Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 1143

Declaration of Tharan Gregory Lanier in Support of 1142 MOTION in Limine Defendants' Motions in Limine filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20)(Related document(s) 1142 ) (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 4/26/2012)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) NO. C 07-01658 PJH PAGES 1 - 296 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 1, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MUCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 8f319c19-708f-4538-8f96-b9dac31aabed Page 257 1 MY ONLY CONCERN IN THIS IS THE USE OF THE WORD 2 "THEFT". 3 CASE. 4 MORE ARGUMENTATIVE THAN ACCURATE. 5 THIS IS NOT A THEFT CASE. THE WORDS ARE TERMS OF ART. THIS IS AN INFRINGEMENT AND I AGREE THAT THAT'S SO, I AM GOING TO -- I DON'T WANT YOU TO USE THE 6 WORD "THEFT" THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE OPENING STATEMENT. 7 BUT OTHERWISE, I AGREE WITH THE THREE CATEGORIES. 8 CAN PUT ON SOME EVIDENCE AS LONG AS IT GOES TO THE QUESTIONS 9 THAT YOU'VE RAISED WITH RESPECT TO HOW THE DAMAGES ARE TO BE I THINK YOU 10 VALUATED AND PROVIDE SOME CONTEXT. 11 SAP'S IN THAT POSITION AND THAT'S HOW IT IS GOING TO HAVE TO 12 BE. 13 MR. LANIER: 14 THE COURT: 15 AND I THINK THAT THAT'S -- WE UNDERSTAND, YOUR HONOR. TAKE THE WORD "THEFT" OUT AND I'M FINE WITH WHAT YOU'RE DOING. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 8f319c19-708f-4538-8f96-b9dac31aabed UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) NO. C 07-01658 PJH JURY TRIAL VOLUME 2 PAGES 297 - 479 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2010 (PAGES 297 THROUGH 312 ARE UNDER SEAL AND BOUND SEPARATELY) TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MUCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR ef4aebc0-d821-42e8-b4c2-a9398968bc70 Page 339 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 20 21 (DEMONSTRATIVE PUBLISHED TO JURY.) MR. HOWARD: WE TALKED ABOUT THE MAINTENANCE SUPPORT 22 FEES THAT CUSTOMERS PAY. 23 IMPORTANT BECAUSE THAT'S HOW ORACLE DEVELOPS THE SUPPORT FOR THE 24 PRODUCTS AND BUILDS THE NEXT VERSION OF THE SOFTWARE. 25 NOT A SMALL NUMBER. AND I TOLD YOU THAT MAINTENANCE WAS AND IT'S ORACLE INVESTS BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EVERY Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR ef4aebc0-d821-42e8-b4c2-a9398968bc70 Page 340 1 YEAR INTO ITS PRODUCTS, BILLIONS OF DOLLARS EVERY YEAR INTO 2 DEVELOPING ITS SOFTWARE. 3 AMOUNT, $3.3 BILLION THIS YEAR, $4 BILLION IN THE NEXT FISCAL 4 YEAR. AND YOU CAN SEE THAT IT INCREASES THAT TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR ef4aebc0-d821-42e8-b4c2-a9398968bc70 Page 341 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 6 MR. HOWARD: I TOLD YOU THAT ORACLE WAS QUITE A BIT 7 SMALLER THAN SAP IN 2004 IN ENTERPRISE APPLICATION SOFTWARE. 8 ORACLE HAD TRIED, AND THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW, THAT ORACLE HAD 9 TRIED TO CATCH UP. AND IT DECIDED THAT ONE OF THE WAYS THAT IT 10 COULD BE MORE COMPETITIVE WITH SAP WAS TO BUY PEOPLESOFT. 11 IT DID THAT, SAP, WHICH HAD LONG BEEN THE DOMINANT PLAYER IN 12 THAT MARKET, FELT VERY THREATENED. 13 WHEN ORACLE -- THE EVIDENCE WILL SHOW THAT ORACLE'S 14 PURCHASE OF PEOPLESOFT WAS A RISK, AND IT WAS A VERY BIG 15 DECISION FOR ORACLE. 16 EVEN TO THIS DAY, YOU'LL HEAR THE LARGEST ACQUISITION THAT 17 ORACLE HAS EVER MADE, AND THEY'VE MADE A FEW. 18 THEY PAID OVER $11 BILLION FOR PEOPLESOFT. PEOPLESOFT AT THE TIME WAS A COMPANY WITH ALMOST 19 $3 BILLION IN ANNUAL REVENUES. 20 IMPORTANT -- PEOPLESOFT HAD ALMOST 10,000 CUSTOMERS. 21 EVIDENCE WILL SHOW THAT THESE CUSTOMERS -- AND I'VE TALKED ABOUT 22 THE MAINTENANCE FEES THAT THESE CUSTOMERS PAY, SO WHAT ORACLE IS 23 GETTING FOR ITS $11 BILLION IN PART IS THE 10,000 CUSTOMERS THAT 24 PEOPLESOFT HAS, ALL OF THOSE CUSTOMERS PAYING MAINTENANCE FEES, 25 ALL OF THOSE MAINTENANCE FEES ABLE TO BE USED TO PAY FOR THE AND -- AND THIS IS VERY AND THE Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR ef4aebc0-d821-42e8-b4c2-a9398968bc70 Page 342 1 TRANSACTION, TO PAY FOR THE DEAL, AND TO INVEST IN NEW PRODUCT. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR ef4aebc0-d821-42e8-b4c2-a9398968bc70 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH PAGES 480 - 640 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2010 (PAGES 485 THROUGH 491 ARE UNDER SEAL AND BOUND SEPARATELY) TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MUCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 88ee2e49-3169-4370-8a69-037d69c1111e Page 502 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 9 THE COURT: I MEAN, I -- I DON'T MEAN TO SAY I BOUGHT 10 THE ARGUMENT, BUT I WAS PERSUADED THE -- BY YOUR ARGUMENT THAT, 11 INDEED, IT'S RELEVANT. 12 PARTICULARLY GIVEN THAT LIABILITY'S NO LONGER AT ISSUE IN THE 13 CASE. 14 BUT AT SOME POINT, IT BECOMES CUMULATIVE SO I'M NOT GOING TO ALLOW YOU TO JUST HAMMER ON IT 15 OVER AND OVER AGAIN. 16 DATES OF KNOWLEDGE AND THE TIME FRAME. 17 ME LIKE YOU NEED FOUR BOARD MEMBERS, I THINK IS WHAT YOU 18 REFERRED TO THE OTHER DAY, TO DO THAT. I UNDERSTAND YOU NEED TO ESTABLISH THE BUT IT DOESN'T SEEM TO TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 88ee2e49-3169-4370-8a69-037d69c1111e Page 522 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 20 Q. 21 PEOPLESOFT, HOW MUCH DID YOU PAY FOR PEOPLESOFT? 22 A. NOW, THE -- THE ACQUISITION OF ORACLE'S ACQUISITION OF I PAID JUST OVER 11 BILLION. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 88ee2e49-3169-4370-8a69-037d69c1111e UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 5 PAGES 754 - 946 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BY: BINGHAM MUCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 5aa486af-96d5-4092-b078-2f276d575630 Page 846 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 12 Q. 13 MODEL FOR THE PEOPLESOFT AND SIEBEL ACQUISITIONS. ALL RIGHT. 14 LET'S TALK SPECIFICALLY ABOUT ORACLE'S FINANCIAL AGAIN, WHY DID ORACLE HAVE THOSE PROJECTIONS 15 PREPARED? 16 A. 17 FROM THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO SPEND 11 -- ACTUALLY MORE THAN 18 $11 BILLION AND TO TAKE ON ALL THE LIABILITIES THAT COME WITH 19 PEOPLESOFT AND THE ASSETS. 20 21 WHAT ARE THEY USED FOR? WELL, THESE PROJECTIONS ARE THE BASIS FOR ASKING PERMISSION SO THOSE MODELS ARE LITERALLY THE KEY JUSTIFICATION TO SPEND $11.1 BILLION. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 5aa486af-96d5-4092-b078-2f276d575630 Page 867 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 5 Q. 6 STANDS READY TO PAY ORACLE $40 MILLION AS COMPENSATION FOR THE 7 INFRINGEMENT IT HAS NOW ADMITTED TO. 8 9 NOW SAP'S COUNSEL IN HIS OPENING STATEMENT SAID THAT SAP WHY HAVEN'T YOU TAKEN THAT OFFER? A. TAKING $40 MILLION FROM SAP, SAP PAYING US $40 MILLION IS 10 A REWARD FOR THEIR BAD BEHAVIOR, FRANKLY. 11 PEOPLE WHO SAY THEY ARE TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR EVERYTHING 12 THEY DID, THIS IS EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE OF THAT. 13 IT ACTUALLY, FOR THIS IS LIKE TAKING SOMEONE'S WATCH AND HOCKING IT. 14 SAY IT'S A $2,000 WATCH, AND HOCKING IT FOR $20, AND THEN 15 OFFERING TO GIVE US $20. IT'S CRAZY. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 5aa486af-96d5-4092-b078-2f276d575630 Page 910 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 5 Q. WHY WOULD THEY PAY THE LICENSE FEE UP FRONT? 6 A. THERE IS A WIDE VARIETY OF REASONS AND HERE'S A LONG LIST. 7 SOME OF THESE I BELIEVE MR. ELLISON AND MS. CATZ 8 MENTIONED THIS MORNING. 9 UP FRONT, IT REALLY BALANCES AN IMPORTANT ISSUE IN THIS CASE. FIRST ONE IS VERY IMPORTANT. IF IT'S 10 IN THAT -- THE TIMING IN THIS CASE IS MAYBE THE MOST IMPORTANT 11 ISSUE. 12 ORACLE SPENT $11 BILLION TO ACQUIRE PEOPLESOFT IN 13 JANUARY 2005, AND IT PAID IT UP FRONT. 14 RISK OF EXECUTING ON THAT PLAN. 15 ORACLE COULDN'T GO BACK AND GET THAT $11 BILLION BACK FROM 16 PEOPLESOFT SHAREHOLDERS. 17 THE RISKS ON EXECUTING ON THAT PLAN WAS ON ORACLE. 18 AND THEN IT TOOK ON THE AND IF IT DIDN'T GO WELL, THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT WORKS. SO ALL SO FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO 19 BALANCE THAT. 20 INCLUDES THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE SOFTWARE THAT WAS 21 ACQUIRED THAT'S NOW IN THIS LAWSUIT. 22 SOFTWARE AND WE SHOULD USE THAT TRANSACTION TO ALLOW FOR THIS 23 UPFRONT PAYMENT. WE HAVE A TRANSACTION AT THAT POINT THAT SO ORACLE PAID FOR THE TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 5aa486af-96d5-4092-b078-2f276d575630 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 6 PAGES 947 - 1187 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 9, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MUCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1017 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 21 Q. 22 NEGOTIATED LICENSE FRAMEWORK; IS THAT RIGHT? 23 A. THAT'S CORRECT. 24 Q. AND YOU UNDERSTAND THAT SAP IS A PROPONENT OF A DIFFERENT 25 MEASURE OF DAMAGES IN THIS CASE, RIGHT? NOW, ALL OF THE TESTIMONY GIVEN HAS BEEN BASED ON THE Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1018 1 A. THAT'S CORRECT. 2 Q. WHAT IS THAT MEASURE? 3 A. I BELIEVE IT'S SAP'S OPINION THAT THE DAMAGES SHOULD BE 4 MEASURED JUST BASED ON THE NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS THAT ORACLE 5 LOST -- ULTIMATELY LOST, AND THEN THERE'S -- THERE'S A 6 CALCULATION THEY DO OF, I THINK, TWO CUSTOMERS WHERE THEY CALL 7 THAT INFRINGERS' GAINS. 8 GAINS. 9 Q. SO IT'S LOST CUSTOMERS AND INFRINGERS' AND THAT'S LOOKING AT IT FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF JANUARY 19, 10 2005 -- 11 A. THAT'S CORRECT. 12 Q. -- WHEN THEY STARTED INFRINGE? 13 A. THAT'S CORRECT. 14 Q. AND THEN GOING FORWARD IN TIME, WHEN YOU DO A LOST 15 PROFITS/INFRINGERS' PROFITS CALCULATION? 16 A. 17 IN TIME WHEN TOMORROWNOW CEASED OPERATIONS. 18 LOOKING AT WHETHER THERE'S ALSO FUTURE IMPACT, FROM SAP'S 19 PERSPECTIVE, THEY DON'T LOOK AT FUTURE IMPACT. 20 OCTOBER 2008. 21 Q. 22 SAP IS ARGUING FOR? 23 A. 24 WAY TO VALUE THE SOFTWARE AND THE SOFTWARE MATERIALS THAT WERE 25 TAKEN, THAT PROPERTY OF ORACLE, IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE BASICALLY, IT WOULD BE FROM JANUARY 2005 THROUGH THE POINT AND THEN ALSO THEY STOP AT DO YOU AGREE WITH THE METHODOLOGY OF MEASURING DAMAGES THAT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, THE -- THE ONLY Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1019 1 LICENSE IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES. 2 Q. WHY IS THAT? 3 A. THERE'S -- ONE, IT GIVES YOU A CHANCE TO ACTUALLY VALUE THE 4 COPYRIGHTED PROPERTY. 5 PUT IT INTO PERSPECTIVE OF WHAT -- WHAT YOU WOULD PAY FOR THAT 6 AND HOW ONE WOULD USE IT AT THE TIME OF THAT NEGOTIATION. 7 YOU CAN LOOK AT THE PROPERTY TAKEN AND IT ALLOWS YOU TO VALUE THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SOFTWARE 8 THAT'S USED BY TOMORROWNOW IN THE SAFE PASSAGE PROGRAM. 9 ACTUALLY CAN INSERT THAT SOFTWARE, AS THE MANAGEMENT OF SAP, DID YOU 10 INTO THAT PROGRAM AND PUT A VALUE ON THAT AND DETERMINE THAT 11 VALUE WITH THE LICENSE. 12 IT ALSO ALLOWS YOU TO PUT A VALUE ON THE -- THE 13 BENEFITS TO SAP WHEN THEY HAVE THE SOFTWARE, CAN GO OUT AND 14 HAVE -- THEY'RE IMPROVED CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIPS AT SAP. 15 WHEN THEY DON'T CONVERT A CUSTOMER, THEY HAVE ADDITIONAL 16 RESOURCES THAT THEY DIDN'T HAVE WITHOUT HAVING THE LICENSE. 17 CAN PUT A VALUE ON THAT. 18 EVEN YOU AND IT CERTAINLY IS THE ONLY WAY -- IT'S THE ONLY WAY 19 IN THIS CASE TO PUT A VALUE ON THE IMPACT TO ORACLE OF THE 20 PEOPLESOFT ACQUISITION. 21 ANY WAY THAT THE LOST PROFITS APPROACH PUTS A VALUE ON THE 22 IMPACT OF ORACLE OF SPENDING $11 BILLION ON PEOPLESOFT. ORACLE PAID $11 BILLION AND THERE'S NOT 23 AND THEN IT ALLOWS ORACLE TO BE BASICALLY PAID FOR 24 THE VALUE OF ITS PROPERTY AT -- AT THE POINT IN TIME WHEN SAP 25 LAUNCHED THE PROGRAM AND -- AND HAD THE PROPERTY OF ORACLE TO Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1020 1 LAUNCH SAFE PASSAGE AND TO MAKE THE PROJECTIONS AND TO GO TO THE 2 MARKET WITH ITS PLANS TO IMPACT ORACLE. 3 Q. 4 POINTS ON THAT. 5 ALL RIGHT. AND I THINK THERE IS A SLIDE WITH SOME BULLET DOES THIS EXPLAIN WHY THE METHOD SAP IS ARGUING FOR 6 IS NOT ADEQUATE? 7 A. 8 THERE'S NO WAY THAT THE LOST PROFITS AND THE -- I GUESS THEY 9 CALL THEM INFRINGERS' PROFITS, MEASURES THE FULL MARKET VALUE OF IT PROVIDES SOME OF THAT SUMMARY. AS I MENTIONED, ONE, 10 THE COPYRIGHTED WORKS. 11 MEASURE THE TOTAL IMPACT ON ORACLE, WHICH I MENTIONED. 12 AND, OBVIOUSLY, LOST PROFITS DOES NOT IT ALSO DOES NOT CAPTURE ALL THE ACKNOWLEDGED 13 BENEFITS THAT WE'VE SEEN IN THE RECORDS OF THE INFRINGEMENT, SO 14 ALL THE PLANS AND -- AND MANAGEMENT FOCUS OF SAP'S MANAGEMENT 15 WITH SAFE PASSAGE. 16 MEASURE ANY VALUE BEYOND LOST CUSTOMER REVENUES AND PROFITS, 17 WHICH IS A BIG PROBLEM WITH THE APPROACH. 18 AND IT'S -- THE NEXT POINT, IT DOES NOT AND THIRD POINT, IT'S DEPENDENT ON SAP'S EXECUTION. 19 AND SO THEY'VE TAKEN THE PROPERTY SO IT -- IT'S DEPENDENT ON HOW 20 SAP'S EXECUTES THE PROPERTY. 21 COPYRIGHTED WORKS. 22 SCOPE SCHEDULE, IT DOESN'T VALUE THAT. IT'S NOT THE VALUE OF THOSE AND A LOT OF PROPERTY YOU SAW THEM ON MY TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1021 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 12 Q. 13 LOOK AT CALCULATING IT UNDER THE WRONG METHOD, THE LOST 14 PROFITS/INFRINGERS' PROFITS METHOD? 15 A. I DID A CALCULATION OF LOST PROFITS; THAT'S CORRECT. 16 Q. AND WHY DID YOU DO THOSE CALCULATIONS? 17 A. WELL, THERE WAS TWO REASONS. 18 RESULT WAS IN TERMS OF WHAT WERE THE LOST PROFITS AND WHAT WERE 19 THE INFRINGERS' PROFITS. 20 AGO, FOR SOME OTHER CAUSE OF ACTION, IT WAS THE ONLY WAY THAT 21 ONE COULD MEASURE. 22 AND SO I'VE DONE A CALCULATION OF LOST PROFITS IN THE INFRINGER 23 PROFITS. 24 Q. AND WHAT WERE THE RESULTS? 25 A. THE LOST PROFIT NUMBER IS $120 MILLION. ALL RIGHT. LET ME ASK YOU THIS: DID YOU LOOK AT -- DID YOU ONE, I WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THE AND, SECONDLY, I MENTIONED A MOMENT THAT WAS -- THE METHOD WAS LOST PROFITS. THAT'S THE LOST Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1022 1 PROFIT NUMBER. 2 $288 MILLION. 3 THAT WERE SAP CUSTOMERS AND ALSO TOMORROWNOW CUSTOMERS BUT A 4 SUBSET, SO I THINK IT'S ABOUT 60-SOME CUSTOMERS ARE IN THE 5 288 MILLION. 6 AND THEN THE INFRINGER (SIC) PROFIT'S NUMBER IS AND THAT REFLECTS NOT ALL THE CUSTOMERS THAT -- AND THEN THERE'S THREE CUSTOMERS, I THINK IN THAT 7 GROUP OF THE 288,000,000 WHERE THERE'S SOME ISSUES STILL THAT 8 SORT OF EXIST ABOUT THE ROLE OF TOMORROWNOW IN CONVERTING THOSE 9 CUSTOMERS TO SAP. 10 AND SO IF I LOOK AT THE IMPACT OF THOSE THREE 11 CUSTOMERS, I THINK THE NUMBER WOULD BE 236 MILLION. 12 INFRINGER PROFIT'S (SIC) NUMBERS, 288 MILLION, AND THEN RANGES 13 DOWN TO 236 MILLION DEPENDING ON THESE THREE CUSTOMERS. 14 AND SO THAT'S WHERE I'VE COME OUT WITH THOSE SO MY 15 CALCULATIONS. 16 Q. 17 MILLION IN INFRINGER'S PROFITS, WHAT DO WE GET? 18 A. I THINK IT'S 408,000,408. 19 Q. BUT DOES THAT FULLY COMPENSATE ORACLE IN THIS CASE? 20 A. NO, IT WOULD NOT. 21 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. 22 Q. WHAT COMPENSATES ORACLE FOR THE VALUE OF WHAT SAP TOOK? 23 A. THE ONLY WAY TO DO IT IS THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THE 24 LICENSE APPROACH AT THE 1.5 BILLION. SO IF I COMBINE THE 120 MILLION IN LOST PROFITS WITH THE 288 IT WOULD NOT COMPENSATE FOR THE VALUE OF TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1053 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 25 Q. OKAY. SO THE TWO ASPECTS OF THE FIRST METHOD ARE ORACLE'S Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1054 1 LOST SUPPORT PROFITS, RIGHT? 2 A. ON LOST PROFITS. 3 Q. YES. 4 A. YEAH, THAT WAS ONE PIECE. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 16 BY MR. MITTELSTAEDT: 17 Q. 18 RIGHT? 19 A. THAT'S ONE CALCULATION. 20 Q. AND THOSE ARE THE ORACLE CUSTOMERS WHO LEFT ORACLE BECAUSE 21 OF TOMORROWNOW AND OBTAINED MAINTENANCE OR SUPPORT SERVICES FROM 22 TOMORROWNOW? 23 A. THAT'S CORRECT. 24 Q. AND THE OTHER PART OF THIS CALCULATION ARE THE PROFITS THAT 25 SAP GAINED FROM CUSTOMERS WHO LEFT ORACLE AND BOUGHT SOFTWARE OKAY. SO ONE ASPECT OF IT IS ORACLE'S LOST SUPPORT PROFITS, Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1055 1 FROM SAP AS A RESULT OF TOMORROWNOW'S INFRINGEMENT, CORRECT? 2 A. THAT'S CORRECT. 3 Q. AND WE CALL THOSE -- LET'S JUST CALL THOSE SOFTWARE PROFITS 4 OF SAP. 5 MR. CLARKE BEING SAP'S EXPERT. 6 YOU'D -- AND THEN I'LL PUT "MEYER," "M," AND "CLARKE," AND LET'S FOCUS ON THE -- 7 YOU CALCULATED SUPPORT PROFITS FOR TWO TIME PERIODS, 8 THE TOMORROWNOW TIME PERIOD AND THEN A LONGER TIME OUT TO 2015; 9 IS THAT CORRECT? 10 A. RIGHT, TO REFLECT THE ONGOING IMPACT. 11 Q. AND THE -- LET'S TAKE YOUR NUMBER FOR THE TOMORROWNOW 12 PERIOD. 13 A. 14 $36 MILLION. 15 Q. YOUR NUMBER? 16 A. RIGHT. 17 Q. OKAY. 18 A. NO. 19 PLAINTIFF LEFT IN THE CASE, SO IT'S 36. 20 Q. AND MR. CLARKE CAME UP WITH ABOUT THE SAME NUMBER, RIGHT? 21 A. I DON'T THINK THAT'S CORRECT. 22 NUMBER -- I HAVE MY WORK PAPERS -- IS, LIKE, 19 MILLION. 23 Q. 24 32 MILLION. 25 A. THAT NUMBER WAS WHAT, IF YOU RECALL? I BELIEVE FOR THE PLAINTIFF IN THE ACTION RIGHT NOW, 36 MILLION THROUGH TOMORROWNOW PERIOD, RIGHT? WASN'T IT ACTUALLY ABOUT 82 MILLION? I THINK ALL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW IS OIC IS THE ONLY OKAY. OKAY. I THINK HIS COMPARABLE YOU SAY 19 MILLION, I'M GOING TO PUT ABOUT THAT WOULD NOT BE CORRECT, THOUGH. Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1056 1 Q. OKAY. 2 A. SO HIS NUMBER -- IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE PLAINTIFF, AS I 3 UNDERSTAND IT THAT'S STILL IN THE LAWSUIT, HIS NUMBER IS 19 4 MILLION, AND MY NUMBER'S 36 MILLION THROUGH OCTOBER 2008 AND 5 121 MILLION THROUGH 2015. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1057 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 5 OKAY. LET'S COME DOWN TO THE SOFTWARE PROFITS OF SAP 6 AS A RESULT OF THE INFRINGEMENT. 7 COME UP WITH THERE? 8 A. 9 288 MILLION. I MENTIONED TWO NUMBERS TODAY. WHAT -- WHAT NUMBER DO YOU I BELIEVE I MENTIONED AND I MENTIONED, I THINK, 236. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1058 1 BY MR. MITTELSTAEDT: 2 Q. 3 OKAY. SO YOUR TOTAL, YOUR TOTAL FOR THOSE TWO CATEGORIES 4 RANGES FROM WHAT, A LOW OF ABOUT IT 272 TO A HIGH OF ABOUT 5 400 MILLION; IS THAT RIGHT? 6 A. IT WAS 400 OR 408, BUT WHATEVER. IT'S CLOSE ENOUGH. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1064 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 13 Q. 14 ONE WAY THROUGH THE END OF TOMORROWNOW AND THEN A SEPARATE 15 CALCULATION FOR OUT THROUGH 2015, CORRECT? 16 A. 17 YEARS IN FOR THE BROKEN SERVICE. 18 Q. 19 PERIOD AND THEN YOU EXTENDED THAT OUT UNTIL 2015, CORRECT? 20 A. 21 AND I'VE ALREADY DESCRIBED THAT. 22 Q. 23 RIGHT? 24 A. 25 TOMORROWNOW TIME FRAME AND ONE GOES FROM OCTOBER 2008 ON SIR, YOU ACTUALLY DID THAT CALCULATION TWO WAYS. IT'S THE SAME CALCULATION. YOU DID IT TWO WAYS. YOU DID YOU JUST ADD THE ADDITIONAL YOU DID IT DURING THE TOMORROWNOW I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION. I HAVE TWO CALCULATIONS ONE CALCULATION GOES FOR THE TOMORROWNOW TIME PERIOD, ONE CALCULATION HAS A SUBTOTAL BASICALLY OF THE Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 Page 1065 1 THROUGH, I THINK IT'S MAY OF 2015. 2 Q. 3 36 MILLION IS FOR THE TOMORROWNOW TIME PERIOD, THOSE THREE OR 4 SO YEARS, CORRECT? 5 A. I WOULD AGREE WITH THAT. 6 Q. THANK YOU. WHETHER YOU CALL IT A SUBTOTAL OR A SEPARATE WAY, YOUR 7 AND MR. CLARKE USED THAT SAME TIME PERIOD, CORRECT? 8 A. 9 FRAME. WELL, MR. CLARKE'S ENTIRE CALCULATION IS FOR THAT TIME I AGREE WITH THAT. 10 Q. MR. 11 A. I DON'T FOLLOW YOUR QUESTION. 12 CLARKE USED THAT SAME TIME PERIOD, CORRECT? HE CUT IT OFF IN OCTOBER 2008. 13 Q. AS YOU DID IN THIS FIRST CALCULATION, CORRECT? 14 A. IN ONE OF THE CALCULATIONS AS PART OF MY PRESENTATION, I 15 SHOW A CUTTING OFF AT THAT POINT IN TIME. 16 Q. 17 OKAY. NOW LET'S GO TO THE SOFTWARE PROFITS OF SAP. THAT'S 18 ALSO REFERRED TO AS INFRINGERS' PROFITS, CORRECT? 19 A. 20 MADE FROM USING, IN THIS CASE, THE SOFTWARE OF TOMORROWNOW OR 21 OF PEOPLESOFT. 22 Q. AND HOW MANY CUSTOMERS IS YOUR 288 MILLION BASED ON? 23 A. I BELIEVE IT'S ABOUT 66. 24 25 THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S THE PROFITS THAT THE INFRINGERS HAD LET ME CHECK THAT FOR YOU. I THINK THERE WERE 86 TOTAL, AND I EXCLUDED 20, SO THERE'S 66 CUSTOMERS IN THE INFRINGERS' PROFIT CALCULATION. Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 6534035e-488d-419b-a89d-bac0b0258f87 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 7 PAGES 1188 - 1420 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 12, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MUCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 26d3e825-e0fc-447f-987f-8e38dc183faa Page 1307 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 11 Q. 12 CALCULATION, THE SOFTWARE COMPANIES, THE -- THE CUSTOMERS WHO 13 LEFT ORACLE FOR SAP TO BUY SOFTWARE FROM SAP. 14 YOUR LOST PROFITS OR INFRINGERS'-PROFITS ANALYSIS A NUMBER OF 15 CUSTOMERS THERE, DIDN'T YOU? 16 A. WE'RE TALKING NOW THE -- THE GAINS FROM OTHER SAP SALES. 17 Q. YES. 18 A. YES, I HAD SOME EXCLUSIONS. 19 Q. AND YOU STARTED WITH ABOUT 86 CUSTOMERS, AND YOU REMOVED 20 ABOUT 20 CUSTOMERS. 21 A. YES, I'M AT 66. 22 Q. OKAY. 23 OF THOSE CUSTOMERS TO SAP COULD NOT BE ATTRIBUTED TO 24 TOMORROWNOW'S INFRINGEMENT, CORRECT? 25 A. OKAY. LET'S GO TO THE -- FINALLY, TO THE OTHER PART OF THE YOU EXCLUDED FROM AND THAT'S BECAUSE YOU CONCLUDED THAT ORACLE'S LOSS IN A GENERAL SENSE. Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 26d3e825-e0fc-447f-987f-8e38dc183faa Page 1309 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 19 Q. OKAY. 20 NOW, AT THE END OF YOUR ANALYSIS OF THE INFRINGERS' 21 PROFITS, CUSTOMERS WHO LEFT ORACLE FOR SAP TO BUY SOFTWARE, YOUR 22 OPINION WAS THAT YOUR NUMBER WAS ABOUT $288 MILLION IN PROFITS, 23 CORRECT? 24 A. THAT'S CORRECT. 25 Q. AND YOUR OPINION WAS THAT THAT $288 MILLION WAS A REASONABLE Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 26d3e825-e0fc-447f-987f-8e38dc183faa Page 1310 1 CALCULATION OF THE VALUE THAT SAP RECEIVED FROM THE ALLEGED 2 INFRINGEMENT, CORRECT? 3 A. WHAT THAT AMOUNT IS, IT'S -- 4 Q. SIR -- 5 A. TOMORROWNOW WAS ONE FACTOR IN SAP MAKING THE $288 MILLION. 6 THAT'S WHAT IT IS. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 18 Q. 19 THIS YEAR. 20 QUESTION -- THIS IS FROM YOUR DEPOSITION, SIR, MAY 13 OF "OKAY. SO THE $288 MILLION OF INFRINGERS' 21 PROFITS THAT YOU CALCULATED, IS IT YOUR POSITION THAT 22 BUT FOR THE ACTIVITIES OF TOMORROWNOW, SAP WOULD NOT 23 HAVE RECEIVED ANY OF THOSE PROFITS? 24 25 "A. IT IS MY POSITION THAT THE $288 MILLION IS A CALCULATION OF BENEFITS THAT SAP RECEIVED Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 26d3e825-e0fc-447f-987f-8e38dc183faa Page 1311 1 FROM THE ALLEGED INFRINGEMENT. 2 PERSPECTIVE, I HAVE LOOKED AT THOSE CUSTOMERS 3 AND DETERMINED THAT THE 288 MILLION IS A 4 REASONABLE CALCULATION OF THAT VALUE." 5 NOW, SIR -- 6 A. 7 AND FROM MY EXACTLY WHAT I JUST SAID. I'LL STAND BY THAT TESTIMONY. I'LL STAND BY THAT. THAT'S TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 26d3e825-e0fc-447f-987f-8e38dc183faa Page 1315 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 12 Q. AND HOW ABOUT THE INFRINGERS' PROFITS? 13 A. THAT NUMBER WAS 288 MILLION, WAS MY UPPER BOUND. 14 THERE'S THREE CUSTOMERS I MENTIONED TO MR. MITTELSTAEDT THAT 15 TAKES IT DOWN TO 236 ON THE LOWER END OF THAT. AND THEN TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 26d3e825-e0fc-447f-987f-8e38dc183faa UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 9 PAGES 1512 - 1695 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR cee31611-03a0-413a-a8ed-ca4c321dc01a Page 1631 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 20 Q. 21 MR. CLARKE, LET ME JUST STOP YOU FOR A MINUTE. THE END DATE FOR THIS CALCULATION IS, I AM NOT SURE 22 IF YOU SAID IT, IT'S THE SAME END DATE THAT MR. MEYER USES? 23 A. 24 SURE THAT'S THE DATE WE USED. 25 Q. ACTUALLY, I THINK THIS IS MORE LIKE 12/31/08. I AM PRETTY IN ANY EVENT, THE TWO OF YOU, YOU AND MR. MEYER, HAVE Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR cee31611-03a0-413a-a8ed-ca4c321dc01a Page 1632 1 CALCULATED THE INFRINGERS' PROFITS FOR THE SAME TIME PERIOD? 2 A. 3 MONTHS LONGER, THAT'S ALL. YES. WE BOTH USE THE SAME TIME PERIOD. IT'S JUST THREE TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR cee31611-03a0-413a-a8ed-ca4c321dc01a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 10 PAGES 1696 - 1879 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 9bf78bca-2814-4f8c-93d0-595ef6167f63 Page 1821 1 Q. 2 PROFITS THAT SAP OWES ORACLE? 3 A. 4 WERE NOT RELATED TO THE INFRINGEMENT, FOR EXAMPLE, THE -- MY 5 POSTER CHILD, MY FIRST ONE WAS THE ENGELHARD ACQUISITION BY 6 BASF. 7 INFRINGEMENT. 8 YOU HAVE TO GO TO SAP, THAT'S WHAT WE RUN THE ENTIRE COMPANY 9 ON. WHY DIDN'T YOU USE ALL 86 IN THE CALCULATION OF THE BECAUSE IF I COULD FIND REASONS FOR THEM GOING TO SAP THAT CLEARLY THAT CHANGE DIDN'T OCCUR AS A RESULT OF THE 10 THEY WENT TO SAP BECAUSE THEIR NEW OWNER SAID SO, FOR THE WHOLE HOST OF REASONS THAT WE TALKED 11 EARLIER, ABOUT EARLIER, THERE WERE, THERE WERE STATEMENTS MADE 12 AND THERE WERE CLEAR RATIONALES AND REASONS FOR WHY THESE 13 COMPANIES WENT TO SAP THAT WERE NOT RELATED TO THE 14 INFRINGEMENT. 15 SO THAT'S WHY I EXCLUDED THEM. THEY WOULD HAVE GONE 16 TO THEIR -- TO SAP ANYWAY ABSENT THE INFRINGEMENT. 17 Q. 18 ABOUT WHY YOU USED THE 50 PERCENT PROFIT MARGIN IN CALCULATING 19 THIS. YOU WERE ASKED A LOT OF QUESTIONS DAY BEFORE YESTERDAY 20 DO YOU REMEMBER THAT? 21 A. I DO. 22 Q. WHAT FIGURE DID MR. MEYER USE IN HIS SIMILAR CALCULATION? 23 A. 50 PERCENT. 24 Q. AND WHAT TIME PERIOD DID HE USE AS THE CUTOFF? 25 A. FOR INFRINGERS' PROFITS NOW? Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 9bf78bca-2814-4f8c-93d0-595ef6167f63 Page 1822 1 Q. YES. 2 A. SAME AS ME, 12/31/08. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 9bf78bca-2814-4f8c-93d0-595ef6167f63 Page 1853 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 5 Q. 6 86 CUSTOMERS GIVEN TO YOU BY JONES DAY OR PREPARED -- PREPARED 7 BY DEFENDANT AND GIVEN TO YOU BY EITHER JONES DAY OR SOMEBODY 8 THAT LISTED THOSE 86 CUSTOMERS? 9 A. SOMETHING IN ADDITION TO THE LIST? 10 Q. YES. 11 A. I HAD EXTRACTS FROM THEIR ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS THAT RELATED 12 TO THE 86. 13 REVENUES FOR THE DIFFERENT LINES OF BUSINESS OVER THE WHOLE 14 PERIOD THAT WE ARE REFERRING TO. DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING IN THAT BINDER OTHER THAN THE LIST OF SO THAT WASN'T JUST A LIST. THERE WAS ALL THE TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 9bf78bca-2814-4f8c-93d0-595ef6167f63 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 12 PAGES 2021 - 2230 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA MONDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2027 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 19 NOW, WITH RESPECT TO THE 86, THE LETTER THAT SETS 20 FORTH HOW THE 86 WERE SELECTED IS IN EVIDENCE. 21 EVIDENCE WITHOUT OBJECTION. 22 ON THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY SAP COUNSEL. 23 THE ISSUES, AND WE ARE REALLY JUST REFERRING TO THE ISSUES THAT 24 ARE STATED IN THAT LETTER BY JONES DAY THAT IS IN EVIDENCE. 25 THAT CAME IN AS IT IS SOMETHING THAT WAS DONE BASED THE LETTER STATES THERE WAS NEVER A STIPULATION THAT THOSE 86 CUSTOMERS Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2028 1 REPRESENTED THE UNIVERSE OF DAMAGES. 2 YOU USE EITHER LOST PROFITS OR INFRINGER'S PROFITS OR RUNNING 3 ROYALTY, YOU'RE DEALING WITH A UNIVERSE OF CUSTOMERS THAT IS, WE 4 ALL KNOW, INCOMPLETE. THE PROBLEM IS THAT WHEN AND THAT'S THE ONLY POINT WE'RE MAKING. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2030 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 10 11 THE COURT: YOU CAN ATTRIBUTE IT TO SAP, NOT TO THE LAWYERS. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 19 WITH REGARD TO THE CHARACTERIZATION OF COPYRIGHT 20 INFRINGEMENT AS THEFT OR STEALING, I INDICATED TO YOU ALL FOR 21 OPENINGS THAT YOU COULDN'T USE IT THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE 22 TRIAL. 23 WITNESSES HAVE USED THAT LANGUAGE. 24 INFLAMMATORY, UNNECESSARY. 25 YOU'VE BEEN VERY GOOD. YOU HAVEN'T -- NONE OF THE THIS IS A COPYRIGHT CASE. IN MY VIEW, THAT LANGUAGE IS "COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT" Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2031 1 IS A TERM OF ART THAT IS WHAT HAS BEEN STIPULATED TO. 2 YOU MAY NOT USE THE LANGUAGE -- WORDS SUCH AS "THEFT" OR 3 "STEALING." 4 AND NO, THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF THE TRIAL, WITNESSES HAVE 5 USED LANGUAGE SUCH AS "TAKING OUR SOFTWARE," AND, OBVIOUSLY, YOU 6 CAN CONTINUE TO USE THAT. 7 RULING WAS TWO-FOLD, NOT JUST THAT I DID NOT WANT THE JURY TO BE 8 MISLED INTO THINKING THAT THERE WERE ANY KIND OF CRIMINAL -- 9 CRIMINAL UNDERTONES HERE. BUT KEEP IN MIND THE BASIS FOR MY BUT ADDITIONALLY, IT WAS ON THE BASIS 10 OF MY DETERMINATION THAT THE LANGUAGE IS JUST INFLAMMATORY. 11 IT'S NOT NECESSARY. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2087 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 7 8 9 10 NOW, IF WE GO TO 83, REMEMBER MR. PHILLIPS TESTIFYING? (DEMONSTRATIVE PUBLISHED TO JURY.) MR. BOIES: TESTIFIED IF HE PAYS SOMEBODY $11 BILLION 11 AND HIS COMPETITOR WANTS IT, HE EXPECTS THEM TO PAY BILLIONS OF 12 DOLLARS FOR IT AS WELL. AND WITH SIEBEL THE SAME THING. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2093 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 13 NOW, LET ME SPEND A MOMENT ON -- ON LOST PROFITS 14 AND -- AND WHY LOST PROFITS DOESN'T INCLUDE ALL THAT NEEDS TO BE 15 INCLUDED IN TERMS OF THE LOSS. 16 MARKET VALUE LICENSE AS OPPOSED TO LOST PROFITS. 17 UNDERSTAND. 18 AND WHY WE'RE SEEKING FAIR I WANT YOU TO 102? 19 (DEMONSTRATIVE PUBLISHED TO JURY.) 20 MR. BOIES: FIRST, LOST PROFITS DOES NOT CONSIDER THE 21 RISK ASSOCIATED WITH ORACLE'S SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS IN 22 PEOPLESOFT. 23 THE VALUE OF THE IP TAKEN, BASED ON THE EXPECTATIONS OF THE 24 PARTY AT THE TIME, WHICH IS THE LEGAL STANDARD. 25 PROFITS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH SAP'S INTENT TO DISRUPT ORACLE'S SECOND, LOST PROFITS DOES NOT APPROPRIATELY MEASURE THIRD, LOST Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2094 1 BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS. 2 IT. 3 JUST LOOKING AT THE MAINTENANCE REVENUE. THAT WAS PART OF THE PURPOSE OF DOING AND FOURTH, IT DOES NOT FULLY COMPENSATE ORACLE BASED ON -- 4 NOW, I ALSO WANT TO TALK JUST FOR A MOMENT ABOUT 5 SOMETHING CALLED INFRINGER'S PROFITS, WHICH YOU MAY OR MAY NOT 6 GET TO DEPENDING ON HOW YOU ANSWER SOME OF THE OTHER QUESTIONS 7 ON THE JURY -- BUT I DO WANT TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT INFRINGER'S 8 PROFITS. 9 10 FIRST, INFRINGER PROFITS ARE THE PROFITS THAT THEY MAKE. AND IF YOU GO TO 287 -- 11 (DEMONSTRATIVE PUBLISHED TO JURY.) 12 MR. BOIES: -- MR. MEYER CAME UP WITH AN ESTIMATE OF 13 $288 MILLION FOR INFRINGER PROFITS. 14 INCOMPLETE. 15 HOW MUCH MORE THAN THAT 'CAUSE I DON'T HAVE THE DATA. 16 OF THE PROBLEMS WITH THE INFRINGER'S PROFITS IS THAT THE DATA IS 17 NOT ALL AVAILABLE. AND HE SAID THAT'S HE SAID IT'S MORE THAN THAT, BUT I CAN'T TELL YOU AND ONE TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2185 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 19 AND IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, IN COMMON SENSE TERMS, IF 20 SOMEBODY GOES IN AND STEALS A GAME FROM BEST BUY, AND LET'S SAY 21 BEST BUY HAS A LOT OF THOSE GAMES, SO THEY DON'T REALLY LOSE 22 ANY CUSTOMERS OVER IT BECAUSE THEY HAVE EXCESS INVENTORY, AND 23 LET'S SAY THE PERSON NEVER USES THE GAME, BESIDES PARENTS WON'T 24 LET THEM USE THE GAME, WHATEVER REASON, DOESN'T USE THE GAME, 25 DOES THAT MEAN HE DOESN'T OWE ANYTHING FOR THAT GAME THAT WAS Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2186 1 2 TAKEN? YOU CAN'T HAVE THAT KIND OF RULE ABOUT THINGS THAT 3 PEOPLE ESSENTIALLY TAKE. 4 THEN GO BACK IN AND SAY, WELL, WE DIDN'T MAKE AS MUCH AS WE 5 THOUGHT WE GAINED, YOU DIDN'T LOSE AS MUCH AS YOU THOUGHT YOU 6 WOULD LOSE, THEREFORE, WE DON'T HAVE TO PAY YOU WHAT IT WOULD 7 HAVE COST US TO LICENSE THAT SOFTWARE AT THE TIME. 8 9 YOU DON'T HAVE A RIGHT TO TAKE AND NOT ONLY IS THAT NOT FAIR, BUT THAT SENDS UP EVERY WRONG INCENTIVE FOR HOW WE WANT PEOPLE, AND PARTICULARLY LARGE 10 CORPORATIONS TO BEHAVE AND CONDUCT THEIR BUSINESSES. 11 ALSO SOMETHING THAT UNDERMINES THE VERY FOUNDATIONS OF THE 12 SOFTWARE BUSINESS. IT IS TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d Page 2224 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 5 THE COURT: ALL RIGHT. "WE HAVE A QUESTION FROM THE 6 JURY, AND IT READS AS FOLLOWS: 7 CHART OF HOW MR. MEYER AND MR. CLARKE CALCULATED ALL OF THEIR 8 FAIR MARKET VALUE OR LOST PROFIT AMOUNTS." WE WANT TO HAVE A BREAKDOWN OR TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, CRR, FCRR & Diane E. Skillman, CSR, RPR, FCRR 4f0da915-c98f-44a3-8b36-ea1a0524702d UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, JUDGE ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL. ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) ) SAP AG, ET AL., ) ) DEFENDANTS. ) ____________________________) JURY TRIAL NO. C 07-01658 PJH VOLUME 13 PAGES 2231 - 2267 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2010 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS APPEARANCES: FOR PLAINTIFFS: BY: BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLP THREE EMBARCADERO CENTER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-4607 ZACHARY J. ALINDER, HOLLY A. HOUSE, GEOFFREY M. HOWARD, DONN P. PICKETT, ATTORNEYS AT LAW BY: BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 HARRISON STREET, SUITE 900 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94612 DAVID BOIES, STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN, ATTORNEYS AT LAW (APPEARANCES CONTINUED NEXT PAGE) REPORTED BY: RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR NO. 8258 DIANE E. SKILLMAN, CSR NO. 4909 Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 abeb4473-7d08-4b2d-b453-697267a99a01 Page 2258 TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT 8 THE COURT: 9 COUNSEL? 10 OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I SEE THAT YOU WERE ABLE TO COME UP WITH A DEMONSTRATIVE THAT YOU HAVE JOINTLY PARTICIPATED IN. 11 MR. LANIER: 12 THE COURT: YES, YOUR HONOR. 13 TO ME. 14 JURY? 15 OKAY. AND IT SEEMS FINE -- IT SEEMS FINE MARKED IN SOME FASHION. 16 IS THERE ANY REASON WHY WE CAN'T JUST GIVE IT TO THE WE JUST HAVE TO, FOR THE RECORD, MAKE SURE THAT IT'S MR. LANIER: AND WE JUST -- WE DON'T OBJECT TO GIVING 17 IT DIRECTLY TO THE JURY IN RESPONSE TO THEIR QUESTION, AND WE'RE 18 HAPPY TO CALL IT JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT -- 19 20 21 22 THE COURT: JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT 1. HOW'S THAT? (OFF-THE-RECORD DISCUSSION.) MR. LANIER: WE HAVE A JTX1. I THINK WE'RE UP TO JTX6, SO THIS WOULD BE 7? 23 MR. HOLTZMAN: 24 MR. HOWARD: 6. 25 MR. LANIER: JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT 6. I THINK THIS IS 6. Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 abeb4473-7d08-4b2d-b453-697267a99a01 Page 2259 1 THE COURT: 2 MAYBE YOU CAN JUST PUT A LITTLE STICKER ON IT. 3 4 5 JOINT TRIAL EXHIBIT 6. I DON'T SEE THAT IT NEEDS ANY ELABORATION. NICHOLE WILL JUST TAKE IT TO THEM, AND THEY CAN CONTINUE WITH THEIR WORK. 6 MR. LANIER: 7 THE COURT: 8 MR. HOWARD: 9 THE COURT: 10 MR. LANIER: 11 THE COURT: WE AGREE, YOUR HONOR. OKAY. VERY WELL. OKAY. GOOD. THANK YOU, YOUR HONOR. ALL RIGHT. TEXT REMOVED - NOT RELEVANT Raynee H. Mercado, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530 abeb4473-7d08-4b2d-b453-697267a99a01 2267 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF REPORTER I, RAYNEE H. MERCADO, OFFICIAL REPORTER FOR THE UNITED 5 STATES COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, HEREBY CERTIFY 6 THAT THE FOREGOING PROCEEDINGS IN C07-01658PJH, ORACLE USA, 7 INC, ET AL. V. SAP AG, ET AL., WERE REPORTED BY ME, A CERTIFIED 8 SHORTHAND REPORTER, ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2010, AND WERE 9 THEREAFTER TRANSCRIBED UNDER MY DIRECTION INTO TYPEWRITING; 10 THAT THE FOREGOING IS A FULL, COMPLETE AND TRUE RECORD OF SAID 11 PROCEEDINGS AS BOUND BY ME AT THE TIME OF FILING. 12 THE VALIDITY OF THE REPORTER'S CERTIFICATION OF SAID 13 TRANSCRIPT MAY BE VOID UPON DISASSEMBLY AND/OR REMOVAL FROM THE 14 COURT FILE. 15 16 ___________________________________ 17 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR 18 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2010 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RAYNEE H. MERCADO, CSR, RMR, CRR, FCRR, CCRR (510) 451-7530

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?