Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 91 Letter Brief Supplemental Brief Opposing Psystar's Motion to Compel and In Support of Apple's Cross Motion for Protective Order filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Decl. of Tyler Gee ISO Supplemental Brief Opposing Motion to Compel, # 2 Exhibit Ex. A to Decl. of Tyler Gee, # 3 Exhibit Ex. B to Decl. of Tyler Gee, # 4 Exhibit Ex. C to Decl. of Tyler Gee, # 5 Exhibit Ex. D to Decl. of Tyler Gee, # 6 Exhibit Ex. E to Decl. of Tyler Gee)(Related document(s) 91 ) (Boroumand Smith, Mehrnaz) (Filed on 8/27/2009)
Apple Inc. v. Psystar Corporation
Doc. 100 Att. 1
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document100-2
Filed08/27/09 Page1 of 3
EXHIBIT A
TO DECLARATION OF TYLER GEE IN SUPPORT OF APPLE INC.'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OPPOSING PSYSTAR'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND IN SUPPORT OF APPLE'S CROSS MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Dockets.Justia.com
Form lO-K
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document100-2
Pa Filed08/27/09 Page2 of 3ge 1 of98
10-K 1 dlOk.htm FORM 10-K
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form lO-K
(MarkOne)
18
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year
ended September 27, 2008
or D TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCIlANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission fie number: 000-10030
APPLE INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charer)
California
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
94-2404110 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
(Address of
Cprincipalnexecutive offces) (Zip Code) uperti o, California 95014
1 Infinite Loop
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (408) 996-1010
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act:
Common Stock, no par value The NASDAQ Global Select Market (Title of class) (Name of exchange on which registered)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) ofthe Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
NoD
No l8
the Securities Act. Yes l8
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15( d) of the Act. Yes 0
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has fied all report required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes l8 No 0
Regulation S-K (section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and wil not be contained, to the best ofthe registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Par II of this Form lO-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. l8 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated fier, a non-accelerated fier, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated fier," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent fiers pursuant to Item 405 of company" in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act.
http://ww.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000119312508224958/d10k.htm
8/27/2009
Form 10-K
Case3:08-cv-03251-WHA Document100-2
Filed08/27/09 Page3 ofPage 1 of 1 3
I.al)J~.of .cøntents
Gross Margin
Gross margin for the three fiscal years ended September 27, 2008, are as follows (in milions, except gross margin percentages):
Net sales $ 32,479 $ 24,006 $ 19,315
Cost of
2008 200 200
sales Grrossmargin21,334 15,852 13,717 margin $ 11,145 $ 8,154 $ 5,598 G oss percentage 34.3% 34.0% 29.0%
Gross margin percentage was relatively flat in 2008 as compared to 2007. Gross margin percentage of34.0% in 2007 increased significantly from 29.0% in 2006. The primar drivers ofthis increase were more favorable costs on certain commodity components, including NAND flash memory and DRAM memory, higher overall revenue that provided for more revenue from the Company's direct sales channels. leverage on fixed production costs and a higher percentage of
The Company expects its gross margin percentage to decrease in future periods compared to levels achieved during 2008 and 2007, and anticipates gross margin levels of about 30% in 2009. This expected decline is due largely to the anticipated impact of product transitions, flat or reduced pricing on new and innovative products that have higher cost structures, both expected and potential future cost increases for key components, a stronger U.S. dollar, and higher logistical costs.
The foregoing statements regarding the Company's expected gross margin percentage are forward-looking and could differ from anticipated levels because of several factors, including but not limited to certain ofthose set forth below in Par I, Item lA, "Risk Factors" under the subheading "Future operating results depend upon the Company's abilty to obtain key
components including, but not limited to microprocessors, NAND flash memory, DRAM and LCDs at favorable prices and in
suffcient quantities," which is incorporated herein by reference. There can be no assurance that tageted gross margin percentage levels wil be achieved. In general, gross margins and margins on individual products wil remain under downward
pressure due to a variety offactors, including continued industr wide global product pricing pressures, increased competition,
compressed product life cycles, product transitions and expected increases in the cost of key components including, but not limited to microprocessors, NAND flash memory, dynamic random access memory ("DRAM") and liquid crystal displays ("LCDs"), as well as potential increases in the costs of outside manufacturing services and a potential shift in the Company's . sales mix towards products with lower gross margins. In response to these competitive pressures, the Company expects it wil continue to take product pricing actions, which would adversely affect gross margins. Gross margins could also be affected by
the Company's abilty to manage product quality and warranty costs effectively and to stimulate demand for certain of
its
products. Due to the Company's significant international operations, financial results can be significantly affected in the shortterm by fluctuations in exchange rates.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for the three fiscal years ended September 27,2008, are as follows (in milions, except for percentages):
2008
2007
Research and development Percentage of net sales
Sellng, general, and administrative
$ 1,109
3.4%
$ 3,761
$ 782 3.3%
$ 2,963
200 $ 712 3.7%
$ 2,433
Percentage of net sales
11.6%
12.3%
12.6%
Research and Development ("R&D")
Expenditures for R&D increased 42% or $327 milion to $1. bilion in 2008 compared to 2007. These increases were due
primarily to an increase in R&D headcount in the current year to support expanded R&D activities and higher stock-based compensation expenses. In 2008, $11 milion of softare development costs were capitalized
46
http://ww.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000119312508224958/d10k.htm
8/27/2009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?