Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
1080
MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Compatibility Testing Suite filed by Google Inc.. Responses due by 5/21/2012. Replies due by 5/29/2012. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Truman Fenton, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 5/6/2012)
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
_______________________
6
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
GOOGLE, INC.,
10
11
)
)
) No. CV 10-03561 WHA
Defendant.
)
)
_______________________)
12
13
14
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
15
16
17
Videotaped Deposition of DANIEL MORRILL,
18
taken at 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite
19
400, Redwood Shores, California, commencing
20
at 9:43 a.m., Tuesday, July 12, 2011,
21
before Leslie Rockwood, RPR, CSR No. 3462.
22
23
24
25
PAGES 1 - 248
Page 1
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
MS. TERAGUCHI:
2
Foerster for plaintiff Oracle America.
3
4
MR. WEINGAERTNER:
Scott Weingaertner of
King & Spalding for Google.
5
6
Yuka Teraguchi of Morrison &
MR. KAMBER:
Matthias Kamber of Keker & Van
09:41:11
Nest for Google.
7
MR. HWANG:
8
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
9
The witness will be sworn in and we may
10
Thank you, Counsel.
proceed.
09:41:21
11
12
Renny Hwang of Google.
THE REPORTER:
Would you raise your right
hand, please, Mr. Morrill.
13
You do solemnly state that the evidence you
14
shall give in this matter shall be the truth, the whole
15
truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God.
16
THE WITNESS:
17
THE REPORTER:
18
19
I do.
Thank you.
EXAMINATION
BY MR. MUINO:
20
Q.
Good morning, Mr. Morrill.
21
A.
Good morning.
22
Q.
Can you please state your full name for the
24
A.
My full name is Daniel Lawrence Morrill.
25
Q.
And what is your home address?
23
09:41:34
record.
09:41:43
Page 5
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1
Q.
Did you draft that -- this paragraph?
2
A.
I believe that this was one of the sections
3
that was present when I began work with this document,
4
but I believe that I substantially revised this section
5
and probably wrote this text in its current form.
6
Q.
Okay.
15:17:52
What does it mean for a device
7
implementation to support the full Dalvik executable
8
bytecode specification?
9
A.
It means it includes a virtual machine that
10
can load and execute Dalvik bytecode as described in the
11
resources ten listed in the text.
12
Q.
15:18:08
Does it require that the Dalvik virtual
13
machine be included in the implementation?
14
MR. WEINGAERTNER:
15
THE WITNESS:
16
Q.
BY MR. MUINO:
Objection to form.
It does not require that.
15:18:25
Are you aware of any
17
Android-compatible devices that do not include the Dalvik
18
virtual machine?
19
MR. WEINGAERTNER:
20
THE WITNESS:
Objection to form.
I'm not by name.
However, I am
21
aware that there is a software company which makes a --
22
makes and markets a version or alternate implementation
23
of the Dalvik virtual machine known, I believe, as Dalvik
24
Turbo, is their brand name for it, and I believe that
25
company's name is Myriad.
15:18:41
15:19:02
Page 156
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?