National Federation of the Blind et al v. Target Corporation

Filing 28

Memorandum in Opposition re 16 First MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed byNational Federation of the Blind, Bruce Frank Sexton, the National Federation of the Blind of California. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Denying Target's Motion to Dismiss# 2 Request For Judicial Notice# 3 Declaration of Camilla L. Roberson# 4 Exhibit A# 5 Exhibit B# 6 Exhibit C)(Paradis, Laurence) (Filed on 6/12/2006)

Download PDF
National Federation of the Blind et al v. Target Corporation Doc. 28 Att. 1 Case 3:06-cv-01802-MHP Document 28-2 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, CA 94704-1204 (510) 665-8644 510.665.8644 LAURENCE W. PARADIS (California Bar No. 122336) MAZEN M. BASRAWI (California Bar No. 235475) DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, California 94704 Telephone: (510) 665-8644 Facsimile: (510) 665-8511 TTY: (510) 665-8716 TODD M. SCHNEIDER (California Bar No. 158253) JOSHUA KONECKY (California Bar No. 182897) SCHNEIDER & WALLACE 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 421-7100 Fax: (415) 421-7105 TTY: (415) 421-1655 DANIEL F. GOLDSTEIN (pro hac vice) BROWN, GOLDSTEIN & LEVY, LLP 120 E. Baltimore St., Suite 1700 Baltimore, MD 21202 Telephone: (410) 962-1030 Fax: (410) 385-0869 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND, the NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF CALIFORNIA, on behalf of their members and all others similarly situated, and BRUCE F. SEXTON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. TARGET CORPORATION Defendant. Case No.: C 06-01802 MHP CLASS ACTION [proposed] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT TARGET CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS Judge: The Honorable Marilyn Hall Patel National Federation of the Blind, et al. v. Target Corporation Case No.: C 06-01802 MHP [proposed] Order Denying Defendant Target Corporation's Motion to Dismiss Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:06-cv-01802-MHP Document 28-2 Filed 06/12/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DISABILITY RIGHTS ADVOCATES 2001 Center Street, Third Floor Berkeley, CA 94704-1204 (510) 665-8644 Having considered Defendant Target Corporation's ("Target") Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint and Plaintiffs' Opposition; and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES Target's Motion for the following reasons: 1. plaintiffs have properly pled a claim under the Americans With Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§12101, et seq., because Target stores are places of public accommodation and target.com is a service, privilege and advantage of Target stores that is denied to the blind; 2. plaintiffs have properly pled a claim under the Unruh Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§51, et seq., because: (a) Target is a business establishment within the meaning of the Unruh Act and target.com is a service, privilege and advantage that Target denies to the blind; and (b) plaintiffs have properly pled a claim under Title III of the ADA; 3. plaintiffs have properly pled a claim under California's Disabled Persons Act ("DPA"), Cal. Civ. Code §§54, et seq., because: (a) Target stores are public accommodations within the meaning of the DPA and target.com is a privilege, service and advantage of Target stores that is denied to the blind; (b) target.com is a public place within the meaning of the DPA that is denied to the blind; and (c) plaintiffs have properly pled a claim under Title III of the ADA; 4. The Commerce Clause of the Constitution of the United States, U.S. Const. art. I, §8, cl. 3, does not bar the application of the Unruh Act and DPA to target.com. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _____________, 2006 ________________________________ HONORABLE MARILYN H. PATEL United States District Court Judge National Federation of the Blind, et al. v. Target Corporation Case No.: C 06-01802 MHP [proposed] Order Denying Defendant Target Corporation's Motion to Dismiss

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?