Matthew Gillis v. John Miller, et al


OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claims is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING) and Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Download PDF
Case: 16-1245 Document: 22-1 Filed: 01/06/2017 Page: 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Deborah S. Hunt Clerk 100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988 Tel. (513) 564-7000 Filed: January 06, 2017 Mr. Russell C. Babcock Mr. Victor Joseph Mastromarco Jr. The Mastromarco Firm 1024 N. Michigan Avenue Saginaw, MI 48602 Mr. Kenneth G. Galica Mr. Daniel A. Klemptner Johnson, Rosati, Schultz & Joppich 27555 Executive Drive, Suite 250 Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3550 Re: Case No. 16-1245, Matthew Gillis v. John Miller, et al Originating Case No. : 1:14-cv-12518 Dear Counsel, The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case. Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Yours very truly, Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?