Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al
Filing
37
ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND by Judge Manuel L. Real. The Court finds, adjudges, and orders as follows: 1. That the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. 2. This action shall be remanded to the Los Angeles Superior Court. 3. That the Court DENIES Plaintiffs' request for monetary sanctions. (mailed 8/13/13) Terminated. Made JS-6 (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal CV 103) (lom)
Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al
Doc. 37 Att. 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
SOUTHERN DIVISION
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Tel: (213) 894-3535
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053
Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516
(714) 338-4750
EASTERN DIVISION
TERRY NAFISI
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134
Riverside, CA 92501
(951) 328-4450
8/13/13
District Court Executive and
Clerk of Court
Los Angeles Superior Court,
Central District
Stanley Mosk Courthouse
111 North Hill St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Re: Case Number: 2:13-cv-03265-R
Previously Superior Court Case No. BC505118
Case Name: Jordan Spint et al v. Swarovski North America Limited et al
Dear Sir / Madam:
Pursuant to this Court’s ORDER OF REMAND issued on 8/13/13
above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this
Court.
Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it
to our office. Thank you for your cooperation.
Respectfully,
Clerk, U. S. District Court
By: Lori Muraoka
Deputy Clerk
G Western
✘
213-894-1532
G Eastern
G Southern Division
cc: Counsel of record
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein.
Clerk, Superior Court
By:
Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?