Charles Hollis, Jr., et al v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Assn

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to apply the proper summary-judgment framework to the Hollises personal-capacity and next-friends claims under the reasonable-modification provision of the Fair Housing Act. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr.,Eric L. Clay, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-6434

Document: 35-1

Filed: 07/29/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: July 29, 2014

Mr. Larry Lamont Crain
5214 Maryland Way, Suite 402
Brentwood, TN 37027
Mr. Stephen M. Dane
Mr. Ryan C. Downer
Relman, Dane & Colfax
1225 19th Street, N.W., Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
Mr. Gary R. Wilkinson
51 Century Boulevard, Suite 300
Nashville, TN 37214
Re: Case No. 13-6434, Hollis, et al v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Ass’n
Originating Case No. : 3:12-cv-00137
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.