Matthew Gillis v. John Miller, et al

Filing

OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claims is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING) and Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Case: 16-1245

Document: 22-1

Filed: 01/06/2017

Page: 1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
Deborah S. Hunt
Clerk

100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540
POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Tel. [phone]
www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: January 06, 2017
Mr. Russell C. Babcock
Mr. Victor Joseph Mastromarco Jr.
The Mastromarco Firm
1024 N. Michigan Avenue
Saginaw, MI 48602
Mr. Kenneth G. Galica
Mr. Daniel A. Klemptner
Johnson, Rosati, Schultz & Joppich
27555 Executive Drive, Suite 250
Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3550
Re: Case No. 16-1245, Matthew Gillis v. John Miller, et al
Originating Case No. : 1:14-cv-12518
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled case.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered
in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

Cathryn Lovely
Deputy Clerk
cc: Mr. David J. Weaver
Enclosures
Mandate to issue.