Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1080
MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Compatibility Testing Suite filed by Google Inc.. Responses due by 5/21/2012. Replies due by 5/29/2012. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Truman Fenton, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 5/6/2012)
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
________________________
6
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
GOOGLE, INC.,
10
11
)
)
) No. CV 10-03561 WHA
Defendant.
) VOLUME I
)
________________________)
12
13
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
14
15
Videotaped Patent Issues Deposition
16
of JOHN C. MITCHELL, Ph.D., taken at
17
755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California,
18
commencing at 9:43 a.m., Tuesday,
19
September 6, 2011, before Leslie Rockwood,
20
RPR, CSR No. 3462.
21
22
23
24
25
PAGES 1 - 270
Page 1
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
2
THE REPORTER:
Would you raise your right
hand, please.
3
You do solemnly state that the evidence you
4
shall give in this matter shall be the truth, the whole
5
truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God.
6
THE WITNESS:
7
THE REPORTER:
8
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
9
10
I do.
Thank you.
You may proceed.
EXAMINATION
BY MR. PAIGE:
09:44:15
11
Q.
BY MR. PAIGE:
Good morning, Dr. Mitchell.
12
A.
Good morning.
13
Q.
I know you've been deposed before, and I know
14
you know the rules of the road pretty well so I'll skip
15
that.
09:44:24
16
A.
Okay.
17
Q.
And just ask you:
18
Is there any reason that
you couldn't give your best testimony here today?
19
A.
Not that I know of.
20
Q.
Are you taking any medication or anything
21
else that might impair your ability to give your best
22
09:44:30
testimony today?
23
A.
No, I'm not.
24
Q.
Okay.
25
Have you developed any opinions on
matters relating to this case that are not set forth in
09:44:37
Page 5
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
Q.
Have you read the code for the CTS?
2
A.
I have read some of it.
3
Q.
And from reading that code, can you tell me
4
whether it tests for the presence of any code that you
5
claim to be infringing in this matter?
6
A.
11:06:42
There is a more detailed explanation in my
7
write-up of experiments I conducted that has to do with
8
the security tests in particular.
9
else that write-up describes.
10
I don't recall what
And if I remember correctly, it's a general
11
explanation of the kind of experiments I conducted.
12
there may be other things that I did that are not
13
directly repeated in detail in that portion of the
14
11:07:07
report.
15
Q.
So
Can you tell me whether the CTS test from
16
your review of the code tests for anything other than the
17
security patents that are relevant to your opinions on
18
11:07:23
infringement in this case?
19
A.
You know, I'm not going to be able to recall,
20
you know, some significant period of time after carrying
21
out those tests exactly what's covered.
22
is that the CTS takes considerable time, at least hours,
23
maybe more than ten hours on some platforms to run, if I
24
remember correctly.
25
things.
11:07:42
My recollection
So I'm sure that it tests many
11:08:09
Page 61
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
ErrataSheet
(Reporter:Leslie Rockwood,RPR,CSRNo. 3462 with Veritext | 212-279-9424)
Oracle America,Inc. v. Google,Inc.
WHA
USDCND of Cal.(SF)- No. CV '10-03561
Deposition JohnMitchell- September ,20ll
of
6-7
I, JobnMitchell, do herebycertify that I havereadthe foregoingt.anscriptofmy testimony,and
further certiry that it is a true andaccurate
rccord ofmy testimony(with the exceptionofthe
correctionslisted below):
Liae
8
Orieiaal Tert
I've donebY best
I've donemy best
lt-t2
Page
I'm knowledgeable it, andI
about
don't- feelconfident
discussing
thos€
conceDts.
I'm knowledgeable
aboutit, and I feel
confidentdiscussing
thoseconcepts.
l9
t2
35
5
l3
5l
56
59
I knew orofessionallv
wav in whichit is meant
instruction.is when
JavaC
whetherthis addresses
tavac
3
t2
Idid-Iidentito
I did identitu
o
22
72
5
75
103
182
208
208
instruction.
when
I haveI expectmadecomments
or
analysis
draw the library
l0 - 11 l'm underoathnot soineto make
l0
detail analvsis
70
166
I know orofessionallv
wav in which it is met
whetier this addresses questionyou
the
askedearlier or not.
I'm underoath.so I'm not soinsto makc
detailedanalvsis
had to decide- whetherto build and
supplyAndroidphones.
theirdecisions
to
on
of
do so depend their assessment
developersuccess end customer
and
demand thereforedependon the
and
samefactors.
and in the process I havereached
a
conclusionand rationalefor that
conclusion exoressed mv reoort.
as
in
I expectI havemadecomments
or
analysis
draw the line
6
hadto decide- (answercut off by
Mr Paige)
70
Coiiccted Tert
andin theprocess (answer off
cut
by Mr Paige)
l 8 -1 9 I aDswerd that as best I can.
I
JavaC
t4
Gosselin's
I arswered that as best as I can.
tavac
l5
Li Dons's
223
20
241
6
263
t4
a classfile theresultofcompiling
sourcecode
look at difs
any kind of UR secure
today pop-
Gosling's
Li Gone's
file, theresultofcompilingsou.rce
a class
code.
look at diffs
any kind of "you are secue today'' pop-
UD
UD
Prcc
Litre
275
22
289
12
295
308
Orisinel Tcrt
nrmlbers referto asindices
that
elements
string valve
refers this asb€ingin this
to
example
underinterpretation
and
execution.
REZclass
309
l0
l8
328
t3
REZ class
Id o d o
t-2
versions Androidcompleting
of
whetcver
comeaspartof
binaries
theSDK
345
DATED:
Oct17.2010
Corrcted Tera
numbers referto, asindices,
that
elements
strinewlue
refers thb asbeing, this cxample,
to
in
underinterpretatiotr ex€cutiorL
and
resclass
resclass
I did do
versions Android,cornplaing
of
whatever
bimdescomeaspartofthe
SDK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?