Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al v. City of Richmond, California et al
Filing
49
Declaration of John Ertman in Support of 45 Reply to Opposition/Response, 46 Opposition/Response to Motion, 45 Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 46 Motion to Dismiss filed byDeutsche Bank National Trust Company, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y, # 26 Exhibit Z, # 27 Exhibit AA)(Related document(s) 45 , 46 ) (Tsai, Rocky) (Filed on 8/29/2013)
EXHIBIT F
Community
at
a
glance
Name
City
of
Richmond
County
Contra
Costa
CBSA
Name
San
Francisco-‐Oakland-‐Fremont,
CA
(Oakland-‐Fremont-‐Hayward
CBSA-‐Div)
Population
103,701
Total
Mortgages
(1st's
only)
(2010
Census)
28,131 (total
for
zip
codes)
53%
Home
ownership
rate
81,602 (total
for
zip
codes)
35,884
Total
Households
(2010
Census)
(2010
Census)
12,128
(2011
CoreLogic)
%
of
Underwater
homes
%
of
Underwater
homes
-‐
CBSA
%
of
Underwater
homes
-‐
State
46%
32%
31%
(2011
CoreLogic)
(Q1-‐2012;
CBSA-‐Div)
(Q1-‐2012)
Foreclosure
statistics
Foreclosures
in
most
recent
month
Foreclosure
rate
fraction 1
of
every
110
281
month
of
Oct
2012
properties
received
FC
notice
in
Oct
2012
Mortgage
stats
breakdown
Total
Mortgages
(GSE,
Banks,
etc)
All
PLS
Mortages
PLS
Single-‐family,
Owner-‐Occ,
1st
Total
12,128
2,077
1,468
Current
1,620
937
78%
64%
Delinquent
457
294
22%
20%
Underwater
5,579 46%
1,700 82%
1,236 84%
City
of
Richmond
PLS
Loans
by
Zip
(July
-‐
2012)
*
Zip
Code
House-‐
holds
Total
PLS
Loans
94801
94802
94804
94805
94807
94808
94850
9,034
-‐
13,948
5,149
-‐
-‐
-‐
662
2
999
408
2
3
1
28,131
2,077
Average
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
%
U/W
of
Total
PLS
$330,530
538
81%
$129,232
-‐
0%
$304,867
834
83%
$336,337
326
80%
$432,879
1
50%
$121,982
-‐
0%
$420,523
1
100%
$318,974
1,700
82%
Total
U/W
Underwater
Loans
%
of
U/W
Total
U/W
that
are
&
Current
Current
71%
382
#DIV/0!
-‐
72%
601
72%
234
100%
1
#DIV/0!
-‐
1
100%
1,219
72%
In
Fore-‐
closure
or
REO
74
82
-‐
-‐
111
122
53
39
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
-‐
Delin-‐
quent
238
243
*
Note,
zip
codes
listed
may
cover
some
areas
outside
of
the
city
limits
and/or
leave
portions
uncovered
resulting
in
variance
versus
census
tract
data.
Because
loan
statistics
are
tracked
by
zip
code,
the
above
number
should
be
treated
as
an
estimate.
Exact
numbers
will
be
determined
from
lien
addresses
at
the
appropriate
time.
12/10/12
Confidential,
Mortgage
Resolution
Partners,
LLC
City
of
Richmond:
Page
1
of
2
Foreclosure
statistics
by
zip
code
110
new
foreclosures
filed
in
Oct
2012
October
2012
Foreclosure
Rate
Heat
Map
1
in
every
281
housing
units
received
a
foreclosure
filing
in
Oct
2012
12/10/12
Confidential,
Mortgage
Resolution
Partners,
LLC
City
of
Richmond:
Page
2
of
2
Saving Homes, Saving Cities
Solving the Mortgage Crisis Locally
Processes and Cash Flows
Key Steps To The MRP Process
1. The City hires MRP at no cost per the terms of the MRP Advisory Agreement as modified by
the City and agreed to by MRP. At each step in the process the City has the option to
terminate the Agreement and must approve the next step before it is taken. The City does
not pay any costs of the program. Nothing in the Agreement obligates the City to file an
eminent domain motion.
2. The City pre approves all communications with the homeowners and the community.
3. Before or after the City files an eminent domain motion the Homeowner may opt out of the
program and their mortgage will be dropped from the motion before it is purchased.
4. Qualified homeowners who opt into the program may elect to refinance for less than the
current value of their home.
5. Qualified homeowners who opt into the program may elect to sell their home in full
satisfaction of their mortgage and lease back their home with an option to purchase it in the
future.
6. Homeowners who opt into the program, but do not qualify for a refinance or a lease will be
dropped from the eminent domain motion before their mortgage is purchased.
2
Step 1. City Controls The Process
PLS Trustee
Receives offer to
purchase loan
Proceed to
prepackaged
eminent domain
settlement
yes
MRP
Identifies Possible
Homeowners
Start:
Hires MRP, Signs
Advisory Agreement
Appoints Staff
Accept
offer?
no
City
Appoints Counsel
Prepares offer to
purchase loans
Makes offer to
purchase loans
Proceed?
no
Stop
yes
Proceed?
Prepare Resolution
of Necessity
Material
Stop
yes
Proceed?
Builds community
consensus to proceed with
Eminent Domain motion.
Drops homeowners that
opt out.
no
no
Stop
yes
RON
Approved?
no
Stop
yes
File Eminent
Domain Motion
3
Step 2. Home Owner May Opt Out
City
Start:
City Files Eminent
Domain Motion
MRP
Presents program
to homeowners
Home Owner
Interested?
no
Dropped
From
Motion
yes
To
Refinance
Option
yes
City approves
presentation
materials
Qualifies
for refi?
no
Qualifies
For Lease?
no
Dropped
From
Motion
yes
To Lease
Option
Step 3: Refinance Option
PLS Trustee
Funder
Receives $160,000
Pays $160,000 Loan
Acquisition Price
Delivers Underwater
PLS Mortgage
City
FHA Lender
Home Owner
Start:
Obtains Order For
Possession of
Mortgage
Home Owner Opts
to Refinance
Receives
Underwater PLS
Mortgage
Records the new
$190,000 FHA
Mortgage
Receives $190,000
Gets a new
$190,000 FHA
Mortgage @ no cost
= 95% of home
value
Sends $190,000 to
Funder to payoff
PLS mortgage
Old Mortgage Paid
Off
Sends $9,500 to
community
Invests $9,500 to
stabilize local
housing
Receives monthly
mortgage payments
from Home Owner
Sends reduced
monthly mortgage
payments to new
FHA Lender
Pays MRP $4,500
Pays $3,260 of other
expenses
Avoids another
foreclosure
5
Step 3: Lease/Purchase Option
PLS Trustee
Funder
Receives $160,000
Pays $160,000 Loan
Acquisition Price
Delivers Underwater
PLS Mortgage
City
Home Buyer
Home Owner
Start:
Files Motion,
Possession
Granted
Home Owner Opts
For Lease/Purchase
Receives
Underwater PLS
Mortgage
Signs Lease,
Buys Home
Receives $190,000
Signs a market rate
lease with an option
to purchase. Sells
home to buyer.
Sends $190,000 to
Funder
Old Mortgage Paid
Off
Sends $9,500 to
community
Invests $9,500 to
stabilize local
housing
Credits a portion of
rent to tenant’s
purchase account
Pays rent
Pays MRP $4,500
Pays $3,260 of other
expenses
Avoids another
vacant home
Buys home or
continues to rent
6
Follow the Money
Proceeds From Refinance Of Each Loan or Home Sales Proceeds
Fair Value Paid for Each Loan (If 80% of home value)
Gain On Each Loan
$190,000
($160,000)
$30,000
Where does the $30,000 Gain On Each Loan Go?
Paid to Community For Each Loan
$9,500
Paid to Funder For Each Loan
$20,500
MRP Fee Paid By Funder
($4,500)
Eminent Domain Legal Expenses Paid By Funder
($2,000)
Cost of Homeowner Education Paid By Funder
($600)
Mortgage Servicing Costs During Holding Period Paid By Funder
($100)
Fees Paid to Investment Bankers Paid By Funder
($560)
Funder Net Income Per Loan
$13,540 (8%)
7
ADVISORY SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Advisory Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into by and between
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“MRP”) and the City
of __________ (the “City”) and is effective as of _______________, 2012 (the “Effective
Date”).
RECITALS
A.
MRP is a community advisory firm advising public agencies on ways to
assist the agency in reducing the impact of the mortgage crisis with its communities including, if
necessary, by acquiring mortgage loans through the use of eminent domain, in order to
restructure or refinance the loans and thereby preserving home ownership, restoring homeowner
equity and stabilizing the communities’ housing market and economy by allowing many
homeowners to remain in their homes.
B.
America in general and the City in particular are each experiencing an
historic home mortgage crisis and as a result of the home mortgage crisis, many homeowners in
the City have lost significant portions of their disposable income, and some have been unable to
make timely mortgage payments on their homes. This has resulted in unprecedented rates of
default and foreclosure, loss of homeowner equity, loss of family wealth, and even loss of shelter
for some families. The home mortgage crisis has resulted in other adverse impacts within the
City such as job losses, reductions in income, consumer demand, and investment, a spiraling
reduction in property values, a reduction in property and payroll tax revenues, vandalism,
abandoned homes and a general decline in the economy and the quality of life for residents.
Restructuring or refinancing mortgage loans will benefit the City’s residents by preserving home
ownership; restoring homeowner equity; and likely also increasing income, property values,
consumer demand, investment, and property and payroll tax revenue.
C.
The City is interested in retaining MRP to act as its advisor to assist the
City in exploring potential solutions to the mortgage crisis; to assist the City by negotiating on
the City’s behalf with entities which will provide the necessary funding to the City in order to
allow the City to acquire loans; and to assist the City in negotiating contracts with third parties
including owners of loans, attorneys, lenders, data companies, other government agencies and
others as necessary to implement a program or programs to benefit the City’s residents.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, MRP and the City agree
as follows:
1.
PURPOSE. The purpose of this Agreement is to enable the City and MRP to work
together to assess and implement a program or programs designed to ease the impacts of the
mortgage crisis on the residents of the City.
2.
SERVICES. MRP agrees to provide the following services (“Services”), and the City
authorizes MRP to represent the City as described:
-1-
(a)
to advise the City on various alternatives in order to provide assistance to its
residents who are burdened with mortgage loans including assessing the possibility and benefits
of the formation of a joint powers authority;
(b)
to identify and negotiate with companies acceptable to the City, in its sole and
absolute discretion, to lend funds to the City on a fully secured, non-recourse basis if such funds
are required in order to provide the necessary relief;
(c)
to provide extensive legal research acquired by MRP on all aspects of the
acquisition and refinancing of mortgage loans including each of the legal steps necessary to
implement the necessary programs;
(d)
to identify and negotiate with law firms acceptable to the City, in its sole and
absolute discretion, to work with the City to implement the programs which the City elects to
implement;
(e)
to negotiate with other local, state and federal governments and agencies as
necessary to implement programs chosen by the City;
(f)
to negotiate on behalf of the City with the holders of mortgage loans secured by
property owned by residents of the City (and with trustees, servicers, investors and other parties
having a relationship with the holders of the loans);
(g)
criteria;
to work with the City to identify mortgage loans to target based upon the City’s
(h)
to negotiate on behalf of the City with any other third party as necessary to
implement programs which the City elects to implement; and
(i)
to work with the City to establish education and communication programs to
address residents’ questions about a program or programs the City implements.
Provided, however, in no event shall MRP have the authority to enter into any contracts
on behalf of the City.
3.
COMPENSATION. As its sole and exclusive compensation for the performance of the
Services (the “Advisory Fee”), MRP shall receive the sum of $4,500 per loan for each loan
ultimately acquired by the City or otherwise resolved in a manner which results in the
restructuring or refinancing of a loan through a program implemented by the City. The Advisory
Fee shall be paid only through the programs implemented by the City and shall not be paid
directly by the City.
4.
ASSIGNMENT. MRP shall not have the right to assign and/or delegate its duties
hereunder without the prior written consent of City, which consent may be withheld in the City’s
sole and absolute discretion.
5.
COOPERATION. Each party agrees to cooperate to carry out the purpose of this
Agreement and to perform all acts and execute all documents reasonably required to institute the
-2-
programs chosen by the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement or as are or may become
necessary or convenient to effectuate and carry out this Agreement.
6.
RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES. The relationship of MRP to the City shall at all times
be that of an independent contractor. MRP expressly acknowledges and agrees that it does not
have the authority to bind the City by contract or otherwise.
7.
TERM. This Agreement shall be in effect for a period of one (1) year from the Effective
Date and will be renewed automatically for successive terms of one (1) year each unless either
party gives notice to the other at least sixty (60) days prior to the termination of any term. This
Agreement will continue in effect after the end of the term of this Agreement with respect to all
programs which the City has implemented or is in the process of implementing as of the end of
the term of this Agreement.
8.
GENERAL PROVISIONS.
(a)
Execution. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original. A signature transmitted via scanning and emailing or
facsimile shall have the same effect as an original signature.
(b)
Modification of Agreement. This Agreement may be modified only by a writing
signed by MRP and the City.
(c)
Entire Agreement. This Agreement together with any Nondisclosure and/or
Common Interest Agreements entered into between the parties either prior or subsequent to the
Effective Date constitute the entire understanding and agreement between the parties concerning
this subject matter.
(d)
Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction finds or rules that any provision
of this Agreement is invalid, void, or unenforceable, the provisions of the Agreement not so
adjudged shall remain in full force and effect. The invalidity in whole or in part of any provision
of this Agreement shall not void or affect the validity of any other provision of this Agreement.
(e)
Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by and shall be interpreted
according to the laws of the State of California.
(f)
Waiver of Breach. No waiver of breach of any term or provision of this
Agreement shall be construed to be, or shall be, a waiver of any other breach of this Agreement.
(g)
Arms-Length Transaction. This Agreement is a product of arms-length
negotiations and each party has had an opportunity to receive independent legal advice from
attorneys of its own choosing. Thus, neither party can claim that any ambiguities in any term of
this Agreement should be construed against any other party.
(h)
No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement will not confer any rights or
remedies upon any person other than the parties hereto and their permitted successors and
permitted assigns.
-3-
9.
NOTICES. All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be transmitted
by personal delivery or reputable overnight courier service such as FedEx to the parties at the
following addresses:
MRP:
The City:
Mortgage Resolution Partners, LLC
33 Pier South Embarcadero, Suite 201
San Francisco, CA 9411
Attn: CEO
Such notice shall be deemed given upon personal delivery to the appropriate address or
on the next business day if sent by overnight courier service.
WHEREFORE, the parties indicate by their signatures below their entry into this
legally-binding Agreement.
The City
(signature)
(date)
Name (printed):
Mailing address:
Telephone no.:
E-mail address:
Date of Signing:
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Representative:
(signature)
(date)
Name (printed):
Graham Williams
Mailing address:
33 Pier South Embarcadero, Suite 201, San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone no.:
415-795-2031
E-mail address:
gwilliams@mortgageresolutionpartners.com
Date of Signing:
-4-
Saving Homes, Saving Cities
Solving the Mortgage Crisis Locally
The Mortgage Crisis – Far From Over
American
families:
14
million
past,
present
and
future
foreclosures
Future
foreclosures,
6,000,000
Already
foreclosed,
4,500,000
Delinquent
or
in
foreclosure,
3,500,000
We are less than one third of the way through the foreclosure crisis
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
2
The Cost of Foreclosures*
Local Governments
$19,227
- Lost Property Taxes
-
Unpaid Utility Bills
Property Upkeep
Policing
Legal costs, building inspections
- Demand for social services
Borrowers
$10,300**
Lenders
$26,230***
Close Neighbors
$14,531****
“Housing remains the biggest impediment to economic recovery, yet Washington seems
paralyzed.” -- Joseph Stiglitz and Mark Zandi
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
*HUD
Economic
Impact
Analysis
of
the
FHA
Refinance
Program
for
Borrowers
in
NegaLve
Equity
PosiLon
**Household
moving
costs,
legal
fees
and
administraLve
charges
***Legal
fees,
court
fees,
broker
fee,
structural
loss
surrounding
a
foreclosure
****NegaLve
impact
on
the
property
value
of
close
neighbors
3
The Solution – Principal Reduction
“Most
economists
see
principal
reducLons
as
central
to
prevenLng
foreclosures.”
Alan
Blinder,
former
Vice
Chairman
at
the
Federal
Reserve
(Oct.
20,
2011)
“Government
should
reduce
mortgage
principal
when
it
exceeds
110
percent
of
the
home
value.”
Mar@n
S.
Feldstein,
former
Chairman
of
the
Council
of
Economic
Advisers
under
President
Reagan
(Oct.
12,
2011)
“Surely
there
is
a
strong
case
for
experimentaLon
with
principal
reducLon
strategies
at
the
local
level.”
Lawrence
Summers,
former
Treasury
Secretary
under
President
Clinton
and
former
Economic
Adviser
under
President
Obama
(Oct.
24,
2011)
Example:
JP
Morgan
Chase
and
Bank
of
America
unilaterally
reduce
principal
on
opLon
ARM
porZolio
loans
in
order
to
reduce
defaults
and
losses
Principal reduction will prevent future defaults and foreclosures
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
4
Problem à Mortgages Held In Private Label Securities
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
5
million
loans
placed
in
securiLes
not
guaranteed
by
U.S.
Government
Loans
not
conforming
to
Fannie
Mae,
Freddie
Mac
or
FHA
standards
Loans
not
eligible
for
15
federal
programs
created
since
the
housing
crash
Loans
are
much
more
likely
to
be
underwater.
45%
vs.
35%
for
non
PLS
loans
Riskier
loans
created
in
2004
to
2007
helped
create
housing
boom
Have
not
been
originated
since
2007
4.9
million
in
PLS
Securi'es
prohibit
principal
reduc'on
“If we are going to stabilize the housing market, we have to address” PLS loans.
Federal Housing Finance Agency 2009
Result à PLS Families Have Nowhere to Turn
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
5
Fannie Mae Expects 60% of
PLS Mortgages to be Foreclosed – 3 Million Families
Fannie
Mae
Projected
Future
Foreclosure
Rates
And
Losses
For
All
PLS
Families
Modified$
55%$
Variable$
à
60%
Loss
Upon
Default
58%$
Fixed$
à
66%
Loss
Upon
Default
40%$
Op3on$ARM$
70%$
Sub$Prime$
71%$
à
64%
Loss
Upon
Default
à
74%
Loss
Upon
Default
A
DisproporLonate
Number
of
These
Foreclosures
Will
Come
From
Underwater
Loans
Default Rate For 2.3 Million Underwater PLS Loans Will be Much Higher
Default
rate
sources:
Fannie
Mae
2Q
2012
Form
10-‐Q,
page
111
projecLons
for
2006
vintage
PLS
loans
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
6
PLS Mortgages Are Three Times More Likely To
Be Foreclosed
10 Million Future
Foreclosures
Future$Forclosures$
10% of all mortgages
create 32% of
foreclosures
PLS$Mortgages$
32%$
Community action
can prevent them
Other$Mortgages$
68%$
PLS Mortgage Foreclosures Can Be Prevented
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
7
Method of PLS Principal Reduction à
Communities Take Action
Securitization agreements and tax laws prohibit the sale of PLS mortgages except
when the mortgages are condemned
Local government, using their constitutional power of eminent domain,
can condemn PLS mortgages when public purpose exists by paying fair value
Then local governments can reduce the principal balance on the condemned PLS
mortgages, thereby reducing underwater PLS in their community
Governments Can Use Eminent Domain To Avoid Unnecessary Foreclosures
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
8
Resolution Strategies – Underwater PLS
1.5
mm
Current
underwater
PLS
Mortgages
0.8
mm
Delinquent
underwater
PLS
Mortgages
Qualify
for
Immediate
95%
refinance
1. Municipality reduces payoff amount on acquired mortgage to 97.5% of home’s
value.
2. Family obtains a new mortgage
3. Family has equity in home and 100% of home appreciation
4. Family has significantly more disposable income
Qualify
To
Rent
with
Purchase
OpLon
Not
Qualified
to
Rent
1. Family rents home with an option to buy
2. Portion of rent payments are credited to down payment
Not eligible for program
New Alternatives - Most Homeowners Can Now Avoid Foreclosure
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
9
Homeowner Benefit
This is an illustrative example for the level of benefits that participating families may
realize. Communities benefit from greatly reduced probability of foreclosure.
Original
Loan
Today
After
Program
Home Value
$400,000
$200,000
$200,000
Mortgage Balance
$320,000
300,000
$190,000
Home Equity
$80,000
($100,000)
$10,000
80%
150%
95%
$1,798
$1,798
$907
Loan to Value Ratio (LTV)
Monthly Payment
Assumes a 6%, 30 year, fully amortizing mortgage is refinanced by a 4%, 30 year, fully amortizing mortgage. Some loan
programs may also require insurance, which may add $175 per to the After Program monthly payment.
Probability of Default Drops from ~80% to ~7.5%
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
(FHA actuarial assumption, 95%LTV)
10
Underwater PLS Mortgages Are Worth Less Than Homes
Bank of America Merrill Lynch has published its own pricing of always performing underwater PLS
loans.
Source: Chris Flanagan, Bank of America Merrill Lynch,
Securitization Weekly (July 20, 2012) page 8 (LIBOR +700bps discount rate).
Industry recognizes loans are on average worth less than homes
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
11
Refinance Option: Follow the Money
Proceeds
From
Refinance
Of
Each
Loan
(If
95%
of
home
value)
$190,000
Fair
Value
Paid
for
Each
Loan
(If
80%
of
home
value)
($160,000)
Gain
On
Each
Loan
$30,000
Where
does
the
$30,000
Gain
On
Each
Loan
Go?
Paid
to
Community
For
Each
Loan
$9,500
Paid
to
Funder
For
Each
Loan
$20,500
MRP
Fee
Paid
By
Funder
($4,500)
Eminent
Domain
Legal
Expenses
Paid
By
Funder
($2,000)
Cost
of
Homeowner
EducaLon
Paid
By
Funder
($600)
Mortgage
Servicing
Costs
During
Holding
Period
Paid
By
Funder
($100)
Fees
Paid
to
Investment
Bankers
Paid
By
Funder
($560)
Funder
Net
Income
Per
Loan
$13,540
(8%)
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
12
MRP is a Community Advisory Firm
MRP clients are state, county, and city governments that purchase underwater PLS
mortgages and resolve them to the benefit of their communities. In order, MRP provides,
under an advisory contract with the community, the following services:
•
Identify and value PLS mortgages
•
Educate the community
•
Arrange acquisition financing
•
Advise community in filing eminent domain motion
Demonstrate the public purpose
Determine fair market value of mortgages
•
Arrange servicing of acquired mortgages
•
Arrange resolution of acquired mortgages
MRP Receives Fee of $4,500 for Each Loan Purchased The Same Fee The Federal Government Pays Banks For a HAMP Restructure
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
13
Foreclosures Reduce Property Tax Receipts
Under Proposition 13 when homes are
sold in foreclosure, the sales price sets
the base for their assessed valuation
levels and property tax receipts.
Increases in valuations are then
limited to a maximum of 2% per year.
No#Foreclosure
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Total
Prop9139Limit
$400,000
$408,000
$416,160
$424,483
$432,973
$441,632
$450,465
$459,474
$468,664
$478,037
$487,598
Assessed9Value
$200,000
$204,000
$208,080
$212,242
$224,976
$238,475
$252,783
$267,950
$284,027
$301,069
$319,133
Assumptions:
Property(tax(rate
Propostion(13(Cap(on(Annual(Increase(In(Assessed(Value
Annual(Home(Value(CAAGR(For(Next(Three(Years
Annual(Home(Value(CAAGR(Thereafter
Highest(Assessed(Value(For(Current(Owner
Assessed(Value(Today
Foreclosure(Sales(Price(Discount
Number(of(Homes(Foreclosed(Avoided
1.25%
2.0%
2.00%
6.00%
$400,000
$200,000
10%
((((((((((((((( 1,000
Estimated(Increase(in(Total(Property(Taxes(Collected
Estimated(Increase(in(Average(Property(Taxes(Collected
$6,279,571
$6,280
Foreclosure#in#Year#1
Differtial9
1000
1000
Prop9139Limit Assessed9Value
Impact
Homes
Homes
$200,000,000
$400,000
$200,000 $200,000,000
$0
$204,000,000
$183,600
$183,600 $183,600,000 $20,400,000
$208,080,000
$187,272
$187,272 $187,272,000 $20,808,000
$212,241,600
$191,017
$191,017 $191,017,440 $21,224,160
$224,976,096
$194,838
$194,838 $194,837,789 $30,138,307
$238,474,662
$198,735
$198,735 $198,734,545 $39,740,117
$252,783,141
$202,709
$202,709 $202,709,235 $50,073,906
$267,950,130
$206,763
$206,763 $206,763,420 $61,186,710
$284,027,138
$210,899
$210,899 $210,898,689 $73,128,449
$301,068,766
$215,117
$215,117 $215,116,662 $85,952,104
$319,132,892
$219,419
$219,419 $219,418,996 $99,713,896
$2,712,734,425
$2,210,368,776 $502,365,649
Next Steps
1. The
City
retains
MRP
at
no
cost
per
the
terms
of
the
MRP
Advisory
Agreement
as
modified
by
the
City
and
agreed
to
by
MRP.
2. The
City
is
in
control,
at
each
step
in
the
process
the
City
has
the
opLon
to
terminate
the
Agreement
and
must
approve
the
next
step
before
it
is
taken.
3. The
City
does
not
pay
any
costs
of
the
program.
4. Nothing
in
the
Agreement
obligates
the
City
to
file
an
eminent
domain
moLon.
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
15
Who Supports the Program?
Broad community-focused support for the program
• AFSCME
•
Americans for Financial Reform
•
Center for Popular Democracy
•
National Community Reinvestment Coalition
•
Federal Banking Regulators
Representing
• 1.6 million state and local government employees
• 600 local housing focused organizations
• 250 national, state and local groups working on financial industry reform
Program Addresses Concerns Of Local Homeowners And Community-focused
Organizations
Mortgage Resolution Partners LLC
Pier 33 South Embarcadero, Suite 201| San Francisco, CA 94111 | 415.795.2032
16
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?