Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
*** FILED IN ERROR. DOCUMENT LOCKED. DOCUMENT TO BE REFILED LATER. *** Declaration of Joshua L. Fuchs in Support of 380 Memorandum in Opposition Declaration of Joshua L. Fuchs in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B-1, # 3 Exhibit B-2, # 4 Exhibit B-3, # 5 Exhibit B-4, # 6 Exhibit B-5, # 7 Exhibit B-6, # 8 Exhibit B-7, # 9 Exhibit C-1, # 10 Exhibit C-2, # 11 Exhibit D, # 12 Exhibit E, # 13 Exhibit F, # 14 Exhibit G, # 15 Exhibit H, # 16 Exhibit I, # 17 Exhibit J, # 18 Exhibit K-1, # 19 Exhibit K-2, # 20 Exhibit L-1, # 21 Exhibit L-2, # 22 Exhibit L-3, # 23 Exhibit L-4, # 24 Exhibit L-5, # 25 Exhibit L-6, # 26 Exhibit L-7, # 27 Exhibit M, # 28 Exhibit N)(Related document(s) 380 ) (Lanier, Tharan) (Filed on 7/29/2009) Modified on 8/28/2009 (ewn, COURT STAFF).
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Doc. 382 Att. 16
Filed07/29/09 Page1 of 3
Filed07/29/09 Page2 of 3
"Polito, John A." 02/02/2009 08:06 PM
To "Scott Cowan (swcowan@JonesDay.com)" , "Joshua Fuchs " , "Laurens Wilkes" cc "Howard, Geoff" , "Alinder, Zachary J." , "Russell, Chad" bcc Subject Requests under the Expanded Timeline Agreement
This message has been forwarded.
Counsel, The Expanded Timeline Agreement between the parties states that documents will be produced for the time period of March 22, 2007, through October 31, 2008, for documents including: (8) "TN/SAP customer" related documents (documents from centralized sources and key custodians from both sides concerning those customers and created after the complaint, including the SAS database post-shutdown, the pathfinder database, customer off-boarding or transfer documents, TN, SAP and Oracle customer contracts, customers returning to Oracle from TN, customers lost by Oracle and efforts by Oracle to mitigate its damages, customers gained by TN or SAP). (10) TomorrowNow Business Model Related Documents (documents from centralized sources or key custodians from both sides concerning: TN-related policies created or modified in any way since filing of complaint, including related to Project Blue; continued use of Oracle intellectual property, including transfer to third parties; Mark White's placement as head of TN; SAP's efforts to sell TN; documents related to independent third party support). The servers reviewed during the Data Warehouse review are centralized sources. Pursuant to the Expanded Timeline Agreement, Plaintiffs request that Defendants produce documents that post-date the collection of server images reviewed through the Data Warehouse and are related to TN/SAP customers and/or TomorrowNow's business model. In particular, our ongoing review of documents reveals that TN-FS01 was a repository of TN/SAP customer-related documents and documents related to TomorrowNow's business model well into 2008. Please provide an estimate as to when supplemental Data Warehouse images will be available for review, beginning with TN-FS01. As well, one or more servers that we believe to contain relevant information have never been made available through the Data Warehouse, possibly on the basis of the previous timelines that were operative in this case. In particular, it is our understanding that DCPRJSVR01 contains files related to TN/SAP customers and TomorrowNow's business model. DCPRJSVR01 has never been made available through the Data Warehouse. We request that DCPRJSVR01 and similar servers be made available through the Data Warehouse. Please provide an estimate as to when images of servers not yet reviewed through the Data Warehouse containing relevant, post-March 22, 2007 information will be made available through the Data Warehouse, beginning with DCPRJSVR01. Finally, we request copies of the contents of MAIL03 and WEB01 as of October 31, 2008. Every file on these machines is relevant to TN/SAP customers/or TomorrowNow's business model. As with Defendants' prior production of TN Disk 09, since every file will be relevant, we request a full production without need for interim review through the Data Warehouse. Best regards, John Polito John A. Polito
Filed07/29/09 Page3 of 3
Associate T 415.393.2314 F 415.393.2286 email@example.com BINGHAM Bingham McCutchen LLP Three Embarcadero Center San Francisco, CA 94111-4067
================================================================= ============= Bingham McCutchen LLP Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with IRS requirements, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Any legal advice expressed in this message is being delivered to you solely for your use in connection with the matters addressed herein and may not be relied upon by any other person or entity or used for any other purpose without our prior written consent. The information in this e-mail (including attachments, if any) is considered confidential and is intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited except by or on behalf of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify me immediately by reply email, delete this email, and do not disclose its contents to anyone. Thank you. ================================================================= =============
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?