Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 837

REQUEST FOR INPUT. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 28, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/28/2012: #1 Errata Order With Signature) (whalc1, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

REQUEST FOR INPUT

GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 10-03561 WHA

In the brief to be submitted on Friday, Oracle shall please address the following: To

17

what extent does Oracle contend that the 37 APIs as a group constitute a “compilation” within

18

the meaning of Section 101, and/or contend that the individual APIs individually constitute a

19

“compilation.” Is there any other theory of protectability beyond “compilation” for the APIs?

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: March 28, 2012.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE