Mark Parsons, et al v. DOJ, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s dismissal for lack of standing is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for consideration of Defendants 12(b)(6) failure to state a claim arguments. Decision for publication. John M. Rogers and David W. McKeague, Circuit Judges; and Edmund A. Sargus , Jr., Chief District Judge (AUTHORING), for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

Case: 14-1848

Document: 38-3

Filed: 09/17/2015

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1848
MARK PARSONS; BRANDON BRADLEY;
SCOTT GANDY; ROBERT HELLIN;
JOSEPH F. BRUCE; JOSEPH W. UTSLER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,

FILED
Sep 17, 2015
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: ROGERS and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; SARGUS, District Judge.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s dismissal for lack
of standing is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for consideration of Defendants’ 12(b)(6)
failure to state a claim arguments.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk