Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al

Filing 382

*** FILED IN ERROR. DOCUMENT LOCKED. DOCUMENT TO BE REFILED LATER. *** Declaration of Joshua L. Fuchs in Support of 380 Memorandum in Opposition Declaration of Joshua L. Fuchs in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend Complaint filed bySAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B-1, # 3 Exhibit B-2, # 4 Exhibit B-3, # 5 Exhibit B-4, # 6 Exhibit B-5, # 7 Exhibit B-6, # 8 Exhibit B-7, # 9 Exhibit C-1, # 10 Exhibit C-2, # 11 Exhibit D, # 12 Exhibit E, # 13 Exhibit F, # 14 Exhibit G, # 15 Exhibit H, # 16 Exhibit I, # 17 Exhibit J, # 18 Exhibit K-1, # 19 Exhibit K-2, # 20 Exhibit L-1, # 21 Exhibit L-2, # 22 Exhibit L-3, # 23 Exhibit L-4, # 24 Exhibit L-5, # 25 Exhibit L-6, # 26 Exhibit L-7, # 27 Exhibit M, # 28 Exhibit N)(Related document(s) 380 ) (Lanier, Tharan) (Filed on 7/29/2009) Modified on 8/28/2009 (ewn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al Doc. 382 Att. 4 Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document382-5 Filed07/29/09 Page1 of 5 EXHIBIT B-4 Dockets.Justia.com Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document382-5 Filed07/29/09 Page2 of 5 CATHERINE LEE HYDE April 2, 2008 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Page 66 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE CORPORATION, ET AL, * Plaintiffs, * * VS. * CASE NO. 07-CV-01658 (MJJ) * SAP AG, ET AL, * Defendants. * ******************************************************* HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ORAL AND VIDEOTAPED 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF CATHERINE LEE HYDE VOLUME 2 APRIL 2, 2008 ******************************************************* REPORTED BY: CAROL JENKINS, CSR, RPR, CRR CERTIFICATE NO. 2660 Merrill Legal Solutions (800) 869-9132 7bc988a8-2ef0-4ad0-8c3e-14dec30a8535 Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document382-5 Filed07/29/09 Page3 of 5 CATHERINE LEE HYDE April 2, 2008 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Page 112 09:13:26 09:13:28 09:13:36 09:13:37 09:13:39 09:13:39 09:13:45 09:13:48 09:13:52 09:13:53 09:13:56 09:14:01 09:14:01 09:14:05 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q. (By Mr. Howard) Ms. Hyde, yesterday you referred to environments that would be on a SQL database or an Oracle database. Do you recall that? A. Q. Vaguely. Is there something in the naming convention of the environments that would tell us whether it's on a SQL database or an Oracle database? MR. McDONELL: Vague and ambiguous. I'm sorry. Someone's THE VIDEOGRAPHER: phone is really blanking our sound. MR. McDONELL: A. Q. Can you repeat that? (By Mr. Howard) Is there a designator in any Still doing it? Merrill Legal Solutions (800) 869-9132 7bc988a8-2ef0-4ad0-8c3e-14dec30a8535 Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document382-5 Filed07/29/09 Page4 of 5 CATHERINE LEE HYDE April 2, 2008 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL Page 113 09:14:10 09:14:12 09:14:15 09:14:16 09:14:18 09:14:24 09:14:27 09:14:30 09:14:33 09:14:36 09:14:38 09:14:39 09:14:41 09:14:45 09:14:45 09:14:46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 of the environment names to indicate whether that environment is on a SQL database or an Oracle database? MR. McDONELL: of foundation. A. In later naming conventions, and I don't know Vague and ambiguous, lack exactly when it started, but the last alpha character identifies the database type. Q. What's the identifier in those later naming conventions for a SQL database environment? MR. McDONELL: A. Q. M. (By Mr. Howard) What's the indicator in those Same objections. later naming conventions for an Oracle database environment? MR. McDONELL: A. O. Same objections. Merrill Legal Solutions (800) 869-9132 7bc988a8-2ef0-4ad0-8c3e-14dec30a8535 Case4:07-cv-01658-PJH Document382-5 Filed07/29/09 Page5 of 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?