Anthony Rorrer v. City of Stow, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s grant of summary judgment to the City of Stow on Rorrer s ADA and Ohio discrimination claims is REVERSED, and those claims are REMANDED for trial before a different district judge. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in all other respects. Decision for publication. Eric L. Clay and Bernice Bouie Donald (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; Samuel H. Mays , Jr., U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation.

Case: 13-3272

Document: 006111975537

Filed: 02/26/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-3272

FILED
Feb 26, 2014

ANTHONY RORRER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
CITY OF STOW and WILLIAM KALBAUGH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: CLAY and DONALD, Circuit Judges; MAYS, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Ohio at Akron.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s grant of
summary judgment to the City of Stow on Rorrer’s ADA and Ohio discrimination claims is
REVERSED, and those claims are REMANDED for trial before a different district judge. IT
IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED in all other
respects.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk