Peter Newberry v. Marc Silverman, et al
Filing
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The judgment of the district court with regard to Newberry s fraud claim is VACATED and REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED on all other grounds. Decision for publication. Ronald Lee Gilman (AUTHORING), John M. Rogers, and Jeffrey S. Sutton, Circuit Judges.
Case: 14-3882
Document: 33-3
Filed: 05/29/2015
Page: 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-3882
FILED
PETER C. NEWBERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
May 29, 2015
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
v.
MARC H. SILVERMAN, D.D.S.;
SILVERMAN DENTAL, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: GILMAN, ROGERS, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Ohio at Cincinnati.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the judgment of the district court with
regard to Newberry’s fraud claim is VACATED and REMANDED to the district court for further
proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED on all other grounds.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?