Charles Hollis, Jr., et al v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Assn

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to apply the proper summary-judgment framework to the Hollises personal-capacity and next-friends claims under the reasonable-modification provision of the Fair Housing Act. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr.,Eric L. Clay, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 13-6434

Document: 35-3

Filed: 07/29/2014

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6434
CHARLES M. HOLLIS, JR.; MELANIE HOLLIS,
Individually and as Next Friends for H.H. and C.A.H.,
two minor children,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,

FILED
Jul 29, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
CHESTNUT BEND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Before: SILER, CLAY, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s judgment
is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to apply the
proper summary-judgment framework to the Hollises’ personal-capacity and next-friends claims
under the reasonable-modification provision of the Fair Housing Act.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk