Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1080

MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Regarding Compatibility Testing Suite filed by Google Inc.. Responses due by 5/21/2012. Replies due by 5/29/2012. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Truman Fenton, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 5/6/2012)

Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

4
5

_______________________

6

ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

7

Plaintiff,

8

vs.

9

GOOGLE, INC.,

10
11

)
)
) No. CV 10-03561 WHA

Defendant.

)
)

_______________________)

12
13
14

HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY

15
16
17

Videotaped Deposition of DANIEL MORRILL,

18

taken at 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite

19

400, Redwood Shores, California, commencing

20

at 9:43 a.m., Tuesday, July 12, 2011,

21

before Leslie Rockwood, RPR, CSR No. 3462.

22
23
24
25

PAGES 1 - 248
Page 1
Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127

Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1

MS. TERAGUCHI:

2

Foerster for plaintiff Oracle America.

3
4

MR. WEINGAERTNER:

Scott Weingaertner of

King & Spalding for Google.

5
6

Yuka Teraguchi of Morrison &

MR. KAMBER:

Matthias Kamber of Keker & Van

09:41:11

Nest for Google.

7

MR. HWANG:

8

THE VIDEOGRAPHER:

9

The witness will be sworn in and we may

10

Thank you, Counsel.

proceed.

09:41:21

11
12

Renny Hwang of Google.

THE REPORTER:

Would you raise your right

hand, please, Mr. Morrill.

13

You do solemnly state that the evidence you

14

shall give in this matter shall be the truth, the whole

15

truth and nothing but the truth, so help you God.

16

THE WITNESS:

17

THE REPORTER:

18
19

I do.
Thank you.

EXAMINATION
BY MR. MUINO:

20

Q.

Good morning, Mr. Morrill.

21

A.

Good morning.

22

Q.

Can you please state your full name for the

24

A.

My full name is Daniel Lawrence Morrill.

25

Q.

And what is your home address?

23

09:41:34

record.

09:41:43
Page 5

Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127

Highly Confidential - Attorneys' Eyes Only
1

Q.

Did you draft that -- this paragraph?

2

A.

I believe that this was one of the sections

3

that was present when I began work with this document,

4

but I believe that I substantially revised this section

5

and probably wrote this text in its current form.

6

Q.

Okay.

15:17:52

What does it mean for a device

7

implementation to support the full Dalvik executable

8

bytecode specification?

9

A.

It means it includes a virtual machine that

10

can load and execute Dalvik bytecode as described in the

11

resources ten listed in the text.

12

Q.

15:18:08

Does it require that the Dalvik virtual

13

machine be included in the implementation?

14

MR. WEINGAERTNER:

15

THE WITNESS:

16

Q.

BY MR. MUINO:

Objection to form.

It does not require that.

15:18:25

Are you aware of any

17

Android-compatible devices that do not include the Dalvik

18

virtual machine?

19

MR. WEINGAERTNER:

20

THE WITNESS:

Objection to form.

I'm not by name.

However, I am

21

aware that there is a software company which makes a --

22

makes and markets a version or alternate implementation

23

of the Dalvik virtual machine known, I believe, as Dalvik

24

Turbo, is their brand name for it, and I believe that

25

company's name is Myriad.

15:18:41

15:19:02
Page 156

Veritext National Deposition & Litigation Services
866 299-5127