W.J. O'Neil Company v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s orders are REVERSED, the judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for sanctions [5099231-2] filed by Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., is DENIED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Judge (AUTHORING); Danny J. Boggs and David W. McKeague (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges.
Case: 13-2320
Document: 47-3
Filed: 08/28/2014
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-2320
FILED
W.J. O’NEIL COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Aug 28, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
SHEPLEY, BULFINCH, RICHARDSON &
ABBOTT, INC.; SMITH SECKMAN REID,
INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED the district court’s orders are
REVERSED, the judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings
consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for
sanctions filed by Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., is DENIED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?