Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 126

SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Order for (i) OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE IN DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY A NON-PARTY, OR PERMITTING A SECOND RULE 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION TO DETERMINE THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THAT CLAIM; (ii) GRANTING RELIEF FROM THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF 123 [REDACTED] filed by Plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Majar Productions LLC, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Supplemental Decl of Betsy C. Manifold, # 2 Exhibit 13, # 3 Exhibit 14, # 4 Exhibit 15, # 5 Exhibit 16, # 6 Exhibit 17 [REDACTED & FILED UNDER SEAL])(Manifold, Betsy)

Download PDF
8 FRANCIS M. GREGOREK (144785) gregorek@whafh.com BETSY C. MANIFOLD (182450) manifold@whafh.com RACHELE R. RICKERT (190634) rickert@whafh.com MARISA C. LIVESAY (223247) livesay@whafh.com WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP 750 B Street, Suite 2770 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/239-4599 Facsimile: 619/234-4599 9 Interim Lead Class Counsel for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 WESTERN DIVISION 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, ) ) INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORP., et al., Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx) SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF BETSY C. MANIFOLD IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION [DKT. 123, 124] BY ORDER DATED JULY 9, 2014 [DKT. 119] Date: July 25, 2014 Time: 9:30 A.M. Judge: Hon. Michael R. Wilner Room: H-9th Floor Disc. Cutoff: July 11, 2014 Pretrial Conf.: N/A Trial Date: N/A L/D File Jt. MSJ: 11/14/14 1 I, Betsy C. Manifold, hereby declare as follows: 2 1. I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the States of California, 3 New York, and Wisconsin, and before this Court. I am a partner with the law firm 4 Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, interim lead class counsel for 5 plaintiffs and the class. I have personal knowledge of the following facts, and if 6 called upon to do so, I could and would competently testify as to them. 7 2. I submit this declaration in further support of the motion by plaintiffs 8 Good Morning To You Productions Corp., Robert Siegel, Rupa Marya d/b/a Rupa & 9 The April Fishes, and Majar Productions, LLC’s (“Plaintiffs’”) for an order: (i) 10 overruling Defendants’ claim of privilege in documents produced by a non-party, or 11 permitting a second rule 30(B)(6) deposition to determine the factual basis for that 12 claim, (ii) granting relief from the discovery cut-off to conduct that deposition, and 13 (iii) and [proposed] order thereon. [Dkt. 123, 124]. 14 permitted by Court Order dated July 9, 2014 [Dkt. 119]. 15 SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS Supplemental briefing was 16 3. 17 Exhibit 13: Form ASCAP License Agreements for: (i) Restaurants, Bars, 18 Nightclubs, and Similar Establishments; (ii) Shopping Centers and Shopping Malls; 19 and (iii) Radio Station; 20 21 22 23 24 25 Attached hereto are true and correct copies of the following: Exhibit 14: Excerpts from the Deposition of Richard Reimer (ASCAP) taken on July 21, 2014; Exhibit 15: Excerpts of ASCAP Compendium of ASCAP Rules and Regulations, and Policies Supplemental to the Articles of Incorporation; Exhibit 16: Excerpts from the Deposition of Richard Reimer (ASCAP) taken on July 11, 2014; and 26 Exhibit 17: True and correct copies of correspondence exchanged between 27 ASCAP and Clayton F. Summy Co. in 1943 produced by non-party ASCAP on May 28 -1- 1 9, 2014 (ASCAP0193-197) (filed under seal in compliance with the parties’ 2 protective order and non-party’s ASCAP’s “Confidential” designation). 3 4 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 22nd day of July 2014, in the City of San Diego, State of California. 5 By: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 WARNER/CHAPPELL:21016.decl.bcm 28 -2- /s/ Betsy C. Manifold BETSY C. MANIFOLD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?