Matthew Gillis v. John Miller, et al
OPINION and JUDGMENT filed : The district court s grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs First Amendment retaliation claims is AFFIRMED. Decision for publication. Karen Nelson Moore (DISSENTING) and Eric L. Clay (AUTHORING), Circuit Judges; and Joseph M. Hood, U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
MATTHEW GILLIS (16-1245);
FRED WALRAVEN (16-1249),
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
Jan 06, 2017
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk
JOHN MILLER; in his official and individual
capacities; BAY COUNTY SHERIFF’S
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: MOORE and CLAY, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Bay City.
THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was submitted
on the briefs without oral argument.
IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that the district court’s
grant of summary judgment to Defendants on Plaintiffs’ First Amendment retaliation
claims is AFFIRMED.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?