Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
110
Declaration of Andrew C. Byrnes in Support of 109 [Plaintiff Overture Services, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Production of Damages Documents] filed by Overture Services, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit E# 4 Exhibit F# 5 Exhibit G# 6 Exhibit H# 7 Exhibit I# 8 Exhibit J# 9 Exhibit K# 10 Exhibit L# 11 Exhibit M# 12 Exhibit N# 13 Exhibit O# 14 Exhibit P# 15 Exhibit Q# 16 Exhibit R# 17 Exhibit C# 18 Exhibit D)(Related document(s) 109 ) (Byrnes, Andrew) (Filed on 1/28/2004)
Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Doc. 110 Att. 5
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-6
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 1 of 4
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-6
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 2 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
305458.01
BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE JACK C. BERENZWEIG (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WILLIAM H. FRANKEL (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) JASON C. WHITE (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) CHARLES M. MCMAHON (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) NBC Tower - Suite 3600 455 North Cityfront Plaza Drive Chicago, Illinois 60611 Telephone: (312) 321-4200 Facsimile: (312) 321-4299 Attorneys For Plaintiff OVERTURE SERVICES, INC. KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP JOHN W. KEKER - #49092 JON B. STREETER - #101970 DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 MICHAEL S. KWUN - #198945 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: (415) 391-5400 Facsimile: (415) 397-7188 Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION OVERTURE SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a California corporation, Defendant. Case No. C 02-01991 JSW ADR SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Judge: Hon. Jeffrey S. White
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW ADR
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-6
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 3 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court has considered the Further Joint Case Management Statement filed by plaintiff Overture Services, Inc. ("Overture") and defendant Google Inc. ("Google") on February 6, 2003. Good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders that the January 31, 2003 Case Management Order be modified as follows: Event Last Day for the Parties to Exchange Source Code Responsive to Discovery Requests Served Prior to December 18, 2002, Subject to Any Appropriate Objections Last Day for Overture to Serve Revised Preliminary Infringement Contentions with Respect to Claim 14 of the '361 Patent Last Day for Google to Serve Preliminary Invalidity Contentions Last Day for Simultaneous Exchange of Proposed Terms and Claim Elements for Construction and/or Governed by 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 6 Last Day for Simultaneous Exchange of Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence Last Day for Parties to File Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement Last Day to Complete Mediation Before Private Mediator Last Day to Take Discovery Relating to Claim Construction Case Management Conference Last Day for Overture to File Opening Claim Construction Brief and Supporting Evidence Last Day for Google to File Responsive Claim Construction Brief and Supporting Evidence Last Day for Overture to File Reply Claim Construction Brief and Rebuttal Evidence 4-5 4-5 4-5 4-4 3-1 3-3 4-1 4-2 4-3 Patent L.R. Date 2/14/03
2/28/03 3/14/03 3/31/03 4/21/03 5/13/03 5/19/03 6/12/03 6/13/03 at 1:30 p.m. 6/27/03 7/11/03 7/22/03
1
305458.01
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW ADR
Case 3:02-cv-01991-JSW
Document 110-6
Filed 01/28/2004
Page 4 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Event Technology Tutorial for Court and Claim Construction Prehearing Conference
Patent L.R. 4-6
Date 8/6/03 at 8:30 a.m.
Claim Construction Hearing
4-6
8/7/03 at 8:30 a.m.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 7, 2003
By: ________/s/_____________________ HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
305458.01
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER CASE NO. C 02-01991 JSW ADR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?