr t ....... " If, me <>I tilt reuon. he', pop.lor rid .., <01</1. TIIen: .... pI«,,"n ,,110 "U you lhll ~"'f'" p:. ytd b ""'. wtw 1rUIl. Ibc", run Illilo • • ~y ODd so_ ... 110 .....so 1lIo., NIt tw<IIy .... ,och . A-1047 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 6 of 32 From inside the book :IJ "(Ie' mlc1I1g o ILlb~o, ... n I~IS bock - --0-- - ------_.-, t~ 0- - --..- ,- - - ' - - - - - - - - -_ . - 1 ~ )"" hne"" ""'_ioo . <1 WeU, Nl,ohl:, "'OS Iill.in: . b<~1 c<>isC to 5« t JeI,,,,,) CU~ 511<: ..'_ oo-:J 1 Imop.: when he .... b 000.., ' ''''''''I Oo,h k\ i&£ ,ho ;>/0,"," r lay'''' tallr.in~ .b<nt. 1...... B......o. Lacs 01 ,imos in .... cI.bh,. .. "",'1 """" • radi~ on u,d U<TV ~"'- in . ... ";:~ i, .." "';,<h<rl """. ... Paq.155 <nJJU .... IIIOlr ""pc>. t\l ~I< """Wlj\. ......, ""'"" ......., ''' ~ 'J """- olea, then: w<'" """'pi.............. IIood> in """~ ~f .... _10, lhe ""-k r.r • .....t M'e, ,ho< I:rxh in ,lI.< b"llpto. tbc: bane 0>: d - " : &lid ,be ~ n:ttUIOl:. '" ~ clubhouse. or • <rmr.O' """ '" Imp "',if.,.o ,ake OW" ~,.ilI< Ixa. B" thUlp iii« 11<>" ,, _.Ion . . .;..... "',' .~.. ~""n ,n ..".....,... *'_ ;. ....t..-.t....... Pog.17G So ' ' f}<>''O ..... oP.<I .. d "'S'l' _ • :.. ,,_ '" ..... _•• ow- ........ 'N • • A_ he., • up<eI .. ~ you _~ . ...... ... . ', , ... _ w ".___ ,~ A-1048 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 7 of 32 From inside the book [ S .~rch min e"" , &ad pteuod mo. Om Millen« oe:oodtcI. TIle:! .",....,... """,illa!ed Cory Dell """ tk I.... of II> kft tho re<r.a. Go.rJ ...,~ h b) .... YOlO, otId P'y,24S ",",)I>00I, >. "'n.y ,Iu, MinclI<r. > nrm'" rknh ott 50 uodtv ..·ilb . ruv we.u ~ u.. ~f d~l>. II>ould .1Idbe w ... V:lV fIEDdl. wilb. P'g' 3X pro!>obly .....,nd $~,900. ' )'h~''''lIy ! be......,. 1""","!1 told Mine ..... ' ... ' ,"" ""ry <i/I~m><"e I cb .... , nipl one! c:o .....rciaI WIll S1(JQ. J O$I 1.1 Ratalally, Mill: ..... F ' '" Goloe hul ,.d ooys. ' ..... t., .• II>: ""'l'. 0 ...1 lYe f_ «0' . 1h>1 tho",', $100 diIJ...1l<e 1><-. cI'Iar\cr a<>d ooaawm.l onl, • A-1049 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 8 of 32 From inside the book t~lbot 45 "geo m,ldin, ",Ibot i, lhi o book P>g,170 "m"".,..,. , n::~ '-''''1''''" w"- .. ~~ ,,~"''' A <... "", ny """ If"''''' ....0 Talbot. This" all:. .. <l>jurblog l>cnusc Tal,., and I dkin', care: "'" mucio lot .aob ~""'T 0"<, ""',., ;. !'-' • ., Yor'. Wo'", • . . , ~ppo> il", H,', d 1'", city •• n, 1 . 1 1 ",)'" ",. ~o",,",I ......M< o", •• ,t ~; .. II'> in'cn:sU"1\. ,110"01, til oee 1be Y,,*, .. 1Iad< Tal..,., ,he gill " . ............... A \._" '-'A •• .J __ , ._ . _ . _ , . _ ....... , , .......... "'_ """O''Y .. Pog.19J r "<~<)' <K ....,.,lru08 to ... Almoot e",rybo<ly "upcd, All. til< baUp""'. Sl ...... 8.rb<, ..... IN!. 1'be I.., Iirot h< P • big 10.1 bUl ba:I '0 I .., in !/Ie iiii/o. nan _ Tllt>ol tot ItI$ qdck ....... .. P,"<,225 ..,..,.._ ~u . '" "~" ~ 6"' ~u.,,_., . ,a~. ~1 . ,~ _.,"' ,, ~ ~ f"""""J 01 R.,... •• ,~" ""oou .~. ,uit "II';." T.I;"" by aJ> ".ony· mOUI ~I 1111'1(011 YQr~ . A pote",llr wi' is onJy SO",. ... M\ 'fI'OflC tlwI kin«.=-d d "onk •. No motIC. """' ",OD«"' y"" .Ie, )'<'I' lox. WI>o wulll<> .. b • I'""' .... ,y ,u i!'! B",,1n= In ,I>< oJu"""""" ~ II> I>< 0....,' 1. ... ~ In ra=r . .... rv. A-1050 Case 1:05-cv-08136-DC Document 1073-3 Filed 08/26/13 Page 9 of 32 From inside the book "oarybe l" 33 poces [ SE 1Ych rra,ch " ~ I "QalY boll " in this oo ok '-.-'- - .. , -_ .. " .- - .. _ .. . - - - r -' - - , - ..--- ,- - . "xl,)." AI1<. Ih< E'IIIC Bobbie .. J I ...·c..... J p><ty "illl G.-y Iid l and nil wlte :0..... ~"'''' Ihrtx. m d hi>. Guy's "i/c, No.., ..ill !Ibe'~ been ""';0'" '0 ...." me s ine< .... ·d ... ><1 i. I. r ;Jo, , prin ~ ~ ""'hook 'h., . • .. it .... IlOl - ~ ..., - - _ or _ .' ______ ~ -- JOOd ",.... 10 beu IIll! "e'~ IQi:tl to I\.UI I.b:: $tISOIl "11111 001 nin< pit<l!cro, Ilc-.sc. ... ~ ...., uOlkd ox., Salmoa 10 BoI,,,",," 1 f", ~e lInbo.d... ~. hold.I~ """;" 5 nsh1h,odNj OOg'O',), 110)'." "id $to" SUber. I look ., "'" pltcltlog.LI! and l.tee IR " , ,. ,,10 Itave i, .. 0&: Dioll" s.:~~ MOlt) I",k AIm. G&Iy Bdl. 51<", E",bor ,.<tin, "lho , Iv P>O<tin~ b<~ .... . ~ " .. r: .", pm< .... ~Iow. WI!c~ _ Jl..1t hod , ...................... <WO 1f'Cn' 0'" . ... ~ " " , . '~..w-.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?