Rupa Marya v. Warner Chappell Music Inc

Filing 197

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for to Exclude Evidence filed by plaintiffs Good Morning to You Productions Corp, Majar Productions LLC, Rupa Marya, Robert Siegel. Motion set for hearing on 2/9/2015 at 09:30 AM before Judge George H. King. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Exhibit A to Proposed Order)(Manifold, Betsy)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT A CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER SPECIFIC TEXT TO STRIKE FROM CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. 182) From To Specific Text to be Deleted Page:Line Page:Line 2:13 2:15 “On December 9, 1935, Summy published two versions of Happy Birthday to You that included lyrics and obtained registration certificates E51988 and E51990. Exs. 101, 103.” 2:19 2:20 “Id. Forman also arranged the music for the 51988 version. Ex. 103. 2:19 2:20 “Forman also arranged the music for the 51988 version. Ex. 103.” 2:22 2:23 “The music for this version was arranged by Preston Ware Orem, another Summy employee. Ex. 101.” 2:24 2:26 “On December 6, 1962, Summy-Birchard Co.—Summy’s successor—renewed these copyrights. Exs. 120 [sic, should be 102], 104.” 6:11 6:13 Certificate E51990 establishes prima facie that Warner/Chappell has a copyright in Happy Birthday to You’s “words” and “text”— what the undisputed evidence shows to be the “familiar lyrics.” Ex. 101.” 6:18 6:21 “If any further proof were needed—and it is not—it is supplied by certificate E51988, registered the exact same day by Clayton F. Summy, Warner/Chappell’s predecessor, which refers to an “arrangement of unison chorus” and “revised text.” Ex. 103.” 6:22 7:1 “The only ‘revised text’ therein is the ‘second verse.’ Thus, the unrevised text is, and can only be, the ‘familiar lyrics,’ which were registered the same day in E51990. Plaintiffs, who bear the burden proof, have no admissible evidence rebutting the certificates.” 6:27 6:28 “Warner/Chappell has submitted admissible copies of the registrations from the Copyright Office. Exs. 101, 103, 107 at 109 at 1553-54, 1561 (Blietz Dep.), 125.” CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER From To Specific Text to be Deleted Page:Line Page:Line 15:7 15:10 “Certificates E51990 and E51988 each identify Mildred J. Hill as the author of Happy Birthday to You. Exs. 101, 103. This is prima facie evidence that Mildred authored the lyrics of Happy Birthday to You and that the lyrics were original to her.” 15:12 15:15 “Plaintiffs object to Warner/Chappell’s registration certificates, which Warner/Chappell received from the Copyright Office and which include official Copyright Office cover pages that state ‘Copy of Registration.’” 16:23 17:1 Warner/Chappell’s copyright certificates constitute prima facie evidence that Summy was authorized to copyright Happy Birthday to You.” 35:22 36:1 “Certificate E51990 describes the publication of Happy Birthday to You as “pf., with words” and states that “© is claimed on arrangement as easy piano solo with text.” Ex.101 (emphasis added). Certificate E51988 states, with respect to that publication of Happy Birthday to You, that “© is claimed on arrangement for unison chorus and revised text.” Ex. 103 (emphasis added). The plain language of these certificates demonstrates that the copyrights cover the lyrics to the songs, and not simply the arrangements.” 36:14 36:21 “Certificate E51990 covers “arrangement as easy piano solo with text,” while certificate E51988 covers “arrangement for unison chorus” and ‘revised text.’ Exs. 101, 103. As discussed above, if the ‘revised text’ in E51988 is the second verse of Happy Birthday to You, then the ‘text’ claimed in E51990 (on the same day) must have been the ‘familiar,’ first verse of Happy Birthday to You. “Warner/Chappell’s certificates are prima facie evidence that Summy had the right to copyright these lyrics.” 38:4 38:6 “It is the registration certificates—both of which identify Mildred J. Hill as the author of the work—and not the applications—that receive the statutory presumption. 17 U.S.C. § 410(c); see Exs. 101, 103.” 40:3 40:4 “In 1935, Summy published only two versions of Happy Birthday to You with lyrics. Exs.101, 103 . . . .” CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -2- From To Specific Text to be Deleted Page:Line Page:Line 40:7 40:8 “The other version contains only the familiar lyrics, and bears the publication number 3075. Ex. 106.” 40:13 41:1 Because there is no evidence that Summy published other lyrical versions of Happy Birthday to You in 1935, publication 3075, which was not submitted in connection with E51988, must have been submitted in connection with E51990. “The information on publication 3075 also corresponds with the Copyright Office’s record of the work deposited for E51990. The cover of publication 3075 contains the title ‘Piano Solo with words,’ which is the exact same phrase that appears in the Copyright Office deposit record for E51990, down to the capitalization of the first two words only, and which is different from the description in the application and the certificate (which include the phrases ‘pf., with words’ and ‘Arrangement as easy piano solo, with text’). . . . . 103 (certificate) . . . 106 (3075 publication).” 41:2 41:10 “in completing the deposit record for E51990, the Copyright Office was actually looking at the deposit copy, which was Summy publication 3075. Other information on publication 3075 matches the description contained in the deposit record for E51990. The title of publication 3075, as shown above the sheet music, is ‘Happy Birthday to You!’—with an exclamation mark. Ex. 106. The deposit record likewise lists an exclamation mark, which was not at the end of the title on the application or the title on the certificate. Exs. 48, 103, 105. The statement ‘by Mildred J. Hill’ also appears on both the cover of publication 3075 and the deposit record for E51990. Exs. 105-06.” 41:16 41:18 “(1) an original version, which was deposited for 51990, that contains only the familiar lyrics to the song, and claims copyright in the entirety of those lyrics (‘© is claimed on arrangement on easy piano solo with text’). . . .” 43:7 43:9 As shown above, the evidence conclusively demonstrates that the E51990 deposit copy contained the familiar lyrics for Happy Birthday to You.” CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -3- From To Specific Text to be Deleted Page:Line Page:Line 43:11 43:12 “Here, there is no suggestion of any defect with the deposit copies submitted for E51990.” 48:13 48:15 “On December 9, 1935, Summy Co. deposited in the Copyright Office two copies of each of the works published in connection with E51990 and E51988. Exs. 101, 103.” 48:18 48:21 “the evidence shows that the only other 1935 publication of Happy Birthday to You that contained words aside from the E51988 deposit copy also contained the term “Copyright,” the name of the proprietor, and the year in which copyright was secured. Ex. 106 . . . .” 50:7 50:9. “The undisputed evidence demonstrates that, at the time of the 1988 acquisition, Warner-Chappell’s predecessor-ininterest was “100% owned by its chairman, David K. Sengstack.” Ex 119. at 1761.” Exhibit A Continues on Next Page CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -4- SPECIFIC TEXT TO STRIKE FROM JOINT STATEMENT OF UNCONTROVERTED FACTS (Dkt. 183) Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact D9. Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response • App’x Ex. 103 (E51988 registration certificate which states, “By Mildred J. Hill”) • App’x Ex. 101 (E51990 registration certificate which states, “By Mildred J. Hill”) • . . . . App’x Ex. 101 (Marcotullio Ex. 9) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 106 CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -5- Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response (1935 publication of “Happy Birthday to You!,” which states “By Mildred J. Hill on the cover and “Mildred J. Hill” at the top of the sheet music) D16. On or about • App’x Ex. 101 December 9, 1935, (E51990 Clayton F. Summy registration Co. obtained certificate) copyright • . . . . App’x Ex. Registration 101 Certificate E51990. (Marcotullio Ex. 9) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office D18. Registration Certificate 51990 states that it • App’x Ex. 101 (E51990 registration CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -6- Specific Text to be Deleted Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact applies to a “published musical composition” entitled “Happy birthday to you.” Fact No. Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response certificate) • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of Jeremy Blietz) at 1561: App’x Ex. 101 (Marcotullio Ex. 9) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office D19. The listing under • App’x Ex. 101 the byline in (E51990 Registration registration Certificate E51990 certificate) states: “By • App’x Ex. 109 Mildred J. Hill, (Dep. Tr. of arr. by Preston Ware Orem;* pf., Jeremy Blietz) with words.” at 1561: App’x Ex. 101 (Marcotullio Ex. 9) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -7- Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 2, 9 D20. Registration • App’x Ex. 101 Certificate E51990 (E51990 also states: “(© is registration claimed on certificate) arrangement as • App’x Ex. 109 easy piano solo (Dep. Tr. of with text).” Jeremy Blietz) at 1561: App’x Ex. 101 (Marcotullio Ex. 9) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 2, 9 D21. Registration • App’x Ex. 101 Certificate E51990 (E51990 lists the date of registration publication as CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -8- Specific Text to be Deleted Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact December 6, 1935. Fact No. Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response certificate) • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of Jeremy Blietz) at 1561: App’x Ex. 101 (Marcotullio Ex. 9) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl. at ¶¶ 2,9) D22. Registration • App’x Ex. 101 Certificate E51990 (E51990 states that two registration copies of the certificate) published musical composition were • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of received and registered in the Jeremy Blietz) Copyright Office at 1561 App’x on December 9, Ex. 101 1935. (Marcotullio Ex. 9) was provided to CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER -9- Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 2, 9 D23. • App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) . D25. • App’x Ex.106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) D26. • App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) D28. The version of • App’x Ex. 106 CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 10 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Happy Birthday to (1935 You with publication of publication sheet music for number 3075 Happy Birthday identifies the title to You!) of the • App’x Ex. 100 composition, on the sheet music, as (Kaplan Decl.) “Happy Birthday at ¶ 7 to You!” D31. • App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) D33. • App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) D36. • App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 11 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response to You!) D41. • App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) • App’x Ex. 103 (E51988 registration certificate) • App’x Ex. 101 (E51990 registration certificate) • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of Jeremy Blietz) at 1553-54, 1561: App’x Exs. 101 and 103 (Marcotullio Exs. 9 and 4) were provided to Warner/Chappel l by the CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 12 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Copyright Office D42. • App’x Ex. 103 (E51988 registration certificate) • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of Jeremy Blietz) at 1553-54: App’x Ex. 103 (Marcotullio Ex. 4) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office D44. Registration • App’x Ex. 103 Certificate E51988 (E51988 applies to a registration “published certificate) musical • App’x Ex. 109 composition” (Dep. Tr. of entitled “Happy birthday to you; Jeremy Blietz) unison song.” at 1553-54: CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 13 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response App’x Ex. 103 (Marcotullio Ex. 4) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 4, 9 D45. The listing under • App’x Ex. 103 the byline in (E51988 Registration registration Certificate E51988 certificate) states: “By • App’x Ex. 109 Mildred J. Hill, (Dep. Tr. of rev. text and arr. of music by Mrs. Jeremy Blietz) R. R. Forman* at 1553-54: 4to.” App’x Ex. 103 (Marcotullio Ex. 4) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 14 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 4, 9 D46. Registration • App’x Ex. 103 Certificate E51988 (E51988 also states: “(© is registration claimed on certificate) arrangement for unison chorus and • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of revised text).” Jeremy Blietz) at 1553-54: App’x Ex. 103 (Marcotullio Ex. 4) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 4, 9 D47. Registration • App’x Ex. 103 Certificate E51988 (E51988 lists the date of registration publication as certificate) December 6, 1935. • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 15 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Jeremy Blietz) at 1553-54: App’x Ex. 103 (Marcotullio Ex. 4) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 4, 9 D48. Registration • App’x Ex. 103 Certificate E51988 (E51988 states that two registration copies of the certificate) published musical composition were • App’x Ex. 109 (Dep. Tr. of received and registered in the Jeremy Blietz) Copyright Office at 1553-54: on December 9, App’x Ex. 103 1935. (Marcotullio Ex. 4) was provided to Warner/Chappel l by the Copyright CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 16 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Office • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 4, 9 D67. On or about • App’x Ex. 102 December 6, 1962, (certificate of Summy-Birchard registration of a Co. obtained claim to renewal Registration copyright, Certificate 306186) R306186, which was a renewal of Registration E51990. D68. Registration Certificate R306186 applies to “HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU! – easy piano solo with text.” • App’x Ex. 102 (certificate of registration of a claim to renewal copyright, 306186) D69. Registration Certificate R306186 states that the “Renewable Matter” is “Arrangement as easy piano solo • App’x Ex. 102 (certificate of registration of a claim to renewal copyright, 306186) CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 17 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response with text.” D70. Registration Certificate R306186 states “By Mildred J. Hill” in the area designated for Copyright Office notations. • App’x Ex. 102 (certificate of registration of a claim to renewal copyright, 306186) D71. On or about • App’x Ex. 104 December 6, 1962, (certificate of Summy-Birchard registration of a Company obtained claim to renewal Registration copyright, Certificate 306185) R306185, which was a renewal of Registration E51988. D72. Registration Certificate R306185 applies to “HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO YOU! – Unison Song.” • App’x Ex. 104 (certificate of registration of a claim to renewal copyright, 306185) D79. As of October 1988, Birch Tree Group Ltd. Was 100% owned by • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of October 1988 CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 18 - Specific Text to be Deleted Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact its then chairman, David K. Sengstack. Fact No. Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response “Confidential Information Memorandum” regarding Birch Tree Group Ltd) • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶ 17 D82. • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of October 1988 “Confidential Information Memorandum” regarding Birch Tree Group Ltd.) • App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶¶ 16-17 D83. Between approximately September 1931 and January 1989, the Sengstack family continuously operated • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of October 1988 “Confidential Information Memorandum” regarding Birch CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 19 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Warner/Chappell’s Tree Group predecessors-inLtd.) interest (in • App’x Ex. 100 chronological (Kaplan Decl.) order): Clayton F. Summy Co. at ¶ 17 (Delaware), Summy Publishing Co. (Delaware), Summy-Birchard Publishing Co. (Delaware), Summy-Birchard Co. (Delaware), Summy-Birchard Co. (Illinois), Summy-Birchard Co. (Wyoming), Sumco Corp. (Wyoming), Summy-Birchard Co. (Wyoming), The Birch Tree Group Ltd. (Wyoming), Birch Tree Group Ltd. (Wyoming), Summy-Birchard, Inc. (Wyoming). P59 Disputed. Summy- CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 20 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response October 1988 Birchard “Confidential Company has Information been operated Memorandum” continuously by regarding the Sengstack Birch Tree family since Group Ltd.) 1931. As of October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Declaration of Birchard Adam I. Company’s Kaplan successor (“Kaplan company, Birch Decl.”) at ¶ 17 Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P60 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 21 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P61 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P62 Disputed. SummyBirchard CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of October 1988 Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 22 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response “Confidential Company has Information been operated Memorandum” continuously by regarding the Sengstack Birch Tree family since Group Ltd.) 1931. As of October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P68 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 23 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P115 • App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) at 122123 • App’x Ex. 101 (E51990 registration certificate, marked as Marcotullio Ex. 9) at 120507 P116 Disputed. Defendants do possess copies of Happy Birthday to You that were published in 1935 as a “Piano Solo CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK App’x Ex. 106 (1935 publication of sheet music for Happy Birthday to You!) at 122023 Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 24 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response with words.” Defendants do not possess a copy of the specific copy deposited with the Copyright Office. Admissible Evidence Supporting Response App’x Ex. 100 (Kaplan Decl.) at ¶ 7 P192 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P193 Disputed. SummyBirchard CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of October 1988 Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 25 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response “Confidential Company has Information been operated Memorandum” continuously by regarding the Sengstack Birch Tree family since Group Ltd.) 1931. As of October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P196 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 26 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P197 P198 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. . Disputed. SummyBirchard Company has CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK • App’x Ex.119 (Excerpt of October 1988 “Confidential Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 27 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Information been operated Memorandum” continuously by regarding the Sengstack Birch Tree family since 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P202 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 28 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P208 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P209 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Unsupported by (Excerpt of the evidence. October 1988 Summy“Confidential Birchard Information CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 29 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Memorandum” Company has regarding been operated Birch Tree continuously by Group Ltd.) the Sengstack family since • App’x Ex. 100 1931. As of (Kaplan Decl.) October 1988, at ¶ 17 SummyBirchard Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P224 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 30 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P225 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P226 Disputed. SummyBirchard Company has CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of October 1988 “Confidential Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 31 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Information been operated Memorandum” continuously by regarding the Sengstack Birch Tree family since 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P227 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 32 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P228 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Summy(Excerpt of Birchard October 1988 Company has “Confidential been operated Information continuously by Memorandum” the Sengstack regarding family since Birch Tree 1931. As of Group Ltd.) October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P229 Disputed. SummyBirchard Company has been operated CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK • App’x Ex. 119 (Excerpt of October 1988 “Confidential Information Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 33 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response Memorandum” continuously by regarding the Sengstack Birch Tree family since Group Ltd.) 1931. As of October 1988, • App’x Ex. 100 Summy(Kaplan Decl.) Birchard at ¶ 17 Company’s successor company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. P230 Disputed. • App’x Ex. 119 Unsupported by (Excerpt of the evidence. October 1988 Summy“Confidential Birchard Information Company has Memorandum” been operated regarding continuously by Birch Tree the Sengstack Group Ltd.) family since 1931. As of October 1988, SummyBirchard Company’s successor CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 34 - Specific Text to be Deleted Fact No. Statement of Fact Admissible Evidence Supporting Fact Opposing Party’s Response Admissible Evidence Supporting Response company, Birch Tree Group Ltd., was 100% owned by its then chairman David K. Sengstack. WARNERCHAPPELL:21436.EXH.A.ORDER CASE NO. CV 13-04460-GHK Ex. A to [PROPOSED] ORDER - 35 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?