Peter Newberry v. Marc Silverman, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court with regard to Newberry s fraud claim is VACATED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED on all other grounds. Decision for publication. Ronald Lee Gilman (AUTHORING), John M. Rogers, and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 14-3882 Document: 33-1 Filed: 05/29/2015 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: May 29, 2015 Mr. Michael Matthew Mahon Mr. Danny M. Newman Jr. Reminger 525 Vine Street, Suite 1700 Cincinnati, OH 45202 Mr. Peter Canavan Newberry 1217 Criswell Road Berry, KY 41003 Re: Case No. 14-3882, Peter Newberry v. Marc Silverman, et al Originating Case No. : 1:14-cv-00313 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. Richard W. Nagel Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?