Bryan Pringle v. William Adams Jr et al

Filing 159

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants David Guetta, Frederick Riesterer, Shapiro Bernstein and Co. Motion set for hearing on 12/19/2011 at 10:00 AM before Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Memorandum)(Miller, Donald)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SOUTHERN DIVISION

11 BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual,
12
13

Pringle,
v.

14 WILLIAM ADAMS, JR.; STACY
FERGUSON; ALLAN PINEDA; and
15 JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and
collectively as the music group The
16 Black Eyed Peas, et al.,
17

Defendants.

18
19
20

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. SACV 10-1656 JST(RZx)
Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker
Courtroom 10A
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANTS
SHAPIRO, BERNSTEIN & CO,
INC., FREDERIC RIESTERER AND
DAVID GUETTA
Complaint Filed: October 28, 2010
Trial Date: February 28, 2012
Hearing Date: December 19, 2011:
10:00 A.M.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NY985329.1
217131-10001

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

[Proposed] Order
Before the Court is the Motion of Defendants Shapiro, Bernstein & Co, Inc.,

3 Frederic Riesterer and David Guetta (collectively “Defendants”) for summary
4 judgment against Plaintiff Bryan Pringle pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of
5 Civil Procedure. Having considered the parties’ submissions, heard oral argument,
6 and taken the matter under submission, the Court finds that Defendants have
7 established their entitlement to summary judgment, and Plaintiff has failed to
8 establish any genuine issue of material fact. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion is
9 hereby GRANTED. Judgment shall be entered in Defendants’ favor, and the action
10 is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
11 Dated: ________, 2011
12
By:
Hon. Josephine Staton Tucker
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NY985329.1
217131-10001

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1