Cotton Bayou Marina, Inc. v. BP, PLC et al
REPLY to Response to Motion 54 Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Errata D) (Buffkin, Russell)
Cotton Bayou Marina, Inc. v. BP, PLC et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION COTTON BAYOU MARINA, INC. ) d/b/a TACKY JACK'S RESTAURANT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) BP, plc, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00243-WS-C
HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS RENEWED MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING TRANSFER BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Defendant, Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. ("HESI"), respectfully submits this Reply1 in response to Plaintiffs' Opposition to HESI's Motion for Stay of Proceedings (the "Opposition"), In support of its Motion to Stay, HESI states: INTRODUCTION This case is one of almost 300 virtually identical individual and class actions pending in various state and federal courts in the southeastern United States (the "Actions"). Each Action arises out of an explosion and fire onboard Transocean's Deepwater Horizon drilling rig on April 20, 2010, and the ensuing oil spill from the BP well located on Mississippi Canyon Block 252 (the "Deepwater Horizon Incident"). On May 17, 2010, HESI filed its Motion to Stay Proceedings (the "Motion to Stay"). [Doc. 7]. On June 2, 2010, this Court denied HESI's Motion to Stay without prejudice to HESI's
In filing this Reply, HESI reserves all defenses, including its rights to object to jurisdiction, service of process, and any other issues in this matter, and all other defenses available pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b), including lack of subject matter jurisdiction, lack of personal jurisdiction, improper venue, insufficient process, insufficient service of process, failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and failure to join necessary parties. Without waiving such rights, HESI files this motion in the interests of judicial efficiency and economy.
ability to re-file its Motion to Stay after responsive pleadings have been filed. [Doc. 38]. On July 6, 2010, HESI filed its Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for More Definite Statement [Doc. 52] and thereafter filed its Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. [Doc. 54]. Plaintiffs responded in opposition (the "Opposition") on August 4, 2010 [Doc. 65], arguing that the stay should be denied because "[t]he posture of this case has not changed since this Court's June 2nd Order stating HESI's Motion to Stay was premature" and because "the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has not yet consolidated this and other similar cases." Opposition at 2, 4. However, in light of recent events, Plaintiffs' arguments are now largely moot. First, as discussed previously, HESI filed a Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for More Definite Statement in response to Plaintiffs' Complaint and in compliance with the Court's June 2, 2010, Order. Second, on August 10, 2010, the MDL Panel in In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig
"Deepwater Horizon" in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, MDL-2179 issued a Transfer Order consolidating 77 virtually identical actions for coordination of all pretrial proceedings in the U.S. Eastern District of Louisiana (Judge Barbier), including 23 cases pending in the Southern District of Alabama. A true and correct copy of the Transfer Order is attached as Exhibit A. In response to the initial Transfer Order, the Transferee Court issued a Pre-Trial Order No. 1, also on August 10, 2010, extending all responsive pleading deadlines in and/or staying all cases that are subject to the Transfer Order pending a pre-trial conference in the consolidated proceeding. See Pre-Trial Order No. 1 at ¶ 6, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit B.
In the Transfer Order, the MDL Panel also indicated that it will soon issue a Conditional Transfer Order ("CTO"), and such CTO will likely transfer and centralize the more than 200 remaining potential "tag-along" actions for all pre-trial proceedings in the Transferee Court. See Transfer Order at p. 1, n.1, p. 3. The instant case is one such "tag-along" action. See Notice of Potential "Tag-Along" Actions, a true and correct copy of which is attached as Exhibit C. In the likely event that this action is conditionally transferred to the U.S. Eastern District of Louisiana, it would automatically become subject to the Transferee Court's Order staying the proceeding pending the pre-trial conference in the consolidated proceeding. See Pre-Trial Order No. 1 at ¶¶ 2, 3 ("This Order . . . will also apply to any 'tag-along actions' later filed in, removed to, or transferred to this Court . . . . Any 'tag-along actions' later filed in, removed to or transferred to this Court . . . will automatically be consolidated with this action[.]"). For the reasons stated by HESI in its Renewed Motion to Stay and in light of the fact that this case likely will soon be transferred to and consolidated in the Transferee Court, and thus be subject to the Transferee Court's orders and stay, the Court should immediately stay this case pending a determination by the MDL Panel as to whether this case will be included in the cases subject to a forthcoming CTO. Unless the Court grants an immediate stay, the parties and the Court may very well waste time, efforts and resources briefing issues that will likely need to be re-briefed in the Transferee Court's consolidated proceedings. Moreover, allowing this case to proceed when it is likely to be transferred pursuant to a CTO could frustrate the Transferee Court's purposes for implementing the stay set forth in its Pre-Trial Order No. 1. To the extent this case is not included in a CTO, the Court would be able to lift the stay if and when appropriate.
The U.S. Court for the Southern District of Alabama has, in the previous few days, granted motions to stay proceedings in cases likely to be considered "tag-along" actions. For example, Judge William Steele of the Southern District of Alabama granted HESI's Motion to Stay Proceedings in Civil Action No. 10-0421-WS-B, James E. Fisher, et al., v. BP, PLC, et al., on August 17, 2010, noting that "the interests of justice would be served by entry of a stay in this case until such time as the MDL Panel rules on the transfer issue." A true and correct copy of that court's Order is attached as Exhibit D. Consistent with that reasoning, this Court should stay all proceedings in the above-captioned lawsuit until after the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation (the "MDL Panel") issues a Conditional Transfer Order ("CTO") CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, a stay is appropriate in order to preserve judicial economy and efficiency and to prevent a waste of resources and the accompanying prejudice to HESI. HESI respectfully requests that this Court enter an order staying all proceedings in this case pending the MDL Panel's issuance of a CTO with regard to the above-captioned litigation, without prejudice to the rights of any party to file a motion for leave in the case of an emergency or other exceptional circumstances or to seek an extension of the stay. Respectfully submitted this 20th day of August, 2010. GODWIN RONQUILLO PC DONALD E. GODWIN (GODWD 5022) (pro hac vice) Email email@example.com BRUCE W. BOWMAN, JR. (pro hac vice) Email firstname.lastname@example.org JENNY L. MARTINEZ (pro hac vice) Email email@example.com FLOYD R. HARTLEY, JR. (pro hac vice) Email firstname.lastname@example.org GAVIN E. HILL (pro hac vice) Email email@example.com
1201 Elm Street, Suite 1700 Dallas, Texas 75270-2041 Telephone: 214.939.4400 Facsimile: 214.760.7332 and R. ALAN YORK (pro hac vice) Email firstname.lastname@example.org 1331 Lamar, Suite 1665 Houston, Texas 77010 Telephone: 713.595.8300 Facsimile: 713.425.7594 and s/ Russell C. Buffkin JOHN N. LEACH (LEACJ2634) Email email@example.com JOSEPH P. H. BABINGTON (BABIJ7938) Email firstname.lastname@example.org RUSSELL C. BUFFKIN (BUFFR6510) Email email@example.com HELMSING, LEACH, HERLONG, NEWMAN & ROUSE, P.C. Post Office Box 2767 Mobile AL 36652 Telephone: 251.432.5521 Facsimile: 251.432.0633 ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have on this 20th day of August, 2010, a copy of the foregoing pleading was filed electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all counsel of record registered to receive electronic service by operation of the court's electronic filing system. I also certify that I have mailed this filing by United States Postal Service to all counsel of record who are not registered to receive electronic service by operation of the court's electronic filing system. Jere L. Beasley, Esquire Rhon E. Jones, Esquire David B. Byrne, III, Esquire John E. Tomlinson, Esquire J. Parker Miller, Esquire BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, PC Post Office Box 4160 Montgomery, AL 36103-4160 Counsel for Plaintiffs Christopher D. Boutwell, Esquire BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, PC 415 East Commerce Street, Suite 215 Greenville, AL 36037 Counsel for Plaintiffs A. Danner Frazer, Jr., Esquire Ross A. Frazer, Esquire Robert J. Mullican, Esquire FRAZER GREENE UPCHURCH & BAKER Post Office Box 1686 Mobile, AL 36633 Counsel for Cameron International Corp. Randal H. Sellers, Esquire M. Warren Butler, Esquire Bryan G. Hale, Esquire STARNES DAVIS FLORIE 100 Brookwood Place, 7th Floor Birmingham, AL 35209 Counsel for Cameron International Corp. s/ Russell C. Buffkin Of counsel John M. Johnson, Esquire Adam K. Peck, Esquire William H. Brooks, Esquire Marchello D. Gray, Esquire LIGHTFOOT, FRANKLIN & WHITE, L.L.C. 400 North 20th Street Birmingham, AL 35203 Counsel for BP Entities Richard C. Godfrey, Esquire John T. Hickey, Jr., Esquire James Andrew Langan, Esquire KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP 300 N. LaSalle Chicago, IL 60654 Counsel for BP Entities David J. Beck, Esquire BECK, REDDEN & SECRET, LLP One Houston Center 1221 McKinney Street, Suite 4500 Houston, TX 77010 Counsel for Cameron International Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?