Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
110
Declaration of Andrew C. Byrnes in Support of 109 [Plaintiff Overture Services, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Production of Damages Documents] filed by Overture Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit E# 4 Exhibit F# 5 Exhibit G# 6 Exhibit H# 7 Exhibit I# 8 Exhibit J# 9 Exhibit K# 10 Exhibit L# 11 Exhibit M# 12 Exhibit N# 13 Exhibit O# 14 Exhibit P# 15 Exhibit Q# 16 Exhibit R# 17 Exhibit C# 18 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) 109 ) (Byrnes, Andrew) (Filed on 1/28/2004)
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Doc. 110 Att. 12
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-13
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 1 of 5
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-13
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 2 of 5
He llerEh r m an
A T T O R N E Y S
January 12,3004 Via Facsimile & U.S. Mail Christine P. Sun Keker & Van Xest LLP 7 10 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 941 11-1704 Re:
Overture v. Google: Discovery Issues
Andrew C. Byrnes ABymes@hewrn.com Direct (650) 324-7021
Main (650) 324-7000 Fax (650) 324-0638
05392.0150
Dear Ms. Sun: Thank you for your letter of January 9. I look forward to hearing from Mr. Grewal on or before Wednesday, January 14, regarding email document production. In addition, Overture agrees to supplement its discovery responses and document production, and provide an updated privilege log by February 13, so long as Google does the same. With respect to damages discovery, the parties made their informal agreement deferring damages discovery until after the Markman hearing when that hearing was scheduled for October 22,2003. Now that the hearing has been delayed for five months, due to Google's submission of an overlong claim construction brief, there is no reason to delay hrther that discovery. Indeed, by the time of the Markman hearing, Overture's complaint will have been pending for 23 months. Please reconsider your objection to producing damages discovery at this time. If you do not agree to include damages discovery in your February 13 supplementation, we reserve our right to seek the Court's assistance.
The parties' as-of-yet unsuccessful attempts to schedule the 30(b)(6) deposition
regarding GoTo.com's pre-critical date system do not justify continued delay in producing
Robert Haslam's December 24, 2003 letter to Ms. Dune explained that, as newly substituted counsel, we were not able to prepare for and defend the deposition before the mediation, but would be able to provide you a deposition this month after the mediation. Last week, Patty Thayer of my f r reiterated the proposal to Michael Kwun. Mr. Kwun responded that the im deposition might not be able to happen in January due to the deposing attorney's schedule. We remain willing to provide a 3O(b)(6) deponent later this month. We would also like to discuss Google's takmg the renewed deposition of Darren Davis this month. In any event, Heller Ehrman's understandable need to get up to speed on the case - and delay the 3O(b)(6)
heller Ehrrnan White & McAuliffe LLP 275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 www.hewm.com San Erancisco
damages documents. We have on several occasions offered to provide a deponent in January,
Silicon Valley
Los Angeles
San Diego Milan
Seattle
Portland
Anchorage
New York
Washington, D.C.
Madison,WI
Hong Kong
Singapore
Affilaled Offices:
Paris Rome
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-13
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 3 of 5
HellerEhrman
A T T O R N E Y S
Christine P. Sun January 12, 2004 Page 2
deposition by a short time -- is no justification for Google's refusing to produce responsive damages documents.
I have recently been made aware of two additional outstanding discovery issues that require prompt resolution. First, my understanding is that Mr. Kwun agreed on Google's behalf to produce responsive documents, excluding source code, regarding Google's AdSense program, including its relationship to AdWords. Please confirm that you will produce any such documents no later than February 13. Second, with respect to Google's production of "search logs" and related documents pursuant to Overture's Request for Production No. 77, it is my understanding that Google's counsel agreed to the proposed three-step process set forth in Charles McMahon's October 7, 2003 letter to Mr. Kwun. Please confirm that you will produce the log entries and documents discovered during that process no later than February 13.
Finally, please note that I am resident in Heller Ehrman's Silicon Valley office. Please direct your response to the fax number above andor the address below so that I receive your response as quickly as possible.
cc:
Jason C. White, Esq.
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
VIII.JILUV.~
Document 110-13
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 4 of 5
%IUUl
~ . J . A Lr r u
UJIJ
.JL*
UUJO
nnLmn nmwimu miu u 4
****************************** *** MULTI TX/RX REPORT *** ********%*********************
TX/RX NO TX/RX INCOMPLETE TRANSACTION OK ERROR INFORMATION
PGS .
-____
(1)
(2)
1425 3
*0060~05392~0150#14153977188#P
13123214229#P
HellerEhrman
A T T O ~ N E Y
Facsimile Transmitta1
S
275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 Main (650) 324-7000 Fax (650) 324-0638
To: Telephone:
Christine P. Sun; Kelker & Van Nest 415.391.5400
Fax:
41 5.397.7 188
312.321.4229
To: Telephone:
Telephone: Direct Fax:
Jason C. White; Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione 3 12.321 A225 Fax:
From:
Andrew C. Byrnes 650.324.7021 650.324.6078
No. of Pages: Date: Message:
3
(including cover) : January 8,2004
05392.0150 ( 0 6)
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-13
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 5 of 5
********************* *** TX REPORT 0 0 6
8**8*XS**~M*8*$$*$$*8
TRANSMISSION OK TX/RX NO CONNECTION TEL CONNECTION ID ST. T I E USAGE T
PGS. SENT
1257 0#05392~0150#13123214299 01/13 1 4 : 5 5 0 1 ' 39 3
RESULT
OK
I
HellerEhrman
A T T O R N E Y S
Facsimile Transmittal
275 Middlefield Road Menlo Park, CA 94025-3506 Main (650) 324-7000 Fax (650) 324-0638
To: Telephone:
To: Telephone:
415.391.5400
312.321.4225
Christine P.Sun;Keker & Van Nest
Fax:
Fax:
415.397.7188
Jason C.White; Brinks Hofa Gilson & Lione
3 12.32 1.4229
From: Telephone: Direct Fax:
No. of Pages:
Andrew C. Byrnes 650.324.7021 650.324.6078
Date:
3 (including cover)
January 8,2004
05392.0150 (60)
Message:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?