Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.
Filing
837
REQUEST FOR INPUT. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 28, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/28/2012: #1 Errata Order With Signature) (whalc1, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ORACLE AMERICA, INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
REQUEST FOR INPUT
GOOGLE INC.,
Defendant.
/
15
16
No. C 10-03561 WHA
In the brief to be submitted on Friday, Oracle shall please address the following: To
17
what extent does Oracle contend that the 37 APIs as a group constitute a “compilation” within
18
the meaning of Section 101, and/or contend that the individual APIs individually constitute a
19
“compilation.” Is there any other theory of protectability beyond “compilation” for the APIs?
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 28, 2012.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?