Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 497

Declaration of DANIEL PURCELL in Support of #496 MOTION in Limine No. 5, #494 MOTION in Limine No. 3, #492 MOTION in Limine No. 1, #493 MOTION in Limine NO. 2, #495 MOTION in Limine No. 4 filed byGoogle Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40)(Related document(s) #496 , #494 , #492 , #493 , #495 ) (Kamber, Matthias) (Filed on 10/7/2011)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 22 Oracle America v. Google - Expert Report of Iain Cockburn – September 12, 2011 - Subject to Protective Order (Contains Confidential and Highly Confidential/Attorneys' Eyes Only Material) Exhibit 5 Conjoint Analysis Application Launch Times (Seconds) '104 and '205 '205 '720 '205 and '720 Disabled Disabled Disabled Disabled Unmodified Android OS Application E-mail Camera E-mail Camera E-mail Camera E-mail Camera E-mail Camera Test 1 1.53 2.03 5.90 5.47 1.33 1.70 2.07 3.30 2.53 3.53 Test 2 1.40 2.23 6.17 6.10 1.03 2.10 3.87 4.03 2.47 3.13 Test 3 1.57 2.27 5.43 4.53 1.07 2.10 3.23 3.73 2.43 3.37 Test 4 1.70 1.93 5.23 5.17 1.03 2.00 3.13 3.63 2.53 3.23 Test 5 1.43 2.03 5.53 4.83 1.07 2.00 4.17 3.63 2.53 3.63 Test 6 1.53 2.23 6.13 5.17 1.13 1.90 3.03 4.43 2.97 3.17 Test 7 1.67 1.97 5.50 4.80 1.27 1.90 3.17 3.43 2.37 3.07 Test 8 1.63 1.97 5.43 5.33 1.13 2.00 3.83 3.40 2.63 3.33 Test 9 1.80 1.97 5.70 6.40 1.07 1.93 3.37 4.03 2.27 2.90 Test 10 1.63 2.13 4.77 6.23 1.00 1.90 2.60 4.17 2.37 3.10 Mean 1.59 2.08 5.58 5.40 1.11 1.95 3.25 3.78 2.51 3.25 StDev 0.12 0.13 0.42 0.64 0.11 0.12 0.62 0.37 0.19 0.22 Min 1.40 1.93 4.77 4.53 1.00 1.70 2.07 3.30 2.27 2.90 Max 1.80 2.27 6.17 6.40 1.33 2.10 4.17 4.43 2.97 3.63 Average 1.83 5.49 1.53 3.51 2.88 (Email and Camera) '104, '205, and '720 Disabled E-mail Camera 8.57 8.80 8.37 7.13 8.27 8.20 7.83 7.97 8.47 7.33 8.83 7.43 9.77 9.50 8.63 9.63 9.13 8.00 8.67 7.63 8.65 8.16 0.52 0.88 7.83 7.13 9.77 9.63 8.41 Impact On Android Sales Base -23.7% - -18.2% -12.3% -39.3% Implied Apportionment Percentage Base 22.8% - 17.1% 11.6% 38.9% Note: Nexus One phones were used for all of the tests. Each phone was tested 10 times on launching email and camera applications. Application launch times measured through recording a video of the process and counting the number of frames from the time of launch to the application being ready to use. Videotaping has been performed by VPG Integrated Media under my direction. Source: Impact on Android Sales based on Shugan Exhibits 4a and 4b. Calculation of implied apportionment percentage as described in Appendix D.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?