Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1080

MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Compatibility Testing Suite filed by Google Inc.. Responses due by 5/21/2012. Replies due by 5/29/2012. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Truman Fenton, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 5/6/2012)

Download PDF
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 ________________________ 6 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 7 Plaintiff, 8 vs. 9 GOOGLE, INC., 10 11 ) ) ) No. CV 10-03561 WHA Defendant. ) VOLUME I ) ________________________) 12 13 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 14 15 Videotaped Patent Issues Deposition 16 of JOHN C. MITCHELL, Ph.D., taken at 17 755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California, 18 commencing at 9:43 a.m., Tuesday, 19 September 6, 2011, before Leslie Rockwood, 20 RPR, CSR No. 3462. 21 22 23 24 25 PAGES 1 - 270 Page 1 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only 1 2 THE REPORTER: Would you raise your right hand, please. 3 You do solemnly state that the evidence you 4 shall give in this matter shall be the truth, the whole 5 truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God. 6 THE WITNESS: 7 THE REPORTER: 8 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: 9 10 I do. Thank you. You may proceed. EXAMINATION BY MR. PAIGE: 09:44:15 11 Q. BY MR. PAIGE: Good morning, Dr. Mitchell. 12 A. Good morning. 13 Q. I know you've been deposed before, and I know 14 you know the rules of the road pretty well so I'll skip 15 that. 09:44:24 16 A. Okay. 17 Q. And just ask you: 18 Is there any reason that you couldn't give your best testimony here today? 19 A. Not that I know of. 20 Q. Are you taking any medication or anything 21 else that might impair your ability to give your best 22 09:44:30 testimony today? 23 A. No, I'm not. 24 Q. Okay. 25 Have you developed any opinions on matters relating to this case that are not set forth in 09:44:37 Page 5 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only 1 Q. Have you read the code for the CTS? 2 A. I have read some of it. 3 Q. And from reading that code, can you tell me 4 whether it tests for the presence of any code that you 5 claim to be infringing in this matter? 6 A. 11:06:42 There is a more detailed explanation in my 7 write-up of experiments I conducted that has to do with 8 the security tests in particular. 9 else that write-up describes. 10 I don't recall what And if I remember correctly, it's a general 11 explanation of the kind of experiments I conducted. 12 there may be other things that I did that are not 13 directly repeated in detail in that portion of the 14 11:07:07 report. 15 Q. So Can you tell me whether the CTS test from 16 your review of the code tests for anything other than the 17 security patents that are relevant to your opinions on 18 11:07:23 infringement in this case? 19 A. You know, I'm not going to be able to recall, 20 you know, some significant period of time after carrying 21 out those tests exactly what's covered. 22 is that the CTS takes considerable time, at least hours, 23 maybe more than ten hours on some platforms to run, if I 24 remember correctly. 25 things. 11:07:42 My recollection So I'm sure that it tests many 11:08:09 Page 61 Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services 866 299-5127 ErrataSheet (Reporter:Leslie Rockwood,RPR,CSRNo. 3462 with Veritext | 212-279-9424) Oracle America,Inc. v. Google,Inc. WHA USDCND of Cal.(SF)- No. CV '10-03561 Deposition JohnMitchell- September ,20ll of 6-7 I, JobnMitchell, do herebycertify that I havereadthe foregoingt.anscriptofmy testimony,and further certiry that it is a true andaccurate rccord ofmy testimony(with the exceptionofthe correctionslisted below): Liae 8 Orieiaal Tert I've donebY best I've donemy best lt-t2 Page I'm knowledgeable it, andI about don't- feelconfident discussing thos€ conceDts. I'm knowledgeable aboutit, and I feel confidentdiscussing thoseconcepts. l9 t2 35 5 l3 5l 56 59 I knew orofessionallv wav in whichit is meant instruction.is when JavaC whetherthis addresses tavac 3 t2 Idid-Iidentito I did identitu o 22 72 5 75 103 182 208 208 instruction. when I haveI expectmadecomments or analysis draw the library l0 - 11 l'm underoathnot soineto make l0 detail analvsis 70 166 I know orofessionallv wav in which it is met whetier this addresses questionyou the askedearlier or not. I'm underoath.so I'm not soinsto makc detailedanalvsis had to decide- whetherto build and supplyAndroidphones. theirdecisions to on of do so depend their assessment developersuccess end customer and demand thereforedependon the and samefactors. and in the process I havereached a conclusionand rationalefor that conclusion exoressed mv reoort. as in I expectI havemadecomments or analysis draw the line 6 hadto decide- (answercut off by Mr Paige) 70 Coiiccted Tert andin theprocess (answer off cut by Mr Paige) l 8 -1 9 I aDswerd that as best I can. I JavaC t4 Gosselin's I arswered that as best as I can. tavac l5 Li Dons's 223 20 241 6 263 t4 a classfile theresultofcompiling sourcecode look at difs any kind of UR secure today pop- Gosling's Li Gone's file, theresultofcompilingsou.rce a class code. look at diffs any kind of "you are secue today'' pop- UD UD Prcc Litre 275 22 289 12 295 308 Orisinel Tcrt nrmlbers referto asindices that elements string valve refers this asb€ingin this to example underinterpretation and execution. REZclass 309 l0 l8 328 t3 REZ class Id o d o t-2 versions Androidcompleting of whetcver comeaspartof binaries theSDK 345 DATED: Oct17.2010 Corrcted Tera numbers referto, asindices, that elements strinewlue refers thb asbeing, this cxample, to in underinterpretatiotr ex€cutiorL and resclass resclass I did do versions Android,cornplaing of whatever bimdescomeaspartofthe SDK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?