Charles Hollis, Jr., et al v. Chestnut Bend Homeowners Assn
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: The district court s judgment is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to apply the proper summary-judgment framework to the Hollises personal-capacity and next-friends claims under the reasonable-modification provision of the Fair Housing Act. Decision for publication. Eugene E. Siler, Jr.,Eric L. Clay, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
CHARLES M. HOLLIS, JR.; MELANIE HOLLIS,
Individually and as Next Friends for H.H. and C.A.H.,
two minor children,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
Jul 29, 2014
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
CHESTNUT BEND HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Before: SILER, CLAY, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee at Nashville.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s judgment
is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED to the district court with instructions to apply the
proper summary-judgment framework to the Hollises’ personal-capacity and next-friends claims
under the reasonable-modification provision of the Fair Housing Act.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?