Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 126

SUPPLEMENT to MOTION for Order for (i) OVERRULING DEFENDANTS' CLAIM OF PRIVILEGE IN DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY A NON-PARTY, OR PERMITTING A SECOND RULE 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION TO DETERMINE THE FACTUAL BASIS FOR THAT CLAIM; (ii) GRANTING RELIEF FROM THE DISCOVERY CUTOFF 123 [REDACTED] filed by Plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Majar Productions LLC, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Supplemental Decl of Betsy C. Manifold, # 2 Exhibit 13, # 3 Exhibit 14, # 4 Exhibit 15, # 5 Exhibit 16, # 6 Exhibit 17 [REDACTED & FILED UNDER SEAL])(Manifold, Betsy)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 16 Ex. 16 54 Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 WESTERN DIVISION -------------------------------------------X 3 GOOD MORNING TO YOU PRODUCTIONS CORP, et al. 4 Plaintiffs, 5 6 -againstWARNER/CHAPPELL MUSIC INC., et al., 7 Defendants. -------------------------------------------X 8 Lead Case No. CV 13-04460-GHK (MRWx) 9 10 DATE: July 11, 2014 TIME: 2:00 p.m. 11 12 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION of Richard 13 Reimer, taken by Plaintiffs, held at the 14 Offices of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & 15 Garrison, LLP, 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 16 New York, New York 10019, before Gilbert J. 17 Bowles, a Notary Public of the State of New 18 York. 19 20 21 22 23 Job No: 81987 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Ex. 16 55 Page 2 1 A P P E A R A N C E S: 2 3 4 5 WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ Attorneys for the Plaintiffs 270 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10016 BY: MARK C. RIFKIN, ESQ. 6 7 8 MUNGER TOLLES & OLSON 355 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071 BY: MELINDA EADES LeMOINE, ESQ. 9 10 11 12 PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON 1285 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10019 BY: DARREN W. JOHNSON, ESQ. 13 14 15 ALSO PRESENT: STEVE SANPIETRO Legal Video Specialist 16 17 18 * RANDALL S. NEWMAN, ESQ. * * 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Ex. 16 56 Page 3 1 S T I P U L A T I O N S 2 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between 4 the attorneys for the respective parties herein, 5 that filing and sealing be and the same are 6 hereby waived. 7 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that all 8 objections, except as to the form of the 9 question, shall be reserved to the time of the 10 trial. 11 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the within 12 deposition may be sworn to and signed before any 13 officer authorized to administer an oath, with 14 the same force and effect as if signed and sworn 15 to before the Court. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Ex. 16 57 Page 12 1 move on. 2 Q Mr. Reimer, in the period from 3 1974 through 1979, did ASCAP provide services 4 to Summy-Birchard individually as opposed to 5 part of the services you provided to all of 6 your members in issuing blanket licenses? 7 MS. LeMOINE: Objection to form. 8 MR. JOHNSON: Objection. 9 A I really don't know. 10 Q What services did ASCAP provide to 11 Summy-Birchard in the period from 1974 12 through 1979? 13 MS. LeMOINE: 14 Speculation. 15 A Objection to form. Well, you know, apart from the 16 documents that we already produced I'm 17 unaware of any specific services. 18 Q Okay, that's fine. 19 20 Does ASCAP have any interest in the music it licenses? 21 A Again, we produced documents that 22 I believe make clear whatever interest ASCAP 23 has. 24 have no interest in the copyrights 25 themselves. I also said in my declaration that we TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Ex. 16 58 Page 13 1 Q 2 music? 3 Do you have any interest in the MR. JOHNSON: Objection. That's 4 also beyond the scope of the topics 5 here. 6 very specific. 7 royalties interest in any copyrights. 8 9 Interest in any fees or MR.RIFKIN: Okay. Are you going to instruct him not to answer? 10 11 Your topics about interest are MR. JOHNSON: Well, are you insisting -- are you continuing -- 12 MR.RIFKIN: I asked a question. 13 simply asked a question as a yes or no 14 answer. 15 to answer go ahead, if not, let him 16 I answer and we can move on. 17 If you want to instruct him not MR. JOHNSON: First, I'm going to 18 object to the form of the question. 19 Second, I'm going to instruct him not to 20 answer. 21 22 MR.RIFKIN: Q Okay, that's fine. Does ASCAP have any interest in 23 the copyright or any copyright to the song 24 Happy Birthday To You? 25 A Again, I think my response is that TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Ex. 16 59 Page 14 1 the documents we produced speak for 2 themselves. 3 Q Did ASCAP ever have any interest 4 in any copyright to the song Happy Birthday 5 To You? 6 7 8 9 10 A I would make the same response I just made. Q Can you answer that yes or no for the record, please? A I will answer it by saying I think 11 the documents we produced are 12 self-explanatory. 13 Q Do you know if any of those 14 documents identify any interest in the 15 copyright that ASCAP has the copyright to the 16 song Happy Birthday To You? 17 MS. LeMOINE: Objection. Vague. 18 MR. JOHNSON: Objection. This is 19 also -- he's already testified to this 20 in his declaration in this case. 21 know what the answer is. 22 try to suggest on the record that he 23 hasn't already provided this information 24 to you. 25 MR.RIFKIN: You So let's not I simply want him to TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Ex. 16 60

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?