Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.

Filing 837

REQUEST FOR INPUT. Signed by Judge Alsup on March 28, 2012. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/28/2012: #1 Errata Order With Signature) (whalc1, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ORACLE AMERICA, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. REQUEST FOR INPUT GOOGLE INC., Defendant. / 15 16 No. C 10-03561 WHA In the brief to be submitted on Friday, Oracle shall please address the following: To 17 what extent does Oracle contend that the 37 APIs as a group constitute a “compilation” within 18 the meaning of Section 101, and/or contend that the individual APIs individually constitute a 19 “compilation.” Is there any other theory of protectability beyond “compilation” for the APIs? 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 28, 2012. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?