Edward Monroe, et al v. Fts Usa, Llc, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed: it is Ordered that the district court's certification of this case as a collective action, its allowance of representative tesimony at trial, and its use of an estimated-average approach are AFFIRMED. It is further ordered that the district court's calculation of damages is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for recalculation of damages consistent with the opinion, decision for publication. Danny J. Boggs; Jeffrey S. Sutton (CONCURRENCE/DISSENT), and Jane Branstetter Stranch (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges.

Case: 14-6063

Document: 60-2

Filed: 03/02/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6063
EDWARD MONROE, FABIAN MOORE, and
TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,

FILED
Mar 02, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
FTS USA, LLC; UNITEK USA, LLC,
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: BOGGS, SUTTON, and STRANCH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Tennessee at Memphis.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s certification of this
case as a collective action, its allowance of representative testimony at trial, and its use of an estimatedaverage approach are AFFIRMED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the district court’s calculation of
damages is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for recalculation of damages consistent with the
opinion of this court.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk