Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 1125

MOTION for Summary Judgment re Copyright Damages filed by Google Inc.. Responses due by 5/29/2012. Replies due by 6/5/2012. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of David Zimmer, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F)(Van Nest, Robert) (Filed on 5/12/2012)

Download PDF
Exhibit A 1 2 3 4 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP MICHAEL A. JACOBS (Bar No. 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com MARC DAVID PETERS (Bar No. 211725) mdpeters@mofo.com 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 / Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 5 6 7 8 9 10 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP DAVID BOIES (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) dboies@bsfllp.com 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 / Facsimile: (914) 749-8300 STEVEN C. HOLTZMAN (Bar No. 144177) sholtzman@bsfllp.com 1999 Harrison St., Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 / Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ORACLE CORPORATION DORIAN DALEY (Bar No. 129049) dorian.daley@oracle.com DEBORAH K. MILLER (Bar No. 95527) deborah.miller@oracle.com MATTHEW M. SARBORARIA (Bar No. 211600) matthew.sarboraria@oracle.com 500 Oracle Parkway Redwood City, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 506-5200 / Facsimile: (650) 506-7114 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 22 ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 23 Plaintiff, 24 GOOGLE, INC. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES v. 25 Case No. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA Judge: Honorable William H. Alsup 26 Defendant. 27 28 ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1), Plaintiff Oracle America, Inc. 2 (“Oracle”) hereby makes its initial disclosures. Oracle has made a reasonable and good faith 3 effort to make the initial disclosures provided herein, including providing general descriptions of 4 documents, and identifying persons who may have knowledge of pertinent information, relating 5 to the issues in this action. However, Oracle’s investigation of its claims and defenses in this 6 action is ongoing. Other potential witnesses and/or documents may be identified and become 7 significant as discovery proceeds and as the case develops, and therefore, Oracle reserves the 8 right to supplement these disclosures. 9 10 INDIVIDUALS LIKELY TO HAVE DISCOVERABLE INFORMATION THAT ORACLE MAY USE TO SUPPORT ITS CLAIMS OR DEFENSES (FED. R. CIV. P. 26(A)(1)(A)). 11 The persons Oracle believes are likely to have discoverable information that Oracle may 12 I. use to support its claims and defenses are: 13 14 15 16 17 18 Name, Address, Telephone Greg Bollella Contact through counsel for Oracle Roger Calnan Contact through counsel for Oracle Andrew Carr Contact through counsel for Oracle Safra Catz Contact through counsel for Oracle 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Neal Civjan Contact through counsel for Oracle Patrick Curran Contact through counsel for Oracle Bill Daly Contact through counsel for Oracle Don Deutsch Contact through counsel for Oracle Larry Ellison Contact through counsel for Oracle 26 27 28 Gustavo Galimberti Contact through counsel for Oracle ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 Subject Java development Java development and distribution Java distribution Oracle’s business; Oracle’s acquisition of Sun; Java business models, business plans, and associated financial data; license discussions between Oracle and Google Java licensing and sales, including negotiations with Google Java standards, JCP, and open Java Oracle financial data Java standards, JCP, and open Java, Java revenues and business History of Oracle; Oracle’s business; Oracle’s acquisition of Sun; Java business models and business plans; license discussions between Oracle and Google Java development, Java licensing, Java distribution and support 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Name, Address, Telephone Craig Gering Contact through counsel for Oracle Ivgen Guner Contact through counsel for Oracle Vineet Gupta Contact through counsel for Oracle Steve Harris Contact through counsel for Oracle Jeannette Hung Contact through counsel for Oracle Thomas Kurian Contact through counsel for Oracle 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Jacob Lehrbaum Contact through counsel for Oracle Matthew Mayerson Contact through counsel for Oracle Kerry McGuire Contact through counsel for Oracle John Pampuch Contact through counsel for Oracle Bill Pittore Contact through counsel for Oracle Nandini Ramani Contact through counsel for Oracle Mark Reinhold Contact through counsel for Oracle 18 19 20 21 22 Hasan Rizvi Contact through counsel for Oracle Susan Roach Contact through counsel for Oracle Bill Shannon Contact through counsel for Oracle 23 24 25 26 27 28 Param Singh Contact through counsel for Oracle Guy Steele Contact through counsel for Oracle Brian Sutphin Contact through counsel for Oracle Lars Bak Google employee ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 Subject Java development, licensing, and testing Oracle financial data Java sales and licensing, including negotiations with Google Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, and business plans Java development Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, and business plans; license discussions between Oracle and Google Java licensing and copyrights Software distribution Java business and revenues Java VM technology Java VM development Java Development Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, business plans, patent rights and copyrights Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, and business plans; license discussions between Oracle and Google Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, business plans, patent rights and copyrights Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, business plans, patent rights and copyrights Mobile Java development and business plan Java development Java licensing and business, including negotiations with Google, Java business plans Inventor of U.S. Patent No. 6,910,205 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Name, Address, Telephone Nedim Fresko 121 Lincoln Way San Francisco, CA 94122-2717 Li Gong Mozilla Foundation 650 Castro Street, Suite 300 Mountain View, CA 94041-2072 lgong@mozilla.com James Gosling 75 Fox Hollow Lane Redwood City, CA 94062-4158 Robert Griesemer Google employee Richard Tuck 343 Hill Street San Francisco, CA 94114-2916 Frank Yellin Google employee Representatives of Google, including witnesses identified in Google’s initial disclosure 14 15 Joshua Bloch Google employee 16 17 18 Dan Bornstein Google employee 19 20 Bill Buzbee Google employee 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Eric Chu Google employee Gregorz Czajkowski Google employee Tim Lindholm Google employee Rich Miner Google employee Subject Inventor of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,966,702 and 7,426,720 Inventor of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,125,447 and 6,192,476 Inventor of U.S. Patent No. RE38,104 Inventor of U.S. Patent No. 6,910,205 Inventor of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,966,702 and 6,061,520 Inventor of U.S. Patent No. 6,061,520 Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, and revenues Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, and revenues Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, and revenues Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, and revenues Java license negotiations between Google and Sun Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, and revenues Java license negotiations between Google and Sun Java license negotiations between Google and Sun 28 ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 3 1 2 3 Name, Address, Telephone Larry Page Google employee 4 5 6 Andy Rubin Google employee 7 8 9 Eric Schmidt Google employee 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Representatives of manufacturers and distributors of Android devices Alan Brenner RIM/Blackberry employee Ethan Beard Facebook employee Rich Green Nokia employee 18 Subject Knowledge of Oracle’s Java-related intellectual property; Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, and revenues; license discussions between Google and Oracle Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, revenues, and license negotiations between Google and Oracle Java development; knowledge of Oracle’s Javarelated intellectual property; Android development, marketing and distribution (including Open Handset Alliance), business plans, infringement, profit models, and revenues; license discussions between Google and Oracle Android distribution, revenues, infringement Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, business plans, patent rights and copyrights Java license negotiations between Google and Sun Java development, distribution, licensing, business models, business plans, patent rights and copyrights 19 II. 20 Oracle discloses and describes by category the following documents, electronically-stored DOCUMENTS (FED. R. CIV. P. 26(A)(1)(B)). 21 information, data compilations and tangible things that are or may be in the possession, custody 22 or control of Oracle that Oracle currently and reasonably believes it may use to support its claims 23 or defenses: 24 1. U.S. Patent No. 6,125,447 and related files. 25 2. U.S. Patent No. 6,192,476 and related files. 26 3. U.S. Patent No. 5,966,702 and related files. 27 4. U.S. Patent No. 7,426,720 and related files. 28 5. U.S. Patent No. RE38,104 and related files. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 4 1 6. U.S. Patent No. 6,910,205 and related files. 2 7. U.S. Patent No. 6,061,520 and related files. 3 8. U.S. Certificate of Copyright Registration for J2SE 1.4, the copyrighted 4 5 work, and related files. 9. 6 7 work, and related files. 10. 8 9 U.S. Certificate of Copyright Registration for J2SE 5.0, the copyrighted U.S. Certificate of Supplemental Copyright Registration for J2SE 5.0 and related files. 11. 10 Documents evidencing the conception, development, reduction to practice, and design of the inventions claimed by the patents at issue. 11 12. Documents relating to the history and development of the Java platform. 12 13. Java releases and related documentation. 13 14. Documents evidencing sales, distribution, deployment, and use of Java 14 products. 15 15. Java-related contracts, licenses, and pricing models. 16 16. Sun and Oracle Java business plans and financial results. 17 17. Documents evidencing Google’s knowledge of the Sun patent portfolio, 18 including documents relating to licensing of the Java IP rights by Google 19 and Google’s participation in the Java Community Process. 20 18. Android releases and related documentation. 21 19. Google marketing, advertising, and press releases, and statements 22 regarding Android, Android devices, Android distribution and deployment, 23 and revenues attributable to Android. 24 20. Public and third-party reports, releases, and statements regarding the 25 distribution and deployment of Android devices, and the impact of Android 26 and Android devices on the use, distribution, and deployment of the Java 27 platform and Java devices. 28 ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 5 1 21. Documents relating to each type and category of damages described in 2 Section III below, including license fees, revenue from and profitability of 3 Java and related Oracle businesses, and Oracle’s and Google’s business 4 models for the relevant lines of business. 5 The above documents are maintained primarily at one or more Oracle locations in 6 California (Santa Clara, Redwood Shores, and Menlo Park) and Broomfield, Colorado, depending 7 on the location of the various individuals identified above. 8 III. 9 10 INITIAL DISCLOSURES REGARDING COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES (FED. R. CIV. P. 26(A)(1)(C)). Oracle has not completed its calculation for monetary damages as it will require expert 11 evaluation of information in Google’s possession. When available, documents and information 12 will be provided in conformity with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) and/or any relevant Orders entered 13 by the Court. 14 Based on information currently available to Oracle, Oracle seeks compensation for all 15 damages caused by Google’s infringing activities, including recovery of profits Oracle would 16 have made without the infringement, disgorgement of profits made by Google that are attributable 17 to the infringement, and/or award of the fair market value of a license for the rights infringed. 18 Such compensation may include at least (1) harm to the profits of Oracle’s Java business caused 19 by Google’s infringing activities, including lost license fees; (2) harm to Oracle’s business model 20 and strategy relating to Java and the importance of minimizing “forks” in Java; (3) harm to 21 Oracle’s reputation and goodwill; (4) harm to Oracle profits from the sales or licenses of other 22 software or hardware products reasonably related to or stemming from Oracle’s Java business; (5) 23 the amount a willing buyer would have been reasonably required to pay a willing seller in a 24 hypothetical negotiation for a license to the infringed intellectual property at the time of the 25 infringement; and/or (6) all Google profits directly or indirectly attributable to the infringement, 26 including profits from advertising, search and other revenue through use of the Android platform 27 on mobile devices. Because Google’s infringement has been willful and intentional, Oracle is 28 entitled to recover treble damages, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284. ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 6 1 Oracle is entitled to actual damages for Google’s use of Oracle’s copyrighted works, 2 together with Google’s profits attributable to the infringement, computed by subtracting from 3 Google’s gross revenue any deductions established by Google for deductible expenses or the 4 elements of profit attributable to factors other than the infringed work. 17 U.S.C. § 504(b). 5 Regarding Google’s revenue from its Android business, Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt has said 6 “Trust me that revenue is large enough to pay for all of the Android activities and a whole bunch 7 more.” Google will disclose information regarding its revenues and expenses attributable to 8 Android during discovery. At a minimum, Oracle is entitled to statutory damages, pursuant to 17 9 U.S.C. § 504(c). 10 In addition, Oracle is entitled to recover the costs of suit, prejudgment interest, and 11 attorney’s fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. These costs, expenses and further relief cannot be 12 computed until the conclusion of this suit. 13 14 IV. INITIAL DISCLOSURES REGARDING INSURANCE (FED. R. CIV. P. 26(A)(1)(D)). 15 Oracle is unaware of any insurance agreement under which an insurance business may be 16 liable to satisfy all or part of a judgment in this action or to indemnify or reimburse for payments 17 made to satisfy any judgment. 18 Dated: December 2, 2010 19 MICHAEL A. JACOBS MARC DAVID PETERS MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 20 By: /s/ Marc David Peters 21 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORACLE AMERICA, INC. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 7 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I declare that I am employed with the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, whose address is 755 Page Mill Road, Palo Alto, California 94304-1018. I am not a party to the within cause, and I am over the age of eighteen years. 3 4 I further declare that on December 2, 2010, I served a copy of: 5 ORACLE AMERICA, INC.’S INITIAL DISCLOSURES 6 BY ELECTRONIC SERVICE [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. rule 5(b)] by electronically mailing a true and correct copy through Morrison & Foerster LLP's electronic mail system to the e-mail address(es) set forth below, or as stated on the attached service list per agreement in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure rule 5(b). 7 8 9 Robert F. Perry Scott T. Weingaertner Bruce W. Baber KING & SPALDING LLP 1185 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10036-4003 Timothy T. Scott Geoffrey M. Ezgar Leo Spooner III KING & SPALDING, LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 400 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 14 RPerry@kslaw.com SWeingaertner@kslaw.com TScott@kslaw.com GEzgar@kslaw.com LSpooner@kslaw.com 15 Fax: 10 11 12 13 16 17 18 19 212.556.2222 Fax: Donald F. Zimmer, Jr. Cheryl Z. Sabnis KING & SPALDING LLP 101 Second Street, Suite 2300 San Francisco, CA 94105 20 fzimmer@kslaw.com csabnis@kslaw.com 21 650.590.1900 Ian C. Ballon Heather Meeker (App for Admission to ND Cal to be filed) GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 1900 University Avenue East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Fax: 415.318.1300 22 ballon@gtlaw.com meekerh@gtlaw.com Fax: 24 Joseph R. Wetzel GREENBERG TRAURIG LLP 153 Townsend Street, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94107 25 wetzelj@gtlaw.com 26 650.328.8508 Fax: 415.707.2010 23 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 1 1 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 2 Executed at Palo Alto, California, this 2nd day of December, 2010. 3 4 5 Richard S. Ballinger (typed) /s/ Richard S. Ballinger (signature) 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE CASE NO. 3:10-cv-03561-WHA pa-1433184 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?