Charles Hollis, Jr., et al v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Assn


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to apply the proper summary-judgment framework to the Hollises personal-capacity and next-friends claims under the reasonable-modification provision of the Fair Housing Act. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr.,Eric L. Clay, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 13-6434 Document: 35-1 Filed: 07/29/2014 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: July 29, 2014 Mr. Larry Lamont Crain 5214 Maryland Way, Suite 402 Brentwood, TN 37027 Mr. Stephen M. Dane Mr. Ryan C. Downer Relman, Dane & Colfax 1225 19th Street, N.W., Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 Mr. Gary R. Wilkinson 51 Century Boulevard, Suite 300 Nashville, TN 37214 Re: Case No. 13-6434, Hollis, et al v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Ass’n Originating Case No. : 3:12-cv-00137 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Keith Throckmorton Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?