Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al

Filing 983

STIPULATION to Reschedule the October 4, 2010 hearing on Google's Objections, by removing the hearing from the calendar and allowing Google to re-file the Objections after the current stay is lifted, consistent with the Court's August 25, 2010 Order (Dkt. No. 978); filed by Defendant and Counterclaimant Google Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Caruso, Margret)

Download PDF
Perfect 10 Inc v. Google Inc et al Doc. 983 Att. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 PERFECT 10, INC., a California corporation, 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 GOOGLE INC., a corporation; and 15 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 01980.51320/3655537.1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [PROPOSED] ORDER REMOVING THE HEARING ON GOOGLE INC.'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE HILLMAN'S AUGUST 10, 2010 ORDER FROM THE COURT'S CALENDAR AND GRANTING GOOGLE LEAVE TO RE-FILE THE MOTION AFTER THE STAY IS LIFTED Defendants. AND COUNTERCLAIM Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) [PROPOSED] ORDER REMOVING THE HEARING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF THE 8/10/10 ORDER FROM THE COURT'S CALENDAR AND GRANTING GOOGLE LEAVE TO RE-FILE Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 Order WHEREAS, Google, on August 24, 2010, filed its Motion for Review of and 3 Objections to Magistrate Hillman's Order of August 10, 2010 on Google's Motion to 4 Quash Subpoenas to Shantal Rands Poovala (Dkt. No. 976) ("Objections"); 5 WHEREAS, this Court, by its August 25, 2010 Order (Dkt. No. 978), stayed 6 all proceedings except those matters directly related to Perfect 10's appeal of the 7 Court's July 30, 2010 Order until the Ninth Circuit issues a decision on that appeal; 8 WHEREAS, this Court's August 25, 2010 Order also extended the deadline 9 for Google to file a motion for review of Magistrate Hillman's August 10, 2010 10 Order until fourteen days after the lifting of the stay following the conclusion of 11 Perfect 10's appeal; 12 14 16 18 20 WHEREAS the hearing on Google's Objections is currently set for October 4, WHEREAS, the parties agree that briefing and argument on Google's ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS 1. 2. The October 4, 2010 hearing on Google's Objections is taken off the Google is granted leave to re-file a motion for review of Magistrate 13 2010 at 10:00 a.m. before this Court; 15 Objections should take place after the stay is lifted; 17 HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 19 Court's calendar, and 21 Hillman's August 10, 2010 Order fourteen (14) days after the lifting of the current 22 stay following the conclusion of Perfect 10's appeal, consistent with this Court's 23 August 25, 2010 Order. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: ________ __, 2010 26 27 28 01980.51320/3655537.1 A. Howard Matz United States District Judge Case No. CV 04-9484 AHM (SHx) -2[PROPOSED] ORDER REMOVING THE HEARING ON GOOGLE'S MOTION FOR REVIEW OF THE 8/10/10 ORDER FROM THE COURT'S CALENDAR AND GRANTING GOOGLE LEAVE TO RE-FILE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?