Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al

Filing 37

ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Manuel L. Real. The Court finds, adjudges, and orders as follows: 1. That the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. 2. This action shall be remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. 3. That the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' request for monetary sanctions. (mailed 8/13/13) Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal CV 103) (lom)

Download PDF
Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al Doc. 37 Att. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION SOUTHERN DIVISION 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 EASTERN DIVISION TERRY NAFISI 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 8/13/13 District Court Executive and Clerk of Court Los Angeles Superior Court, Central District Stanley Mosk Courthouse 111 North Hill St. Los Angeles, CA 90012 Re: Case Number: 2:13-cv-03265-R Previously Superior Court Case No. BC505118 Case Name: Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 8/13/13 above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: Lori Muraoka Deputy Clerk G Western ✘ 213-894-1532 G Eastern G Southern Division cc: Counsel of record Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court By: Date CV - 103 (09/08) Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?