Shirley Brown v. Michael Chapman, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s decision to allow plaintiff to amend her complaint and its application of the deliberate-indifference standard are AFFIRMED, and the reminder of the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (AUTHORING), Eric L. Clay, and Ronald Lee Gilman, Circuit Judges.

Case: 15-3158

Document: 37-3

Filed: 02/19/2016

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-3158

FILED

SHIRLEY BROWN, Individually and as
Administratrix of the Estate of Rodney Brown,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

Feb 19, 2016
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

v.
MICHAEL CHAPMAN, et al.,
Defendants,
RICHARD RUSNAK; JOHN SATTLER;
JAMES MERRITT; CITY OF CLEVELAND,
Defendants - Appellants.
Before: MOORE, CLAY, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s decision to allow
plaintiff to amend her complaint and its application of the deliberate-indifference standard are
AFFIRMED, and the reminder of the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk