Matthew Gillis v. John Miller, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claims is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING) and Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988
Tel. (513) 564-7000
Filed: January 06, 2017
Mr. Russell C. Babcock
Mr. Victor Joseph Mastromarco Jr.
The Mastromarco Firm
1024 N. Michigan Avenue
Saginaw, MI 48602
Mr. Kenneth G. Galica
Mr. Daniel A. Klemptner
Johnson, Rosati, Schultz & Joppich
27555 Executive Drive, Suite 250
Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3550
Re: Case No. 16-1245, Matthew Gillis v. John Miller, et al
Originating Case No. : 1:14-cv-12518
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Mandate to issue.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?