Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 69

REPLY (re 64 MOTION to Dismiss First, Third, and Fourth Causes of Action of The Second Amended Complaint ) filed byGOOGLE UK LTD., Google Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Colleen Bal, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)(Bal, Colleen) (Filed on 8/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637 CHARLES TAIT GRAVES, State Bar No. 197923 RIANA PFEFFERKORN, State Bar No. 266817 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation One Market Plaza Spear Tower, Suite 3300 San Francisco, California 94105-1126 Telephone: (415) 947-2000 Facsimile: (415) 947-2099 cbal@wsgr.com tgraves@wsgr.com Attorneys for Defendants Google Inc., Google UK Ltd., and YouTube, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 BE IN, INC., a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE INC., a California corporation; YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and GOOGLE UK LTD., a private limited company registered in England and Wales, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REPLY DECLARATION OF COLLEEN BAL ISO MOTION TO DISMISS SAC CASE NO.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 5:12-cv-03373-LHK REPLY DECLARATION OF COLLEEN BAL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST, THIRD, AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION OF THE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Hearing Date: November 21, 2013 Hearing Time: 1:30 p.m. Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 1 I, Colleen Bal, declare: 2 1. I am a partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. (“WSGR”), counsel for 3 Defendants Google Inc., Google UK Ltd. and YouTube, LLC in this action. I have personal 4 knowledge of the facts stated herein, and would and could testify thereto if called as a witness. 5 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the First Amended 6 Complaint (Docket No. 22) filed in SOAProjects, Inc. v. SCM Microsys, No. 5:10-cv-01773- 7 LHK (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2010). 8 9 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Complaint (Docket No. 1) filed in TMX Funding, Inc. v. Impero Tech. Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00202-JF (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10 14, 2010). 11 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the Notice of Removal 12 (Docket No. 1) filed in Vinyl Interactive, LLC v. Guarino, No. 4:09-cv-00987-CW (N.D. Cal. 13 March 6, 2009) and the portion of Exhibit A thereto that is the original Complaint filed in that 14 action. I have not attached additional documents that were appended to the Notice of Removal 15 due to their volume. 16 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the First Amended 17 Complaint (Docket No. 37) filed in Brocade Commc’ns Sys., Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc., No. 18 5:10-cv-03428-PSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2010). 19 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the Complaint (Docket 20 No. 1) filed in Cvent, Inc. v. Eventbrite, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00481-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. May 1, 21 2010). 22 23 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the 24 foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed in San Francisco, California 25 this 15th day of August, 2013. 26 27 /s/ Colleen Bal Colleen Bal 28 REPLY DECLARATION OF COLLEEN BAL ISO MOTION TO DISMISS SAC CASE NO.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?