Be In, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
69
REPLY (re 64 MOTION to Dismiss First, Third, and Fourth Causes of Action of The Second Amended Complaint ) filed byGOOGLE UK LTD., Google Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Colleen Bal, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)(Bal, Colleen) (Filed on 8/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
COLLEEN BAL, State Bar No. 167637
CHARLES TAIT GRAVES, State Bar No. 197923
RIANA PFEFFERKORN, State Bar No. 266817
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
One Market Plaza
Spear Tower, Suite 3300
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone: (415) 947-2000
Facsimile: (415) 947-2099
cbal@wsgr.com
tgraves@wsgr.com
Attorneys for Defendants
Google Inc., Google UK Ltd.,
and YouTube, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
BE IN, INC., a New York Corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE INC., a California corporation;
YOUTUBE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, and GOOGLE UK LTD., a private
limited company registered in England and
Wales,
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
REPLY DECLARATION OF COLLEEN BAL
ISO MOTION TO DISMISS SAC
CASE NO.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 5:12-cv-03373-LHK
REPLY DECLARATION OF
COLLEEN BAL IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST,
THIRD, AND FOURTH CAUSES OF
ACTION OF THE SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Hearing Date: November 21, 2013
Hearing Time: 1:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
1
I, Colleen Bal, declare:
2
1.
I am a partner at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C. (“WSGR”), counsel for
3
Defendants Google Inc., Google UK Ltd. and YouTube, LLC in this action. I have personal
4
knowledge of the facts stated herein, and would and could testify thereto if called as a witness.
5
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the First Amended
6
Complaint (Docket No. 22) filed in SOAProjects, Inc. v. SCM Microsys, No. 5:10-cv-01773-
7
LHK (N.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2010).
8
9
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Complaint (Docket
No. 1) filed in TMX Funding, Inc. v. Impero Tech. Inc., No. 5:10-cv-00202-JF (N.D. Cal. Jan.
10
14, 2010).
11
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the Notice of Removal
12
(Docket No. 1) filed in Vinyl Interactive, LLC v. Guarino, No. 4:09-cv-00987-CW (N.D. Cal.
13
March 6, 2009) and the portion of Exhibit A thereto that is the original Complaint filed in that
14
action. I have not attached additional documents that were appended to the Notice of Removal
15
due to their volume.
16
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the First Amended
17
Complaint (Docket No. 37) filed in Brocade Commc’ns Sys., Inc. v. A10 Networks, Inc., No.
18
5:10-cv-03428-PSG (N.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2010).
19
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the Complaint (Docket
20
No. 1) filed in Cvent, Inc. v. Eventbrite, Inc., No. 1:10-cv-00481-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. May 1,
21
2010).
22
23
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
24
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed in San Francisco, California
25
this 15th day of August, 2013.
26
27
/s/ Colleen Bal
Colleen Bal
28
REPLY DECLARATION OF COLLEEN BAL
ISO MOTION TO DISMISS SAC
CASE NO.: 5:12-CV-03373-LHK
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?