LaRussa v. Twitter Inc.

Filing 158

Download PDF
LaRussa v. Twitter Inc. Doc. 158 Att. 6 EXHIBIT G ConnectU v. Facebook Page 1 of 2 Sutton, Theresa A. From: Sent: To: Peterson, Arissa [] Monday, October 09, 2006 2:01 PM Sutton, Theresa A. Subject: RE: ConnectU v. Facebook Theresa, Thank you for sending the complaint and answer. Please let me know what you find out about the stipulation or other form of protective order that would cover Pacific Northwest Software's document production. I have conferred with Mr. Taves and he is working to retrieve the responsive documents. We should be able to produce them by October 18 or just shortly thereafter. Please confirm that you will be striking the deposition set for October 18. Thanks, Arissa Arissa Peterson Attorney at Law Williams, Kastner & Gibbs PLLC 601 Union St., Suite 4100 Seattle, WA 98101-2380 Phone: (206) 233-2984 Fax: (206) 628-6611 From: Sutton, Theresa A. [] Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 5:04 PM To: Peterson, Arissa Subject: ConnectU v. Facebook ArissaThank you for calling. I've attached the complaint and answer in this matter. I read the protective order after we spoke and, for reasons that are not clear to me, it does not specifically call out production by third parties. We have previously received a stipulation from opposing counsel to treat the produced materials as confidential, so I am confident that we could do the same here. I also will check to see if the Court has a protective order. Please call if you have additional questions. Theresa <<2004.10.28 1st Amended Complaint.pdf>> <<2004.11.18 TFB's Answer to 1st Amended Complaint & MZ & TFB's Counterclaim.pdf>> 9/19/2007 ConnectU v. Facebook Page 2 of 2 ___________________________________ O ORRICK Theresa Sutton Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP Silicon Valley Office 1000 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025 650.614.7307 (Voice) 650.614.7401 (Fax) =========================================================== IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication, unless expressly stated otherwise, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matter(s) addressed herein. =========================================================== NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: THIS E-MAIL IS MEANT FOR ONLY THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OF THE TRANSMISSION, AND MAY BE A COMMUNICATION PRIVILEGED BY LAW. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS E-MAIL IN ERROR, ANY REVIEW, USE, DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION, OR COPYING OF THIS E-MAIL IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY OF THE ERROR BY RETURN E-MAIL AND PLEASE DELETE THIS MESSAGE FROM YOUR SYSTEM. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR COOPERATION. For more information about Orrick, please visit 9/19/2007

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?