Lawrence Landrum v. Carl Anderson


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court's denial of Landrum's Rule 60(b) motion is AFFIRMED on the grounds set forth in this court's opinion. Decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Alice M. Batchelder, and Julia Smith Gibbons (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 14-3591 Document: 37-3 Filed: 02/12/2016 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 14-3591 LAWRENCE LANDRUM, Petitioner - Appellant, FILED Feb 12, 2016 DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk v. CARL ANDERSON, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Before: BOGGS, BATCHELDER, and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati. THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel. IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, on the grounds set forth in this court’s opinion of even date, it is ORDERED that the district court’s denial of Landrum’s Rule 60(b) motion is AFFIRMED. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?