Lawrence Landrum v. Carl Anderson


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's denial of Landrum's Rule 60(b) motion is AFFIRMED on the grounds set forth in this court's opinion. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Alice M. Batchelder, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 14-3591 Document: 37-1 Filed: 02/12/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: February 12, 2016 Mr. David M. Henry Ms. Jocelyn Kelly Lowe Mr. Charles L. Wille Office of the Attorney General of Ohio 150 E. Gay Street, 16th Floor Columbus, OH 43215 Mr. Randall L. Porter Ohio Public Defender's Office 250 E. Broad Street, Suite 1400 Columbus, OH 43215 Mr. Gerald W. Simmons 312 Walnut Street, Suite 1400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Re: Case No. 14-3591, Lawrence Landrum v. Carl Anderson Originating Case No. : 1:96-cv-00641 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?