Lawrence Landrum v. Carl Anderson

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's denial of Landrum's Rule 60(b) motion is AFFIRMED on the grounds set forth in this court's opinion. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Alice M. Batchelder, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-3591

Document: 37-1

Filed: 02/12/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: February 12, 2016
Mr. David M. Henry
Ms. Jocelyn Kelly Lowe
Mr. Charles L. Wille
Office of the Attorney General of Ohio
150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
Mr. Randall L. Porter
Ohio Public Defender's Office
250 E. Broad Street, Suite 1400
Columbus, OH 43215
Mr. Gerald W. Simmons
312 Walnut Street, Suite 1400
Cincinnati, OH 45202
Re: Case No. 14-3591, Lawrence Landrum v. Carl Anderson
Originating Case No. : 1:96-cv-00641
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.