Darrell Myers, et al v. Agrilogic Insurance Services,, et al


OPINION filed : We do not doubt that the district court would have been correct had discovery yielded only the facts before it when it dismissed this claim. But the district court never allowed the Myerses to develop a case. Under these circumstances, we REVERSE the dismissal of the UCSPA claim and REMAND for further proceedings, decision not for publication. Danny J. Boggs, Helene N. White (authoring), and Bernice Bouie Donald, Circuit Judges.

Download PDF
Case: 15-5442 Document: 27-2 Filed: 06/09/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Deborah S. Hunt Clerk Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov Filed: June 09, 2017 Mr. Bradley E. Cunningham Mr. Mark S. Fenzel Mr. Erik Jon Wilbekin Re: Case No. 15-5442, Darrell Myers, et al v. Agrilogic Insurance Services, et al Originating Case No. : 5:14-cv-00227 Dear Counsel, The Court issued the enclosed Opinion today in this case. Sincerely yours, s/Beverly L. Harris Case Manager Direct Dial No. 513-564-7077 cc: Mr. Robert R. Carr Enclosure Mandate to issue

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?