Edward Monroe, et al v. Fts Usa, Llc, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: it is Ordered that the district court's certification of this case as a collective action, its allowance of representative tesimony at trial, and its use of an estimated-average approach are AFFIRMED. It is further ordered that the district court's calculation of damages is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for recalculation of damages consistent with the opinion, decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs; Jeffrey S. Sutton (CONCURRENCE/DISSENT), and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-6063

Document: 60-1

Filed: 03/02/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: March 02, 2016

Mr. Colin D. Dougherty
Jonathan D. Christman
P.O. Box 3001
Blue Bell, PA 19422
Mr. Miguel A. Estrada
1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20036
Mr. Adam W. Hansen
Ms. Rachhana T. Srey
Ms. Anna P. Prakash
80 S. Eighth Street, Suite 4600
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Mr. William C. Jhaveri-Weeks
300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000
Oakland, CA 94612
Mr. William Benjamin Ryan
Mr. Bryce W. Ashby
1545 Union Avenue
Memphis, TN 38104
Re: Case No. 14-6063, Edward Monroe, et al v. FTS USA, LLC, et al
Originating Case No. : 2:08-cv-02100
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule
36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Cathy Lovely
Deputy Clerk
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.