W.J. O'Neil Company v. Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s orders are REVERSED, the judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for sanctions [5099231-2] filed by Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., is DENIED. Decision for publication. R. Guy Cole, Jr., Chief Judge (AUTHORING); Danny J. Boggs and David W. McKeague (DISSENTING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-2320 Document: 47-3 Filed: 08/28/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 13-2320 FILED W.J. O’NEIL COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellant, Aug 28, 2014 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. SHEPLEY, BULFINCH, RICHARDSON & ABBOTT, INC.; SMITH SECKMAN REID, INC., Defendants - Appellees. Before: COLE, Chief Judge; BOGGS and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED the district court’s orders are REVERSED, the judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for sanctions filed by Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson & Abbott, Inc., is DENIED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?