Southern California Institute of Law v. TCS Education System et al

Filing 29

RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Lawto Motion Hearing, Link Motions to Minutes,, 24 Plaintiff's response to OSC re Dismissal (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Declaration, # 3 Declaration, # 4 Affidavit)(Shohet, George)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 George A. Shohet SBN 112697 LAW OFFICES OF GEORGE A. SHOHET, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 245 Main Street, Suite 310 Venice, CA 90291-5216 Tel.: (310) 452-3176 Fax: (310) 452-2270 Gretchen M. Nelson SBN 112566 KREINDLER & KREINDLER LLP 707 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 4100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Tel.: (213) 622-6469 Fax: (213) 622-6019 Attorneys for Plaintiff Southern California Institute of Law 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, a California corporation, Plaintiff, vs. 21 22 23 24 25 TCS EDUCATION SYSTEM, an Illinois corporation; DAVID J. FIGULI, an individual; and GLOBAL EQUITIES, LTD. d/b/a HIGHER EDUCATION GROUP, a Colorado limited liability company, 26 27 28 CASE NO.: CV10-8026 PSG (AJWx) [Assigned to Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez] PROOF OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) AND SUPPORTING DECLARATIONS Action Filed: Oct. 25, 2010 Hearing Date: None Set Ctrm: 880 Defendants. ________________________________________________________________ PROOF OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) AND SUPPORTING DECLARATIONS PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 I, George A. Shohet, declare as follows: 3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by the Law 4 Offices of George A. Shohet, A Professional Corporation, whose business address is 5 245 Main Street, Suite 310, Venice, California 90291. I am over the age of 18 and 6 not a party to this action. On April 18, 2011, I served the following document(s): 7 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 8 REGARDING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m); 9 10 DECLARATION OF GEORGE A. SHOHET IN SUPPORT OF 11 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 REGARDING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m); 13 14 DECLARATION OF PAMELA VAUGHN REGARDING SERVICE OF 15 PROCESS ON DEFENDANTS DAVID J. FIGULI AND GLOBAL 16 EQUITIES, LLC D/B/A HIGHER EDUCATION GROUP; and 17 18 DECLARATION OF STUART SORENSEN REGARDING 19 ATTEMPTED SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANTS DAVID 20 J. FIGULI AND GLOBAL EQUITIES, LLC D/B/A HIGHER 21 EDUCATION GROUP 22 by placing a true copies thereof in two envelopes addressed to each of the defendants 23 named below at the addresses shown: 24 David J. Figuli Global Equities, LLC 8697 S. Blue Creek Road Evergreen, CO 80439 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________ 1 DECLARATION OF GEORGE A. SHOHET IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) 1 AND 2 3 4 5 David J. Figuli Global Equities, LLC P.O. Box 392 Conifer, CO 80433 6 7 [ ] BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope 8 addressed to each person[s] named at the address[es] shown and giving same to a 9 messenger employed by Now Legal Services, whose business address is 1301 W. 10 2nd Street, Suite 101, Los Angeles, California 90026, for personal delivery before 11 5:00 p.m. on April 18, 2011. 12 13 [ ] BY FEDERAL EXPRESS: On the above-mentioned date, I placed a 14 true copy of the above mentioned document(s), in a sealed envelope or package 15 designated by Federal Express with delivery fees paid or provided for, addressed to 16 the person(s) as indicated above and deposited same in a box or other facility 17 regularly maintained by Federal Express or delivered same to an authorized courier 18 or driver authorized by Federal Express. 19 20 [X] BY CERTIFIED MAIL: On April 18, 2011, I deposited a true copy 21 of the above mentioned documents in a sealed envelope with the United States 22 Postal Service in Santa Monica, California fully pre-paid to be sent to the defendants 23 identified above by First Class Mail combined with Certified Mail, return receipt 24 requested. 25 26 27 28 [ ] BY FACSIMILE: From facsimile machine telephone number (310) 452-2270, on April 18, 2011, I served a full and complete copy of the above________________________________________________________________ 2 DECLARATION OF GEORGE A. SHOHET IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) 1 referenced document[s] by facsimile transmission to the person[s] at the number[s] 2 indicated. 3 4 [ ] BY E-MAIL: On April 18, 2011, I served a full and complete copy of 5 the above-referenced document[s] by e-mail transmission to the person[s] at the e- 6 mail addresses indicated above. 7 8 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that 9 the foregoing is true and correct, that the original of the aforementioned document(s) 10 was/were printed on recycled paper, and that this Proof of Service was executed by 11 me on April 18, 2011, at Los Angeles, California. 12 13 14 George A. Shohet 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________________________________ 3 DECLARATION OF GEORGE A. SHOHET IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m) 1 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who have 3 consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of the foregoing 4 document via Central District of California CM/ECF system on April 18, 2011 5 6 ____/s/ George A. Shohet_______________ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?