Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc
Filing
126
SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Order for (i) OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE IN DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY A NON-PARTY, OR PERMITTING A SECOND RULE 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION TO DETERMINE THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THAT CLAIM; (ii) GRANTING RELIEF FROM THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF #123 [REDACTED] filed by Plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Majar Productions LLC, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supplemental Decl of Betsy C. Manifold, #2 Exhibit 13, #3 Exhibit 14, #4 Exhibit 15, #5 Exhibit 16, #6 Exhibit 17 [REDACTED & FILED UNDER SEAL])(Manifold, Betsy)
8
FRANCIS M. GREGOREK (144785)
gregorek@whafh.com
BETSY C. MANIFOLD (182450)
manifold@whafh.com
RACHELE R. RICKERT (190634)
rickert@whafh.com
MARISA C. LIVESAY (223247)
livesay@whafh.com
WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER
FREEMAN & HERZ LLP
750 B Street, Suite 2770
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619/239-4599
Facsimile: 619/234-4599
9
Interim Lead Class Counsel for Plaintiffs and Proposed Class
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
WESTERN DIVISION
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
WARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC, )
)
INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
GOOD MORNING TO YOU
PRODUCTIONS CORP., et al.,
Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx)
SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF
BETSY C. MANIFOLD IN FURTHER
SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION
[DKT. 123, 124] BY ORDER DATED
JULY 9, 2014 [DKT. 119]
Date:
July 25, 2014
Time:
9:30 A.M.
Judge:
Hon. Michael R. Wilner
Room:
H-9th Floor
Disc. Cutoff:
July 11, 2014
Pretrial Conf.:
N/A
Trial Date:
N/A
L/D File Jt. MSJ: 11/14/14
1
I, Betsy C. Manifold, hereby declare as follows:
2
1.
I am an attorney duly licensed to practice law in the States of California,
3
New York, and Wisconsin, and before this Court. I am a partner with the law firm
4
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP, interim lead class counsel for
5
plaintiffs and the class. I have personal knowledge of the following facts, and if
6
called upon to do so, I could and would competently testify as to them.
7
2.
I submit this declaration in further support of the motion by plaintiffs
8
Good Morning To You Productions Corp., Robert Siegel, Rupa Marya d/b/a Rupa &
9
The April Fishes, and Majar Productions, LLC’s (“Plaintiffs’”) for an order: (i)
10
overruling Defendants’ claim of privilege in documents produced by a non-party, or
11
permitting a second rule 30(B)(6) deposition to determine the factual basis for that
12
claim, (ii) granting relief from the discovery cut-off to conduct that deposition, and
13
(iii) and [proposed] order thereon. [Dkt. 123, 124].
14
permitted by Court Order dated July 9, 2014 [Dkt. 119].
15
SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBITS
Supplemental briefing was
16
3.
17
Exhibit 13: Form ASCAP License Agreements for: (i) Restaurants, Bars,
18
Nightclubs, and Similar Establishments; (ii) Shopping Centers and Shopping Malls;
19
and (iii) Radio Station;
20
21
22
23
24
25
Attached hereto are true and correct copies of the following:
Exhibit 14: Excerpts from the Deposition of Richard Reimer (ASCAP) taken
on July 21, 2014;
Exhibit 15: Excerpts of ASCAP Compendium of ASCAP Rules and
Regulations, and Policies Supplemental to the Articles of Incorporation;
Exhibit 16: Excerpts from the Deposition of Richard Reimer (ASCAP) taken
on July 11, 2014; and
26
Exhibit 17: True and correct copies of correspondence exchanged between
27
ASCAP and Clayton F. Summy Co. in 1943 produced by non-party ASCAP on May
28
-1-
1
9, 2014 (ASCAP0193-197) (filed under seal in compliance with the parties’
2
protective order and non-party’s ASCAP’s “Confidential” designation).
3
4
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 22nd day of July 2014, in the City of San Diego, State of California.
5
By:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
WARNER/CHAPPELL:21016.decl.bcm
28
-2-
/s/ Betsy C. Manifold
BETSY C. MANIFOLD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?