Anthony Rorrer v. City of Stow, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s grant of summary judgment to the City of Stow on Rorrer s ADA and Ohio discrimination claims is REVERSED, and those claims are REMANDED for trial before a different district judge. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in all other respects. Decision for publication. Eric L. Clay and Bernice Bouie Donald (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Samuel H. Mays , Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

Case: 13-3272

Document: 006111975544

Filed: 02/26/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: February 26, 2014
Ms. Christy B. Bishop
Mr. Dennis R. Thompson
Thompson & Bishop
946 Kenmore Boulevard
Akron, OH 44314
Mr. Roland J. De Monte
Mr. Robert Scot Harvey
Fisher & Phillips
9150 S. Hills Boulevard, Suite 300
Cleveland, OH 44147
Mr. Neil S. Sarkar
Mr. Frank H. Scialdone
Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder
34305 Solon Road, Suite 100
Cleveland, OH 44139
Re: Case No. 13-3272, Anthony Rorrer v. City of Stow, et al
Originating Case No. : 5:11-cv-01024
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Geri M. Smith
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.