Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Filing
994
Offer of Proof Regarding The At-Risk Report and Impact on Damages Analysis by SAP AG, SAP America Inc, Tomorrownow Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L)(Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 11/19/2010) Modified on 11/22/2010 (kc, COURT STAFF).
Oracle Corporation et al v. SAP AG et al
Doc. 994 Att. 5
EXHIBIT E
Dockets.Justia.com
Service Gap Example
· On 10/1/01 cancelled JDE support with Oracle · On 4/1/06 started support with TN 4/1/06 started support with TN · BBS ran self support for 4.5 years
Appendix W-19
14
Service Gap Example
· On 1/1/04 cancelled JDE support with O l 1/1/04 ll d JDE t ith Oracle · On 3/7/07 started support with TN · TMA ran self support for 3 years
Appendix W-19
15
Joint Exclude Example
· Standard Register was highly customized, disliked Oracle, in financial distress, did not want to upgrade and used little Oracle support. and used little Oracle support · Discussed support with multiple providers (including TN) (including TN)
Appendix D-237.PE
22
Joint Exclude Example
· No intention to upgrade · Researched self-support
Appendix D-67.PE
23
Product Extensions Example
· First SAP sale 8/15/97; bought SAP again in g g 6/05 to 6/06 · Purchases extended Capital Group's purchases of SAP software that were made prior to TN's support · Purchases after 06/06 extended the prior SAP purchases
Appendix D-46.Dis
38
Non-Replacement Products Example
· Hitachi bought SAP Compliance Calibrator by Virsa Systems Systems · Not related to PeopleSoft software · TN did not cause sale did t l
Appendix D-106.Dis
48
Reseller/BPO Example
· Baxter bought software through BPO · No SAP license in Baxter's name · Baxter 's relationship was with BPO, NOT SAP
Appendix D-33.Dis
50
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?