Almy et al v. United States Department of Defense et al

Filing 85

MOTION to Continue the Hearing Date for Plaintiff Almy's Motion for a Protective Order filed by Department of the Air Force, Michael B. Donley, Robert M. Gates, United States Department of Defense. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Parker, Ryan) (Filed on 9/13/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

IAN GERSHENGORN
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
VINCENT M. GARVEY
Deputy Branch Director
PAUL G. FREEBORNE
Senior Trial Counsel
Virginia Bar No. 33024
RYAN B. PARKER
Trial Attorney
Civil Division, Federal Programs Branch
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 883
Washington, D.C. 20044
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

MICHAEL D. ALMY, ANTHONY J.
LOVERDE, AND JASON D. KNIGHT,

14

Plaintiffs,

15
16

vs.

17
18

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE et al.,

19
20
21
22

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: CV 3:10-CV-5627 (RS)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE
HEARING DATE FOR PLAINTIFF
ALMY’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE
ORDER
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
COURTROOM: SAN FRANCISCO
COURTHOUSE, COURTROOM 3 – 17TH
FLOOR, 450 GOLDEN GATE AVENUE,
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94102

23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING DATE
FOR PLAINTIFF ALMY’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, Almy v. United States Department of Defense, No. 3:10-CV-5627 (RS)
-1 -

1

This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Administrative Motion for a Continuance

2

of the Hearing Date for Plaintiff Almy’s Motion for a Protective Order. Having considered

3

Defendants’ submission, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion. The hearing on

4

Plaintiff Almy’s Motion for a Protective Order, Dkt. No. 81, shall be continued until Thursday,

5

October 11, at 1:30 pm.
6
7
8

Dated:_________________________

___________________________

9

Judge Richard Seeborg
10

United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANING DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR A CONTINUANCE OF THE HEARING DATE
FOR PLAINTIFF ALMY’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, Almy v. United States Department of Defense, No. 3:10-CV-5627 (RS)
-2 -